Lovelace was an almost good movie. Amanda Seyfried did stellar work in an under-written role. It's one of those movies with lots of famous actors in small roles, which is distracting and takes you out of the movie. Also, if your movie is 87 minutes (before credits) and has two separate "Six years later" jumps it is probably not structured properly. Also, per the credits, Linda Lovelace's story is a work of fiction, with fictional characters with only unintentional similarities to actual events (?) Skip it.
More Blogs
-
1
Saturday Jan 19, 2013
OSCARS: Best Picture: Should Win: Argo Will Win: Lincoln Not Ev… -
0
Sunday Dec 16, 2012
Something I am working on: INTRODUCTION "Familiarity breeds c… -
0
Wednesday Dec 12, 2012
The 12/12/12 Concert, to be fair, is definitely raising a lot of mone… -
0
Saturday Nov 24, 2012
I find myself almost unreasonably entertained reading old magazines. … -
0
Wednesday Nov 14, 2012
I am going to see Lou Reed in December. It's at an unfamiliar place … -
0
Tuesday Nov 06, 2012
I couldn't take the wait tonight and decided to go to bed, fairly con… -
1
Wednesday Oct 24, 2012
I've now been forty for fifteen minutes. On the whole, I prefer … -
0
Friday Oct 05, 2012
Tim Burton's Dark Shadows was very enjoyable (I never saw the TV show… -
1
Sunday Sep 30, 2012
Today is the last day of the last full month of my thirties. I confe… -
0
Friday Sep 14, 2012
I am going to see "The Master" (Paul Thomas Anderson's newest) in NYC…