Lovelace was an almost good movie. Amanda Seyfried did stellar work in an under-written role. It's one of those movies with lots of famous actors in small roles, which is distracting and takes you out of the movie. Also, if your movie is 87 minutes (before credits) and has two separate "Six years later" jumps it is probably not structured properly. Also, per the credits, Linda Lovelace's story is a work of fiction, with fictional characters with only unintentional similarities to actual events (?) Skip it.
More Blogs
-
2
Tuesday Jun 11, 2013
Once a year I make a trek to the UMDNJ in bee-you-tee-full Newark NJ … -
0
Saturday Jun 01, 2013
Just watched Medium Cool, having never seen it. Wow, what a terrific … -
2
Monday May 27, 2013
I fly out to Illinois tomorrow for a work-related week of training an… -
1
Saturday May 25, 2013
On second consideration, taking an end-of-the-work-week-nap at 7:30PM… -
0
Monday May 20, 2013
Prescription Bottle Orange should be its own color in the Pantone thi… -
0
Saturday May 18, 2013
"You have nice eyebrows, I want to make fuck on you." That thought j… -
0
Friday May 10, 2013
This summer (so far) my concert itinerary is as follows: Sting Bill… -
1
Sunday Apr 21, 2013
I don't sing nor dance and yet I have found myself in the cast of a l… -
0
Thursday Apr 04, 2013
Roger Ebert was (is and will be) a MAJOR influence on my writing, as … -
1
Friday Mar 22, 2013
Harmony Korine's Spring Breakers was an intriguing mix of mainstream …