Recently a model who I would argue was a vanilla model rather than an alternative model won the set of the day. For me this opens up an interesting philosophical debate. Some people would argue that there are lots of other places were a vanilla model can enjoy sucess and SuicideGirls should remain one venue where alternative models who would be rejected by those vanilla sites get the opprtunity to shine. I understand and respect that viewpoint. Other people would suggest that if we are arguing against discrimination on those other websites then we would be total hypocrites to openly practise discrimination in the opposite direction here. I can understand and respect that viewpoint too. What do you think?
vithen:
I think that the sg model and target for the site has been widened because of the uprising of the Onlyfans and independent sale of content and pornography created by the models instead of people exploiting them. I think if anyone can take advantage of the platform and works for the page to become more popular its a good thing. ☺️ at the end if we're truly feminists empowering females it'd be hypocritical to say someone is different for.not having tattoos. when in actuality having tattoos has become very mainstream. I believe as well that the site should run heavy marketing if it wants to exist and grow the community. The only issue I see is there and that the servers aren't enough to have a decent livestream function. the site should be revamped and sold heavily on every media possible. and maybe could use a few investors. 😅