Why I ask you to support newest set of @julha?
To be honest, and may be harsh, but you can call me whatever, I want all the sets here to be at the same visual aesthetics levels, as hers are.
Whenever my friends, and they are people with taste, tell me: "Nika, SG is such sh... Sorry, boring, all the same, porny, hollow and mass-market nowdays, why are you even there?" I proudly answer: "Not all!" And send them @julha.
For all you could say, I am a member too, and a long time fan of SG and basically I produce a lot of content here for no money, just for membership. And almost every day I am dissapointed with SotDs. That's why I want kiss from a rose to go FP.
And I name @julha as an example because, as much as I love many other models, she is the only one I know nowdays (I am not speaking of old-school SGs, only relatively new) who's ALL sets are high quality. Here are a lot of amazing models, looking whose profiles, nevertheless, I see at least one set of which I would get rid if I were them. Not @julha. None of her sets are less then amazing. She does not have no "hollow" set (which does not contain visual idea).
That is what I speak about when I say "quality standart". Not even photographical quality - though her photographers's work is flawless - but such photography costs, and not all models can afford, so it must not be a criteria. Technically imperfect sets are OK here and I want it to stay this way, and even amateur photography can say a lot sometimes. The criteria - the set must be EXPRESSIVE. That's what I mean by "quality".
Only one of @julha 's sets went SotD. At the moment Kiss from a rose is terribly underrated, especially for a model who is already pink (so has to have more exposure, no?) Let's make it SotD please, for the greater good. Cause I still believe this project is... much more then it seems.
