Now I know that Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky have the same interests in mind for making changes for American's/people in general. But they both have different ways of accomplishing this, My Question is this: To you, which way, and philosophy do you feel makes a stronger point?
I feel that Micheal Moore tends to be a bit more abrasive and in your face about how he gets his point accross, whereas Chomsky kinda opens new doors for you to explore on your own. Both approaches have there merits, but in the long run which do you think will have a bigger impact?
anyway these are just the musings of a lost little boy, subject to parinoia and conspiricy theory's!
lol
I feel that Micheal Moore tends to be a bit more abrasive and in your face about how he gets his point accross, whereas Chomsky kinda opens new doors for you to explore on your own. Both approaches have there merits, but in the long run which do you think will have a bigger impact?
anyway these are just the musings of a lost little boy, subject to parinoia and conspiricy theory's!
lolVIEW 7 of 7 COMMENTS
one problem with moore is that a lot of people are put off by him because of his tendency to be so in-your-face and not PC, and some of those people are the ones that really need to be opened up....
but Chomsky doesnt have the audience that moore has in making movies and huge best sellers and oscars and stuff.
personally i think Chomsky, just because he's so terribly intelligent and you can only listen to moore's rants for so long (i still love him all the same.)
ps. space chicks rule.