i have this paper do on universal morality and wherther or not it exsists, so i figure i'd post my definitionof it here and see what you all though.
Morality is not about absolutes, it is about changes, morality is fluidity and therefore you cannot break your morals. The term going against your morals is often used; yet again fluidity, like a stream, walking against the river is much harder than walking with it. When there are groups, are there sepperate streams, or do they become one larger river, and if they combine what of yoour own morals that dont mesh with those of the others? That is the undercurrents, those who's morals go against those of society are walking against a raging river in trying to keep with their own. My morality isnt yours, and yours is not mine, the final deffinition falls to each their own
Morality is not about absolutes, it is about changes, morality is fluidity and therefore you cannot break your morals. The term going against your morals is often used; yet again fluidity, like a stream, walking against the river is much harder than walking with it. When there are groups, are there sepperate streams, or do they become one larger river, and if they combine what of yoour own morals that dont mesh with those of the others? That is the undercurrents, those who's morals go against those of society are walking against a raging river in trying to keep with their own. My morality isnt yours, and yours is not mine, the final deffinition falls to each their own
What do you mean you never see horses?? I was under the impression Bend was nothing BUT horses!
And thanks.