When I walked into my local tattoo parlour today the last thing I was expecting the dood to say when I showed him what I wanted to have done was "Oh bloody hell...bloody hell....no. No. No. Not on your leg no. I'd have to have a back or a thigh." Now I may be wrong, I probably am but should he not at that point have discussed with me simpifying the piece if he found it "too detailed"? Now this guy comes highly recommended, has won many awards and has been in the business for decades (he tattooed my mum back in 1990) so yeah, I was a bit taken aback. I really wanted to get a sleeve for my lower leg started but I'm going to have to go back to the drawing board I guess. The piece in question is this btw. Anybody have any thoughts/ have encountered this reaction before?
More Blogs
-
0
Monday Oct 17, 2011
So I got my ears pierced (finally) at the weekend. I'm going to take … -
5
Tuesday Oct 04, 2011
Uggh. I think I need to vent. So I got made redundant a month ago… -
0
Monday Sep 12, 2011
Missing Elliott a bit right now. R.I.P buddy -
0
Thursday Sep 08, 2011
So I read in a magazine today that they might be making Ghostbusters … -
2
Saturday Aug 06, 2011
Read More -
1
Saturday Jul 30, 2011
When I walked into my local tattoo parlour today the last thing I was… -
0
-
0
Monday Jul 18, 2011
Read More -
6
Monday Jul 11, 2011
Read More -
0
Thursday Jul 07, 2011
Read More
I'm not a tattoo buff, but that looks pretty detailed