When I walked into my local tattoo parlour today the last thing I was expecting the dood to say when I showed him what I wanted to have done was "Oh bloody hell...bloody hell....no. No. No. Not on your leg no. I'd have to have a back or a thigh." Now I may be wrong, I probably am but should he not at that point have discussed with me simpifying the piece if he found it "too detailed"? Now this guy comes highly recommended, has won many awards and has been in the business for decades (he tattooed my mum back in 1990) so yeah, I was a bit taken aback. I really wanted to get a sleeve for my lower leg started but I'm going to have to go back to the drawing board I guess. The piece in question is this btw. Anybody have any thoughts/ have encountered this reaction before?
More Blogs
-
3
Tuesday May 01, 2012
Read More -
1
Friday Dec 09, 2011
This is me trying my best not to kill an Elliott Smith song. I failed… -
3
Thursday Nov 17, 2011
Read More -
4
Saturday Nov 12, 2011
So I'm on a detox from alcahol. I decided after bonfire night that I'… -
4
Sunday Nov 06, 2011
Read More -
0
Thursday Nov 03, 2011
Read More -
1
Monday Oct 31, 2011
When I was a kid me and my brother would go trick or treating on ha… -
0
Saturday Oct 29, 2011
My friend's having a halloween party tonight but I don't feel like … -
2
Friday Oct 21, 2011
Read More -
1
Tuesday Oct 18, 2011
Read More
I'm not a tattoo buff, but that looks pretty detailed