I've seen a lot of good reviews for the movie Cloverfield. It makes me wonder how we watched the same fucking movie. I thought it was a horrible, contrived waste of money that gave me a headache. The whole shaky filming thing is annoying, not clever or original. I'm fairly certain the camcorder industry's image stabilization stuff has come a long way since the Blair Witch Project. Clearly, the guy who's doing the recording sucks hardcore with a camera, but does he have to be so damned annoying? I really wish he had gotten killed early on in the movie. What is the effect they were after, to make a giant monster of unknown origin attack on Manhattan, more realistic? To me , it didn't cause I hated the camera guy. At one point, after a character's brother has been killed he's saying all this stupid shit and being annoying and asking dumb ass questions. Realistically, to me , the brother would have told the guy to shut the fuck up, turn the fucking camera off and proceeded to beat the fuck out of him. But then that doesn't make much of a movie. Of course what they came up with didn't make much of a movie either. For a horror movie, I laughed a lot at the parts that I think were supposed to be scary. But, I'm a bitch....
maiwan:
thanks for checking out my set hun!
iyi:
Thank you...