So it turns out there are a bunch of circumcised men who are trying to stretch out their foreskins using various devices to restore themselves to their natural state.
They claim the benefits in increased sensitivity, especially during intercourse, are worth the effort.
The foreskin stretches like your stomach skin stretches when you get fat. But you have to have something pulling on it constantly. It doesn't hurt, they tell me, but it's not convenient.
But they say having foreskin makes sex much more pleasurable. Without the foreskin the unprotected cock head becomes worn out and desensitized throughout life. If more men had foreskins protecting their glans, there'd be fewer men using Viagra, they say.
Informationof this can easily be found online.
The men growing back their foreskins also say intact penises are much more pleasurable for the women. So I must ask this worldwide audience of sexually experienced women their verdict. Have any of you had sex with both cut and uncut men, and have you noticed any difference? Or know of anybody who has?
They claim the benefits in increased sensitivity, especially during intercourse, are worth the effort.
The foreskin stretches like your stomach skin stretches when you get fat. But you have to have something pulling on it constantly. It doesn't hurt, they tell me, but it's not convenient.
But they say having foreskin makes sex much more pleasurable. Without the foreskin the unprotected cock head becomes worn out and desensitized throughout life. If more men had foreskins protecting their glans, there'd be fewer men using Viagra, they say.
Informationof this can easily be found online.
The men growing back their foreskins also say intact penises are much more pleasurable for the women. So I must ask this worldwide audience of sexually experienced women their verdict. Have any of you had sex with both cut and uncut men, and have you noticed any difference? Or know of anybody who has?
VIEW 4 of 4 COMMENTS
Good crowlers are many out there.
[Edited on Jan 18, 2005 5:37PM]