candycox

IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE DIRTY TRUTH BEHIND 9/11, DOWNLOAD THIS VIDEO NOW!! OPEN YOUR EYES IF YOU DON'T ALREADY KNOW!!

Website: Loose Change - The Truth Behind 911, 2nd edition

Video: go to this link to download the video from Google (you will need to download the Google video player first, but it only takes a minute!!) -
Loose Change, 2nd Edition 9/11 video

Another video to download:

Martial Law 9-11: Rise of the Police State
Download link: Martial Law: 911 video

Watch an in-depth and extremely informative analysis of how this monstrosity of a government has coordinated the biggest, most shocking cover-up conspiracy in history!! This is seriously something that any politically savvy, truth-seeking citizen should watch - it's that damn important.


___________________________________________________
EVIDENCE OF EXPLOSIVES IN THE WTC SOUTH TOWER COLLAPSE:


The evidence showing that the World Trade Center towers were demolished is compelling. Here are a few photos of explosives detonating during the collapse of the South Tower. Each frame is numbered by its position in the video. The video was shot at 30 frames per second. So an eight frame interval covers about one quarter of a second.

Frame 147 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face at the 79th floor.
Frame 203 shows a row of explosives detonating right across the east face at the 75th floor.

The middle photos show the dust from the explosions outlined in red.

The end photos show the relative positions of the two lines of dust.

It has been claimed that the explosions of dust that span the east face of the tower, were caused by air being forced from the windows as each of the floors above collapsed. This explanation is obviously incorrect. If it was correct, such lines of dust would have been expelled from the windows of each floor in succession. That is, we would have seen such lines of dust expelled from floors 79, 78, 77, 76 and 75 in succession, but what we observe is an explosion of dust at floor 79, no new clouds of dust for a few floors, then another explosion of dust at floor 75. It is worth noting that the second line of (much larger) explosions occur at the center of a section of mechanical floors (the three mechanical floors appear as a slightly darker gray band across the building and are important for the strength they impart to the building). It is possible that the mechanical floors 76 and 75 (and also 74) have no windows, but of course, if this is so, it raises many more questions than it answers. In particular, if the mechanical floors have no windows, then the explosions of dust from floor 75 cannot be caused by air being forced from them as the floors above collapsed.

The dust due to the visible explosions is a whitish grey. The dust from the demolition of the upper section (which is disintegrating as it falls) is dark grey. One wonders what caused this difference.
__________________________________________________
In related news:

BYU professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC
By Elaine Jarvik
Deseret Morning News

The physics of 9/11 including how fast and symmetrically one of the World Trade Center buildings fell prove that official explanations of the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics professor.
In fact, it's likely that there were "pre-positioned explosives" in all three buildings at ground zero, says Steven E. Jones.
In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net, whose research Jones quotes. Jones' article can be found at Jones' website.
Jones, who conducts research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling for an independent, international scientific investigation "guided not by politicized notions and constraints but rather by observations and calculations.
"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes which were actually a diversion tactic," he writes. "Muslims are (probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all," Jones writes.
As for speculation about who might have planted the explosives, Jones said, "I don't usually go there. There's no point in doing that until we do the scientific investigation."
Previous investigations, including those of FEMA, the 9/11 Commission and NIST (the National Institutes of Standards and Technology), ignore the physics and chemistry of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, to the Twin Towers and the 47-story building known as WTC 7, he says. The official explanation that fires caused structural damage that caused the buildings to collapse can't be backed up by either testing or history, he says.
Jones acknowledges that there have been "junk science" conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11, but "the explosive demolition hypothesis better satisfies tests of repeatability and parsimony and therefore is not 'junk science.' "
In a 9,000-word article that Jones says will be published in the book The Hidden History of 9/11, by Elsevier, Jones offers these arguments:

The three buildings collapsed nearly symmetrically, falling down into their footprints, a phenomenon associated with "controlled demolition" and even then it's very difficult, he says. "Why would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7 and the Towers when 'toppling over' falls would require much less work and would do much more damage in downtown Manhattan?" Jones asks. "And where would they obtain the necessary skills and access to the buildings for a symmetrical implosion anyway? The 'symmetry data' emphasized here, along with other data, provide strong evidence for an 'inside' job."

No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel columns, he says.

WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes, collapsed in 6.6 seconds, just .6 of a second longer than it would take an object dropped from the roof to hit the ground. "Where is the delay that must be expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational laws of physics?" he asks. "That is, as upper-falling floors strike lower floors and intact steel support columns the fall must be significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . How do the upper floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the collapsing buildings?" The paradox, he says, "is easily resolved by the explosive demolition hypothesis, whereby explosives quickly removed lower-floor material, including steel support columns, and allow near free-fall-speed collapses." These observations were not analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission, he says.

With non-explosive-caused collapse there would typically be a piling up of shattering concrete. But most of the material in the towers was converted to flour-like powder while the buildings were falling, he says. "How can we understand this strange behavior, without explosives? Remarkable, amazing and demanding scrutiny since the U.S. government-funded reports failed to analyze this phenomenon."

Horizontal puffs of smoke, known as squibs, were observed proceeding up the side the building, a phenomenon common when pre-positioned explosives are used to demolish buildings, he says.

Steel supports were "partly evaporated," but it would require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel and neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate temperatures that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked planes lasted at most a few minutes, and office material fires would burn out within about 20 minutes in any given location, he says.

Molten metal found in the debris of the World Trade Center may have been the result of a high-temperature reaction of a commonly used explosive such as thermite, he says. Buildings not felled by explosives "have insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal," Jones says.

Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were reported by numerous observers in and near the towers, and these explosions occurred far below the region where the planes struck, he says.

Jones says he became interested in the physics of the WTC collapse after attending a talk last spring given by a woman who had had a near-death experience. The woman mentioned in passing that "if you think the World Trade Center buildings came down just due to fire, you have a lot of surprises ahead of you," Jones remembers, at which point "everyone around me started applauding."
Following several months of study, he presented his findings at a talk at BYU in September.
Jones says he would like the government to release 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video footage for "independent scrutiny." He would also like to analyze a small sample of the molten metal found at Ground Zero.
___________________________________________________
Another relevent article:

George W. Bush was Complicit with the 911 Attack on America
by Sterling D. Allan (Oct. 14, 2003)

The terrorist attack on America on September 11, 2001 was a tragedy of epic proportions. What few would care to find out is that the President of the United States is implicated strongly in its planning and its outcomes.

The History Channel in recent years did a special on the attack on Pearl Harbor in which it gave documented evidence that President Roosevelt knew that attack was coming and actually allowed it to take place as a way to get Americans behind the war effort.

Other, less glamorous precedents of this phenomenon can be given, such as Hitler's burning of the Reichstag to provide impetus for his war effort.

As an outcome of the 911 attack, we have legislation such as the Patriot Act that significantly curtails fundamental rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Also, the Iraq war has increased U.S. presence and control in the Mideast.

The question of why and to what extent President George W. Bush was involved in the terrorist attack on America will take years of investigation and probing to conclude with any degree of finality. But what can be determined with clarity at this point is that he had foreknowledge, and he had an agenda -- and that his actions amount to high treason.

The following is offered as a partial list of evidences for this charge.

President Bush presented an image to the nation that on the morning of the attack he was going about his usual Presidential itinerary and that he was caught completely by surprise. However, a careful look at the timeline of the attack, and what he would have known with his intelligence sources, shows a premeditated intent to convey such an image with the intent to deceive.

By the time he responded, it was too late to stop three of the four planes. Most Americans knew about the attack before President Bush responded. Does he expect us to believe that in this day of instantaneous communication available to the lay public that the President of the United States and those who advise him could be so slow to grasp the gravity of the situation?

Fifteen minutes before he went into the Booker Elementary School classroom he confirmed to a reporter that he had been apprised of the first plane hitting the World Trade Center -- a known terrorist target. He was again briefed at the Elementary School.

By this time, NORAD knew of at least two hijackings and possibly a third; and such information would have been available to the President.

Then, moments before entering the classroom he watched live footage as the second plane hit the second tower. Nevertheless he continued with the education photo-op. Two or three minutes later Andrew Card came up to President Bush while he was reading to the children, and told him, "A second plane has hit the World Trade Center. America is under attack."

Bush continued with the children for at least seven more minutes reading with them about a girl and her goat. His departure from the classroom was not in haste.

When later asked by a reporter what he was doing and how he responded when he found out about the attack, his reply was worded to gave the impression that he saw the first plane hit, and then heard a few minutes later that a second plane had hit, and that he didn't want to scare the children, so he did not interrupt his event with them.

He said, in part, "I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I used to fly myself, and I said, 'There's one terrible pilot.' and I said, 'It must have been a horrible accident.' "

He could not have seen the first plane hit because that image did not come forth until later. The timing was such that it would have been the second plane he saw --hitting the second tower while the first tower was billowing smoke from the first hit.

That alone proves he was lying about how much he knew -- at a minimum from the TV coverage that millions of other Americans were also watching -- and that he was purposely conveying an image of naivety, when the truth was that he knew much more and purposely did nothing.

He is the only one who could have given permission to U.S. military jets to intercept and shoot down the hijacked planes thereby averting every target hit after the first. It is likely that he knew that other hijacked planes were in the air, and he could have given the command to intercept and shoot down if necessary. His known behavior constituted gross negligence at best, and given what he most probably knew, treason.

Meanwhile, that same morning, Warren Buffett, the world's second richest man, worth $36.0 billion, was at the U.S. Strategic Command headquarters located at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha Nebraska (SAC), where the President was later spirited that day. Buffet had scheduled this event in advance.

One of the people invited to his event was Anne Tatlock, the chief executive of Fudiciary Trust Co. International, that manages $44 billion. Her office space in the World Trade Center happened to be precisely where the second plane hit.

She was en route to SAC when she learned of the first attack, and arrived at the Omaha, Nebraska base just in time to be rushed by military personnel into a room where she watched the second plane hit her office space, killing 87 of her 650 employees.

Think of it this way. The whole world watched the events of Sept. 11 replayed over and over, especially the segment in which the second plane ran into the second tower. That spot on the second tower where the plane hit was Anne Tatlock's office space. She, as the chief executive of that office space, was the most relevant person to that attack in terms of its target. She was in the air, on her way to Offutt before the attacks commenced that morning; and arrived just in time for military officers to rush her in to where she could watch on television the second plane hit her office complex; and Bush would later that day go to that military base.

Why was Warren Buffett, a civilian, hosting a pre-planned non-publicized charity event at a military center -- the very center where Bush was taken -- and where Tatlock arrived? Buffet is reportedly not famous for charity work, but has somewhat the opposite reputation among his peers.

One must ask who the others of Buffett's financial prowess were in attendance at SAC on that day of the collapse of the World Trade Centers. Did they meet with President Bush. What was the nature of their conversation?

A detailed report of President Bush's day on 911 speak of this incidental meeting of Buffet earlier that day, but say "it's unknown if any of these people were still at Offutt by the time Bush arrived in the afternoon." (cooperativeresearch.net; San Francisco Business Times, 2/1/02; Forbes 10/15/01; Wall Street Journal 9/12/01.) Published news reports of Bush's activities at Offutt mention several government individuals who were present with him, and mention that there were "others" as well. (ABC News, 9/11/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01, Washington Times, 10/8/02.)

The foreplanned meeting there of at least two of these players of such global prestige, one of which would be most profoundly effected by the attack, is too striking to dismiss as sheer coincidence.

The likelihood of conspiracy or complicity is too high to ignore. It must be investigated at length.

The country recently watched as Arnold Schwarzenegger won a historic election in California. The prominent heavy weight economic advisors by his side that helped promote public confidence in his campaign was Warren Buffett.

The precedence in history of wealth buying politics for control and expansion of power and gain at the expense of the freedom of the people is too clear to deny as a possible contemporary reality as well. Prophecy likewise speaks of such a beastly cabal that overthrow the freedom of all lands, countries, and peoples. It is that evil collusion of wealth, power and intelligentsia bent on self interest that has brought the downfall of previous civilizations, and which will likewise bring the demise of ours if we continue in our present course.

President Bush is not the leader of this conspiracy, but clearly he is one of its willing players, a fact that can be documented from a host of other evidences spanning back to his initiation into a lifetime membership in the Yale Skull and Bones fraternity. He is certainly not the first U.S. President to be illicitly controlled from behind the scenes.

He was not the one in charge on the morning of September 11. That much is obvious. He was being dictated to by others. But Constitutionally, he was under oath to be the one in charge, and the fact that he knew what was happening and purposely did not take measures to thwart additional attacks, in itself is treason. He could have averted the second and third attacks, but he did not. Instead, he purposely conveyed the image that the gravity of what was happening did not hit him until it was too late.

The call has been going forth to Americans for years to awaken to a sense of their awful situation, and to throw off this secret combination that is getting above them, of which President Bush is yet another low-level player. Close analysis of his behavior on 911 bespeak a man who was not in control but who was being controlled by others.
People typically get the government they deserve or at least allow, and U.S. citizens have gradually been seduced by this international cabal into accepting the intoxications of socialism to which they have grown addicted.

Such an addiction by such a powerful master will be enormously difficult to overcome; but the alternative is destruction on such a scale as this world has never seen -- a prospect that would be far more devastating and excruciating, and which would pale the events of 911 in comparison.

American Politics and other high level corruptions have created a terminal cancer prognosis for this country with a prescription of heavy chemotherapy and radiation treatment, so to speak. I am an alternative medicine candidate who does not believe any cancer has to be terminal. There are alternative remedies, and one of the most important is the belief that a cure is possible -- the will to live . . . and to change.

Let's begin by having more accountability in the U.S. media to investigate these matters and report them honestly to the American people so that we can have a clear diagnosis. Otherwise the media is complicit as well, and will have to answer accordingly.



Go here to further educate yourself on the 9/11 lies:
PrisonPlanet.com and Info Wars