SG is like goths, punks, over-stoned hippies and modernists. It's a representation of alt-ideals that wish to be artistic and progressive. But they are not concrete ideas, thus they turned into these expired, ridiculous fads as time expired these ideals, and it's rather silly that since 1920's, people continue to ask the age-old & already-answered-in-all-possible-ways question:
What is art?
But what IS art?
(oh, it's so DEEP...so PHILOSOPHICAL...)
*yawn*
Calling it post-mo is redundant, and the redundancy of post-mo is a redundant statement.
2-3 demonstrations of "creativity" (yeah) a day since...2000? 2001? And women's idea of womanhood had only became more banal than ever. Trying to find era-old ideals of feminine "grace" and "beauty" underneath at best Kitch cosmetics and costumes, through the staple-images of tittie-grabbing, crutching ass-spreading, pussy-flashing, "come hither" expressions, playing with glass, coals, and watery ice, molesting your internet-friends' banjos, are over and done ideas. I am not saying these women didn't try against or assisted in the war for branches of feminism; but it's not hard to see that SG, right now, is nothing beyond extentions of clothing tags on sex shop items. Whether art or porn, our sets are rallied through a line of acceptance process suggesting that unless we meet the needs of our eye-candy demanding viewer, we are "out".
This is not news, of course.
SG is expecting women of all kinds to involve themselves in civilized cat-fights, a competition to see who can look flirtatious and sexy enough to be the next alt-mainstream trend. The moderators all have their definitions of beauty set in stone. How are many of us more than internet porn stars? Other internet porn stars get paid in advance to their pictures being used! We are given a budget of $0 everytime we start a set, we show up on time with our own resources of amateur photographers, make up artists/hair stylists, props, ideas, and supporting casts, hoping that after days (or weeks) of photoshopping that we will EVENTUALLY be accepted into this "Barely-18-Amateur-Pr0nographic-Guild".
Mind you, my sets are not art.
None of these are alternative expressions.
Art is a buzz word abused by goths, punks, hippies, and modernists of kinds; we are all dust-farting this word into the gusts of wind, hoping it will be carried to something greater which we cannot imagine. Just because the fart dust is going with the momentum of the wind, does not mean you can say the dust is progressive.
Everything on SG is a scheme to get people to THINK this is art while slow-wanking to boobies that can give someone (but not you) tit-fucks. Yes, IT'S ALL PORN. Duh.
What is porn?
But what IS porn?
(oh, it's so DEEP...so PHILOSOPHICAL...)
*yawn*
And, mind you, this is just my mental setting before I will probably do a non-sensical pr0nography set.
Keep looking out for AZN titties, wankers.
What is art?
But what IS art?
(oh, it's so DEEP...so PHILOSOPHICAL...)
*yawn*
Calling it post-mo is redundant, and the redundancy of post-mo is a redundant statement.
2-3 demonstrations of "creativity" (yeah) a day since...2000? 2001? And women's idea of womanhood had only became more banal than ever. Trying to find era-old ideals of feminine "grace" and "beauty" underneath at best Kitch cosmetics and costumes, through the staple-images of tittie-grabbing, crutching ass-spreading, pussy-flashing, "come hither" expressions, playing with glass, coals, and watery ice, molesting your internet-friends' banjos, are over and done ideas. I am not saying these women didn't try against or assisted in the war for branches of feminism; but it's not hard to see that SG, right now, is nothing beyond extentions of clothing tags on sex shop items. Whether art or porn, our sets are rallied through a line of acceptance process suggesting that unless we meet the needs of our eye-candy demanding viewer, we are "out".
This is not news, of course.
SG is expecting women of all kinds to involve themselves in civilized cat-fights, a competition to see who can look flirtatious and sexy enough to be the next alt-mainstream trend. The moderators all have their definitions of beauty set in stone. How are many of us more than internet porn stars? Other internet porn stars get paid in advance to their pictures being used! We are given a budget of $0 everytime we start a set, we show up on time with our own resources of amateur photographers, make up artists/hair stylists, props, ideas, and supporting casts, hoping that after days (or weeks) of photoshopping that we will EVENTUALLY be accepted into this "Barely-18-Amateur-Pr0nographic-Guild".
Mind you, my sets are not art.
None of these are alternative expressions.
Art is a buzz word abused by goths, punks, hippies, and modernists of kinds; we are all dust-farting this word into the gusts of wind, hoping it will be carried to something greater which we cannot imagine. Just because the fart dust is going with the momentum of the wind, does not mean you can say the dust is progressive.
Everything on SG is a scheme to get people to THINK this is art while slow-wanking to boobies that can give someone (but not you) tit-fucks. Yes, IT'S ALL PORN. Duh.
What is porn?
But what IS porn?
(oh, it's so DEEP...so PHILOSOPHICAL...)
*yawn*
And, mind you, this is just my mental setting before I will probably do a non-sensical pr0nography set.
Keep looking out for AZN titties, wankers.
VIEW 27 of 27 COMMENTS
shando:
Laaaaaa sing it sister! That was fucking awesome! Another deep, intelligent sg bites the dust... that has been happening a lot with my favorite sgs during my 2 year hiatus from this site. It's so saddening, but completely understandable 
warskeptic:
Excellent post. Most of us know it's true, even if we are too sucked in by the eye candy to accept it and act on it.