in my humble opinion...
when posting in a hopefuls group thread that is dedicated to critiquing a hopeful's rejected set, i believe that it is entirely appropriate to mention when the hopeful is just plain "not for you," for ANY reason. the powers that be who select second chance sets read every comment, and take into consideration whether the general consensus regarding the model is positive or negative. this includes both technical critiques and the popularity of the model.
saying a specific model is "not for you" is in no way an insult. everyone is entitled to personal preferences, and you can't please everyone all of the time, so why worry about it?
i'm sure at this point no one even remembers what i'm talking about, but that's my two cents, anyway...
when posting in a hopefuls group thread that is dedicated to critiquing a hopeful's rejected set, i believe that it is entirely appropriate to mention when the hopeful is just plain "not for you," for ANY reason. the powers that be who select second chance sets read every comment, and take into consideration whether the general consensus regarding the model is positive or negative. this includes both technical critiques and the popularity of the model.
saying a specific model is "not for you" is in no way an insult. everyone is entitled to personal preferences, and you can't please everyone all of the time, so why worry about it?
i'm sure at this point no one even remembers what i'm talking about, but that's my two cents, anyway...
VIEW 4 of 4 COMMENTS
weston:
Was nice seeing you again. Glad you made it to Boll Weevil. Sorry I didn't really say anything...Beaten down by standing in the sun and already shy to begin with....But yea, still nice to see ya and partake in the digesting of food together 
uproot:
hey i just found j's longhorns hat behind the couch! wish ida brought it last night, sorry