Flux has the best answer of all time to the question "why do you allow nude pictures of yourself to be published (on the Internet / in a magazine etc.)?"
I was just reading her profile, and under the heading WHY I DID SG she writes "by letting people whack it to you, you change the face of Desire. By changing what humanity desires, you can change the world."
Wow. That pretty much sums it all up, doesn't it? You know, I have an entire shelf loaded with neo-feminist sex-positive theory in my bedroom but that's really all you need to say right there. Atta girl.
On another subject . . .
Earlier I was contemplating what it is that makes any one certain picture jump out at you. Why do some images stand out so sharply from the rest in a set, even when it's the same succulent bad-ass chick in all of them? I think it comes down to a matter of plausibility. With some pictures, it's easy to believe -- to mentally insert yourself into the scene. For example, a shot of a young woman in the shower, looking over her shoulder at the camera with a grin. It doesn't take much to imagine that you are actually standing there, that you just walked into the bathroom, that she is saying with her face and body "I know you like to look at me and that makes me happy."
As a rule: More contrived = less erotic. More natural = more erotic. Perhaps this is why mainstream, mass-media porn is often so dull and unsexy -- and why amateur porn in general and SuicideGirls in particular tend to rock.
Well, off to work I go. Them planes ain't gonna fly themselves.
I was just reading her profile, and under the heading WHY I DID SG she writes "by letting people whack it to you, you change the face of Desire. By changing what humanity desires, you can change the world."
Wow. That pretty much sums it all up, doesn't it? You know, I have an entire shelf loaded with neo-feminist sex-positive theory in my bedroom but that's really all you need to say right there. Atta girl.
On another subject . . .
Earlier I was contemplating what it is that makes any one certain picture jump out at you. Why do some images stand out so sharply from the rest in a set, even when it's the same succulent bad-ass chick in all of them? I think it comes down to a matter of plausibility. With some pictures, it's easy to believe -- to mentally insert yourself into the scene. For example, a shot of a young woman in the shower, looking over her shoulder at the camera with a grin. It doesn't take much to imagine that you are actually standing there, that you just walked into the bathroom, that she is saying with her face and body "I know you like to look at me and that makes me happy."
As a rule: More contrived = less erotic. More natural = more erotic. Perhaps this is why mainstream, mass-media porn is often so dull and unsexy -- and why amateur porn in general and SuicideGirls in particular tend to rock.
Well, off to work I go. Them planes ain't gonna fly themselves.