So tell me, How is it that the World Court will not issue an arrest warrant for a standing Dictator, that every one in the world knows is committing Human Rights Violations, and the U.N. will stand by and only issue sanctions, only making things worse on the people of that country, and not truly effection the Dictator in any way shape or form? But let NATO or the U.S. Military step in and kick that Ruler out of power and the Word Court wants to issue arrest warrants right away.
Why won't the World Court issue an arrest warrant for a country's ruler while he is in power?
They are all big and bad after someone has no power. But while they are in power apparently they think it's ok to let them do what they want to their subjects.
It istime to get rid of the U.N. and the World Court because neither one of them work. The U.N. will crumble if the U.S. pulls its money out of it.
Why won't the World Court issue an arrest warrant for a country's ruler while he is in power?
They are all big and bad after someone has no power. But while they are in power apparently they think it's ok to let them do what they want to their subjects.
It istime to get rid of the U.N. and the World Court because neither one of them work. The U.N. will crumble if the U.S. pulls its money out of it.
longlostsapper:
Because if they step in when there in power it changes there role in things basically saying we pick who gets to lead, i understand your feelings on this but try to remember politics and people in power don't give a shit about the little/common people
01_conservative:
I understand that, I have a degree in this crap, but it's about time that someone stands up for the people. If the World Court wants real legitimacy then they need to start issuing warrants for these people and force them to stay in their countries. They break the laws of human decency then they pay the price, not that the World Court decideds who rules, they just decide who protects the little people.