• commentary
  • THURSDAY OCTOBER 11 2007 8:00 PM

"Terminator" Plus Vin Diesel Equals Fuck No



If watching "Top Chef" has taught me anything (it hasn't but bear with me), it's that recipes are important. The act of putting great ingredients together to create something fantastic, cannot be overestimated. Start out with second rate ingredients, and you risk ruining the end product.

In fact, even one or two bad ingredients can sabotage the overall result. (I learned that from "Three's Company." I gotta be honest, I'm not convinced this recipe-analogy thing is gonna fly. I'm hoping these cutesy asides distract from that.) For instance:

Peanut butter + jelly = good

Peanut butter + jelly + a horrible actor = no good

Lemme get more specific. A good recipe was:

Terminator + James Cameron + Arnold = classic movie

Maybe Arnold isn't the most versatile guy on Earth, but he can do one thing pretty well. Act like a robotic-killing machine. Now, sure, this skill didn't serve him so well when he was playing almost every other role, but it worked here. As for the remaining elements, James Cameron is a pretty good director and Terminator was his masterpiece. This combo worked perfectly for two movies.

Then they changed the recipe to:

Terminator + "not James Cameron" + Arnold = fun movie

Okay, that doesn't sound that appetizing, but, I actually thought it was a fun movie. Arnold had sort of a meta, fucking around, tongue-in-cheek vibe going, they added a hot new Lady-nator, and it went by quick. They also switched out Eddie Furlong with some other guy. He wasn't that important, which is why he's not in the recipe. Or, maybe he's the side dish of vegetables that has very little bearing on whether you order the meal. (Yeah, I know, I'll drop it soon.)

Now, comes word that the recipe has been watered down even more.

Terminator + "McG aka guy who did the Charlie's Angels movie" + Vin Diesel = Hey wait a minute!

I don't know about you, but I only like one of those ingredients. You may be thinking, "Well, Vin Diesel's a better actor than Arnie..." Maybe he's got more range, and by that I mean that he can go from "deep gravel voice" to "even deeper gravel voice," but that doesn't mean shit in this role. He's no Arnold, not when it comes to the Terminator. No offense but, the T-800 isn't made from clay, and this isn't the Golem movie.

I guess what I'm saying is, that's the worst looking PB&J I've ever seen...

(See, I kind of wrapped it up okay. Just promise me you won't let this turn you off of all analogies.)



TheCoolerKing is off to NYC to get drunk and run around like a jerk. Does that city still never sleep?

  • news
  • MONDAY JULY 10 2006 5:00 PM

It's Not Aquaman

James Cameron has finally picked his next film to direct - "Avatar."

It's been nine long years since "Titanic," and while a host of directors have tried to fill his shoes, none come close to Cameron’s combination of genius and ego (as the boys of "Entourage" can attest).

His new project, which also has gone under the cover title "Project 880," follows a paraplegic war veteran who is brought to another planet inhabited by a humanoid race at odds with Earth's citizens.


Sounds like a guaranteed special effects bonanza... and a $200 million-plus budget.

But hopefully Cameron won't take on screenwriting duties, as even his staunchest fans know that isn't his strength. Who can forget such script howlers like "You could just call me a tumbleweed blowin' in the wind" (Titanic) and "You have to see with better eyes than that" (The Abyss)?

Cameron says he's looking to cast unknowns for the new film, which may help save a few pennies. Very few.

"Avatar" is scheduled to be released summer 2008.