• news
  • SUNDAY MAY 16 2010 1:00 PM

R.I.P. Ronnie James Dio

Much to my dismay, it has just been confirmed that heavy metal legend Ronnie James Dio passed away on this sad Sunday morning. His wife and manager Wendy officially released the following statement on his website about an hour ago:

Today my heart is broken, Ronnie passed away at 7:45am 16th May. Many, many friends and family were able to say their private good-byes before he peacefully passed away. Ronnie knew how much he was loved by all. We so appreciate the love and support that you have all given us. Please give us a few days of privacy to deal with this terrible loss. Please know he loved you all and his music will live on forever.

- Wendy Dio


The 67-year old frontman of iconic bands such as Rainbow, Black Sabbath and most recenty Heaven & Hell was diagnosed with stomach cancer in November last year. Rumors of Dio's demise surfaced on the internet earlier this year but were discredited when he appeared to be alive and his condition improved somewhat after undergoing chemo therapy. Sadly, Dio was forced to cancel all upcoming shows with Heaven & Hell scheduled this Summer due to his declining health and eventually lost his battle to cancer.

R.I.P. Dio, you will be missed by many.

  • news
  • THURSDAY JUNE 25 2009 6:30 PM

The King of Pop Is Dead

Reportedly, pop icon Michael Jackson has passed away after suffering from cardiac arrest at his Los Angeles home earlier today. The singer was rushed to the hospital in a coma but paramedics were unable to revive him, after which he was pronounced dead at 2:26 p.m. The King of Pop was 50 years old.

With a career starting as early as age eleven with the Jackson 5, Michael Jackson is widely considered one of the most influential artists of the past century, and remains one of the world's best-selling musician of all time. The singer was in Los Angeles rehearsing for his upcoming sold-out performances next month which have obviously been canceled.

Jackson is survived by his three children: Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr., Paris Michael Katherine Jackson and Prince "Blanket" Michael Jackson II.



  • feature
  • MONDAY JULY 21 2008 6:00 AM

Life Is Ugly So Why Not Kill Yourself*

Often in my writing for SuicideGirls I’ve talked about girls, but I haven’t talked a lot about suicide. Last week a friend of mine attempted it, unsuccessfully, thank you Jesus. Twenty-five years ago another friend managed to do it successfully and I’m still bummed about that. When I lived in Chicago my band used to play at a place called Batteries, which was booked by Jim Ellison of the band Material Issue. I was pretty torn up when I found out he’d killed himself in 1996. They played their song "Valerie Loves Me" at a club I went to this week, which got me thinking even harder about suicide and its consequences. I’ve known a couple people, including an uncle and a co-worker, who managed to commit slow suicide by drinking themselves to death. And I myself have come pretty close to doing the deed, too.

We used to get into these long philosophical debates around the kitchen table of the punk house near Akron City Hospital, where nearly everyone on the scene seemed to hang out 24/7. In one debate almost everyone in the room agreed that suicide was a perfectly viable option and that it was up to the individual alone to decide whether to do it or not. I’m not sure I was the only one who disagreed. But I was certainly in the minority. I imagine a lot of “alternative” type people feel somewhat the same way as my friends did; that suicide is an acceptable option.

Intellectually, it’s easy to come up with a convincing argument that suicide is nobody’s business but that of the person who kills herself or himself. But in practical, real world terms, this is never the case. Suicide is devastating to everyone whose life a person touches. No matter how much of a loner you are, there are people who care about you and it’s never easy to deal with someone you care about killing themselves. In the case of my friend Iggy who hung himself in 1983, he seems to have been deliberately trying to hurt his girlfriend who’d recently dumped him. But she dumped him because it was the only way she could think of to make him deal with his alcoholism and general destructiveness. I don’t blame her. I would’ve done the same thing. What he did was incredibly nasty and mean. And I don’t think it really solved his problems.

Most religions forbid suicide and imagine horrible punishments awaiting in the next world for those who take their own lives. If you dug through the Buddhist literature I’m sure you could find some variation on this. There must be a sutra or vinaya text somewhere saying what kind of future incarnation awaits those who commit suicide. But I don’t know about it since I’m a pretty lousy Buddhist scholar. This in itself says something, though. Because even if such a text does exist, it’s not greatly emphasized. There are a number of scholarly articles on the Internet about the matter. Here’s one. Here’s another. And here’s one more.

The Vietnamese Buddhists who set fire to themselves
to protest the Viet Nam War are well known. For a while there that seemed like one of the most enduring images the general public in the West had of Buddhism. People on this side of the planet had already been taught by their early scholars that Buddhism was a Nihilistic religion filled with talk of suffering and emptiness. So it probably came as no great surprise to hear about Buddhists offing themselves. Buddhism isn’t nihilistic, though. And I don’t think those guys did anyone very much good by going up in flames.

In any case, I’m not terribly concerned with scholarly research or mass opinions. I scanned through those articles I linked to, but I really didn’t read them in depth. It’s interesting to know the history, but not really necessary. Buddhism, as far as I’m concerned, is more about our own experiences than about received wisdom from others. My own experience tells me that suicide is not really a viable option. It ultimately cannot possibly solve the problems it’s intended to solve and it causes a whole lot of unnecessary suffering and grief.

People kill themselves to put an end to their suffering. Ian Curtis did it to end his suffering over his marriage and finances. Pete Ham killed himself because he was suffering over the fate of Badfinger, the world’s greatest power pop band. Kurt Cobain killed himself to end his suffering from all those stomach aches. Of course these are all over-simplifications. But it’s clear that all of these people, as well as anyone else who has ever taken their own lives, did so because they saw it as a way out of suffering. It’s certainly not something you do just for the hell of it.

But the idea that committing suicide will end your suffering comes from the belief that you and the world in which you live are two different things. You believe that you can leave this world and thereby leave suffering behind. But my own sense after years of zazen practice is that this is not true. I’ve spent a long time watching the boundary line between what I call “me” and what I call the rest of the world blur and fade. I’m no longer certain at all where the dividing line is. I’m beginning to even suspect that that guy Buddha may have been right when he said it doesn’t exist at all. In fact I’ve had a few times when this apparently nonsensical notion has come up and bit me on the ass in ways I cannot possibly deny.

So what I’m saying here goes a little further than just the old “the show must go on” type thing, where people say you have a responsibility to your friends and family not to go off and shoot your brains out in the greenhouse. You also have a responsibility to yourself and even to the universe as a whole not to do that. Even if committing suicide solves the immediate problem by ending a poor relationship or making it so your stomach doesn’t hurt anymore, the suffering you thought was yours alone spreads out like a wave to those parts of the universe you’ve been taught to think of as separate from you. It’s impossible for me to believe that even the person who dies does not, in some way, continue to suffer just as greatly after suicide as before. I no longer believe it’s possible to leave this world. And that’s as far as I want to speculate about that. Anything I might say about the mechanism involved in how this happens would just be a load of stinky brain farts. Still, I have a very deep and unshakable feeling that this is true.

Anyway, please forgive the grimness of this little piece. What my friend did last week got me thinking hard about the matter. So SuicideGirls readers, don’t kill yourselves! Life is beautiful, so why not eat health foods instead?*


*This title of this article comes from a punk rock compilation album put out around 1979-80 by New Underground Records. The Descendents and Red Cross are featured. I’d love to find a copy of this or its sequel Life Is Beautiful So Why Not Eat Health Foods.



Brad Warner will be at the Young Buddhists Retreat in Montague, MA from August 28-31.

Brad Warner is the author of Hardcore Zen and Sit Down and Shut Up!. He maintains a blog about Buddhist stuff and a MySpace page too. If you're in Southern California and you want to try some Zazen for yourself, he has a group that meets every Saturday in Santa Monica.

You can buy the new CD by his band Zero Defex (0DFx) at CD Baby.


  • news
  • MONDAY JUNE 23 2008 2:30 PM

Noooooooooooooooooo... George Carlin, R.I.P.

George Carlin, the legendary comedian who was once arrested for obscenity for his "Seven Words You Can't Say on Television" skit (the case went all the way to the Supreme Court) has died. He was 71.

Do I even need to say anything about him? I'll just leave it to everyone else to share their own thoughts on his landmark comedy routines and add my own: I was a sophomore in high school when I first heard one of Carlin's full shows, "You Are All Diseased." Aside from laughing to the point of tears, my perceptions on the world were forever changed. I had never heard anyone speak so profanely and yet so eloquently. I immediately scrambled to find more albums from the guy I had previously only known as the comedian who played Rufus in Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure. Carlin's humor had the same effect on me as Lenny Bruce's sketches had had on Carlin.

I'll close with some classic clips:








George, you will be sorely missed.

  • feature
  • MONDAY NOVEMBER 26 2007 12:00 PM

Brad Warner's Hardcore Zen: How the Death of My Grandma Turned Me Into a Total Asshole

A buncha stuff has happened since I wrote my last Suicide Girls article two weeks ago. When I wrote that piece I was in Ohio, which is where I was born and mostly raised except for three years in Africa. I went to Ohio because I had some speaking engagements and gigs playing bass for the mighty 0Dfx (aka Zero Defex) and also because my grandma had been in the hospital and I wanted to visit with her. The gigs all went super. But not so much grandma. As it turns out she not only died, but she did so right before my very eyes. I’ve never seen a person die before. It’s a pretty life-changing thing to witness.

The doctors hadn’t given grandma a very good prognosis when they sent her home from the hospital. But when I arrived she seemed OK. Not great. But certainly not a week away from dying. Grandma lived in southern Ohio near Cincinnati, whereas my gigs were up in northern Ohio in Akron and Cleveland. So my plan was to visit her for a few days, go up north, do my stuff , go back down to Cincy, visit some more and then head home to Los Angeles. But right when my Akron/Cleveland stuff was over I got a call saying grandma’s condition had suddenly worsened and I’d better haul ass down south to see her. So I did. By the time I got there, she was in a very bad way. She died at 4:55 in the morning, the day after I got back down to where she lived.

I’d only just gone to bed about an hour before the hospice nurse woke us all up to say we might want to come into grandma’s room because she could go at any time. We all sat with her. She was in and out of consciousness, but couldn’t talk or move very much. I chanted the Heart Sutra for her because she liked hearing that when I chanted it after grandpa died. We talked to her, held her hand, all that stuff. And then there was a moment when she just gave up the struggle and slipped away.

I already gave my schpiel on death here earlier this year after my mom died. So I’m going to pass on that. I’ll just say that even though grandma’s dead, there really isn’t anywhere she could go but here. I’ll miss her even so.

Two major deaths of important women in your life in the same year is bound to have an effect on you. It’s made me a total asshole. What I mean by that is that I just don’t give a shit anymore. I’m gonna pretty much say and do whatever the fuck I want from now on.

Of course there are limits, obviously. I’m not gonna go out and rape, pillage and plunder. I’m not gonna be like a drugged out hedonist or nothin’. But I’m not gonna pull punches with people anymore. I’m gonna say what needs saying and do what needs done, and if people don’t like it, tough titty for them.

Still, I am a Buddhist. So I’m turning into an asshole with 25 years of Zen practice already under my belt. This may make me a slightly different type of asshole from an asshole who hasn’t done that stuff.

One of the things that I think gets lost in the way Zen is presented these days is that the whole idea of Zen in the beginning was to answer the question: How can we live a truly happy life? These days in America Zen stuff always gets all caught up in religious ideas of righteousness and holy-ocity. Fuck that shit. What Buddha wanted to find wasn’t something holy, he just wanted to live a life that wasn’t a fucking drag all the time.

In India in Buddha’s day, just like in ours, there were two basic ideas about how you can live a happy life. One camp said eat, drink, fuck, curse, and do whatever the hell you please because the only real thing in this universe is matter. There’s no God, there’s no Eternal Reward, all that shit is bupkiss, so do whatever makes you feel good right now. The other camp said that the material world was an illusion, that the spirit was the only true reality, so you should mortify the body in order to experience spiritual bliss and make a better place for yourself in the life hereafter.

Buddha tried both of these approaches, but he wasn’t satisfied with either one. The eat, drink and bed down with Mary approach seemed to hold out the promise of pleasure and plenty, but it never really delivered. You got fat, got hung-over and Mary gave you the clap. So he checked out the spiritual stuff and found that you could get pretty blissed out with those practices, but that whenever you weren’t getting some kind of spiritual high you felt like total shit because you hadn’t taken care of your basic bodily needs. So he founded what he called the Middle Way.

The Middle Way was not some kind of spiritual path designed to make us all holy with shiny pink haloes on our noggins. It was a way to live a life that wasn’t a piece of shit. It was a way to find happiness and stability in an unhappy and unstable world. That’s really all any of us are looking for, when it comes down to it. The stability of the Middle Way comes in our practice of zazen, which is the actual physical/mental practice of stability and happiness. A bit of zazen in the morning and a bit in the evening radiates throughout the rest of the day and makes everything better. That’s all there is to it.

Morality is an important aspect of the practice because we are all interconnected. I can’t be happy if I make the people around me miserable under the mistaken impression that they are not intimately connected with me. So I need to behave morally towards everyone I encounter. I don’t think a lot of the Buddhists in America these days really get that, though. They imagine Buddhist morality has some kind of supposedly “higher purpose,” that we’re moral in order to satisfy some ideal, or to avoid the wrath of a vengeful Buddha -- or at least avoid the wrath of vengeful Buddhists who’ll get on your case if you don’t act like they think you ought to.

But another aspect of Buddhist morality is that you have to do your part. You’re not here just for yourself. You’re here for everyone and everything you encounter. Your role is to do and say the things that need doing and saying from your unique perspective. God is too far removed from the Universe to see himself clearly without splitting himself into a bazillion eyes and ears that watch over all aspects of himself. Whatever perspective you have is the most valuable thing in the universe. You need to be fully yourself. At the same time, you need to completely forget any idea you have about yourself. Or, if you can’t forget it, at least just ignore it, secure in the knowledge that whatever you think you are isn’t what you really are.

Doing and saying what needs doing an saying has to be handled carefully. But being careful and being timid are two very different things. The folks who confuse Buddhist morality with the religious variety think Buddhism is about being timid. This is because they are all a bunch of fuck heads. It's a fine line sometimes between being careful and being timid, so watch it. But erring on either side is equally as bad.

Watching my grandma die, I felt like we all have a limited time in this place to do what needs doing. Even if I get a good 86 years like she did, that still won’t be enough to get it all done. So I’d better get my ass in gear and at least do a few of the things I was put here to do before I bite the big one.

If I seem like an asshole for that, sorry. If you don’t like it, bite me.

Brad Warner is the author of Hardcore Zen and Sit Down and Shut Up!. He maintains a blog about Buddhist stuff. If you're in Southern California and you want to try some Zazen for yourself, he has a group that meets every Saturday in Santa Monica.

  • commentary
  • MONDAY SEPTEMBER 24 2007 7:30 PM

Shockingly, Hollywood Dads Not Thinking of Others



You don't get to do whatever you want. Seems fairly obvious but some people have a hard time grasping this fact.

As much as you'd like to always "follow your dream" and "live in the moment," there are times when you really shouldn't.

An example would be... you probably shouldn't greet the stork with a handshake and a hearty hello when a day later you were planning to pay the ferryman for a boat ride across the river Styx...

Holly Madison, the '#1' girlfriend of 81-year-old Hugh Hefner, is sparking rumors that a baby Hef is on the way after her behavior at the Monte Carlo Television Festival this week. Holly, 27, reportedly abstained from alcohol at a series of parties she attended at the event and spent much of her press tour -- designed to promote Hugh's new reality-tv show The Girls Next Door -- talking about babies.

"I want to have kids with Hef in the next year or so and when that happens I just want it to be me and him."


Good for him! That scenario, I mean. It's good for him and for absolutely no one else.

How about funnyman of yore, Tony Randall, he became a dad at the ripe old age of 79. The old guy, he still had it in 'im! Well, for a little while anyways, he died five years later. Man, who saw that coming! Just bad luck, I guess.

Warren Beatty had a kid at 63. Paul McCartney had one at 62. And the list goes on and on.

Hef actually has four other kids. Now, as stellar of a job as he might've done with the others, father of the year trophies piling up and whatnot, I don't think he should be having a child at the age of eighty-fucking-one. I also believe that other people should feel this way, speak up about it, and shame him into getting spayed.

There's probably a reason why women have a harder time conceiving as they get older, and I'm not sure that reason is so that older dudes have an excuse to fuck young girls.

Fathers? Nope. These guys are basically machines that churn out orphans and single moms. What a great idea. Your withered shell of a carcass gets to play pattycake a few times before shuffling off this mortal coil and leaving behind a kid who will never know its father.

As tempting as it must be to have the chance to yell at someone who looks just like you, I think maybe adopting a kid is the best way to proceed here. Or, getting an animal of some sort. Or, perhaps, being content to continue fucking women decades younger than you until such time as Pluto calls to you from his murky depths...

You don't start sculpting a statue if you're only going to be able to finish the leg (sculptors, feel free to correct me here.) You wouldn't intentionally build half a car would you? Fuck, would you? I'm actually not sure. My analogies are suddenly failing me for some reason...

Maybe I don't need an analogy. Maybe fathering a kid when you have a maximum of five years left on the planet being a horrible idea is plain enough for everyone to see. I bet Tony Randall's eight-year-old agrees with me.



TheCoolerKing continues to not get his pieces done in time for a photo.

  • commentary
  • WEDNESDAY AUGUST 22 2007 8:00 PM

The 9 Coolest Things About "Halloween"



Some random facts: The original Halloween is the perfect horror film. I've seen Halloween at least a hundred times. I hate remakes of movies.

Because of the above reasons I wanted to hate the Halloween remake. In fact, I still might, but for right now I'm gonna try to be something I've never been before. Open-minded.

I really enjoy Rob Zombie's first two movies. The Devil's Rejects is kick-ass violence and mayhem and I actually liked House of 1000 Corpses even more. And his Grindhouse trailer for Werewolf Women of the S.S. was also great. And maybe the fact that they've churned out sequel after crappy sequel over the past 30 years makes this move less blasphemous.

No one should be remaking this movie. However, regardless of whether or not it turns out okay, they at least appear to be going about it the right way. The thing they shouldn't be doing... they're doing... well... I guess...

Though, I gotta say, the Zombie version comes out on the losing end of the trailer battle...



vs.



The battle continues August 31st.

The 9 Coolest Things About Halloween

1) The John Carpenter score. Terrifying. Picture the most harmless image you can possibly imagine. Puppy frolicking with a chew toy, leaf alighting on a gentle pond, whatever. Picture it. Now add the Halloween theme. Now picture me squealing like a sissy.

2) It's the best of the admittedly pathetic group of holiday-themed horror films. Sure, My Bloody Valentine, Silent Night Deadly Night and Father's Day aren't exactly top of the line projects, but Halloween beats them all.

3) The moment when, after impaling a dude to the wall, Michael Myers stares at his victim and then slowly tilts his head, like an animal would. Whoa.

4) Blue Oyster Cult's "Don't Fear the Reaper." Laurie and Annie listen to it while getting high in the car. Awesome song, which, to this day reminds me of Halloween.

5) The fact that the most terrifying mask in horror history, the one worn by Michael Myers aka "The Shape," was fashioned out of a William Shatner "Captain Kirk," mask. Yeah. Be glad they were all out of "Sulu" masks.

6) Dr Loomis played by the late, great Donald Pleasance. When a freshly-pummeled Laurie asks Dr Loomis if, "that was the boogie man," he replies, "As a matter of fact, it was." See, that's just cool.

7) The fact that the whole "unstoppable killer" gimmick was invented here and so, it's not quite as out of hand as it is later in the genre. Meaning, for the most part, all the damage done to good ole "Double M, " is realistic and it's conceivable he could've survived it. Sort of.

8) After the rampage, the part when the neighbor runs out and in response to the noise says "I've been trick-or-treated to death tonight," and Loomis snaps, "Death! You don't know what death is!" I picture the exchange continuing with Loomis also challenging the neighbor's knowledge of "police," "lunatics," "knife-wounds," and "Funyuns."

"Funyuns! You don't know what Funyuns are!"

9) Um, the fact that Michael Myers actually drives a car in the movie. What? And, somehow, it doesn't make him less scary. Does he signal? Buckle-up? Merge well? Who knows... Jason Voorhees couldn't get away with that shit.



TheCoolerKing admits he actually loves Halloween 3: Season of the Witch

  • commentary
  • WEDNESDAY AUGUST 1 2007 8:00 PM

Sharks: The Jerks of the Ocean



Once again it's time to celebrate that most popular of all God's killing machines... the shark. That's right, Discovery Channel's annual Shark Week.

Would sharks be as popular if they had the ability to follow us onto land? I doubt it. If apes started randomly punching people their popularity would drop as fast as... well, the people they were hitting.

But, we have legs and can use them to leave bodies of water and for that reason they are somehow still super-popular.

The following video features a shark hypnotist. I wasn't aware that hypnotism had been perfected on humans yet. In fact, I have a smoking uncle who's living, coughing proof that it hasn't been. Hmmm... Maybe wait until it's 100% effective on creatures you can reason with before trying it out on unstoppable engines of death and misery? No? Okay...



This man has just given up his right to our sympathy when a shark inevitably eats him. A day, a month, a year, whatever... It will happen, and when it does... he had it coming.

I'll go even further, ANY freak accident that befalls him, lightning strike, anvil crushing, quicksand, whatever the case may be. The moment you feel bad for him, say to yourself, "Well, there was that time he tried hynotizing that shark and nothing bad happened to him... I guess he was one up."



Shark Week? There needs to be a "this poor woman" week. Holy shit. Is it a little exploitative to have her tell her shark-attack tale, film a re-enactment of said attack and then let the camera linger on her for seconds after the revelation that her leg was bitten off, all in service of a week devoted to the sharks? I'm not sure either but it was creepy to watch.

Boy, I sure hope you hate sea-turtles.



Don't worry, I have it on good authority that that turtle was a racist. Maybe he should've been allowed to use a gun or something cause that was a one-sided blowout.

Admittedly, my grasp on evolution isn't iron-clad but... I'm guessing that if that shark kills hundreds more turtles, while wounding a few, and then the few who lived breed, and then some of them are wounded while hundreds more are killed... And the few that are left again breed and so on and so forth... In about 2 million years there's gonne be a 25-foot long sea-turtle who's pissed off, impervious to shark bites and ready to get some revenge.

I bet he'll even have an eye patch.

TheCoolerKing looks forward to one day yelling at a shark from the safety of a steel boat.

  • news
  • MONDAY JUNE 25 2007 11:00 PM

Morbid Visions: Death TV is Coming Soon



Peel away the sinister connotations movies and metal bands associate with the concept of death and what's left? The painfully slow act itself. Barring accidents and freak forms of expiration, it would likely be a slow descent; an uncomfortable and frightening transition for the one about to succumb and a long, painful process for his or her loved ones. Beyond that, the tedious day-in-day-out slipping away would be maddeningly boring, and certainly not something others would want to watch… or would they? Spiegel Online reports:

Starting this autumn in Germany, EosTV -- a 24-hour-a-day, 7-days-a-week television channel devoted exclusively to aging, dying and mourning -- will hit the airwaves.


To a lot of you the idea is probably a little off-putting, if not downright disturbing, but there's an interesting logic behind EosTV’s impending inception. It seems that Germany, despite having around 82,000,000 inhabitants, has a very low birth rate compared to other parts of the world; last year almost 150,000 more people died than were born. Besides causing a decline in overall population, what this does is cause a shift in the television viewing demographic.

"Over 800,000 people died in Germany last year," Wolf Tilmann Schneider, the channel's founder, told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "Multiply that by four and you have the rough number of people directly affected by those deaths. There are also 2.1 million people in Germany needing care in their old age. There are millions of people confronting the issues of getting older and dying."


Some of the programming ideas for the channel include documentaries about cemeteries, helpful tips about finding retirement homes, and explorations into the changing ways in which we cope with death, as allowed by the advent of modern technology and the internet. The channel even plans to offer their own modern take on mourning: TV obituaries.

”We are all the same. We all have the same life cycle and we all live and die," says Schneider. "That's where the idea came from that -- just like an obituary one places with a newspaper -- I wanted to give people the opportunity to do that on television.”


It may not be a necessary innovation, but I suppose someone might be interested in getting teary-eyed over a clip of dearly departed Uncle Fritz. But if I were actually old and ‘on my way out’, I’m not so sure I’d want to sit around and wax depressive watching death all day. The programmers at EosTV are surely aware of that, as there will also be shows about retirement homes, nursing care, and installing a stair lift in your home. Stair lifts, as you may not have known, make for compelling viewing.



Ok, so my idea of “Death TV” may be more akin to “Elderly TV”, though something tells me by focusing a little more on the gloomy side of things EosTV could tap into Germany’s ever-present goth scene, which is very much alive. And now that I think of it, I wonder if the founder of the network isn’t the one with the unnatural fixation on death:

Schneider can barely contain himself when he talks about his own interest in cemeteries. "I realized recently," he says breathlessly, "that I really like going to the cemetery. And I've noticed that in Germany and in Europe people go to cemeteries not just to mourn, but also to enjoy the peace."


It’s his, uh, breathless excitement that has lead to the inclusion of "entertainment programs" and documentaries about famous cemeteries. But programming aside, when the dirt hits the shovel, so to speak, Germany will have an interesting addition to their cable lineup… and it's one that may be headed to other shores soon.

Schneider has begun the search for partners across Europe and in the United States. The response, he reports, has been quite lively.


'Til then, the morbid and the elderly will have to wait with bated breath, contenting themselves with Six Feet Under reruns.

  • news
  • FRIDAY JUNE 15 2007 4:00 PM

Russian Drinkers: Nyet Afraid of Alcohol, Poison, Death



In a story that can only be called fucking insane, it seems that a startling percentage of Russian men not only live up to the stereotype of being drunks, but that they are actually rampaging, fearless, super-drunks who will consume anything. Like cologne.

New Scientist reports that, according to a new study, 43% of deaths amongst men between the ages of 25 and 54 are related to drinking non-beverage alcohol, such as cologne, antiseptics, cleaning agents, and other horrific shit. Researcher David Leon explains:

Many Russian men who fall on hard times start drinking non-beverage alcohols because they are cheaper and have a high alcohol content.


I guess it makes sense that there’s such a high percentage of deaths among the truly gung-ho poison-drinkers, but apparently the problem is widespread. According to the study, 8% of the men in the control group admitted to drinking the toxic spirits. That’s like, 1 in 12 -- not soooo bad, right?

Researchers think these numbers represent underestimates, since the study did not include men who lived alone or on the streets.


Oh. Well, if you're still unsure that poisonous substances are unhealthy, or that Russia is wild about booze, I’ll leave you with some additional depressing stats:

  • Men who drink non-beverage alcohol have a five-times greater risk of alcohol-related death.
  • Men who drink only non-beverage alcohol have a 20-times greater risk of death.
  • 72% of murders and 42% of suicides in Russia are related to alcohol.
  • Due to a high death rate and a low birth rate (both related to alcohol), Russia's population is set to decline by about 30,000,000 people in the next 40 years.


Bottoms up!

  • news
  • SATURDAY JUNE 9 2007 8:00 AM

Die Young, Leave a Beautiful Corpse. Or Call Sunset Tan.



There’s nothing that says you’ve lost that loving feelings like, well…death. But just because one has gone to the Great Jazz Joint in the Sky, doesn’t mean that one doesn’t still want to look fierce.

Enter Sunset Tan, the E! network’s latest documentary-style look at the golden brown underbelly of Los Angeles glam. When the scantily clad, blonde Olly girls are called to the James Mortuary for their first airbrush job, they encounter Frankie, an unlikely client, ready for his close up.

Check the link for a longer clip.

  • news
  • MONDAY JUNE 4 2007 12:00 PM

SCOTUS Interruptus; June 4, 2007



Welcome to the second installment of Subrosa’s SCOTUS Interruptus, a quasi-weekly column dedicated to keeping the SuicideGirls.com community abreast (hey-o!) of the Court’s important decisions, argument schedule and whatever else is relevant for that particular week. As always, a record of the opinions published by the Court can be found on their website here.


Justice Ginsberg is Every Woman. It’s All in Her.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg is a very distinguished jurist who has made a long history of staunchly left-leaning votes mixed in with a genteel aura. Always polite, never combative even with her polar opposites on the bench. Heck, I’ve even heard tales about subtle flirtations that go on between her and “Nino” Scalia. She’s a powerful arbiter of our rights and a dogged defender of personal freedoms, but she’s also a lady, dammit.

Until this term, that is. Girlfriend’s on a rampage, yo.

Whatever else may be said about the Supreme Court’s current term, which ends in about a month, it will be remembered as the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it.

Both in the abortion case the court decided last month and the discrimination ruling it issued on Tuesday, Justice Ginsburg read forceful dissents from the bench. In each case, she spoke not only for herself but also for three other dissenting colleagues, Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Stephen G. Breyer.

But the words were clearly her own, and they were both passionate and pointed. In the abortion case, in which the court upheld the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act seven years after having struck down a similar state law, she noted that the court was now “differently composed than it was when we last considered a restrictive abortion regulation.” In the latest case, she summoned Congress to overturn what she called the majority’s “parsimonious reading” of the federal law against discrimination in the workplace.

To read a dissent aloud is an act of theater that justices use to convey their view that the majority is not only mistaken, but profoundly wrong. It happens just a handful of times a year… The oral dissent has not been, until now, Justice Ginsburg’s style. She has gone years without delivering one, and never before in her 15 years on the court has she delivered two in one term.


Some say can thank the sterling attitudes of our two newest Justices for this little burst of Girl Power.

Some might say her dissents are an expression of sour grapes over being in the minority more often than not. But there may be strategic judgment, as well as frustration, behind Justice Ginsburg’s new style. She may have concluded that quiet collegiality has proved futile and that her new colleagues, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., are not open to persuasion on the issues that matter most to her.

Justice Alito, of course, took the place of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, with whom Justice Ginsburg formed a deep emotional bond, although they differed on a variety of issues. And Chief Justice Roberts succeeded Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, with whom Justice Ginsburg often disagreed but maintained a relationship that was at times surprisingly productive.

For example, in 1996, over Justice Scalia’s vigorous dissent, the chief justice gave Justice Ginsburg his vote in a decision holding that the Virginia Military Institute’s men-only admissions policy was unconstitutional. In 2003, they made common cause in a case that strengthened the Family and Medical Leave Act. When Justice Ginsburg criticized a Rehnquist opinion, she did so gently; today’s adversary could be tomorrow’s ally.

If there has been any such meeting of the minds between Justice Ginsburg and her new colleagues, it has not been evident. She may have concluded that her side’s interests are better served by appealing not to the court’s majority but to the public. “She’s sounding an alarm and wants people to take notice,” said Debra L. Ness, president of the National Partnership for Women and Families, an advocacy group that focuses on the workplace.


Good. Give ‘em Hell, sister.


Case of the Living Dead?
Claiborne v. United States

Mario Claiborne was a small-time career crack dealer who was busted selling rocks to an undercover agent. Federal sentencing guidelines provided a range of 36 to 47 months in prison. The trial judge looked at the facts and the attenuating circumstances and gave him 15 months. US federal prosecutors appealed the sentence, arguing that the judge should not have the discretion to go beneath federal guidelines in determining the length of a sentence. The Supreme Court granted certiorari. Claiborne’s case was briefed and argued in front of the Court in February of this year.

Then while awaiting the Court’s opinion, Claiborne died. Bad news for him, but also bad news for his attorneys. Normally, when a criminal defendant dies while his case is on appeal, the appeal is dismissed for constitutional reasons and reasons of judicial economy. In this case, it could leave a lot of folks with a lot of unanswered questions.

Michael Dwyer, assistant federal public defender in the Eastern District of Missouri, on Friday filed a motion asking the Court either to go ahead and decide the Claiborne case as presented, or to grant expedited review of another case from Dwyer's office involving the same Guidelines question. The alternative case suggested is Beal v. U.S. (docket 06-8498) -- like Claiborne, from the Eighth Circuit Court. The Supreme Court considered the Beal case at a Conference in February, but took no action on it, apparently intending to hold it until after it had decided Claiborne. Mario Claiborne's death in a shooting incident in St. Louis on Wednesday has raised the question of what the Court would do with the case, and the issue.

Dwyer contended in his motion that "the close similarity of the facts and decisions of the districts courts and appellate panels in Claiborne and Beal makes the latter case an efficient and effective vehicle to resolve the urgent issues presented in Claiborne. Because of his representation of Claiborne, the Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of Missouri could expeditiously prepare Beal for briefing and argument."


Most commentators seem to think that Dwyer’s motion to convince the court to decide Claiborne has little chance of success, but they might buy his argument to substitute another case in its stead. Dwyer’s motion can be found here and the Solicitor General’s response can be found here.


Smile, Justice Souter! You’re On Candid Camera!

If you’re like me, you’ve always wanted to be inside the Supreme Court while a case was being argued. Maybe I’m over-romanticizing it, but it would seem to me that there could be no more dramatic setting in American government than one where rulings that will shape our nation’s laws for years to come. It would be riveting. Like Law and Order or Boston Legal, but for real.

I dunno. Maybe I’m just a law geek, but I know I’m not the only one who feels this way. Senator Arlen Specter agrees with me enough that he’s introduced a bill that would open the Supreme Court’s oral arguments to television cameras. The bill is receiving widespread support by watchdog groups and government accountability organizations. Unfortunately, the Justices themselves are not such big fans of the idea.

By way of background, the current Justices have widely opposed televising their public proceedings over the years, perhaps none more famously than David H. Souter, who testified before Congress that any cameras entering the Court would have to “roll over my dead body.”…In general, opponents offer four main arguments against televised coverage. First, they fear the media’s obsession with sound bites will lead to snippets from oral argument being taken out of context and unreflective of the true issues before the court. Second, opponents say the presence of cameras could lead to grandstanding by the advocates or even the Justices themselves. Third, opponents say televising oral arguments would demean the legal problems – if not jeopardize the due process rights – of parties before the court. Fourth, they say increased visual exposure could jeopardize the Justices’ safety.


Not mentioned above is a fifth reason why they don’t like this idea: Justice Scalia is worried that the camera will add ten pounds.

Interestingly enough, the problem with the Justices’ arguments is that there doesn’t seem to be enough actual law to them. Until now, perhaps.

The blogosphere has been treated in recent days to a group of law professors of varying ideological preferences pronouncing it within Congress' constitutional powers (some even said "well within") to compel the Supreme Court to allow television coverage of oral arguments. Despite diligent searching, none of those academics has located a precedent that settles the matter, although a few cases have been mentioned suggestively. There is a brand-new lower court precedent, though, that makes the point that inter-branch modesty remains a virtue -- that is, there is a public good in avoiding meddling in another branch's inner workings.

The ruling came in Public Citizen v. U.S. District Court, released on Tuesday by the D.C. Circuit Court in Washington (docket 06-5232). It has to do with the avoidance of judicial meddline with legislative prerogative, and thus is not directly on point in the current debate about Congress' power to tell the Justices how to run their public sessions. But there is a constitutional principle here, and that may well have some relevance.


The Circuit court opinion in Public Citizen can be found here.

Subrosa would like thank KUNGFOO for the column-name suggestion.

  • news
  • SATURDAY APRIL 14 2007 11:00 PM

Don Ho's Final Aloha



It's a rough week in entertainment for the cult wonders. Today, Hawaii state (and, dare I say, national) treasure Don Ho made his way to the great Coconut Grove in the sky, leaving Wayne Newton and Tom Jones to fend for themselves as the last of a dying breed.

I don't quite know what to say at times like this, so I'll go with personal anecdote. See, back in the 1970s, my parents lived for a time in Hawaii. One time a bunch of my mom's relatives flew out to visit, and on a lark she got her two grandmothers a pair of tickets to see Don Ho. It was far and away the highlight of their trip, and they talked about it with wistful fondness for decades. Both of them passed away within the last year and a half, and now this. I've never exactly been into his music itself (nor do I expect many of you to be), but the man lived a great life and made a lot of elderly ladies very happy. So if it's all right with you, I'm going to go ahead and suppose that there's some spectacular astral luau going on right about now, and my great-grandmas are all up in the Mai Tais and wine like there's no tomorrow, tiny bubbles everywhere.

  • news
  • THURSDAY APRIL 12 2007 5:00 PM

A Little Too Comfortably Numb



Two British parents who used their prescribed methadone to keep their infant from crying were told yesterday that only one of them will face prosecution.

Mitchell Bate, aged 22 months, was found dead at home in Rodney Street, Hartlepool, in September 2005.

Gemma Fennelly, 24, of Edinburgh Grove, had originally been accused of giving her son the drug to keep him quiet.
[...]
Fennelly admitted "allowing and/or failing to prevent" her son from swallowing a lethal dose of methadone.


Given her plea the court decided no action would be taken against the father, despite blood samples proving Mitchell's sedation was not a unique event and had been happening "regularly over a protracted period."

The case rather raises the question as to why two recovering heroin addicts, both on a prescribed heroin substitute, were allowed to remain caring for a young child.

Gemma Fennelly will be sentenced on May 3rd.

  • news
  • WEDNESDAY APRIL 11 2007 11:06 PM

Kurt Vonnegut is in Heaven Now

On 11 April 2007, a walking piece of meat with a mop of curly hair and a propensity for Pall Malls (the "classy way to commit suicide") stopped puttering around this little blue and green rock.

So it goes.

  • commentary
  • SUNDAY DECEMBER 31 2006 2:00 PM

Milestone American Death in Iraq

Today marks the 3000th American military casualty in Iraq.

U.S. Deaths Confirmed By The DoD: 2989
Reported U.S. Deaths Pending DoD Confirmation: 11
Total 3000


Happy fucking New Year.

  • feature
  • FRIDAY DECEMBER 8 2006 12:00 PM

Chris Gore’s Footage Fetishes: The Fountain Explained

Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain is a film that has been long in the making. Bringing this existential epic from script to screen took more than six years and was a personal obsession for the director who launched his career with Pi at the Sundance Film Festival in 1998. Brad Pitt was so moved by the screenplay, he broke down and cried after getting to page 40 when he called Aronofsky to say that he was definitely “in.”

After scheduling conflicts and delays, Pitt was out and the movie in limbo. With the fate of the film unknown, Warner Bros. enticed the director with other projects to helm including Batman, but Aronofsky remained steadfast in his intention to make The Fountain. Once imagined as a nearly $100 million dollar epic spanning thousands of years, Aronofsky downsized the project to a modest $35 million dollar studio film to get it to the screen—Hugh Jackman came aboard to star alongside Aronofsky’s love in real-life Rachel Weisz and the film was a “go.” The kind of struggle to get a film as unclassifiable as this one to the screen always says something about the creative minds who will not give up on bringing their ideas into reality. And the reactions, as one might expect, have been mixed. (Read on, but be warned—SPOILER: You will die.)


...what is most interesting is not the “story” but the subtext...

Perhaps you’ve read reviews that have attempted to explain the movie’s plot describing it as “...three parallel stories about love, death, spirituality, and the fragility of existence as told through the odyssey taken on by one man in his thousand-year struggle to save the woman he loves.” Sure, it’s about that and much more. But taking a step back from the surface level story synopsis put forth by the studio marketing department, what is most interesting is not the “story” but the subtext and, more importantly, the reactions to the journey by viewers. Some say the film is difficult to understand as Aronofsky tells his non-linear story, sometimes bouncing between the three time periods within the same scene, but for me, it worked. It’s also the kind of movie that requires a second viewing to get the most out of it. The last movie that I felt required this attention was Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind—a movie whose story unfolds backwards.


Aronofsky tells his non-linear story, sometimes bouncing between the three time periods within the same scene...

For myself, I was moved. Put simply, the film is about the acceptance of death and reaching a place where one can think of death as an act of creation, not destruction. Tomas/Tommy/Bald-Future-Yoga-Man (Hugh Jackman) will not accept death and works tirelessly in all three parallel stories to conquer it. Isabel/Izzi/Tree-Woman (Rachel Weisz) has come to terms with death as she accepts her own. We experience the film through the eyes of Tom as he finally learns to accept his own death, becoming one with the universe. It’s somber, odd, engaging, beautiful, and it’s the one film I’ve seen this year that moved me to tears. Call me a sap, but it wasn’t just the experience, but that so rarely does a film as unique as this one come along. But how could anyone be surprised coming from the director behind Pi and Requiem for a Dream?

And my interpretation of the film is the right one…for me. While we all have different reactions to movies based on our experiences, The Fountain is one of those rare movies that acts as a cinematic Rorschach test saying volumes about the individual based on their response. And the experience and each individuals’ reactions to it, no matter how vastly different, are all completely valid.


It's not about medical experiments, conquistadors, life-giving trees or monkeys.

When I discuss movies with friends and colleagues, there’s a consensus measurable on a scale of brilliant to crap, and there is generally agreement about where most films fall on this scale. But The Fountain transcends this as the reactions are so across the board, more than any other film in recent memory. Some say they “love it” while others say they “hate it.” I’m most interested in the opinions of those who disliked it. A good friend well-versed in film was captivated by the imagery but was confused by the subplot involving the use of experimental compounds on monkeys. That plot thread completely threw him off the underlying themes. He was as confounded as the character of Tommy in the film—so driven in his work-life that he fails to notice the importance of life’s moments in the present. And that reaction is completely valid. Having seen The Fountain more than four times now (yes, I get that way when I see a film I truly love) I imagine that my own feelings about it will alter as I see it differently based on where I’m at in my own spiritual growth.


Put simply, the film is about the acceptance of death...

So, I hope that others will be open to experiencing The Fountain multiple times as they struggle to unravel the message(s) they discover for themselves. The benefit is that, along the way, you may find yourself gaining more than just an understanding of a movie, but of yourself.

Gore gone.

Chris_Gore is an author, a filmmaker, the creator of Film Threat, and plans to see The Fountain again.

  • commentary
  • THURSDAY NOVEMBER 23 2006 11:00 PM

Former KGB Spy Blames Death on Russia

Enacting what appeared to be a poorly written scene from a late night Showtime made-for-TV spy movie, former KGB spy Alexander Litvenko blamed mother Russia for his radiation poisoning that subsequently led to his death.

"The bastards got me. But they won't get everybody," Litvinenko told friend and filmmaker Andrei Nekrasov before losing consciousness earlier this week. The comments were published in an early edition of Friday's Times newspaper.
[...]
Russia has dismissed the allegation as nonsense, saying it was silly to suggest the Kremlin wanted to kill Litvinenko, a critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The 43-year-old former spy, who had been fighting for his life in intensive care, died at 9.21 p.m., said Jim Down, a spokesman for University College Hospital.

But doctors said they still did not know exactly what caused Litvinenko's death. "The medical team at the hospital did everything possible to save his life," said Down.

British police said they were investigating what they called the "unexplained" death.

If Moscow were found to have had a hand in his poisoning there could be far-reaching diplomatic consequences. It would be the first such incident known to have taken place in the West since the Cold War.


While his words may have been poorly chosen, it should not diminish the seriousness of his allegations. Litvinenko has been an avid critic of post-Communist Russian policy, and specifically the apparatus left over from the remains of his former agency, the KGB. And who was former director of the KGB? None other than Vladimir Putin, the west's friendly neighbor and ally who has been responsible for brutal human rights violations in Chechnya, as well as crackdowns on dissidents and even what many believe to be the framing of political rival and oil magnate Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Would someone capable of all this be willing to poison and murder a former agent who spoke out against Putin and his activities? It doesn't seem like much of a stretch.

  • news
  • FRIDAY OCTOBER 6 2006 11:00 AM

Your Hello Kitty Doll Wants to Kill You



Japanese manufacturer Takara is recalling a line of Hello Kitty dolls. The dolls heat up to provide comfort and warmth for a child.

Unless you got one of the ones that break and spray steaming hot Mystery Chemical™ into your child's face and screaming mouth as they sleep. In what's being called "The Worst Month Ever For Shit Randomly Bursting Into Flame", Japanese consumers are being asked to return the deadly dolls as soon as possible.

(via engadget)

  • news
  • FRIDAY OCTOBER 6 2006 8:00 AM

Your Laptop Battery Wants To Kill You



In a nutshell, it sucks to be Sony right now.

It began a while back when laptop batteries began to spontaneously catch fire or even explode. In August, Dell issued the largest laptop battery recall ever; over 4.1 million. The fun doesn't end there. Sony, the manufacturer of the defective lithium-ion batteries also supplies most of the large PC makers with their batteries as well...

A couple weeks after Dell's announcement, Apple followed with a giant battery recall of all 1.8 million G4 Powerbook and iBook batteries sold since 2003; the biggest recall in their history. Now Sony's computer division has joined the “You might get 3rd degree burns while innocently updating your Flickr page” party by recalling their laptop batteries.

At last count, Fujitsu, IBM, Toshiba and Hitachi all joined the battery recall list.

"Sony's brand is severely damaged," said Roger Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies Associates, a market-research firm. "I think it's going to be a question whether they can be in the battery business at all."


This story seems far from over. It might be a good time to check and see if your laptop model is one of those potentially affected. Big companies don’t necessarily want you dead, but they also won’t go too far out of their way to tell you if your product is dangerous, so be smart and check your gear out for yourself (click the manufacturer links in this article to go to their respective battery recall info pages).

Unless maybe you would rather surf the SuicideGirls News Wire from the burn ward of your local hospital.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next