Classic Set of The Day: Bully 1966
Classic Set of the Day:
Bully - 1966
I chose this set because it is simply beautiful and I am in love with her lingerie in this set. So dreamily perfect. Bully is one of the sweetest girls I have ever met. An animal lover, with a super cute sense of humor you can watch a video of her telling jokes here:
Enjoy!
xoxo
-missy
SuicideGirls Free Pin-Up Set
These images, featuring Bully, give you a FREE glimpse into the SuicideGirls take on the modern pin-up.
As a special promotion, to show non-members what lies behind SuicideGirls' members-only velvet rope, we're opening this set up for public view for a limited time. If you're 18 & over click HERE to see the complete adult-only photo set .
If you'd like the inside scoop on SG offers and exclusives (such as this one off free photo set), send your name, age, city, state/country and email address to: newsletter@suicidegirls.com
Gay Kissing Scenes in Rockstar's "Bully" Game
Bully, the controversial new PS2 title from Rockstar games, makers of the Grand Theft Auto series, has earned a rocky road leading up to its release. Everyone from CNN's Lou Dobbs, to game hating laywer Jack Thompson, to the British House of Commons have all weighed in on Bully's potentially civilization-eroding threat.
The actual game play involves schoolyard fights, wedgies, and dunking weaker students' heads in the toilet. Now surprisingly, it also features hott boy-on-boy kissing.
For no apparent reason, Bully's main character Jimmy Hopkins can be led into steamy homosexual kissing scenes when he approaches certain characters. Maybe the designers were taking out a little "controversy insurance" just in case the game's violence didn't make enough of a stir.
Or maybe Jimmy just had a special awakening at Bullworth Academy.
"Bully" to be Bullied Out of Consumers' Hands by Morality Police?
"Jackass" Jack Thompson, the crusading lawyer who has made it his life's work to ban video games he does not deem acceptable, and has specifically targeted Rockstar Games, makers of, among other titles, the wildly popular Grand Theft Auto series, is at it again. This time he's targeting "Bully", Rockstar's newest release pitting prep school kids against campus bullies, claiming the game is a public nuisance.
Lawyer Jack Thompson is attempting to stop the game going on sale, arguing it would cause a public nuisance.
The judge in the case has agreed to take a look at the title and play it before reaching a decision.
A spokesman for developers Rockstar said the game had a teen-only rating in the US and a 15 rating in the UK.
Mr Thompson filed his legal action last month, claiming that the game would violate Florida's public-nuisance laws.
They are typically used to prosecute environmental pollution.
The statue Thompson is citing is typically used for environmental suits to prevent individuals or corporations from engaging in activities that will negatively affect a particular area. Lectlaw defines public nuisance as:
Public nuisances arise in consequence of following particular trades by which the air is rendered offensive and noxious. From acts of public indecency; as bathing in a public river in sight of the neighboring houses or for acts tending to a breach of the public peace, as for drawing a number of persons into a field for the purpose of pigeon-shooting, to the disturbance of the neighborhood or keeping a disorderly house or a gaming house or a bawdy house or a dangerous animal, known to be such and suffering him to go at large, as a large bull-dog accustomed to bite people or exposing a person having a contagious disease, as the smallpox, in public and the like.
A private nuisance is anything done to the hurt or annoyance of the lands, tenements, or hereditaments of another.
These are such as are injurious to corporeal inheritance's; as, for example, if a man should build his house so as to throw the rain water which fell on it, on my land or erect his. building, without right, so as to obstruct my ancient lights; keep hogs or other animals so as to incommode his neighor and render the air unwholesome.
Private nuisances may also be injurious to incorporeal hereditaments. If, for example, I have a way annexed to my estate, across another man's land, and he obstruct me in the use of it, by plowing it up or laying logs across it and the like.
It's difficult to determine the basis for any injuction using that or some modified definition of that set of criteria. It's even harder to imagine how Thompson will try and prove that a particular video game will have this measurable effect on the public welfare while other perfectly legal activities, like shooting firearms, watching violent films and participating on a boxing team, do not.
The truth is that Thompson has had a hard-on for Rockstar games ever since Grand Theft Auto 3 was first released. Despite a lack of convincing evidence correlating the extended play of violent video games with anything but sore thumbs and a fat ass, he's decided that the only form of violence (and anyone who's ever forced themselves to sit down and read the damned thing knows the full of extent of the violence in it) acceptable to people is the bible. Just the Judeo-Christian bible, that is.
"The Bible doesn't promote killing innocent people, Grand Theft Auto does. Islam does. Islam promotes the killing of innocent people. The Quran requires the infidel, whether Jew or Christian, to be killed. ... That's a core essence of the religion. ... Muhammad was a pirate who killed infidels and who advocated the killing of infidels. Not a nice guy. Osama bin Laden is in keeping with his fine tradition."
So the bible, which features such choice moments as a vengeful God repeatedly smiting all of the enemies of the Israelites, turning a woman into a pillar of salt, and fucking with his most devoted worshipper (Job) on a dare from the devil, doesn't advocate any violence at all, but using a computer generated baseball bat to strike back at a make-believe, computer generated bully does?
The only problem I see in this entire equation is that anyone in the judicial system or the government bothers to give this lunatic more than a second glance.
Sir Ian McKellen Tops the "Pink List"
Sir Ian McKellen topped the Pink List, a ranking of the U.K.s most influential gay men and women who lead their respective fields, including the arts, media, politics and business. Critics lauded not only McKellens work in The Lord of the Rings, but also for his work campaigning for gay rights. He knocked last years number one from the top spotElton John.
Despite the strides McKellen and other gay advocates made in recent years, McKellen claimed he worries for children who, struggling with their sexuality, face abuse at the hands of uncaring bullies. He said the word gay picked up a disturbing stigma, and he would like to see it change.
He says, "One of my main concerns is for school children who think they are gay and get bullied in the playground. Gay now has a new definition. Young people use it to mean 'rubbish' - how awful is it for a young adolescent boy or girl to think that they are rubbish? Schools and school teachers need to be trained how to help these children. I was one of the speakers in Trafalgar Square at the weekend and I suggested we abandon that word and use another word beginning with G. Gorgeous. I said, 'Look at me. I am gorgeous!'"
Others on the The Gay and Gorgeous Pink List:
1. Sir Ian McKellen - Actor
2. Sir Elton John - Musician
3. Gary Frisch and Henry Badenhorst - Founders and owners of gaydar.co.uk
4. Sir Cameron Mackintosh - Impresario
5. Peter Mandelson - EU Trade Commissioner
6. Sir Michael Bishop - Chairman, BMI
7. John Galliano - Fashion Designer & Couturier
8. Alan Bennett - Playwright & Author
9. Matt Lucas - Comedian
10. Alexander McQueen - Fashion Designer
Why isnt Tom Cruise listed? Oh yeah, hes American.
