• news
  • WEDNESDAY MAY 25 2005 7:06 PM

ACLU - "Newsweek Got It Right."

According to documents recently declassified by the FBI, prisoners at the Bush Administration's favorite torture facility, told interrogators as early as April 2002 about abuse by guards and desecration of the Koran.

The records, obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union under the Freedom of Information Act, purport to detail guards flushing the Koran in the toilet. Others reported the Koran being kicked, withheld as punishment, and thrown on the floor, and said they were mocked during prayers. And

in the documents released today, one detainee informs his FBI interviewers that using the Koran "as a reprisal or as an incentive for cooperation has failed," and that the only result would be "the damage caused to the reputation of the United States once what had occurred was released to the world." While another detainee acknowledged that there might be "a legitimate need to search the book for hidden items," he objected to the abusive manner in which the searches were conducted.


The ACLU issued a press release today, stating that

The United States governmentÂ’s own documents show that it has known of numerous allegations of Koran desecration for a significant period of time... [and] its failure to address these allegations in a timely manner raises grave questions regarding the extent to which such desecration was authorized by high-ranking U.S. officials in the first place.


Certainly it is reasonable to assume that the usual suspects who rail against the liberal media at every available opportunity in order to distract from the Bush Administration's litany of failures, will publicly apologize for their hackish and partisan "assessment" of Newseek's story of abuse at Guantánamo Bay. Scott McClellan will most likely follow suit for the White House's bullying of Newsweek and other publications.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next

Comments
hypoxian

hypoxian

I'm lost
August 2004

MAY 25, 2005 10:22 PM

dead_ringer said:

moonchilded said:

dead_ringer said:

moonchilded said:
Thistle said:
moonchilded said:
Despite the findings to be credible, Newsweek should have thought about the arab world reaction before releasing a story like that.



They retracted it because the White House accused them of making it up, and in the process causing people to die - even though Newsweek's story was true.



My point is that if you are going to print a story stick to it. If the white house can prove its fake than you should be shut down. Now it sounds the story is true and making Newsweek looking dumb in the process.



Ah, the third point which doesn't make any sense. First you assert that they shouldn't have printed it; then they should have stuck to their guns after printing it; now they look dumb for being right?

You are missing the part where the White House said Newsweek made it up, and accused the magazine of inciting violence merely to score political points (an asinine assertion which was echoed by the usual nit-wits and talking heads). It then bullied Newsweek into retracting its story, and it capitulated because its government source bailed on them.




So I ask you what good will come from this story?
What purpose does it have?
Who will benefit from this new information?

hypoxian

hypoxian

I'm lost
August 2004

MAY 25, 2005 10:35 PM

monastrell said:

but just because that reality pains me deeply - does not mean i am going to play ostrich and be like a 5 year old who plugs their ears and shouts " i don't hear you!!!! " ... which is what the "usual suspects" in our little SG sandbox did ---- almost as if on cue.
.



Please explain this a little more. What you said was very interesting and I believe in full freedom of the press but I guess I just wanted people think how the world really is rather than what it should be. And does our freedom put other people or ourselves in danger? I don't know the answer to that.

Dead_Ringer

Dead_Ringer

I'm lost
September 2004

MAY 25, 2005 10:44 PM

moonchilded said:

dead_ringer said:

moonchilded said:

dead_ringer said:

moonchilded said:
Thistle said:
moonchilded said:
Despite the findings to be credible, Newsweek should have thought about the arab world reaction before releasing a story like that.



They retracted it because the White House accused them of making it up, and in the process causing people to die - even though Newsweek's story was true.



My point is that if you are going to print a story stick to it. If the white house can prove its fake than you should be shut down. Now it sounds the story is true and making Newsweek looking dumb in the process.



Ah, the third point which doesn't make any sense. First you assert that they shouldn't have printed it; then they should have stuck to their guns after printing it; now they look dumb for being right?

You are missing the part where the White House said Newsweek made it up, and accused the magazine of inciting violence merely to score political points (an asinine assertion which was echoed by the usual nit-wits and talking heads). It then bullied Newsweek into retracting its story, and it capitulated because its government source bailed on them.


So I ask you what good will come from this story?
What purpose does it have?
Who will benefit from this new information?



Anyone who feels compelled to make a responsible decision about their elected representatives benefits from having truthful information presented to them. The more information the public has about what its government is doing in its name, the more likely it is to make that informed decision. That is inherently good. The purpose is ensuring transparency and holding the government accountable to the will fo the people.

The facts are not always pretty, but ignoring them or wishing them to go away is irresponsible.

theseeman

theseeman

Asheville, NC
December 2002

MAY 25, 2005 10:55 PM

"Go back to bed America. Your Goverment has figured out how it all transpired. Go back to bed America. Your Goverment is in control again. Here, Heres American Gladiators. Watch this. Shut up. Go back to bed America. Here is American Gladiators. Here is 56 channels of it. Watch these pituary retards bang thier fucking skulls together and congradulate you on living in the land of freedom. Here you go America. You are free to do as we tell you. You are free to do as we tell you."
Bill Hicks

American Gladiators or the OC or the Apprentice or Survior or what have you. Slavery becomes irrelevant when a complex reward and motivation system is established. "You take this and spend it on that. I give you alot of this for doing what I tell you."

hypoxian

hypoxian

I'm lost
August 2004

MAY 25, 2005 10:59 PM

And yet Bush was relected. Somehow these black eyes have not been enough for a vote in new leadership.

BraveArt

BraveArt

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

MAY 25, 2005 11:09 PM

moonchilded said:
And yet Bush was relected. Somehow these black eyes have not been enough for a vote in new leadership.



Unfortunately that has more to do with an ignorant, brainwahsed, placated, disconnected, and apathetic general public than with Bush's talent(or lack therof) as a leader.

Romance

Romance

Brooklyn, NY
May 2004

MAY 25, 2005 11:11 PM

who gives a fuck. no one gives a shit if someone were to flush or burn a bible. if they did, you haven't heard of any riots going on and the ACLU is definitely not going to get involved. i hate this whole you gotta be on your tip-toe around muslims. most of these extremists would look for any excuse to throw a tantrum and bust some skulls. newsweek is fucking trash, i use it to wipe my ass on the toilet. shame on any moron who takes their word literally.

and at the same time shame on the fucking interrogators for using such bullshit tactics to try to sway their prisoners. high school jock mentality fer sure dooodz!

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

MAY 25, 2005 11:11 PM

I tend to agree with what monastrell has said in this thread. I would just like to say that I assume that the reason that Newsweek retracted what they printed was not so much because of pressure from the White House or anything so much as that all they had was a source who backed out when the shit hit the fan. Probably they should have dug a little deeper before printing anything, but I don't really hold it against them that they backtracked. I do hold the White House accountable for lying, since these are government documents. Evidently they did not even so much as check the story out before denying everything and calling for people's heads on platters.

unangelicupstart

unangelicupstart

Seattle, WA
June 2004

MAY 25, 2005 11:20 PM

monastrell said:

moonchilded said:

monastrell said:

but just because that reality pains me deeply - does not mean i am going to play ostrich and be like a 5 year old who plugs their ears and shouts " i don't hear you!!!! " ... which is what the "usual suspects" in our little SG sandbox did ---- almost as if on cue.
.



Please explain this a little more. What you said was very interesting and I believe in full freedom of the press but I guess I just wanted people think how the world really is rather than what it should be. And does our freedom put other people or ourselves in danger? I don't know the answer to that.



there are a couple of guys that defend any and every action and statement by Bush and the Republicans that post frequently on here ...

the second that the violence broke out and Newsweek retracted its story ... they rejoiced and did a "touchdown dance" to rub the nose of all the leftists and anti-war people in shit. Now that it is validated by another source those same people are nowhere to be found ---- and it is the otherside doing a game of high-fives and "in your face" type taunts.

Its all pretty revolting either way ... because ... the absolute value of this ... the essence of what is "between the brackets" .... is that no one should feel vindicated in any form at all. Because, all of us are Americans --- and between Guantanamo Bay, the deaths of prisoners in our custody around the world, the Patriot Act, Abu Ghraib, and this Koran story ---- this is an unprecedented three year run of black-eye after black-eye and no one should feel elated in any form whatsoever.

about the only "positive" that i take from this is that an honest press isn't totally dismantled .... yet .

as far as freedom goes and should there be responsibility ---- yes. Newsweek can play its own censor - if they thought that running that story would undermine operations and put soldiers at risk - that is their decision to weigh and no one else's.

I, however, fear the day that our press unanimously denies information to the public in a country that espouses freedom.



I, for one, am not elated. I just think it's funny that when the truth is revealed the ditto heads are no where to be found. Flushing a symbol of anyones religion in a toilet (if is makes it to the drain or not) is just wrong. However, the denial that such an action might possibly take place was ridiculous. Living in a blue state, I don't get to much fundamentalist dogma thrown at me on a daily basis. That being said, there are places where this is not the case and fundamentalists are among the worst examples:

From the Charlotte Observer -

Posted on Wed, May. 25, 2005

Pastor unrepentant over sign

'The Koran needs to be flushed!' says message at Forest City church

KEN GARFIELD

Religion Editor


An N.C. Baptist official Tuesday said he worries that a sign outside a small church in Forest City could incite "negative actions" toward Christians around the world.

"The Koran needs to be flushed!" states the sign outside Danieltown Baptist Church in the small town some 60 miles west of Charlotte.

The Rev. Creighton Lovelace put up the message on the changeable sign last Friday and will likely put up a new saying this Friday. In between, the 23-year-old Forest City native is answering critics and explaining to national media outlets why he chose to demean the Quran, the holy book for the world's second largest religion: Because, he said, they don't worship Christ as the son of God.

"I don't hate Muslims," Lovelace told the Observer. "I don't hate Islamic people. I just hate the false doctrine."

Norman Jameson, a spokesman for the Baptist State Convention of North Carolina in Cary, said the hallmark of Southern Baptist life is that Lovelace's church enjoys the autonomy to put up whatever sign it chooses. While stressing that the anti-Muslim sentiment does not reflect any position of the N.C. Baptist Convention, Jameson said he's spoken with Southern Baptist missions administrators about the sign's possible effect on Baptists overseas.

Jameson said there has been no talk of relocating missionaries or other Southern Baptists from potential trouble spots. But that doesn't keep him from worrying about the global impact of one N.C. church sign.

"It's a small world," Jameson said. "Nothing that happens in an isolated area goes unnoticed."

Lovelace said he was stirred to put up the sign by the worldwide furor inspired by the Newsweek magazine report that U.S. military guards at the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba flushed a copy of the Quran down a toilet to rile Afghan prisoners. At least 17 people died in rioting that erupted in several countries over the Newsweek report -- a report the magazine later retracted and apologized for.

Just because the sign provokes anger, Lovelace said, is no reason not to say what you believe.

"If one church can't put up a sign and the whole nation be mad at them," he said, "something's wrong."

Lovelace, who went straight from Chase High in Rutherford County to Slidell Baptist Seminary in Slidell, La., said his church averages 25 to 35 for Sunday worship. He's led the church for 13 months and didn't need lay leaders' OK for the sign. The church has no deacons, he said.

Religious and secular leaders were quick to condemn the sign.

"That kind of sentiment is not well-received in this community," Bill Hall of the Rutherford County Chamber of Commerce told the Observer.

Told that Lovelace said he's fielded calls from such national media outlets as MSNBC and "Good Morning America," Hall said, "Oh, my God."

UNC Chapel Hill political science professor Donald Searing told the Daily Courier newspaper in Forest City that putting such a sign in a public place is "an un-American example of intolerance, of aggressive disrespect for deeply held views."

Lovelace said he'll stick to the schedule of changing signs on Friday or perhaps Saturday.

He said the new one may ask, "Where are your treasures, in the flea market or in heaven?"




[Edited on May 25, 2005 11:21PM]

Arrus

Arrus

Olathe, KS
March 2005

MAY 25, 2005 11:31 PM

we should have heard from Stockula by now.... smile

unangelicupstart

unangelicupstart

Seattle, WA
June 2004

MAY 25, 2005 11:34 PM

This was Patrick_Laswell's lovechild, not Stockula's. Stockula's last see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil bit was regarding the Ken Starr comments on CBS news regarding the "nuclear option". He predicted an unholy shit storm in two weeks. Of course, his two weeks have now passed and Stockula remains unheard from.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

MAY 26, 2005 12:14 AM

GOLLIE said:
who gives a fuck. no one gives a shit if someone were to flush or burn a bible. if they did, you haven't heard of any riots going on and the ACLU is definitely not going to get involved. i hate this whole you gotta be on your tip-toe around muslims. most of these extremists would look for any excuse to throw a tantrum and bust some skulls. newsweek is fucking trash, i use it to wipe my ass on the toilet. shame on any moron who takes their word literally.

and at the same time shame on the fucking interrogators for using such bullshit tactics to try to sway their prisoners. high school jock mentality fer sure dooodz!


That's like three incoherent rants in one.

"But wait, there's more...."

loudog1

loudog1

Newport Beach, CA
December 2003

MAY 26, 2005 12:48 AM

"It is also possible that Newsweek reporters relied too much on an uncertain source, or that the magazine confused the story with (confirmed) reports that prisoners themselves used Korans to block toilets as a form of protest."

Here's the link: Washington Post

You people are soooo gulibile.

SomethingStupid

SomethingStupid

North Hollywood, CA
March 2004

MAY 26, 2005 12:57 AM

loudog1 said:
You people are soooo gulibile.


Why are we gullibile? The report by the ACLU has nothing to do with that, and this article is a week old.

[Edited on May 26, 2005 by TedKoppel]

Romance

Romance

Brooklyn, NY
May 2004

MAY 26, 2005 01:01 AM

TheFuckOffKid said:

GOLLIE said:
who gives a fuck. no one gives a shit if someone were to flush or burn a bible. if they did, you haven't heard of any riots going on and the ACLU is definitely not going to get involved. i hate this whole you gotta be on your tip-toe around muslims. most of these extremists would look for any excuse to throw a tantrum and bust some skulls. newsweek is fucking trash, i use it to wipe my ass on the toilet. shame on any moron who takes their word literally.

and at the same time shame on the fucking interrogators for using such bullshit tactics to try to sway their prisoners. high school jock mentality fer sure dooodz!


That's like three incoherent rants in one.

"But wait, there's more...."



wow. you can read. three incoherent rants. indeed.

"it's just that easy!"

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next