• news
  • FRIDAY MARCH 18 2005 8:08 AM

Two Acquitted in Air India Bombing

In 1985, two Air India planes were bombed, killing 331 people. Today, after a two-year, $130 million trial, two men accused of the bombing were found not guilty.

Justice Ian Bruce Josephson of the British Columbia Supreme Court said he simply did not believe the testimony of witnesses who linked the men to the two bombs. Calling them inconsistent, he said the accounts surfaced too late to be credible.

[…]

The star witness in the criminal trial of Malik and Bagri was a woman who was in love with Malik and testified that he told her: "We had Air India crash." Fearing for her life, she is now in a witness protection program.

On Wednesday, the judge labelled the woman's testimony unbelievable, given that she said she still loved and respected him while testifying against him.

"That surprise edges toward incredulity," Josephson said, pointing out how strong and intelligent the unnamed woman appeared to be in court.

"She has not been truthful with court and I am unable to rely on her evidence."


Public safety minister Ann McLellan is considering calls for a public inquiry into the case. In his verdict, Justice Josephson criticized the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) for destroying wiretap evidence prompting some to believe the case had been bungled by CSIS and the RCMP. Meanwhile, the British Columbia Attorney General is considering grounds for appeal.

The bombing is believed to be in retaliation for India’s 1984 raid on the Golden Shrine of Amritsar, the holiest shrine in Sikhism. The bombing was the world’s worst airline terror attack prior to 9-11. The man believed to be the mastermind of the attack was killed by Indian police in 1992.

The family of one of the acquitted men, Ripudaman Singh Malik, has issued a statement at notguitly.org.

 
Comments
2low

2low

Etobicoke, ON
February 2005

MAR 18, 2005 08:41 AM

i dont know why the famelies just dont kill them for something. if it goes to trial it will be dropped as justifiable man slaughter. after all, those were the men that killed there sons doughters etc etc

n2ocowboy

n2ocowboy

Canada
September 2003

MAR 18, 2005 09:02 AM

This just got posted today? Talk about yesterdays news.

It must be really hard to prove a case thats been pending for 20 years.
And it seems that CSIS dropped the ball, I wonder how the outcome would have changed if those tapes have not been erased. I think this is embarrassing for Canada, it just seems like everyone dropped the ball and now families are left holding the bag. And I think Macclelan (sp?) the deputy PM's speech after the verdict was as lame as that tacky blazer she was wearing.

n2ocowboy

n2ocowboy

Canada
September 2003

MAR 18, 2005 09:03 AM

2low said:
i dont know why the famelies just dont kill them for something. if it goes to trial it will be dropped as justifiable man slaughter. after all, those were the men that killed there sons doughters etc etc



Yeah, we can all learn an thing or two from the IRA wink