• news
  • TUESDAY FEBRUARY 22 2005 2:39 AM

Teacher Yanks Chair Out From Under Student For Refusing to Stand During National Anthem

In an ugly display of hyperjingoistic douchebaggery, Stuart Mantel, a high school teacher and wanna-be drill sergeant in Brick, New Jersey, was recently filmed flying into an unhinged rage when one of his students failed to stand for the national anthem. The episode ended with Mantel yanking a chair out from under the student.

Indymedia.org has a copy of the film here, and it's not pretty:

The class started out that morning with Mantel yelling, "I don't want to hear a sound! Not a sound! Morning exercises will come on, you will stand, you will stand quietly, you will pay attention! Any Questions? ...Now stand up and keep your mouths shut!" Students stood up as the national anthem began playing.

In the middle of the anthem, Mantel walked over to Jay and demanded that he stand up. Jay silently refused, and Mantel yelled again, "Stand up!". Jay then said "I don't have to stand up". To which Mantel insisted "You have to stand." Jay said "No I don't". Mantel then reached over and pulled Jay's chair out from under him. Jay responded to Stuart Mantel's outrageous behavior by asking Mantel, "Are you serious?", to which Mantel yelled, "I am damn well serious."

Incredibly, Mantel remains unpunished for his abusive (and unconstitutional) actions, while the student who filmed the incident was suspended 10 days for "violating the teacher's constitutional rights."

According to the student who filmed the incident, this was not the first time that something like this had happened in Mantel's classroom, and the students decided to bring a camera into their classroom in case Mantel flew off the handle again, so they could have evidence of his behavior. When they presented their evidence to the school's principal, however, they were met with hostility:

"The teacher and school principals wanted him (Mantel) to press charges against us...they tried to blame it on us like it was premeditated, like we did it just to get him on tape, which is false. We knew he was gonna go nuts because he frequently used to," said Corey [the student who filmed the incident].

One of the hallmarks of fascism is hyperbolic patriotism, and another is compulsory patriotism. To see them both displayed in an incident like this is disturbing, but what's even more disturbing is the indifference of school administrators to behavior that is not only clearly inappropriate but also illegal. Worse yet is the possibility that episodes like this may be happening with less fanfare in classrooms all over the country.

Hat tip: PissedOffPollyana @ Daily Kos

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

 ... 13

Next

Comments
Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

FEB 23, 2005 03:19 PM

KaliDoom said:
If a man three times your size was raging toward you, what would your reaction be? If someone's arm was reaching out to grab the chair you were sitting on, what would your reaction be? Would you remain sitting in either instance? I highly doubt it. Human nature would be to stop yourself from falling; hence, stand up. Much like the nature to close your eyes if something is headed towards them. Humans have involuntary reactions to protect themselves from bodily injury.

The kids were being disrespectful dicks, no doubt about it. However, as an educator, I am sure the teacher has a school board written protocol to follow for unruly students. Every high school system has one, as they know that teenage hormones are out of control, and that they are going to have at least a couple of disrespectful, unruly teens roaming the halls. I seriously doubt that yelling, cursing, and force are a part of the accepted protocol. From what I understand, if a student is disrespectful, you send him to the office. If he refuses, you bring the administration to the classroom. A teacher should never be the one to escalate the situation. The teacher should be the person to de-escalate it. In this case, the student himself de-escalated the situation by leaving the classroom.

My two pennies.

[Edited on Feb 23, 2005 by KaliDoom]



Thanks, KaliDoom, I was going to respond to that, but I didn't have the energy.

I'm pretty sure that despite all of our best efforts, numbskulls are still going to come by and say something to the effect of "the kid deserved it" because they don't really care to educate themselves about the constitutional or tortious aspects of this.

le sigh.

slayn001

slayn001

United Kingdom
February 2005

FEB 23, 2005 03:43 PM

your best efforts at what ? that is an honest question and not sarcasm.

Jeff_Fries

Jeff_Fries

Humptulips, WA
September 2003

FEB 23, 2005 05:53 PM

reprobate said:

Jeff_Fries said:

Huck said:
christ, what does difference does it make? a) the guy has no right to make the student stand up, and b) he has no right to pull a chair out from under him, potentially causing harm - in which case it would effectively be assault. regardless of whether or not their planting a camera was "entrapment", this fucker belongs in barracks, not a classroom.


So fire him. This isn't a political issue; this is a anger management issue.



It becomes a political issue when a person in authority and acting as an agent of the state uses physical violence to to violate people's constitutional rights. Thats what happened, and the fact is that despite irrefutable evidence of same he was not fired and the student was instead punished.

Thats the issue, not whether the students were little shits who pushed his buttons, a fact of which there is no evidence.


Right. I meant the teacher is not a fascist overlord, he's a guy with issues.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

FEB 23, 2005 06:11 PM

slayn001 said:
your best efforts at what ? that is an honest question and not sarcasm.



Read the entire thread, and it should be clear.

Clidna

Clidna

Canada
January 2005

FEB 23, 2005 07:00 PM

There have been some very interesting points made in this thread (and yes, I read it from the beginning). Just a quick question - am I the only one that sees nothing wrong with showing respect to the National Anthem? I'm not saying you have to sing it, or believe in it, but my parents brought me up to show respect for those who fought for our country in WW1 and WW2, and therefore, if the National Anthem came on (even at home before the hockey game), I was to zip it. I cannot understand why someone living in either of our countries wouldn't want to show respect for the blessings they have been given! We have more freedom than almost anywhere else in the world. The fact that the Constitution says they have the right to NOT stand for the National Anthem is a reason to show your country respect - obviously it is trying to show respect for you! Be grateful you don't live in a country where you can be shot for saying anything against your leader.

(I would like to note that this post is not meant for the people who are arguing the legal ramifications of this, it's more for the people who are thinking outside of a law book. I would also like to note that I am not justifying the teacher's actions in any way, as a matter of fact I'm not even commenting on this particular incident. This is a general query.)

Attack_Macaque

Attack_Macaque

Mesquite, TX
September 2004

FEB 23, 2005 08:01 PM

Okay, this thread is huge and so much has been said by now that it seems almost pointless to post this, but as the person who submitted this article I feel compelled to make a few points. First of all, many of you have said that the students were being dicks and may have instigated the incident, or somehow orchestrated a set-up to entrap the teacher. I'm not sure how to respond to that except to point out that, per at least one of the students, this had been going on for some time, and their intent was to have some physical evidence on their side when they made a complaint against the teacher. A number of you have also responded that it doesn't matter if the students were dicks or not, and I would have to agree - they're kids, and kids will behave like that. A teacher has to be a professional in his dealings with them, and this guy was anything but.

Regarding the issue of "showing respect" for the national anthem, nobody is saying that there's anything wrong with it, if that's what someone chooses to do. I personally find the whole concept of showing respect for inanimate objects, abstractions, and the like to be a bit silly, but to each his/her own. As for those who fought to secure our freedoms and way of life, standing up for a song, saluting a flag, and stuff like that, in my opinion is an insufficient, if well-intentioned, way of showing respect for their sacrifice.

I know that many of you see standing for the anthem, saying the pledge, etc., to be a symbolic way of showing your respect for your country and its ideals. I would just respond with two points: 1) Symbolism is a poor substitute for substance. If you really want to honor your country, its values, and the bravery of those who have fought to protect it, the best way to do so is to exercise the freedoms we enjoy without shame, and to preserve and defend them in our own way - be it through military service, political activism, or whatever. Regarding our troops in particular, we should respect their bravery by demanding that our active military members be put into harm's way only when necessary, and that the welfare of those who have served is provided for if they are unable to provide for it themselves, especially if they are unable to do so becuase of combat-related difficulties.

2) Respect is only ever earned, and never obtained through force. A person may go through the motions of respect because they fear the consequences of not doing so, but they aren't showing true respect. If I don't stand for the national anthem or the flag, which I reserve the right not to do, it's because I feel that my country hasn't earned my respect, not because I have any less respect for its fallen servicemen. And on that note, America has more wealth and power than any other nation in the history of the world, and we've historically done a piss-poor job utilizing it. The current administration, however, has made even our poor track record look good in comparison. I don't think it too much of a stretch to see the flag and other such symbols as at least partially representative of the country's government and its policies, and viewed in that light I don't see anything wrong with withholding respect for those symbols as a form of protest.

Finally, regarding my use fo the word "fascism," I think it's appropriate in this case. Yes, I understand that this incident, taken individually, is an anger management issue, but there are incidents like this happening all over the country, and only a few of them are getting the attention that this case has gotten. I remember a while back hearing about a women's basketball player at some college (I forget which) who had to endure a slew of verbal abuse and threats, simply because she chose to turn her back on the flag when the national anthem was played before games. At one game, she even had some old crank up in her face yelling at her, and I believe no one did anything to intervene on her behalf, even though the guy was acting like he might assault her. In a context when people are being accused with increasing frequency of treason and betrayal because they disagree with the ruling political party and its policies, when even the slightest deviation from lockstep conformity with overblown pep-rally patriotism is equated with flag-burning and the like, I think the word "fascism" is appropriate. If that hurts the feelings of a few of our resident right-wingers, so be it.

KorbenDallas

KorbenDallas

Qatar
January 2005

FEB 23, 2005 08:12 PM

ehhh forget it

[Edited on Feb 23, 2005 by KorbenDallas]

squee_

squee_

Grand Marais, MN
September 2004

FEB 23, 2005 08:24 PM

Clidna said:
There have been some very interesting points made in this thread (and yes, I read it from the beginning). Just a quick question - am I the only one that sees nothing wrong with showing respect to the National Anthem? I'm not saying you have to sing it, or believe in it, but my parents brought me up to show respect for those who fought for our country in WW1 and WW2, and therefore, if the National Anthem came on (even at home before the hockey game), I was to zip it. I cannot understand why someone living in either of our countries wouldn't want to show respect for the blessings they have been given! We have more freedom than almost anywhere else in the world. The fact that the Constitution says they have the right to NOT stand for the National Anthem is a reason to show your country respect - obviously it is trying to show respect for you! Be grateful you don't live in a country where you can be shot for saying anything against your leader.

(I would like to note that this post is not meant for the people who are arguing the legal ramifications of this, it's more for the people who are thinking outside of a law book. I would also like to note that I am not justifying the teacher's actions in any way, as a matter of fact I'm not even commenting on this particular incident. This is a general query.)



Well you may be right. Maybe people should have respect for it. But you shouldn't force it. It seems you are saying that because you have the right not to stand, you should stand. Seems pretty Orwellian to me. What good is a right if people expect you to waive it? Yes, maybe I would stand. Yes, maybe i would even respect people who stood more. Or maybe not. It might depend on why they chose to stand or not stand. Or maybe I wouldn't care. I don't know. What I do know is, that the important thing is that in addition to respecting what the flag or the anthem stand for, we also respect the people who choose to exercise their right to act on what they stand for. Even if we disagree with their reasons for doing so.

[Edited on Feb 24, 2005 by squee]

squee_

squee_

Grand Marais, MN
September 2004

FEB 23, 2005 08:27 PM

bones_708 said:

squee said:


Given that the courts have previously ruled that grabbing a plate out of someone's hand is battery*, I don't think it would take much to argue that this is assault.

*Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel
424 S.W.2d 627 (Tex. 1967)



Given that the relationship betweent the two is much diffrent as well as the intent being diffrent, would you think it's a good case to put infrount of a jury? Little reality please.



You didn't actually add anything to the argument here, You would need to actually explain why you can differentiate the two. "little reality please" lacks something when it comes to being a compelling argument. My point was that the bar has always been fairly low as to what constitutes assault or battery. If you think you can show why this case would be different lets see the argument.


[Edited on Feb 23, 2005 by squee]

squee_

squee_

Grand Marais, MN
September 2004

FEB 23, 2005 08:29 PM

yeah, so apparently I need to learn the difference between the edit tab and the reply tab. confused blush Move along nothing to see here.

[Edited on Feb 23, 2005 by squee]

zenosdog

zenosdog

Bloomfield, NJ
February 2003

FEB 23, 2005 08:34 PM

Holy Shit!!! I graduated from that fucking place!

Dead_Ringer

Dead_Ringer

I'm lost
September 2004

FEB 23, 2005 08:40 PM

drew031670 said:

I understand that, but in my school we had to stand to sing the anthem and say lords prayer every morning. I'm anti-religious and not very patriotic but as long as you do it the teachers shut up.



did you, by chance attend a religious school?

Attack_Macaque

Attack_Macaque

Mesquite, TX
September 2004

FEB 23, 2005 08:54 PM

I went to a Christian school (Southern Baptist), and our morning routine included pledging allegiance to the American flag, the Christian flag (yes, there is such a thing), and the Bible, after which we had to sing "My Country 'Tis of Thee" along with a few religious songs. We also had to memorize bible verses.

Yeah, all that indoctrination really took, didn't it? biggrin

Bondgirl

Bondgirl

Aberdeen, SD
February 2004

FEB 23, 2005 09:04 PM

I am taking shit loads of education classes and I actually sent the link to one of my teachers.

This is a prime example of poor teaching and the students taking advantage of the teacher. These kids look like little shits, and who wasn't in high school?
Teachers need to be able to act productively in a classroom like this.

Makes me sick...

Bondgirl

Bondgirl

Aberdeen, SD
February 2004

FEB 23, 2005 09:08 PM

CuriousKitty said:
Maybe I'm crazy, but I'd write my congressman or something. That is crazy... Education is on a downward spiral and that is very sad. I hope he doesn't teach government class. shocked


Don't worry! No Child Left Behind is changing all of that!!

mad mad mad mad mad whatever whatever mad mad mad mad mad

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

 ... 13

Next