• feature
  • THURSDAY JULY 9 2009 5:30 PM

China Riots: Are Uyghurs The New Tibetans?

I've been to Urumqi and spent some time with the Uyghurs, and have been tracking their fate for years, so here's some information on the China riots that might help you understand a bit more about what‘s going on there.

Suffice it to say, the Han Chinese are not exactly wild about the idea of multiculturalisum, and what we see happening with the Uyghurs is exactly the same thing their People's Republic has done to the Tibetans. Send large numbers of Han out to your city, appoint them to all of the important positions, so that all of a sudden you are powerless and a minority in your own homeland.

When you hear the Uyghurs referred to as “a minority group“ consider this: the fact is that they were never a minority in their Xhingang homeland (formally known as The Xinjiang-Uyghur Autonomous Region, but now called Eastern Turkistan by those who aspire for an independent Uyghur state). Not until the Chinese government started shipping Han out there, that is. In the ancient silk road city of Kashgar, the second largest Uyghur city after Urumqi, the Chinese Government is bulldozing the old part of the city as we speak, and moving all the Uyghurs out of an area where they have lived for hundreds of years. The Uyghurs have good reasons to be resentful.

The UN and Amnesty International have all documented human rights violations against the Uyghurs, so the Chinese position that they are simply doing the ungrateful Uyghurs a favor by bringing the fruits of modern culture to them is hardly tenable.

According to what I have read from sources in Urumqi, here's what got this all started: Someone in the eastern part of China published a fake story on the web accusing some Uyghur guys of raping a Han woman. A racist lynch mob formed and stormed a toy factory in the east of China where the government had shipped a bunch of Uyghurs to provide extra-cheap labor. Apparently two (some reports say more) Uyghurs were killed and many more were injured. Since it was just some funky Uyghurs who were killed, the authorities apparently dragged their feet in doing anything about it.

Hence the march in Urumqi.

You are probably hearing that somewhere around 150 people have been killed in Urumchi -- but we are somehow not quite hearing the race of those who were killed. All the official footage shows pictures of bloody Han, with the implication that it's Han who make up the 150 people who were killed, and that they were killed by Uyghur rioters.

If this is so....why don't they just come out and say that it was Han who were killed ?

Again, this is only what I have been able to gather from the small amount of info that is trickling out on the web from people on the ground, but apparently the first march (1000-3000 people) was relatively peaceful. Protesters marched through the streets until they arrived at the government offices. They were told to disperse, and when they didn't, police came out and randomly machine-gunned about 150 people. Again, this is just a web rumor, but if it's true, this is where the figure of 150 deaths comes from, and is the key event that we are not being told about. This slaughter (and the following round-up of the usual suspects) is apparently what sparked the violence and trashing of Han property and individuals that followed.

You will also hear the Chinese Government blaming all of this on a woman called Rebiya Kadeer. But the news people have yet to give us much information on her. In truth, she is essentially the Dali Lama of the Uyghur people, and was held in prison by the Chinese for 8 years. During this time (and for some reason the news people rarely mention this either) she was nominated for the Noble Peace Prize four times.

Condoleezza Rice made a visit to China while she was Secretary of State, and the Chinese released Kadeer the day before Condi arrived. Kadeer is currently living in Washington DC where she now heads the Uyghur-American Society. This group has been the primary advocacy group for Uyghurs around the world. You can check their website via this link.

Why are we not stepping in, and why has the US Govt said nothing about abuses against the Uyghurs in the past ? The Uyghurs are Moslems, and after 911, Osama Bin Laden reportedly sent some money to a Uyghur nationalist group in the area. As a result Bush basically told the Chinese that they could do anything they wanted to the Uyghur people and the US would not do or say a thing about it. You may have heard about the 17 Uyghurs in Gitmo, but for years the US Govt has known that they were just a bunch of poor shmuks who were in Afghanistan looking for work and were turned over to our troops by bounty hunters.

Is there a media bias in this story? This might be one way to tell. Uyghur people pronounce the name of their capital Urumqi in three syllables: Ur-ROOM-chee. Han, and Chinese government sources pronounce it in four syllables: Ur-rue-MOO-chee. Listening to how someone pronounces it may give you a hint as to what side of the situation they are approaching the story from.

Violence is a questionable way to resolve any issue, and there is sure to be more from both sides before things settle down. But it’s clear which side the authorities are on, and interesting to follow the various spins as news from this here-to-fore backwater ethnic becomes more prominent.

 
Comments
motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUL 09, 2009 08:27 PM

i've been following this as best i can. it's a pretty interesting story, especially with regards to the Chinese actions. one of the first things China did was to block access to Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking sites. this does suggest to me that it's largely Han-on-Urumqi violence.

Pip

Pip

Framingham, MA
OLD SKOOL

JUL 09, 2009 09:44 PM

So the Chinese followed the Soviet model of importing their majority race into their far flung provinces to drum up support. On the one hand it worked, on the other it lest a hell of a mess after the soviet union broke up.

Is this situation simillar to the Kurds? Where none of China's neighbors want anything to come of this because then they have to deal with their Uyghurs?

gfvella

gfvella

Australia
November 2004

JUL 09, 2009 11:06 PM

One thing i was struck by when I was studying China at university was a professor who said that to truly understand China you had to stop thinking of it as nation like France (ethnically homogeneous) or the the USA (multicultural). Instead he said that China should be considered a term for a contiguous area of related ethno-cultural groups that have long term historical ties, i.e. Europe. It was, he maintained, the reason China always comes apart as a centralised state whenever the central power of the state falters.

An extension of this is that the CCP has established the most centralised state in Chinese history and it is exacerbating China's natural ethnic fractures. Any sensible central government would give autonomy or similar, but the CCP is too paranoid of rivals and jealous of its position to ever accept any other participants in civil society, let alone political power.

This said i suspect the Uighurs did their fair share of the popular killings, just like the Tibetans did last year. This sort of ethnic violence is inevitable given Han Chinese racism, CCP oppression, and the natural conflicts created by any colonial situation. That it is inevitable doesn't excuse it though - by either ethnic community - and watch the CCP play it for all its worth as propaganda bacjk in the han heartland.

gfvella

gfvella

Australia
November 2004

JUL 09, 2009 11:25 PM

Pip said:
So the Chinese followed the Soviet model of importing their majority race into their far flung provinces to drum up support. On the one hand it worked, on the other it lest a hell of a mess after the soviet union broke up.



I believe this is true for only some of Chinese internal migration (especially into Tibet) but in a lot of cases it is merely economic opportunity. The CCP has poured lots of money into Tibet and Xinjiang and then had local party officials all but exclude the locals from benefiting - including as workers - in the resulting development. This means lots of opportunities for poor Han Chinese to take advantage of. Mind you permission to move is only given by the CCP so the state knows full well what is happening and giving its blessing.

Pip said:
Is this situation simillar to the Kurds? Where none of China's neighbors want anything to come of this because then they have to deal with their Uyghurs?



Not really, as Xinjiang is home to 99+% of the Uighur population and the biggest single overseas minority is in Kazakhstan with about 250k, as opposed to the 10 million in Xinjiang.

Unlike the Kurds whose problem is that the European powers split their territory when they colonised South-west Asia, the Uighurs problem is that the Chinese have colonised their homeland.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 10, 2009 05:17 AM

motorfirebox said:
i've been following this as best i can. it's a pretty interesting story, especially with regards to the Chinese actions. one of the first things China did was to block access to Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking sites. this does suggest to me that it's largely Han-on-Urumqi violence.


My local paper has some reporters in Urumqi. Things they've reported witnessing include the security forces (who are supposedly there to stop the violence and restore order) allowing Han Chinese mobs to pass through roadblocks and into Uighur neighborhoods unhindered, and groups of Han Chinese beating Uighurs almost to death while the security forces stand around watching and do nothing to stop it.

Also, the "victim" of the alleged rape that started all this has denied the whole thing.

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

JUL 10, 2009 09:06 AM

mingol said:

motorfirebox said:
i've been following this as best i can. it's a pretty interesting story, especially with regards to the Chinese actions. one of the first things China did was to block access to Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking sites. this does suggest to me that it's largely Han-on-Urumqi violence.


My local paper has some reporters in Urumqi. Things they've reported witnessing include the security forces (who are supposedly there to stop the violence and restore order) allowing Han Chinese mobs to pass through roadblocks and into Uighur neighborhoods unhindered, and groups of Han Chinese beating Uighurs almost to death while the security forces stand around watching and do nothing to stop it.

Also, the "victim" of the alleged rape that started all this has denied the whole thing.


Wow.

gfvella

gfvella

Australia
November 2004

JUL 11, 2009 06:51 PM

Another good article on how the CCP has created its own problems with ethnic minorities from the Telegraph.

PaulNikon

PaulNikon

Palm Bay, FL
February 2003

JUL 13, 2009 03:28 PM

Kundalini

Kundalini

Kalamazoo, MI
June 2004

JUL 13, 2009 03:40 PM

Surprisingly (or perhaps not) this is getting little play on the American news. I'm all for making up some "Free Uyghur" shirts to get the word out.

AndThen

AndThen

Bend, OR
July 2007

JUL 14, 2009 06:32 PM



When it comes to the Han majority, I think it's a bit like things were in the South during segregation. Perhaps the white population did not consciously hate blacks, and many whites may have thought that life on the whole was good for black people and that they had little to complain about.

At the same time, I think they were always viewed as a potential source of "ethnic unrest", and "preserving public order" by whatever means possible was seen by most white people as a legitimate and reasonable task for the "security forces" of the day.

One thing seems sure : In Urumqi, the various policing forces do not seem to be spending much time in Han neighborhoods searching out those who took part in attacks against Uyghurs. And the security forces seem to be characterized by having no Uyghur members.

But I suspect that among those of the Han race, as it once was in the South, none of this seems at all peculiar ?

As far as tepid news coverage here in the states......well.....the Uhygurs are Muslims, and this is not exactly an era where you gain points for having much sympathy for those of that religion.