• news
  • TUESDAY JULY 7 2009 6:00 AM

Soon The Supreme Court Will Destroy America

There’s an ugly, dark cloud on the horizon. It’s called Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and it’s headed toward the Supreme Court in September. If all goes according to corporate whore and Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts, America will be forever the slave of corporations. Democracy will be toast.

The most troubling part of the court’s action is the brave new world of politics it could usher in. Auto companies that receive multibillion-dollar bailouts could spend vast sums to re-elect the same officials who hand them the money. If Exxon Mobil or Wal-Mart wants something from a member of Congress, it could threaten to spend as much as it takes to defeat him or her in the next election.



You thought our country was for sale now? You haven’t seen anything yet. This is the kind of shit Roberts and Alito were put on the bench for. The religious right were used by Bush to get right leaning judges on the bench – unfortunately, they are not the kind of right leaning judges they were hoping for. These guys are there to do whatever big business wants them to do. Chief Justice Roberts robe should look like a NASCAR driver's suit, covered in sponsors.

In every major case since he became the nation's seventeenth Chief Justice, Roberts has sided with the prosecution over the defendant, the state over the condemned, the executive branch over the legislative, and the corporate defendant over the individual plaintiff.



By the time Roberts retires, he will have done more to destroy the America we know than any other person alive. I wish that were hyperbole. It’s not. This week’s decision only proves my point.

Citizens United v. FEC started when the right wing group Citizens United made a 90 minute film about Hillary Clinton in 2008. They wanted to run it on TV stations in swing states. The FEC ruled it was not a documentary and slapped a “campaign ad” label on it. It then fell under McCain-Feingold spending restrictions and never aired. Citizens United sued.

The big surprise came last week, when Roberts saw an opportunity to turn America’s clock back to the good old days, when Carnegie, Vanderbilt and Rockefeller ran the country. Time for the return of the robber barons. The Roberts court didn’t rule on Citizens United v. FEC. Instead, both sides were asked to return in September for a “pre-session hearing on the validity of various electoral laws pertaining to the case.” Uh oh.

The Supreme Court wants to hear briefs on a case from 20 years ago: Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. What’s the big deal about Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce? Not much, except that it set restrictions on campaign contributions by corporations, unions and other organizations. It’s the last thing holding corporations back from completely destroying democracy.

“The court, at the very least, is considering reversing more than 100 years of campaign finance precedent prohibiting corporate spending,” said Paul Ryan, associate legal counsel at the Campaign Legal Center. “It would be a pretty large step, and remarkable step, for the court to overturn a century of public policy.”



Shit was awesome 100 years ago. America was, as you may recall, a fantastic place of equality.

If the Supreme Court does overturn either case, the effects on political campaigns will be dramatic, said Marc Elias, a partner at Perkins Coie who served as general counsel on Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) 2004 presidential campaign and who is heading legal efforts for Democrat Al Franken in the disputed Minnesota Senate contest.

“The ban on corporate spending on federal elections is at the center of our current campaign finance system,” he said. “If that were to change it would radically alter the system that we have.”



This is why Roberts and Alito were put on the bench. This is their calling. They showed their hand by clearly going out of their way to ask attorneys in Citizens United vs. FEC to prepare arguments on Austin. It’s the definition of judicial activism, something the right was supposed to be so very opposed to.

The court’s new order is also deeply troubling procedurally. The question of overruling Austin was so much not a part of the Hillary Clinton film case that the parties now have to brief it — submit fully researched arguments to the court — for the first time. This is pure judicial overreach.



So, get ready to be fucked. We are about to live in a country where politicians will do whatever corporations want because Chevron or General Electric or Dow Chemical threatened to hand their opponent millions. As if it wasn’t already bad enough with lobbying, now it’s going to be out in the open and there will be nothing we can do to stop it.

It is a nightmare vision.



Another one you can thank George Bush for.

FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday and Friday for more from FearTheReaper You may also enjoy his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 17

Next

Comments
TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUL 08, 2009 02:18 PM

ENFORCER99 said:
Stop acting like a little girl, i can stand up and say whatever i want just like you can.


True enough. You can say the moon is made of cheese or Dane Cook is funny.

The question is -- since these are both demonstrably false, why would you?

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUL 08, 2009 02:20 PM

ENFORCER99 said:
Stop acting like a little girl.



I find this to be an impossible request.

Katieesq

Katieesq

USA
June 2008

JUL 08, 2009 02:25 PM

Blergh.

ChrisSick

ChrisSick

Philadelphia, PA
March 2008

JUL 08, 2009 02:51 PM

ENFORCER99 said:
get over yourself and read, im a mechanic, there the same in all the branches, none of us need proper grammer or english to do our job, and we dont give a shit. the minority of the military in terms of political parties are Democrats read polls from military times and so forth. it stays consistently low.... Stop acting like a little girl, i can stand up and say whatever i want just like you can.



You can, & you have every right to say it just as badly, crassly, & poorly-structured as you'd like to. And I thank you for that, as you are part of the organization who's mission is to protect those rights.

All I ask- ask mind you, not demand, maybe even politely suggest- is that you stop being such a poor representative of that organization, & oh, why not... how about the species as well? Would that be too much to ask? Could you stop being a bad human? I'd appreciate it.

I know how to read, & look, wonder of wonders, I also know how to form complete sentences using proper spelling & grammar to express my thoughts. What are the odds?

Its not so much that I mind how incredibly fucking retarded your posts are, your lack of any basic facts, your willful ignorance, I could ignore those, that's pretty standard trolling material. What bothers me, really, is you telling me to learn how to read when you can't even figure out how that my response was to your comments & go looking for a little fucking context. Its right there, you're standing in it, reach down & pick some up. No, go on, use both hands. And for the record, this place is lousy with girls who could kick your ass intellectually & physically on your best day & their worst. Just so you know.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUL 08, 2009 02:53 PM

midnightblue69 said:
This is 2008, Liberal=socialist


Oh yes, that makes so much sense.

Oh, and by the way, it's 2009. Just FYI.

Do you come up with this stuff while eating rice and drinking Vodka?


Nice! You're a fucking class act.

Homme

Homme

Los Angeles, CA
January 2009

JUL 08, 2009 02:55 PM

ENFORCER99 said:
get over yourself and read, im a mechanic, there the same in all the branches, none of us need proper grammer or english to do our job, and we dont give a shit. the minority of the military in terms of political parties are Democrats read polls from military times and so forth. it stays consistently low.... Stop acting like a little girl, i can stand up and say whatever i want just like you can.



Haha! There are no "mechanics" in the Air Force. There are "crew chiefs," who service aircraft, and "specialists," who perform line-replaceable maintenance. That's it. Refueling an aircraft is not maintenance. You're a glorified gas station attendant!

/dig

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

JUL 08, 2009 03:50 PM

Homme said:

ENFORCER99 said:
get over yourself and read, im a mechanic, there the same in all the branches, none of us need proper grammer or english to do our job, and we dont give a shit. the minority of the military in terms of political parties are Democrats read polls from military times and so forth. it stays consistently low.... Stop acting like a little girl, i can stand up and say whatever i want just like you can.



Haha! There are no "mechanics" in the Air Force. There are "crew chiefs," who service aircraft, and "specialists," who perform line-replaceable maintenance. That's it. Refueling an aircraft is not maintenance. You're a glorified gas station attendant!

/dig



IDGAS

IDGAS

Jackson Heights, NY
March 2004

JUL 08, 2009 04:03 PM

midnightblue69 said: Since mathematics doesn't seem to be your strong point, let me also inform you that GW Bush appointed 2 justices, same as Clinton and Reagan. Since the 50's every 2 term president has appointed 2 justices.



5 by Eisenhower
4 by Truman, Nixon, and Reagan(1)
3 by - none -
2 by Kennedy*, LBJ, Bush 41, Clinton, and Bush 43
1 by Ford*
0 by Carter*

Notes
* - One term/Not reelected
(1) Includes the promotion of Rehnquist

What is your excuses for not being able to count? Or is it that you cannot write? Did you intended to write that since the 1950s every two term President has appointed at least two...

meatpieboy

meatpieboy

Korea, D.P.R.
June 2004

JUL 08, 2009 04:15 PM

DevilsReject said:

ENFORCER99 said:
Obama LIED and the economy DIED, you libs are so far up eachothers asses you cant see whats goin on through all the shit. but anyways while were bush bashing lets all hate on the other republicans, Lincoln started it all ,what a bastard!! McCain was a POW peh!! he actually served in the military and did something usefull for his country bleh....And Bush he kept us safe from terrorist attacks while he was in office!!! i just know they were all thinking about destroying our economy.... that filthy swine



OMG!

MCCAIN WAS A POW??!?!?!



I heard he was a prisoner of war.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JUL 08, 2009 05:01 PM

You all do know that the constant personal attacks that you are making just reinforce the stereotype of the ugly liberal who responds to any criticism with a personal attack. You are all smarter than this so rather than resort to silly attacks why not respond with well thought out rebuttals.

How many threads do we have that devolve into stupid mindless insults that cause bean or shalome or whomever decides to, to have to come out warn everyone and lock them.

Now can we please get back to calmly and rationally discussing policy and such?

smile

sick

sick

Minneapolis, MN
June 2003

JUL 08, 2009 05:37 PM

Colinism said:
You all do know that the constant personal attacks that you are making just reinforce the stereotype of the ugly liberal who responds to any criticism with a personal attack. You are all smarter than this so rather than resort to silly attacks why not respond with well thought out rebuttals.

How many threads do we have that devolve into stupid mindless insults that cause bean or shalome or whomever decides to, to have to come out warn everyone and lock them.

Now can we please get back to calmly and rationally discussing policy and such?

smile



Haven't read Trolls and Those Who Feed Them lately, huh?

In any case, when well thought out rebuttals are attempted and certain persons completely ignore them, fail to use even the slightest bit of logic, go on insane rants, and otherwise show they aren't worthy of respect, those persons are fair targets for criticism of their intellectual abilities.

Intellectual discourse 101.

SergeantPsycho

SergeantPsycho

USA
January 2007

JUL 08, 2009 05:57 PM

I'm going to agree with FTR here, actually. The idea of corporate donations by itself isn't an issue for me, but what happens in the case of a corporation receiving a bailout (which I strongly disapprove of, btw)? Concievably an incumbent politician could easily abuse this mechanism by funnelling public money to a corporate in the form of a bailout, which would in turn be funneled back to a politician's campaign fund. The idea of corporate bailouts + corporate donations makes for an unsettling proposition.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JUL 08, 2009 06:08 PM

Katieesq said:
Blergh.



Stop acting like a little girl.

midnightblue69

midnightblue69

Harrisonburg, VA
December 2008

JUL 08, 2009 07:52 PM

FearTheReaper said:

You do realize everything you just wrote is sort of nuts, right?



Glad you are finally seeing the light, people often see things in a better light when it is broken down for them.

Will your next article be about Obama's broken campaign promises? Maybe how his health car plan forcing people who can't afford to buy insurance to buy it anyway or be fined a grand is crazy?

Maybe you could write about how criminal it is for Obama to be pushing this massive greenhouse utility tax in the middle of a recession?

Now that you have seen how nuts this article was, it could open the door for you and start a new era of productive writing smile

midnightblue69

midnightblue69

Harrisonburg, VA
December 2008

JUL 08, 2009 08:02 PM

IDGAS said:

midnightblue69 said: Since mathematics doesn't seem to be your strong point, let me also inform you that GW Bush appointed 2 justices, same as Clinton and Reagan. Since the 50's every 2 term president has appointed 2 justices.



5 by Eisenhower
4 by Truman, Nixon, and Reagan(1)
3 by - none -
2 by Kennedy*, LBJ, Bush 41, Clinton, and Bush 43
1 by Ford*
0 by Carter*

Notes
* - One term/Not reelected
(1) Includes the promotion of Rehnquist

What is your excuses for not being able to count? Or is it that you cannot write? Did you intended to write that since the 1950s every two term President has appointed at least two...



It seems my math skills far exceed your reading comprehension. Let me help you out, Every 2 term president has nominated (sic)at least(/sic) 2 justices.

You reiterating that many 2 term presidents have elected MORE than two justices furthers my point that Bush only electing two is common at worst.

Here is a link you may enjoy
http://www.amazon.com/Hooked-Phonics-Learn-Kindergarten-System/dp/1931020299
Here for suport, toodles

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8

 ... 17

Next