• commentary
  • TUESDAY JUNE 23 2009 6:00 AM

You Can’t Really Be This Stupid

Most of the time I get the Republican mindset. More often than not, it is just team vs. team. Their astounding hypocrisy knows no bounds. When in control, they say one thing, but when not in control, they immediately flock to the position they formerly criticized. It’s actually quite amusing. As far as big business goes, they’ll bend over anyway they can and have quite a few Americans convinced screwing themselves over is the way to go. Their economic policies have destroyed our country and I find it hard to believe they still stand behind their ideas, but they serve their corporate masters, so I get it. Yet once again, they have come with an attack that is so shockingly stupid it is beyond my comprehension. Their attacks on Obama over his decision to not strongly criticize the Iranian government are astoundingly stupid. You’ve got to wonder if they actually believe taking such a ridiculously stupid stance is real, or if they will just say the opposite of whatever Obama believes.

"The reaction of the Iranian people shows their discontent with this regime," McCain said during an interview on Fox News' "Fox & Friends."

"It's really a sham that they've pulled off and I hope that we will act," he said. "I think they should be condemned, and it's obvious that this was a rigged election and depriving the people of their democratic rights. We are for human rights all over the world."



Well, first of all, we are not for human rights all over the world. That’s the dumbest argument ever made. We just aren't. We never have been and we never will be. We’re about money and that’s all we are “for” all over the world. To believe otherwise is to deny history and reality.

But let me back up for a moment and just focus on Iran. If there is one country in the world that we owe the favor of staying out of their business to, it is Iran; America has already ruined Iran. The reason Iran is a theocracy is because of the United States of America. It’s called fucking yourself in the ass. It is one our greatest failures. We did more than “meddle” in Iran; in 1953 we helped to overthrow its democratically elected government, installed the brutal Shah and sent Iran on the path to dictatorship. It eventually led to the Islamic Revolution. That’s called “Blowback.” In the 1980’s we supported our friend Saddam Hussein in his war with Iran, which cost hundreds of thousands of Iranian lives. We even shot down an Iranian passenger jet in the ‘80s. Can you imagine if Iran had shot down one of ours?

Now, after years of belligerently stupid foreign policy, Obama has taken a different tact. It’s actually smart, which I’m sure confuses the Iranian leaders. They had become accustomed to the ignorant and simplistic responses of George Bush. Obama has chosen to take the “soft diplomacy” route and it’s already paying off. During his Cairo speech, he addressed Iran.

There is a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians.



It’s hard to call someone the “Great Satan” when Satan is admitting mistakes. I know that’s difficult for the idiots in the GOP to understand, but that’s how it works. By not responding in kind, Obama has shown the belligerence of Iranian leaders to Iranians. They have been on the path to democracy for a long time. It’s a very slow one and should be. Iranians were already upset that their president’s language has caused economic isolation. It is causing massive unemployment and now that the US president is not responding like a mirror belligerent idiot, the focus is on one man as the problem: Ahmadinejad,

But the Republicans want us to keep swinging the big, dumb stick – because it's worked out so well over the past 8 years.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said a slow or muted U.S. response risks undermining the aspirations of Iranian voters to change or question their government.

"If America stands for democracy and all of these demonstrations are going on in Tehran and other cities over there, and people don't think that we really care, then obviously they're going to question, 'do we really believe in our principles?'" Grassley said.



No, actually, they question if we believe in our principles because we support brutal regimes like Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Pakistan. They’re not idiots who believe in words over action. Those are your minions you are thinking of.

"The president of the United States is supposed to lead the free world, not follow it," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. "He's been timid and passive more than I would like."



First, I don’t think in the closet gay guys should be talking about leading anything, not that being gay has anything to do with Senator Graham. Second, I cannot believe anyone would be so dumb as to not understand that if we take a side, then the Iranian government can call the protesters “tools” of the United States. Seriously, how can you be that stupid? I honestly can’t understand it.

Also, the idea that Obama making a harsh statement would have an uplifting affect on the Iranian protesters is shockingly arrogant. Get over yourselves. How is this supposed to work?


    Protestor: Today I take to the streets for my vote! I am willing to die for this cause. Justice must be served!

    Obama: The Iranian leaders are super bad. I’ve got your back with words but not action!

    Protestor: Oh, man, I was only kind of into this stuff, but now I’m really, really into it! I will now overthrow my government because some dude living in another country said he likes me.



That pretty much seems to be what people like McCain and Graham actually think is going to happen. One “atta boy” from the president and the game is changed. America likes you! Now you can have an awesome revolution! It’s so moronic I can barely wrap my head around it.

In reality, the statement McCain and company want would do serious harm to those Iranians taking on their government. Once they are labeled as associated with the United States, they will be murdered. As of now, the security forces are actually showing restraint. But Republicans seem to think having a segment of the Iranian population aligned with “The Great Satan” is wise. Amazing. And I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt. I’m believing them to be sincere. If they are not and this is just another political game and they are criticizing Obama because they want to take the opposing view due to party politics – then they are more disgusting than I could ever imagine because lives are on the line. That is inexcusable.

The sad thing is the protesters aren’t even asking for western type democracy. Most Iranians want a religious government of some sort. What they are in the streets fighting for is the small bit of self rule they were allowed. As one man in the street said, “They’ve taken away the sham of electing someone.” Republicans, and many other Americans, are putting their own spin on it. At best, they want to believe a democracy will emerge from this mess, but that’s not part of the equation yet. This is just a small step in that direction and it’s going very well. (At worst, do they even care about democracy? It's not like Republican's were actually that keen on counting votes or even allowing all eligible Americans to cast them in recent elections.)

The Iranian government will never be the same. Ever. For us, that’s a pretty good deal. So, let’s stay out of this one. We have two reasons for doing so. First, our involvement would backfire on those people we want to succeed. Second, we owe them. We own the Iranian people for every horrible thing we have done. We owe them for subjecting them to 26 years of a brutal dictator followed by 30 years of an oppressive religious government. We did that and it’s time to take the moral high ground.

If we don’t – you can pretty much guarantee the opposite of what we want
will occur.

FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday and Friday for more from FearTheReaper You may also enjoy his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
aepaul

aepaul

Walnut Creek, CA
June 2009

JUN 23, 2009 02:26 PM

America didn't ruin Iran. Iran ruined Iran.

Homme

Homme

Los Angeles, CA
January 2009

JUN 23, 2009 02:30 PM

aepaul said:
America didn't ruin Iran. Iran ruined Iran.



How convient for this post to follow my original post. Thank you.

CharlF

CharlF

South Africa
September 2008

JUN 23, 2009 02:31 PM

OK, I have no doubt that Obama is a Great Guy, and Im sure that he's got some Great ideas for the US and every country it has touched.
But here's the problem, he can only touch/manage what his masters allow him to manage.
Where do you think the government gets the money for everything, the political campaigns, running the government branches, the military, the whole country.
The Federal Reserve, and who owns the FR, not the government, no. The IMF and the World Bank.

So in the long run, I dont think it matters who sits in the white house, because the person who controls the money, controls the puppets. Its time America took back its power from the corrupt international bureaucrats, called bankers.
Ask Yourself. Who has the real power here?

GO HERE AND DOWNLOAD THE MOVIE, WATCH THIS: http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUN 23, 2009 02:40 PM

midnightblue69 said:
it was Clinton who signed NAFTA and most of these criminal trade policies leading to our jobs being shipped over seas.



Well, apart from the fact that the net job shift from NAFTA was small, it's not like any other President ever had ever supported international trade.

Never.

*headdesk*

Are you the new CE Troll De Jure?

Homme

Homme

Los Angeles, CA
January 2009

JUN 23, 2009 02:40 PM

IceBearF said:
MY FRIEND FORWARDED ME THIS LIBERTERIAN VIDEO ON FACEBOOK A WEEK AGO!



And now, a Paultard. Good stuff.

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

JUN 23, 2009 02:40 PM

IceBearF said:
GO HERE AND DOWNLOAD THE MOVIE, WATCH THIS: http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUN 23, 2009 02:40 PM

midnightblue69 said:
No, I definetly am not ignoring the incredibly high cost of a war with Korea. It would be staggering. I am not advocating a war with Korea. If China demanded Korea disarm and get in line they would. It is failure on the part of our policies that we cannot get china to condemn and demand an end to a country developing nuclear weapons. 80% of our manufactured goods are made in China. The money they make from our economy is staggering. Why can't this country demand they put Korea on a leash?


because we need China's manufacturing as much as they need to sell us their manufactured goods. it is not a relationship in which either party can simply make high-handed demands of the other.

midnightblue69 said:
You however ARE ignoring the incredibly high cost of al qaeda having nuclear weapons. The sad fact is we are probably past the point of no return. As gutless as Obama is, the brunt of this falls on Bush. While he was toppling the government of a civilized country, probably the only one in the middle east WITHOUT links to Al Qaeda, Korea was developing nuclear technology and was a legitimate threat. Even if Obama has his way and we give NK hundreds of billions of dollars to be quiet and act nice, do you really believe North Korea will destroy what nuclear arms it can conceal and wipe out all the technology it gained? Of course not.

You seriously ignoring what a detriment this is to the future of this planet. When nuclear technology is readily available to these islamic terrorist groups It will make Al Gores global warming campaign look like a 6 yo girl playing hopscotch.


aside from training, all of my military service was spent in the Republic of Korea. i'm well aware of how dangerous the DPRK is. i am also aware that the situation is dangerous and complex, and requires a steady response. our best hope for peace, with regards to North Korea, is to stall them until Kim dies, while working to erode his cult of personality and ensure that his successor can be dealt with reasonably.

and for the record, the president that did the most harm in our relationship with the DPRK was Clinton, who gave Kim rice without actually bothering to check and see if Kim was actually holding up his end of the bargain.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

JUN 23, 2009 02:43 PM


Oh god, not this shit again.

Maxx

maxx

Los Angeles, CA
July 2002

JUN 23, 2009 02:47 PM

IceBearF said:

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

JUN 23, 2009 02:49 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:

midnightblue69 said:
it was Clinton who signed NAFTA and most of these criminal trade policies leading to our jobs being shipped over seas.



Well, apart from the fact that the net job shift from NAFTA was small, it's not like any other President ever had ever supported international trade.

Never.

*headdesk*

Are you the new CE Troll De Jure?




Well, more specifically, the girl collecting CE troll du jour

Stiles

Stiles

Miami Beach, FL
November 2002

JUN 23, 2009 03:18 PM

Jeebus, this thread has precipitated the third-party dumb.

hopel3ss_romance

hopel3ss_romance

Langhorne, PA
March 2006

JUN 23, 2009 04:05 PM

I just hope that obama doesn't give in to what the republican's want. Let us see what his approach will bring. Hopefully good will come from it.

Adroitbeing

Adroitbeing

I'm lost
September 2003

JUN 23, 2009 04:25 PM

Homme said:
Somebody please murder the corporate media.



I can see reasons to accelerate their undoing, but there is certain pleasure from watching them commit suicide in such painfully obvious ways and at such a glacial pace.

Mr_Matt_

Mr_Matt_

Pompano Beach, FL
July 2005

JUN 23, 2009 04:44 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:


Are you the new CE Troll De Jure?



They come and they go. Nice to have a change of personnel again.

midnightblue69

midnightblue69

Harrisonburg, VA
December 2008

JUN 23, 2009 04:47 PM

Stiles said:

midnightblue69 said:
clunker laws taking cars poor and working people can afford off the road.



How, exactly, would either the House or Senate version of the clunker law do that? You might want to actually read the details in the bill before you reply.



I have read it fully, the bread and butter of it is the government will give anyone who has owned an older vehicle $4600 toward a new more fuel efficient car. There is a table for how much you get for the old car compaired to the new one based on cafe ratings but most old cars vs. new ones will be worth $4600. The receiving dealer is then required to retire the title and have the car destroyed so it doesn't make it back to the road. That in essence will raise the value of most old cars previously affordable to most people to $4600. It also removes a pool of affordable cars off the road. There are millions of poorer and working class people in this country that no way, now how can afford new cars and cant afford payments and full coverage on even 5 year old used cars. They depend on these so called "clunkers"

The clunker law is in effect a new tax. People buying new vehicles have to pay big sales tax on them and in areas that implement it, personal property tax. It's extra money to DMV every time you title and register another car. It also will require people to give more money to the banks(insurance companies)People who buy new cars may help assembly plants but it hurts repair shops and parts manufacturers. Owning vehicles is a flow of money. Either to the manufacturers, banks and government or to repair shops and parts manufaturers. The government is effectively rerouting the flow in such a way that they make more money(TAX)

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next