• feature
  • SUNDAY MAY 3 2009 11:00 AM

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Et Al: Guilty of War Crimes AND Murder One

As Faux News personality Sean Hannity makes light of torture with his headline-grabbing offer to undergo waterboarding for charity, and MSNBC's Keith Olberman gets in on the one-lowmanship with offers of sponsorship, the blogosphere is all atwitter with tales of the "newsmen's" bravado. The attention is unsurprising; who wouldn't pay to see Hannity tortured? I know cheap thrills are scarce these days, and I don't want to rain on the parade. I just hope you know that you're being had.

The Sean Hannity "waterboard me" media circus is no more than a clever ploy. This Fox chickenhawk (along with others in the media) is focusing attention on waterboarding, when there are much more sinister happenings afoot. While we're busy obsessing over Hannity's blustering and bugs in boxes, there's one thing that gets glossed over in the torture debate over and over again -- we didn't just torture people, we killed them!

As we debate the merits of trying Bush, Cheney, and their band of fellow sadists for war crimes, let's not forget the charge of murder one. Apparently, many in the mainstream press and blogosphere already have.

The focus right now is on the recently released legal memos justifying the horrifying and numbing repetition of torture against "high profile" targets. We have a short memory in America and most of what was in these memos -- except for the diabolical excess of the waterboarding and the medieval torture by insects -- was, as President Obama has said, pretty much already known.

Also known, but not discussed at this time, is that less important Al-Qaeda figures were murdered as a result of the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld torture jihad (their techniques euphemistically called "enhanced interrogation" by the mainstream corporate press).

Uh, remember those photos of bludgeoned prisoners in body bags that came out of Abu Ghraib? (And we still have only seen a small portion of the visual evidence.) Those people were murdered as a result of the greenlight on torture. Even the Pentagon has declared some of the Guantanamo dead were victims of homicide.

A 2006 Human Rights First report estimated that nearly 100 people had died in U.S. custody as part of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq since August 2002:

According to the U.S. military's own classifications, 34 of these cases are suspected or confirmed homicides; Human Rights First has identified another 11 in which the facts suggest death as a result of physical abuse or harsh conditions of detention. In close to half the deaths Human Rights First surveyed, the cause of death remains officially undetermined or unannounced. Overall, eight people in U.S. custody were tortured to death.



Furthermore, in 2008, Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to Colin Powell and a man who came over from the dark side to tell the truth, testified before Congress that a minimum of 25 people died in U.S. detention as a result of homicides -- and that the figure was probably higher.

Then there are many "renditioned" individuals who disappeared into torture prisons around the world and have never reappeared. ProPublica investigated human rights groups' and CIA documents and determined that at least 32 terrorism suspects that were in CIA custody have gone missing. The CIA declined to comment on the list, aside from saying it was probably "flawed." There's no way to confirm whether these people are even still living, much less what techniques they've been subjected to. However, the whole situation has the stench of Latin American dictators "disappearing" people attached to it.

With Americans' heads swimming in these many sets of numbers, the individual stories within this sad chapter of our country's history are easily forgotten. This is why the indispensable documentary Taxi to the Dark Side should be required viewing material for every American. The central victim in this story was not waterboarded. Nor was he thought to be guilty of anything beyond driving by Afghanistan's Bagram Air Base at the wrong time. Still, his legs were beaten to the point that they would've had to have been amputated, had he not died from the beating.

But whether or not the government ultimately concludes that these and other deaths were murders, the fact remains that people died in American custody. The responsibility is ours. Even suicides cannot be ruled out. The military has a history of using suicide as a cover for homicide, and there's no way to say whether or not torture has driven a person to suicide.

There are undoubtedly more terrible torture stories that will be unearthed in the coming months and years, and they will cause Americans to both cringe and deny. Meanwhile, the Bush defenders are countering with an allegation that the torture of two or three suspects produced important information (which thus far has not been proven by any facts). But the focus on two or three Al Qaeda leaders has taken attention away from an organized system of torture that resulted in untold deaths, also known as murder.

For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for war crimes -- and murder one.

If we do not bring justice to their deaths, who will?

The evidence of criminal abuse, including rape and murder, that was authorized as a general torture and abuse policy directly from the White House on down is abundant. It only need be assembled as legally admissible proof of guilt in an American court of law or International War Crime Tribunal.

As just one of literally hundreds -- perhaps thousands of examples -- a Salon article in 2004 noted a report by the indefatigable "last of his kind" investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh:

Debating about it, ummm...Some of the worst things that happened you don't know about, okay? Videos, um, there are women there. Some of you may have read that they were passing letters out, communications out to their men. This is at Abu Ghraib...The women were passing messages out saying 'Please come and kill me, because of what's happened' and basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. And the worst above all of that is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror. It's going to come out."

"It's impossible to say to yourself how did we get there? Who are we? Who are these people that sent us there? When I did My Lai I was very troubled like anybody in his right mind would be about what happened. I ended up in something I wrote saying in the end I said that the people who did the killing were as much victims as the people they killed because of the scars they had, I can tell you some of the personal stories by some of the people who were in these units witnessed this. I can also tell you written complaints were made to the highest officers and so we're dealing with a enormous massive amount of criminal wrongdoing that was covered up at the highest command out there and higher, and we have to get to it and we will.



We don’t know how much evidence has been destroyed -- the CIA "disappeared" the torture tapes -- but clearly the shredders and "burn bags" were kept busy in the last days of the Bush Administration. Still, the Obama WH is ordering more devastating detainee abuse photos released in the near future.

But all of these are just small pieces in the very large puzzle of a massive White House orchestrated sanctioning of War Crimes, including rape and murder.

It is not unexpected that the corporate mainstream media would attempt to minimize the criminal behavior of the Bush Administration, because D.C. insiders -- the villagers -- and the corporate oligarchy protects its own. But I am a bit mystified why the progressive blogs and most liberal and civil liberties websites are more caught up with fingering the authors of the memos rather than the masterminds of the war crimes policies: Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rice (not to mention Wolfowitz, Feith, etc.).

As has been pointed out by others, after WW II some Japanese tried for war crimes were hanged for waterboarding allied prisoners. The torture unto death, rape, sexual violations, and abuse that violated the Geneva Conventions was rampant in the Bush gulag.

The most pressing issue of justice is not who wrote the memos that enabled torture (murder and rape) -- although the attorneys should be held accountable -- but who should be tried for initiating and promoting war crimes.

Murder is not something to split hairs about on Sunday morning talk shows. It belongs in a courtroom so that justice can be rendered, the perpetrators jailed, and the Constitution preserved.


Mark Karlin is editor and publisher of BuzzFlash.com, which this May will be celebrating its ninth year of progressive news and commentary on the Internet through an expanded network of websites.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next

Comments
CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

MAY 03, 2009 11:20 AM

Before discussing the article presented, I have to say, I just love being told I've been "had" because I haven't been discussing something that hasn't been widely reported. Thanks for that.


I'm not surprised that prisoners have died. But I would like to see some proof of this statement.

For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for war crimes -- and murder one.



I would love to see justice served. But I need to see more proof of the things you've brought up. This isn't something we can be sloppy with, because sloppy evidence leads to cases being dismissed on technicalities.

For once, I'd like to see some calm, cool, and collected objective information.

silversoul7

silversoul7

Portland, OR
January 2008

MAY 03, 2009 12:00 PM

I'm actually concerned about how deep this rabbit hole goes. I mean, how many people were in on this? Are we going to have to prosecute Bush's entire upper-level cabinet? What about the Senate Intelligence Committee? As much as I'd like to see Cheney and Rummy behind bars, I'm worried about just how many people we might actually be talking about. If this thing goes as deep as I think it does, then perhaps Leahy's "Truth Commission" might be a better alternative.

richkale

richkale

Collingswood, NJ
September 2007

MAY 03, 2009 12:20 PM

I would really like to hope for the release of any evidence showing the true lows sunk to over the past several years, but I'm skeptical. If anything we'll continue getting little tastes just for the sake of knocking the repubs down a couple pegs more in public opinion.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

MAY 03, 2009 03:32 PM

Coyotemike said:
Before discussing the article presented, I have to say, I just love being told I've been "had" because I haven't been discussing something that hasn't been widely reported. Thanks for that.


I'm not surprised that prisoners have died. But I would like to see some proof of this statement.

For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for war crimes -- and murder one.



I would love to see justice served. But I need to see more proof of the things you've brought up. This isn't something we can be sloppy with, because sloppy evidence leads to cases being dismissed on technicalities.

For once, I'd like to see some calm, cool, and collected objective information.



I agree entirely.

SnowgodCCR

SnowgodCCR

Derry, NH
November 2006

MAY 03, 2009 06:46 PM

SockPuppet said:

Coyotemike said:
Before discussing the article presented, I have to say, I just love being told I've been "had" because I haven't been discussing something that hasn't been widely reported. Thanks for that.


I'm not surprised that prisoners have died. But I would like to see some proof of this statement.

For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for war crimes -- and murder one.



I would love to see justice served. But I need to see more proof of the things you've brought up. This isn't something we can be sloppy with, because sloppy evidence leads to cases being dismissed on technicalities.

For once, I'd like to see some calm, cool, and collected objective information.



I agree entirely.



+1

LimoWreck

LimoWreck

I'm lost
October 2007

MAY 03, 2009 11:31 PM

SnowgodCCR said:

SockPuppet said:

Coyotemike said:
Before discussing the article presented, I have to say, I just love being told I've been "had" because I haven't been discussing something that hasn't been widely reported. Thanks for that.


I'm not surprised that prisoners have died. But I would like to see some proof of this statement.

For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for war crimes -- and murder one.



I would love to see justice served. But I need to see more proof of the things you've brought up. This isn't something we can be sloppy with, because sloppy evidence leads to cases being dismissed on technicalities.

For once, I'd like to see some calm, cool, and collected objective information.



I agree entirely.



+1



+2. Wholeheartedly agree.

Jace

Jace

San Francisco, CA
February 2004

MAY 04, 2009 01:06 AM

I also agree.

This is getting kind of weird.

NateHevens

NateHevens

Boca Raton, FL
September 2008

MAY 04, 2009 10:22 AM

FourBelowShaun said:

SnowgodCCR said:

SockPuppet said:

Coyotemike said:
Before discussing the article presented, I have to say, I just love being told I've been "had" because I haven't been discussing something that hasn't been widely reported. Thanks for that.


I'm not surprised that prisoners have died. But I would like to see some proof of this statement.

For these murders, George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld -- who have always had a mean streak of sadism running through their blood, as they micro-managed torture and personally reviewed torture tapes -- should be charged and tried for war crimes -- and murder one.



I would love to see justice served. But I need to see more proof of the things you've brought up. This isn't something we can be sloppy with, because sloppy evidence leads to cases being dismissed on technicalities.

For once, I'd like to see some calm, cool, and collected objective information.



I agree entirely.



+1



+2. Wholeheartedly agree.



+3

Like all of you, I want more information. As Jace said, this is getting weird.

CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

MAY 04, 2009 11:30 AM

Jace said:
I also agree.

This is getting kind of weird.



How do you think I feel? eeek

hawkorhandsaw

hawkorhandsaw

Chicago, IL
March 2009

MAY 04, 2009 12:12 PM

silversoul7 said:
What about the Senate Intelligence Committee?



If the SIC knew about the torture, you'd have a hard time prosecuting them for anything because they are told (and tis true) that if they reveal classified information to ANYONE they can and will be tried for treason. if you listen to some of the senators who were in the SIC when this was going on and they STILL cant tell you what they were told because they'd be sent to prison.

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 04, 2009 12:58 PM

Here's an excerpt from an article which was first published on Salon.com on April 14th, 2006, which talks about "What Rumsfeld Knew."

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was personally involved in the late 2002 interrogation of a high-value al-Qaida detainee known in intelligence circles as "the 20th hijacker." He also communicated weekly with the man in charge of the interrogation, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the controversial commander of the Guantánamo Bay detention center.

During the same period, detainee Mohammed al-Kahtani suffered from what Army investigators have called "degrading and abusive" treatment by soldiers who were following the interrogation plan Rumsfeld had approved. Kahtani was forced to stand naked in front of a female interrogator, was accused of being a homosexual, and was forced to wear women's underwear and to perform "dog tricks" on a leash. He received 18-to-20-hour interrogations during 48 of 54 days.

Little more than two years later, during an investigation into the mistreatment of prisoners at Guantánamo, Rumsfeld expressed puzzlement at the notion that his policies had caused the abuse. "He was going, 'My God, you know, did I authorize putting a bra and underwear on this guy's head?'" recalled Lt. Gen. Randall M. Schmidt, an investigator who interviewed Rumsfeld twice in early 2005.

These disclosures are contained in a Dec. 20, 2005, Army inspector general's report on Miller's conduct, which was obtained this week by Salon through the Freedom of Information Act. The 391-page document -- which has long passages blacked out by the government -- concludes that Miller should not be punished for his oversight role in detainee operations, a fact that was reported last month by Time magazine. But the never-before-released full report also includes the transcripts of interviews with high-ranking military officials that shed new light on the role that Rumsfeld and Miller played in the harsh treatment of Kahtani, who had met with Osama bin Laden on several occasions and received terrorist training in al-Qaida camps.


In a sworn statement to the inspector general, Schmidt described Rumsfeld as "personally involved" in the interrogation and said that the defense secretary was "talking weekly" with Miller. Schmidt said he concluded that Rumsfeld did not specifically prescribe the more "creative" interrogation methods used on Kahtani. But he added that the open-ended policies Rumsfeld approved, and that the apparent lack of supervision of day-to-day interrogations permitted the abusive conduct to take place. "Where is the throttle on this stuff?" asked Schmidt, an Air Force fighter pilot, who said in his interview under oath with the inspector general that he had concerns about the length and repetition of the harsh interrogation methods. "There were no limits."



Much of what Salon revealed in 2006 is also backed up by this 2008 document: Inquiry Into The Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody - a report by the US Senate Committee on Armed Services.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

MAY 04, 2009 02:56 PM

hawkorhandsaw said:

silversoul7 said:
What about the Senate Intelligence Committee?



If the SIC knew about the torture, you'd have a hard time prosecuting them for anything because they are told (and tis true) that if they reveal classified information to ANYONE they can and will be tried for treason. if you listen to some of the senators who were in the SIC when this was going on and they STILL cant tell you what they were told because they'd be sent to prison.



Does that count as "only obeying orders"?

cabaretic

cabaretic

Birmingham, AL
March 2005

MAY 04, 2009 03:29 PM

People have notoriously short memories just by nature of being human. There's a concept called generational memory which is exactly what it sounds like it is. After a while, a new generation formulates its own paradigm and comes up with its own institutional memory. Only the events which are truly gigantic ever get preserved for a long time, and even those tend to be romanticized and glossed away into a kind of deliberate nostalgia.

If history was ever remembered exactly the way it happened in the past by subsequent generations, there would be no need for historians and research.

As for Bush Administration war crimes? I doubt it's politically expedient for anyone to take the time to prosecute the key figures, so they simply won't be. I think about how much energy was taken to impeach President Clinton, hearings, congressional time focused purely on a trial, and even though the President clearly lied to the American public, he was still not convicted.

code_red

code_red

Portland, OR
July 2005

MAY 04, 2009 04:11 PM

cabaretic said:
People have notoriously short memories just by nature of being human. There's a concept called generational memory which is exactly what it sounds like it is. After a while, a new generation formulates its own paradigm and comes up with its own institutional memory. Only the events which are truly gigantic ever get preserved for a long time, and even those tend to be romanticized and glossed away into a kind of deliberate nostalgia.

If history was ever remembered exactly the way it happened in the past by subsequent generations, there would be no need for historians and research.

As for Bush Administration war crimes? I doubt it's politically expedient for anyone to take the time to prosecute the key figures, so they simply won't be. I think about how much energy was taken to impeach President Clinton, hearings, congressional time focused purely on a trial, and even though the President clearly lied to the American public, he was still not convicted.



You make a very good point. However, I never thought the day would come where Iowa is more progressive then California (read: same-sex marriage) but it happened in my lifetime. At this point, I believe anything is possible. But that's just me. whatever

Quella

Quella

USA
July 2008

MAY 04, 2009 04:18 PM

I think that it's going to take a long time to investigate, and it's not going to lead to any attempts to prosecute Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld et al. It seems grievously short-sighted to let these war crimes slide, and seems to leave the door open to the same behavior for the future. However, I think one valid concern is that attempting to prosecute would take such an enormous amount of time and resources to try these invdividuals that President Obama would not be able to accomplish anything in office. Furthermore, I think it'd be very hard to get enough evidence --- speaking of forgetting history, how about the whole Plume-CIA case trial? A smaller crime and an impotent prosecution attempt with *one* scapegoat.

It's hard to sit back and watch, hard not to wonder about what will happen when the pendulum swings back to ... Jeb? robot

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2

Next