• feature
  • MONDAY MARCH 23 2009 1:00 PM

Stick Your Damn Hand In It: 20th Birthday of the Exxon Valdez Lie



"Gail, Please! Stick your hand in it!"

The petite Eskimo-Chugach woman gave me that you-dumb-ass-white-boy look.

"Gail, Gail. STICK YOUR GODDAMN HAND IN IT!"

She stuck it in, under the gravel of the beach at Sleepy Bay, her village's fishing ground. Gail's hand came up dripping with black, sickening goo. It could make you vomit. Oil from the Exxon Valdez.

It was already two years after the spill and Exxon had crowed that Mother Nature had happily cleaned up their stinking oil mess for them. It was a lie. But the media wouldn't question the bald-faced bullshit. And who the hell was going to investigate Exxon's claim way out in some godforsaken Native village in the Prince William Sound?

So I convinced the Natives to fly the lazy-ass reporters out to Sleepy Bay on rented float planes to see the oil that Exxon said wasn't there.

The reporters looked, but didn't see it, because it was three inches under their feet, under the shingle rock of the icy beach. Gail pulled out her hand and now the whole place smelled like a gas station. The network crews wanted to puke. And now, with their eyes open, they saw the oil, the vile feces-colored smear across the glaciated ridge faces, the poisonous "bathtub ring" that ran for miles and miles at the high tide level.

And it's still there. Less for sure. But twenty years later. IT'S STILL THERE, GODDAMNIT. And I want YOU, dear reader, to stick your hand in it. I want YOU, President Obama, to stick your hand in it before you blithely fulfill your Palin-esque campaign promise for a little more offshore drilling.

***

Tuesday marks the 20th Anniversary of the Exxon Valdez grounding and the smearing of 1,200 miles of Alaska's coastline with its oil.

It also marks the 20th Anniversary of a lie. Lots of lies: catalogued in a four-volume investigation of the disaster; four volumes you'll never see. I wrote that report, with my team of investigators working with the Natives preparing fraud and racketeering charges against Exxon. You'll never see the report because Exxon lawyers threatened the Natives, "Mention the f-word [fraud] and you'll never get a dime" of compensation to clean up the villages. The Natives agreed to drop the fraud charge -- and Exxon stiffed them on the money. You're surprised, right?

***

Doubtless, for the 20th Anniversary of the Great Spill, the media will schlep out that old story that the tanker ran aground because its captain was drunk at the wheel. Bullshit.

Yes, the captain was "three sheets to the wind" -- but sleeping it off below-decks. The ship was in the hands of the third mate who was driving blind. That is, the Exxon Valdez' Raycas radar system was turned off; turned off because it was busted and had been busted since its maiden voyage. Exxon didn't want to spend the cash to fix it. So the man at the helm, electronically blindfolded, drove it up onto the reef.

So why the story of the drunken skipper? Because it lets Exxon off the hook: Calling it a case of "drunk driving" turns the disaster into a case of human error, not corporate penny-pinching greed.

Indeed, the "human error" tale was the hook used by the Bush-stacked Supreme Court to slash the punitive damages awarded against Exxon by 90%, from $5 billion, to half a billion for 30,000 Natives and fishermen. Chief Justice John Roberts erased almost all of the payment due with the la-dee-dah comment, "What more can a corporation do?"

Well, here's what they could have done: Besides fix the radar, Exxon could have set out equipment to contain the spill. Containing a spill is actually quite simple. Stick a rubber skirt around the oil slick and suck it back up. The law requires it and Exxon promised it.

So, when the tanker hit, where was the rubber skirt and where was the sucker? Answer: The rubber skirt, called "boom" -- was a fiction. Exxon promised to have it sitting right there near the Native village at Bligh Reef. The oil company fulfilled that promised the cheap way: they lied.

And the lie was engineered at the very top. After the spill, we got our hands on a series of memos describing a secret meeting of chief executives of Exxon and its oil company partners, including ARCO, a unit of British Petroleum. In a meeting of these oil chieftains held in April 1988, ten months before the spill, Exxon rejected a plea from T.L. Polasek, the Vice-President of its Alaska shipping operations, to provide the oil spill containment equipment required by law. Polasek warned the CEOs it was "not possible" to contain a spill in the mid-Sound without the emergency set-up.

Exxon angrily vetoed ARCO's suggestion that the oil companies supply the rubber skirts and other materiel that would have prevented the spill from spreading, virtually eliminating the spill's damage.

Regulations state that no tanker may leave the Alaska port of Valdez without the "sucker" equipment, called a "containment barge," at the ready. Exxon signed off on the barge's readiness. But, that night twenty years ago, the barge was in dry-dock with its pumps locked up under arctic ice. By the time it arrived at the tanker, half a day after the spill, the oil was well along its thousand-mile killing path.

Natives watched as the now-unstoppable oil overwhelmed their islands. Eyak Native elder Henry Makarka saw an otter rip out its own eyes burning from oil residue. Henry, pointing down a waterside dead-zone, told me, in a mix of Alutiiq and English, "If I had a machine gun, I'd shoot every one of those white sons-of-bitches."

***

Exxon promised -- promised -- to pay the Natives and other fisherman for all their losses. The Chief of the Natives at Nanwalek lost his boat to bankruptcy. His village, like other villages, Native and non-Native, decayed into alcoholism. The Mayor of fishing port Cordova killed himself, citing Exxon in his suicide note.

On the island village of Chenega, Gail Evanoff's uncle Paul Kompkoff was hungry. Until the spill, he had lived on seal meat, razor clams and salmon Chenegans would catch, and on deer they hunted. The clams and salmon were declared deadly and the deer, not able to read the government warning signs, ate the poisoned vegetation and died.

The President of Exxon, Lee Raymond, helicoptered into Chenega for a photo op. He promised to compensate the Natives and all fishermen for their losses, and Exxon would thoroughly clean the beaches.

Uncle Paul told the Exxon chief of his hunger. The oil company, sensing PR disaster, shipped in seal meat to the isolated village. The cans were marked, "NOT FIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION." Uncle Paul said, "Zoo food."

Paul didn't want a seal in a can. He wanted a boat to go fishing, to bring the village back to life.

Two years after the spill, Otto Harrison, General Manager of Exxon USA, told Evanoff and me to forget about a fishing boat for Uncle Paul. Exxon was immortal and Natives were not. The company would litigate for 20 years.

They did. Only now, two decades on, Exxon has finally begun its payout of the court award -- but only ten cents on the dollar. And Uncle Paul's boat? No matter. Paul's dead. So are a third of the fishermen owed the money.

***

Lee Raymond, President of Exxon at the time of the spill -- and its President when the company made the secret decision to do without oil spill equipment, retired in April 2006. The company awarded him a $400 million retirement bonus, more than double the bonuses received by all AIG executives combined.

***

Gail's oily hand never made it to national television. The networks were distracted with another oil story.

After sailing back to Chenega from Sleepy Bay, I sat with Uncle Paul, watching the smart bombs explode over Baghdad. Gulf War I had begun.

Uncle Paul was silent a long time. The generals on CNN pointed to the burning oil fields near Basra. Paul said, "I guess were all some kind of Native now."



Greg Palast investigated fraud and racketeering claims for the Chugach Natives of Alaska. Now a journalist whose work appears on BBC Television Newsnight, Palast is the author of the New York Times bestselling books The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse. Visit GregPalast.com for more.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
MessyJesse

MessyJesse

Roanoke, VA
February 2008

MAR 29, 2009 06:47 AM

DJForce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.



Tell that to the people in the story whose lives were ruined by the event...


Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.



Your comparison is utterly ridiculous. You are going to compare a natural disaster (i.e. one in which humans can have very little impact besides proper reaction) to a man-made disaster? Fact is, this could have been prevented...and it wasn't.


To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.



Did you read the story? They were sued and paid only a portion of the originally awarded sum.


The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile



Honestly, I appreciate your optimism, however, we as human beings need to understand that we are stewards of this planet and if we don't start acting like it there won't be a planet for our children or grandchildren.

DJForce

DJForce

Summerville, SC
November 2008

MAR 29, 2009 10:32 AM

MessyJesse said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

DJForce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.



Tell that to the people in the story whose lives were ruined by the event...


Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.



Your comparison is utterly ridiculous. You are going to compare a natural disaster (i.e. one in which humans can have very little impact besides proper reaction) to a man-made disaster? Fact is, this could have been prevented...and it wasn't.


To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.



Did you read the story? They were sued and paid only a portion of the originally awarded sum.


The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile



Honestly, I appreciate your optimism, however, we as human beings need to understand that we are stewards of this planet and if we don't start acting like it there won't be a planet for our children or grandchildren.





Your comparison is utterly ridiculous. You are going to compare a natural disaster (i.e. one in which humans can have very little impact besides proper reaction) to a man-made disaster? Fact is, this could have been prevented...and it wasn't.



Yes, I am. Natural disaster, man-made disaster. What's the difference regarding the outcome? Point is, nature is not all sunsets and rainbows. The history of the earth is full of 'disasters'.



Did you read the story? They were sued and paid only a portion of the originally awarded sum.



Then Exxon is in the wrong (assuming the original amount was fair).

DJForce

DJForce

Summerville, SC
November 2008

MAR 29, 2009 10:35 AM

FellOnEarth said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

DJForce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.

Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.

To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.

The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile

PS, on a completly unrelated topis, did you know there is a PARK at ground zero in Hiroshima. It's a tourist trap. smile



surreal You can't possibly be serious, can you? I'm beginning to think you're bubble boy.




I am dead serious. Where's the flaw in my thinking?

Stiles

Stiles

Oakland, CA
November 2002

MAR 29, 2009 10:59 AM

DJFarce said:

FellOnEarth said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

DJFarce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.

Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.

To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.

The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile

PS, on a completly unrelated topis, did you know there is a PARK at ground zero in Hiroshima. It's a tourist trap. smile



surreal You can't possibly be serious, can you? I'm beginning to think you're bubble boy.




I am dead serious. Where's the flaw in my thinking?




surreal

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

MAR 29, 2009 11:36 AM

DJForce said:

FellOnEarth said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

DJForce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.

Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.

To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.

The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile

PS, on a completly unrelated topis, did you know there is a PARK at ground zero in Hiroshima. It's a tourist trap. smile



surreal You can't possibly be serious, can you? I'm beginning to think you're bubble boy.




I am dead serious. Where's the flaw in my thinking?



It isn't our responsibility to teach you about basic logic, basic science or basic reading comprehension.

With that said, here go to this site and find all the fallacies that apply to your "thinking" overall.
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html

Uhm, for everyone else. It is an attempt to help him out, but I'm confident it will fail. He'll start calling everything he doesn't agree with a fallacious argument (for all the wrong reasons.)
I apologize in advance, but it might be more amusing than reading through the drivel.

MessyJesse

MessyJesse

Roanoke, VA
February 2008

MAR 29, 2009 05:04 PM

DJForce said:

Yes, I am. Natural disaster, man-made disaster. What's the difference regarding the outcome? Point is, nature is not all sunsets and rainbows. The history of the earth is full of 'disasters'.



*headdesk*
The difference is that it was preventable and this multinational, multi-billion-dollar corporation decided that it was not a priority to prevent it. Are you fucking high?

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

MAR 29, 2009 05:17 PM

DJForce said:

FellOnEarth said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

DJForce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.

Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.

To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.

The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile

PS, on a completly unrelated topis, did you know there is a PARK at ground zero in Hiroshima. It's a tourist trap. smile



surreal You can't possibly be serious, can you? I'm beginning to think you're bubble boy.




I am dead serious. Where's the flaw in my thinking?



The major flaw is between your ears.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

MAR 29, 2009 06:35 PM

theconservative said:
hell, i find james joyce to be terribly boring.



Yep, ignored.

DJForce

DJForce

Summerville, SC
November 2008

MAR 29, 2009 08:40 PM

MessyJesse said:

DJForce said:

Yes, I am. Natural disaster, man-made disaster. What's the difference regarding the outcome? Point is, nature is not all sunsets and rainbows. The history of the earth is full of 'disasters'.



*headdesk*
The difference is that it was preventable and this multinational, multi-billion-dollar corporation decided that it was not a priority to prevent it. Are you fucking high?



Nope, never done drugs.

I didn't say that it was a good thing. I said that life will go on. I think people are making way to big a deal out of it. We move millions of gallons of oil around every year, we are bound to spill some of it from time to time. Don't like the way oil companies do business? Feel free to boycot them.

In fact, if you want real credibility, stop using oil altogether. Some people love to complain about all the evils of the industrial world, but I don't see many people living off the grid or walking to work. And don't say it's too hard, everyone did it 100 years or so ago.

You think Exxon could be run better? Start your own oil company. Or better yet, go invent something better. Don't want to? Too hard? Then drive your car, turn on your lights, and be grateful for companies like Exxon that make your life so much easier!

LimoWreck

LimoWreck

I'm lost
October 2007

MAR 29, 2009 09:05 PM

DJForce said:

MessyJesse said:

DJForce said:

Yes, I am. Natural disaster, man-made disaster. What's the difference regarding the outcome? Point is, nature is not all sunsets and rainbows. The history of the earth is full of 'disasters'.



*headdesk*
The difference is that it was preventable and this multinational, multi-billion-dollar corporation decided that it was not a priority to prevent it. Are you fucking high?



Nope, never done drugs.

I didn't say that it was a good thing. I said that life will go on. I think people are making way to big a deal out of it. We move millions of gallons of oil around every year, we are bound to spill some of it from time to time. Don't like the way oil companies do business? Feel free to boycot them.

In fact, if you want real credibility, stop using oil altogether. Some people love to complain about all the evils of the industrial world, but I don't see many people living off the grid or walking to work. And don't say it's too hard, everyone did it 100 years or so ago.

You think Exxon could be run better? Start your own oil company. Or better yet, go invent something better. Don't want to? Too hard? Then drive your car, turn on your lights, and be grateful for companies like Exxon that make your life so much easier!



Are you on the dole? Because its either that or you are the most willfully ignorant person I've seen come into these discussions. You're flat out dismissing what happened, and saying, what exactly? That it's pretty much a fact of life? Oopsie?

Oil spills are not a thing to be dismissed. This article was keen on pointing that out. People went bankrupt. They lost their houses. It shattered an ecosystem that'll take decades to repair itself. What wildlife that has managed to "thrive" is deformed or diseased from that oil. Then there's the clean-up, if you can even call it that, which has caused cancers to several of those who participated in it. So not only has it killed fish, deer, and other wildlife, plantlife, etc. It's also, over time, caused the death of human beings in the fallout of this incident. Maybe not all directly, but it's still responsible for all of this and more.

Instead of dismissing it, how about you educate yourself a little bit on this matter. I'm far from an authority on this matter, or others like it, and even I know that this isn't something that you should ignore or dismiss.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

MAR 30, 2009 12:58 AM

DJForce said:

FellOnEarth said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

DJForce said:
You know what no one has mentioned ... that Exxon spilled all that oil ... and the world is still OK.

Yeah, it made an ugly mess, but you know what? Mother Earth has done far worse to herself (Mt. St. Hellens comes to mind). Maybe we should all just relax.

To the individual who lost their fishing job, you should sew...sue...sui...take Exxon to court. They do have an obligation to pay for their actions. My heart goes out to you for that.

The rest of you...lighten up. We're all going to be OK smile

PS, on a completly unrelated topis, did you know there is a PARK at ground zero in Hiroshima. It's a tourist trap. smile



surreal You can't possibly be serious, can you? I'm beginning to think you're bubble boy.




I am dead serious. Where's the flaw in my thinking?



Since you brought up Hiroshima (why not Nagasaki?), I feel I should mention another historical 80's disaster that we learned a valuable lesson from, Chernobyl. Events like these remind us that we don't live in a protective bubble and what happens in one place can effect others in another. Also, the bombings in Japan were relatively low-yield air bursts yet for years, the residual radiation from the fallout negatively effected the lives of the local population and the US servicemen who were sent in to clean-up and rebuild.

According to your logic:
• The planet is here for us to exploit regardless of the impact we have on it.
• Any impact man makes on the environment is irrelevant since natural disasters also happen.
• All man-made accidents are acceptable as long as they're related to the pursuit of industry.
• If we just build parks over every mess we make, everything will be A-OK!
•Ignoring everything makes you feel better.

I'm not going to argue with that last one, I guess ignorance is bliss. whatever

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

MAR 30, 2009 02:52 AM

DJForce said:
Natural disaster, man-made disaster. What's the difference regarding the outcome?


Why is the outcome the relevant criterion?

Why do you even focus on "outcome" in your question?

It's obvious that the critical distinction is ex ante, not ex post.

And when I say "obvious", I mean so bleeding fucking obvious that a ten year old could grasp it. What's your malfunction?

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JUN 16, 2009 01:00 PM

A little bit of good news for the folks affected by the Valdez spill.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has ordered Exxon to pay interest on the (vastly reduced) punitive damage sum of $507.5 million.

Twenty years on, that amounts to an additional $500 million in interest, meaning the average settlement for the 33,000 claimants will go up from approx $15,000 to $30,000.

Still that's nothing compared to the hundreds of thousands in lost earning many have suffered, and doesn't begin to compensate folks for the illness and deaths caused by pollution from the incident.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next