• feature
  • MONDAY MARCH 23 2009 1:00 PM

Stick Your Damn Hand In It: 20th Birthday of the Exxon Valdez Lie



"Gail, Please! Stick your hand in it!"

The petite Eskimo-Chugach woman gave me that you-dumb-ass-white-boy look.

"Gail, Gail. STICK YOUR GODDAMN HAND IN IT!"

She stuck it in, under the gravel of the beach at Sleepy Bay, her village's fishing ground. Gail's hand came up dripping with black, sickening goo. It could make you vomit. Oil from the Exxon Valdez.

It was already two years after the spill and Exxon had crowed that Mother Nature had happily cleaned up their stinking oil mess for them. It was a lie. But the media wouldn't question the bald-faced bullshit. And who the hell was going to investigate Exxon's claim way out in some godforsaken Native village in the Prince William Sound?

So I convinced the Natives to fly the lazy-ass reporters out to Sleepy Bay on rented float planes to see the oil that Exxon said wasn't there.

The reporters looked, but didn't see it, because it was three inches under their feet, under the shingle rock of the icy beach. Gail pulled out her hand and now the whole place smelled like a gas station. The network crews wanted to puke. And now, with their eyes open, they saw the oil, the vile feces-colored smear across the glaciated ridge faces, the poisonous "bathtub ring" that ran for miles and miles at the high tide level.

And it's still there. Less for sure. But twenty years later. IT'S STILL THERE, GODDAMNIT. And I want YOU, dear reader, to stick your hand in it. I want YOU, President Obama, to stick your hand in it before you blithely fulfill your Palin-esque campaign promise for a little more offshore drilling.

***

Tuesday marks the 20th Anniversary of the Exxon Valdez grounding and the smearing of 1,200 miles of Alaska's coastline with its oil.

It also marks the 20th Anniversary of a lie. Lots of lies: catalogued in a four-volume investigation of the disaster; four volumes you'll never see. I wrote that report, with my team of investigators working with the Natives preparing fraud and racketeering charges against Exxon. You'll never see the report because Exxon lawyers threatened the Natives, "Mention the f-word [fraud] and you'll never get a dime" of compensation to clean up the villages. The Natives agreed to drop the fraud charge -- and Exxon stiffed them on the money. You're surprised, right?

***

Doubtless, for the 20th Anniversary of the Great Spill, the media will schlep out that old story that the tanker ran aground because its captain was drunk at the wheel. Bullshit.

Yes, the captain was "three sheets to the wind" -- but sleeping it off below-decks. The ship was in the hands of the third mate who was driving blind. That is, the Exxon Valdez' Raycas radar system was turned off; turned off because it was busted and had been busted since its maiden voyage. Exxon didn't want to spend the cash to fix it. So the man at the helm, electronically blindfolded, drove it up onto the reef.

So why the story of the drunken skipper? Because it lets Exxon off the hook: Calling it a case of "drunk driving" turns the disaster into a case of human error, not corporate penny-pinching greed.

Indeed, the "human error" tale was the hook used by the Bush-stacked Supreme Court to slash the punitive damages awarded against Exxon by 90%, from $5 billion, to half a billion for 30,000 Natives and fishermen. Chief Justice John Roberts erased almost all of the payment due with the la-dee-dah comment, "What more can a corporation do?"

Well, here's what they could have done: Besides fix the radar, Exxon could have set out equipment to contain the spill. Containing a spill is actually quite simple. Stick a rubber skirt around the oil slick and suck it back up. The law requires it and Exxon promised it.

So, when the tanker hit, where was the rubber skirt and where was the sucker? Answer: The rubber skirt, called "boom" -- was a fiction. Exxon promised to have it sitting right there near the Native village at Bligh Reef. The oil company fulfilled that promised the cheap way: they lied.

And the lie was engineered at the very top. After the spill, we got our hands on a series of memos describing a secret meeting of chief executives of Exxon and its oil company partners, including ARCO, a unit of British Petroleum. In a meeting of these oil chieftains held in April 1988, ten months before the spill, Exxon rejected a plea from T.L. Polasek, the Vice-President of its Alaska shipping operations, to provide the oil spill containment equipment required by law. Polasek warned the CEOs it was "not possible" to contain a spill in the mid-Sound without the emergency set-up.

Exxon angrily vetoed ARCO's suggestion that the oil companies supply the rubber skirts and other materiel that would have prevented the spill from spreading, virtually eliminating the spill's damage.

Regulations state that no tanker may leave the Alaska port of Valdez without the "sucker" equipment, called a "containment barge," at the ready. Exxon signed off on the barge's readiness. But, that night twenty years ago, the barge was in dry-dock with its pumps locked up under arctic ice. By the time it arrived at the tanker, half a day after the spill, the oil was well along its thousand-mile killing path.

Natives watched as the now-unstoppable oil overwhelmed their islands. Eyak Native elder Henry Makarka saw an otter rip out its own eyes burning from oil residue. Henry, pointing down a waterside dead-zone, told me, in a mix of Alutiiq and English, "If I had a machine gun, I'd shoot every one of those white sons-of-bitches."

***

Exxon promised -- promised -- to pay the Natives and other fisherman for all their losses. The Chief of the Natives at Nanwalek lost his boat to bankruptcy. His village, like other villages, Native and non-Native, decayed into alcoholism. The Mayor of fishing port Cordova killed himself, citing Exxon in his suicide note.

On the island village of Chenega, Gail Evanoff's uncle Paul Kompkoff was hungry. Until the spill, he had lived on seal meat, razor clams and salmon Chenegans would catch, and on deer they hunted. The clams and salmon were declared deadly and the deer, not able to read the government warning signs, ate the poisoned vegetation and died.

The President of Exxon, Lee Raymond, helicoptered into Chenega for a photo op. He promised to compensate the Natives and all fishermen for their losses, and Exxon would thoroughly clean the beaches.

Uncle Paul told the Exxon chief of his hunger. The oil company, sensing PR disaster, shipped in seal meat to the isolated village. The cans were marked, "NOT FIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION." Uncle Paul said, "Zoo food."

Paul didn't want a seal in a can. He wanted a boat to go fishing, to bring the village back to life.

Two years after the spill, Otto Harrison, General Manager of Exxon USA, told Evanoff and me to forget about a fishing boat for Uncle Paul. Exxon was immortal and Natives were not. The company would litigate for 20 years.

They did. Only now, two decades on, Exxon has finally begun its payout of the court award -- but only ten cents on the dollar. And Uncle Paul's boat? No matter. Paul's dead. So are a third of the fishermen owed the money.

***

Lee Raymond, President of Exxon at the time of the spill -- and its President when the company made the secret decision to do without oil spill equipment, retired in April 2006. The company awarded him a $400 million retirement bonus, more than double the bonuses received by all AIG executives combined.

***

Gail's oily hand never made it to national television. The networks were distracted with another oil story.

After sailing back to Chenega from Sleepy Bay, I sat with Uncle Paul, watching the smart bombs explode over Baghdad. Gulf War I had begun.

Uncle Paul was silent a long time. The generals on CNN pointed to the burning oil fields near Basra. Paul said, "I guess were all some kind of Native now."



Greg Palast investigated fraud and racketeering claims for the Chugach Natives of Alaska. Now a journalist whose work appears on BBC Television Newsnight, Palast is the author of the New York Times bestselling books The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse. Visit GregPalast.com for more.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
LimoWreck

LimoWreck

I'm lost
October 2007

MAR 24, 2009 09:23 AM

nicole_powers said:

gunner762 said:

AkJoey said:
I live in Alaska and have a fishing boat in Prince William sound, so I know first hand, it is fine now, I dont know why everyone is still going on about it, there are plenty of fish and I basically am dodging sea otters, seals, sea lions and any other marine mamals you can think of all of the time. although it was a major tragedy and I am by no means sticking up for the exxon corporation, I think it is time to let it go.



It's great that the life is coming back, but that's not the point .
I had just started fishing there the year before the spill.
Do you know how hard it was to buy a boat, permit and gear as an 18 year old? How many years I worked to save the money to start fishing for myself?
I lost it all after that spill.
It's 20 years later and we still haven't seen the money promised us. If they drag it out long enough, most all the people involved will be dead. Hell, most of the men who taught me to fish are. They went to their graves having lost a huge part of their lives there, and never were paid the money due them.
Exxon could have done the right thing years ago.
How much profit did they make in just the past year?



We have an article going live at 10 am detailing how tough the spill was on the local fishermen (it goes into detail about the permit issue) -- I very much hope you'll comment on it -- I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.



10 am Pacific? I'm very interested in reading more on this.

Stiles

Stiles

Oakland, CA
November 2002

MAR 24, 2009 09:28 AM

theconservative said:
yeah...they really overwhelmed me.



TLDNR'ing a brief and well-written article like this one is nothing to be proud of.

It's bad enough to be content in your ignorance but it's just stupid to take kindergarten-grade cheap shots about the content of something you didn't read.

Attitudes like this writ large are a big reason why your guys got their asses handed to them in the last two elections.


theconservative said:
nice one. wow.



Are you old enough to be on this site legally?

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAR 24, 2009 10:09 AM

MinusFourDegrees said:10 am Pacific? I'm very interested in reading more on this.



PST. It's now live:
http://suicidegirls.com/news/politics/23619/

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

MAR 24, 2009 02:48 PM

Stiles said:

theconservative said:
yeah...they really overwhelmed me.



TLDNR'ing a brief and well-written article like this one is nothing to be proud of.

It's bad enough to be content in your ignorance but it's just stupid to take kindergarten-grade cheap shots about the content of something you didn't read.

Attitudes like this writ large are a big reason why your guys got their asses handed to them in the last two elections.


theconservative said:
nice one. wow.



Are you old enough to be on this site legally?



my point is, that it's not well written.

PointBlank

PointBlank

New York, NY
November 2004

MAR 24, 2009 02:53 PM

theconservative said:

Stiles said:

theconservative said:
yeah...they really overwhelmed me.



TLDNR'ing a brief and well-written article like this one is nothing to be proud of.

It's bad enough to be content in your ignorance but it's just stupid to take kindergarten-grade cheap shots about the content of something you didn't read.

Attitudes like this writ large are a big reason why your guys got their asses handed to them in the last two elections.


theconservative said:
nice one. wow.



Are you old enough to be on this site legally?



my point is, that it's not well written.


But you didn't read it, right? You might want to look into who wrote it and then figure out which one of you--you or the author--is a New York Times bestselling author. Shouldn't take long.

Also: congratulations on posting more in this thread than anyone else! You've shown us all how little you care.

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

MAR 24, 2009 03:05 PM

Y'all, all that theconservative, is saying is that it's a badly written article even though he didn't read it. What's functionally illogical about that?

Unfair standards!

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

MAR 24, 2009 03:14 PM

wildswan said:
Y'all, all that theconservative, is saying is that it's a badly written article even though he didn't read it. What's functionally illogical about that?

Unfair standards!



liberals...

wildswan

wildswan

I'm lost
June 2006

MAR 24, 2009 03:23 PM

MrCrisp said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

wildswan said:
Y'all, all that theconservative, is saying is that it's a badly written article even though he didn't read it. What's functionally illogical about that?

Unfair standards!




liberals...



I know. Whateryougoingtodo? Complete elitist assholery.

MessyJesse

MessyJesse

Roanoke, VA
February 2008

MAR 24, 2009 03:40 PM

Amazing article.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

MAR 24, 2009 04:15 PM

Nice job Greg, your article made it onto The Raw Story!

How long it will take for Alaskans to realize that their most precious natural resources are the ones worth preserving? With former Gov. Palin trying to do everything in her power to mainline oil companys' interests over those of the wildlife, she's willing to sacrifice everything, including her own morals. When ever a seat opens on the State's Supreme Court, Alaskan law requires a panel to vet a list of potential candidates for appointment by the Governor (she has no say except the final approval from a list of vetted candidates). She was given the choice between a man and a woman; one worked as an environmental lawyer, the other served on the board of Planned Parenthood, both of them support the Pro-Choice movement. Hmm, which one to choose?

Facing the ire of social conservatives, Palin decided to defy their wishes by appointing Judge Morgan Christen over the environmental lawyer, Eric Smith. While I applaud Christen's recent appointment to the Court, Palin's selective reasoning was less then noble. For Palin, her criteria was narrow and accordingly she selected the lesser of two evils. Despite the American Family Council's (AFC aka the AFA) desperate urging for Palin to select Smith instead of Christen, Palin could not bring herself to appoint the very man who stood in the way of energy expansion in the Cook Inlet (The main watercourse leading into Anchorage). Along with other environmental groups, Smith had fought to have the Beluga Whale classified as endangered and won with Pres. Bush authorizing endangerment status last year, however Palin has expressed her intent to challenge the classification earlier this year. I guess the last thing she needs is to appoint the man who fought for the legal protections that she is currently fighting against now. Given choice, she has no choice, Palin will always choose oil over life.

I'm on the verge of quitting my job so I can go and visit my sister and her kids in the North Pacific. I plan on doing some traveling and may take another trip back up to Alaska. If I decide to go, I'll try to take a side trip to the 'Sound just so I too can "stick my hand in it".

MessyJesse

MessyJesse

Roanoke, VA
February 2008

MAR 24, 2009 04:21 PM

theconservative said:
my point is, that it's not well written.



What a rousing criticism. I hope you are a rhetoric professor.

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAR 24, 2009 04:42 PM

theconservative said:
my point is, that it's not well written.



I hope theconservative is receiving payments from Exxon's $16 million propaganda and disinformation budget for his comments here. That's the only way they make sense.

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

MAR 24, 2009 05:12 PM

I didn't see a link here to the actual report from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustees Council, so I thought I'd post it in case someone wanted to read up on it:

LEGACY OF AN OIL SPILL 20 YEARS AFTER EXXON VALDEZ

Some notable excerpts:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

It is unfortunate that it takes a disaster of this magnitude to shake us from our complacency and make us see how greatly nature has blessed us here in Alaska and elsewhere in our great country, and to understand how easily and quickly humans can despoil it. Such an environmental disaster makes us realize how much we depend on our natural world and how much harm reckless acts can inflict on our lives and the lives of our families. It is important that we remember and learn from such events. It is in that spirit that we present this 20th Anniversary Status Report.

Craig Tillery
Deputy Attorney General
Alaska Department of Law


[O]ne of the most stunning revelations of Trustee Council-funded monitoring over the last ten years is that Exxon Valdez oil persists in the environment and, in places, is nearly as toxic as it was the first few weeks after the spill. This was not expected at the time of the spill or even ten years later. [...] The amount of Exxon Valdez oil remaining substantially exceeds the sum total of all previous oil pollution on beaches in Prince William Sound, including oil spilled during the 1964 earthquake. [The] oil is decreasing at a rate of 0-4% per year, with only a 5% chance that the rate is as high as 4%. At this rate, the remaining oil will take decades and possibly centuries to disappear entirely.


Resident killer whales in Alaska have generally been increasing since the 1980s. However, the recovery of the AB pod is slower than the growth of other fish-eating pods in Prince William Sound or in Southeast Alaska. Their full recovery to pre-spill levels will likely take an additional decade or more, if their recovery is not further compromised. For the transient AT1 population, there appears to be no hope for recovery. There has not been a successful recruitment to the pod since prior to the spill. This unique population will likely become extinct as the remaining members continue to age and die.


Herring populations were initially damaged by the spill and, for reasons that are not clear, have not rebounded in the subsequent 20 years since the spill. Due to the decreased population, the herring fishery in the Sound has been closed for 13 of the 19 years since the spill. The population began increasing again in 1997 and the fishery was opened briefly in 1997 and 1998. However, the population increase stalled in 1999, and continued disease impacts on the population may be limiting their recovery. The fishery remains closed.

punk

punk

Phoenix, AZ
January 2004

MAR 24, 2009 05:35 PM

For those of you curious what kind of payout people received, my dad's close friends received $50,000-ish, before taxes...for 20 years of lost wages and hardship. That's the swell one-to-one ratio Riki Ott discusses here.

Thanks, Exxon. Thanks Supreme Court. Now go fuck yourself.

cabaretic

cabaretic

Birmingham, AL
March 2005

MAR 24, 2009 05:41 PM

The question I ask is whether punitive damage laws work or whether corporations can wiggle out of them. The theory in limiting damages is that juries had a habit of rewarding "excessive" damages that were not in proportion with the offense committed. I've found that for every instance of that phenomenon, I found fifty like this one where corporations used loopholes to wiggle out of their responsibilities.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next