• feature
  • MONDAY MARCH 23 2009 1:00 PM

Stick Your Damn Hand In It: 20th Birthday of the Exxon Valdez Lie



"Gail, Please! Stick your hand in it!"

The petite Eskimo-Chugach woman gave me that you-dumb-ass-white-boy look.

"Gail, Gail. STICK YOUR GODDAMN HAND IN IT!"

She stuck it in, under the gravel of the beach at Sleepy Bay, her village's fishing ground. Gail's hand came up dripping with black, sickening goo. It could make you vomit. Oil from the Exxon Valdez.

It was already two years after the spill and Exxon had crowed that Mother Nature had happily cleaned up their stinking oil mess for them. It was a lie. But the media wouldn't question the bald-faced bullshit. And who the hell was going to investigate Exxon's claim way out in some godforsaken Native village in the Prince William Sound?

So I convinced the Natives to fly the lazy-ass reporters out to Sleepy Bay on rented float planes to see the oil that Exxon said wasn't there.

The reporters looked, but didn't see it, because it was three inches under their feet, under the shingle rock of the icy beach. Gail pulled out her hand and now the whole place smelled like a gas station. The network crews wanted to puke. And now, with their eyes open, they saw the oil, the vile feces-colored smear across the glaciated ridge faces, the poisonous "bathtub ring" that ran for miles and miles at the high tide level.

And it's still there. Less for sure. But twenty years later. IT'S STILL THERE, GODDAMNIT. And I want YOU, dear reader, to stick your hand in it. I want YOU, President Obama, to stick your hand in it before you blithely fulfill your Palin-esque campaign promise for a little more offshore drilling.

***

Tuesday marks the 20th Anniversary of the Exxon Valdez grounding and the smearing of 1,200 miles of Alaska's coastline with its oil.

It also marks the 20th Anniversary of a lie. Lots of lies: catalogued in a four-volume investigation of the disaster; four volumes you'll never see. I wrote that report, with my team of investigators working with the Natives preparing fraud and racketeering charges against Exxon. You'll never see the report because Exxon lawyers threatened the Natives, "Mention the f-word [fraud] and you'll never get a dime" of compensation to clean up the villages. The Natives agreed to drop the fraud charge -- and Exxon stiffed them on the money. You're surprised, right?

***

Doubtless, for the 20th Anniversary of the Great Spill, the media will schlep out that old story that the tanker ran aground because its captain was drunk at the wheel. Bullshit.

Yes, the captain was "three sheets to the wind" -- but sleeping it off below-decks. The ship was in the hands of the third mate who was driving blind. That is, the Exxon Valdez' Raycas radar system was turned off; turned off because it was busted and had been busted since its maiden voyage. Exxon didn't want to spend the cash to fix it. So the man at the helm, electronically blindfolded, drove it up onto the reef.

So why the story of the drunken skipper? Because it lets Exxon off the hook: Calling it a case of "drunk driving" turns the disaster into a case of human error, not corporate penny-pinching greed.

Indeed, the "human error" tale was the hook used by the Bush-stacked Supreme Court to slash the punitive damages awarded against Exxon by 90%, from $5 billion, to half a billion for 30,000 Natives and fishermen. Chief Justice John Roberts erased almost all of the payment due with the la-dee-dah comment, "What more can a corporation do?"

Well, here's what they could have done: Besides fix the radar, Exxon could have set out equipment to contain the spill. Containing a spill is actually quite simple. Stick a rubber skirt around the oil slick and suck it back up. The law requires it and Exxon promised it.

So, when the tanker hit, where was the rubber skirt and where was the sucker? Answer: The rubber skirt, called "boom" -- was a fiction. Exxon promised to have it sitting right there near the Native village at Bligh Reef. The oil company fulfilled that promised the cheap way: they lied.

And the lie was engineered at the very top. After the spill, we got our hands on a series of memos describing a secret meeting of chief executives of Exxon and its oil company partners, including ARCO, a unit of British Petroleum. In a meeting of these oil chieftains held in April 1988, ten months before the spill, Exxon rejected a plea from T.L. Polasek, the Vice-President of its Alaska shipping operations, to provide the oil spill containment equipment required by law. Polasek warned the CEOs it was "not possible" to contain a spill in the mid-Sound without the emergency set-up.

Exxon angrily vetoed ARCO's suggestion that the oil companies supply the rubber skirts and other materiel that would have prevented the spill from spreading, virtually eliminating the spill's damage.

Regulations state that no tanker may leave the Alaska port of Valdez without the "sucker" equipment, called a "containment barge," at the ready. Exxon signed off on the barge's readiness. But, that night twenty years ago, the barge was in dry-dock with its pumps locked up under arctic ice. By the time it arrived at the tanker, half a day after the spill, the oil was well along its thousand-mile killing path.

Natives watched as the now-unstoppable oil overwhelmed their islands. Eyak Native elder Henry Makarka saw an otter rip out its own eyes burning from oil residue. Henry, pointing down a waterside dead-zone, told me, in a mix of Alutiiq and English, "If I had a machine gun, I'd shoot every one of those white sons-of-bitches."

***

Exxon promised -- promised -- to pay the Natives and other fisherman for all their losses. The Chief of the Natives at Nanwalek lost his boat to bankruptcy. His village, like other villages, Native and non-Native, decayed into alcoholism. The Mayor of fishing port Cordova killed himself, citing Exxon in his suicide note.

On the island village of Chenega, Gail Evanoff's uncle Paul Kompkoff was hungry. Until the spill, he had lived on seal meat, razor clams and salmon Chenegans would catch, and on deer they hunted. The clams and salmon were declared deadly and the deer, not able to read the government warning signs, ate the poisoned vegetation and died.

The President of Exxon, Lee Raymond, helicoptered into Chenega for a photo op. He promised to compensate the Natives and all fishermen for their losses, and Exxon would thoroughly clean the beaches.

Uncle Paul told the Exxon chief of his hunger. The oil company, sensing PR disaster, shipped in seal meat to the isolated village. The cans were marked, "NOT FIT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION." Uncle Paul said, "Zoo food."

Paul didn't want a seal in a can. He wanted a boat to go fishing, to bring the village back to life.

Two years after the spill, Otto Harrison, General Manager of Exxon USA, told Evanoff and me to forget about a fishing boat for Uncle Paul. Exxon was immortal and Natives were not. The company would litigate for 20 years.

They did. Only now, two decades on, Exxon has finally begun its payout of the court award -- but only ten cents on the dollar. And Uncle Paul's boat? No matter. Paul's dead. So are a third of the fishermen owed the money.

***

Lee Raymond, President of Exxon at the time of the spill -- and its President when the company made the secret decision to do without oil spill equipment, retired in April 2006. The company awarded him a $400 million retirement bonus, more than double the bonuses received by all AIG executives combined.

***

Gail's oily hand never made it to national television. The networks were distracted with another oil story.

After sailing back to Chenega from Sleepy Bay, I sat with Uncle Paul, watching the smart bombs explode over Baghdad. Gulf War I had begun.

Uncle Paul was silent a long time. The generals on CNN pointed to the burning oil fields near Basra. Paul said, "I guess were all some kind of Native now."



Greg Palast investigated fraud and racketeering claims for the Chugach Natives of Alaska. Now a journalist whose work appears on BBC Television Newsnight, Palast is the author of the New York Times bestselling books The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse. Visit GregPalast.com for more.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

MAR 23, 2009 07:34 PM

Excellent piece. The SCOTUS case here was a fucking travesty, as is typical these days.

DecemberFlower

DecemberFlower

Denver, CO
September 2005

MAR 23, 2009 08:14 PM

Heart breaking indeed... frown

ClockworkJim

ClockworkJim

Levittown, NY
February 2004

MAR 23, 2009 09:02 PM

wildswan said:

Jace said:

AkJoey said:
I live in Alaska and have a fishing boat in Prince William sound, so I know first hand, it is fine now, I dont know why everyone is still going on about it, there are plenty of fish and I basically am dodging sea otters, seals, sea lions and any other marine mamals you can think of all of the time. although it was a major tragedy and I am by no means sticking up for the exxon corporation, I think it is time to let it go.


I think the whole point of the article was to... not... do everything you just said. And he was pretty convincing.



Yeah, what the fucking fuck?! I think we can all just ignore this missive.


Well, the writer of the article provides anecdotal evidence, and a commentator provides differing anecdotal evidence. Aside from one being a published author, I see neither offering evidence of their statements.

Although I am inclined to believe the oil is still their. From what I have learned, it does not clean up easily.
I just always like to see the authors sources when I read an article with specific accusations like this.

LimoWreck

LimoWreck

I'm lost
October 2007

MAR 23, 2009 09:21 PM

This was an excellent article. I'm not really amazed that I hadn't heard of this. Is there any way to learn the details to the entire thing somewhere?

NurseEvy

NurseEvy

Dayton, OH
March 2009

MAR 23, 2009 09:26 PM

Wow. I'm am just a touch on the young side to remember the exact start of this ordeal, but I have heard about it most of my life.

This was an exceptionally good read and, as such, I sent it to my mom, sister, and boyfriend.

Very well done.

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

MAR 23, 2009 09:31 PM

i got totally bored after the first 2 paragraphs. love the all caps for emphasis. you really brought the thunder on that one.

Stiles

Stiles

Oakland, CA
November 2002

MAR 23, 2009 09:39 PM

theconservative said:
i got totally bored after the first 2 paragraphs. love the all caps for emphasis. you really brought the thunder on that one.



Those four-sentence paragraphs were too much for you, eh?

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

MAR 23, 2009 09:41 PM

yeah...they really overwhelmed me.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Riverside, CA
April 2004

MAR 23, 2009 11:34 PM

theconservative said:
i got totally bored after the first 2 paragraphs. love the all caps for emphasis. you really brought the thunder on that one.



Speaking of bringing the thunder, I wish you had at least tried to convince us how the free market could have solved this problem.

Liathach

Liathach

United Kingdom
December 2008

MAR 24, 2009 02:48 AM

Love the article, and hope to see many more like it, not least because we actually have a debate developing and not the usual group based consensus. I work for a large multinational too, and despite the fact there is plenty of propaganda about how we should put our customers first, have high standards of integrity, etc, etc, when push comes to shove, it's the bottom line that counts. And not the bottom line over the next decade or two, but the next quarter. So costs are cut, staff are dismissed, standards are dropped, just so we can keep the Wall Street boys happy in Quarter Two. And don't we all know how dependable they are? As they say on The Wire, 'Follow the money'.

DeckhandDave

DeckhandDave

Astoria, OR
December 2006

MAR 24, 2009 03:20 AM

AkJoey said:
I live in Alaska and have a fishing boat in Prince William sound, so I know first hand, it is fine now, I dont know why everyone is still going on about it, there are plenty of fish and I basically am dodging sea otters, seals, sea lions and any other marine mamals you can think of all of the time. although it was a major tragedy and I am by no means sticking up for the exxon corporation, I think it is time to let it go.



It's great that the life is coming back, but that's not the point .
I had just started fishing there the year before the spill.
Do you know how hard it was to buy a boat, permit and gear as an 18 year old? How many years I worked to save the money to start fishing for myself?
I lost it all after that spill.
It's 20 years later and we still haven't seen the money promised us. If they drag it out long enough, most all the people involved will be dead. Hell, most of the men who taught me to fish are. They went to their graves having lost a huge part of their lives there, and never were paid the money due them.
Exxon could have done the right thing years ago.
How much profit did they make in just the past year?

Liathach

Liathach

United Kingdom
December 2008

MAR 24, 2009 06:26 AM

In terms of the litigation issue, and how long Exxon are prepared to string it out, I guess it's hardly surprising. Invididual cases of mesophylioma from asbestos exposure have often been strung out in the UK in the certain knowledge that the victims tend not to survive too long. Or, the most glaring case of getting off Scot free - Union Carbide and the Bhopal disaster. 20,000 dead, gassed to death. When Saddam Hussein did it, it was a crime against his people, when a corporation does it, the lawyers rush to bury the issue in legal complexities, and avoid any implication of corporate responsibility. Do we really think that oil companies in Nigeria, Chinese businesses in Sudan or Zimbabwe, or Italian toxic waste disposal firms are operating at what we consider acceptable standards of corporate and social integrity? The only surprising thing is that anyone is surprised when companies behave like this.

theconservative

theconservative

Spring, TX
October 2004

MAR 24, 2009 06:29 AM

RedBstrd said:

theconservative said:
i got totally bored after the first 2 paragraphs. love the all caps for emphasis. you really brought the thunder on that one.



Speaking of bringing the thunder, I wish you had at least tried to convince us how the free market could have solved this problem.



nice one. wow.

Bren73

Bren73

USA
October 2005

MAR 24, 2009 09:05 AM

reason #102,431,877 that this nation is a corporate fascist state.

nicole_powers

nicole_powers

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAR 24, 2009 09:16 AM

gunner762 said:

AkJoey said:
I live in Alaska and have a fishing boat in Prince William sound, so I know first hand, it is fine now, I dont know why everyone is still going on about it, there are plenty of fish and I basically am dodging sea otters, seals, sea lions and any other marine mamals you can think of all of the time. although it was a major tragedy and I am by no means sticking up for the exxon corporation, I think it is time to let it go.



It's great that the life is coming back, but that's not the point .
I had just started fishing there the year before the spill.
Do you know how hard it was to buy a boat, permit and gear as an 18 year old? How many years I worked to save the money to start fishing for myself?
I lost it all after that spill.
It's 20 years later and we still haven't seen the money promised us. If they drag it out long enough, most all the people involved will be dead. Hell, most of the men who taught me to fish are. They went to their graves having lost a huge part of their lives there, and never were paid the money due them.
Exxon could have done the right thing years ago.
How much profit did they make in just the past year?



We have an article going live at 10 am detailing how tough the spill was on the local fishermen (it goes into detail about the permit issue) -- I very much hope you'll comment on it -- I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next