• commentary
  • TUESDAY FEBRUARY 24 2009 6:00 AM

I Don't Know What's Happening

America is clearly overburdened with morons. They are a loud, uneducated group of people who live by one slogan: Taxes Are Bad. No matter the situation, taxes are bad, because government is bad. They’ve now gone as far as to start two glorious wars and combined them with some juicy tax cuts, because, if you are going to spend over a trillion dollars, by all means don’t pay for it. They’ve ruined our country with fiscal irresponsibility and they’d like to fix that – with tax cuts. They created a mythological character named Reagan and now they would very much like to follow him to the bottom of the sea. The only problem is, they are going to take the rest of us with them.

The tax-cut-only-Republicans are no different than crazy religious parents who don’t take their kids to the hospital because they believe in prayer. Much like those kids, our country is dying. Taxes are how we pay for this crazy thing called society. With an endless stream of tax cuts, we end up with what we have now: Schools in shocking disrepair, fewer teachers, bridges, roads and highways falling apart, horrible traffic congestion, sicker people, more crime, oh, and enormous debt, which handicaps the government’s ability to deal with recessions and depressions.

But, the government can’t do anything right, so we have to cut taxes. All one has to do is look at the amazing success of Wall Street over the past year to see how brilliant of a statement this is. Or the shocking disaster of privatizing the Iraq War, where private companies turn so many things into colossal piles of shit, at a far higher cost than if the government had done the work. Yes, private companies are the way to success and government is the way to failure. Lewis Black said it best.



Yeah. It’s people. Turns out mistakes can and will be made, whether it is government or private companies. Who would have thought? I’m actually super pleased with our socialized fire departments. Back in the day, they were private companies, but now they are paid for by the government. Doesn’t take a genius to figure out why. Our crazy, hippy highway system was fucking sweet when the government made it. After years of starving it to death, it has lost a bit of its luster, but still, not bad. Taxes promote general welfare, which is, you know, kind of a good thing.

But the government fucks everything up!



What are you five? Yes, everybody fucks up sometimes. The fact that you can't see the good the government has done is absolutely pathetic. If your kid makes a mistake, why don’t you take him out in the backyard and kill him with a shovel? I mean, he made a mistake, after all. By all means, don’t attempt to fix the situation. Don’t show him a different way. The idea that the government always screws up is such juvenile and pathetic thinking it is astounding, as is the idea it is not repairable. Completely fucking astounding. You have the analytic ability of a hamster.

More than anything, it’s the rigidity of the position. Saying tax cuts is always the way to go is nothing short of cult like. Always saying government needs to be smaller is childish. Government needs to be more efficient, which has nothing to do with size. Everything needs to be more efficient. We should always be looking for ways to streamline. Unfortunately, we usually don’t notice something is wrong until there is a problem – you know, because we are human beings. We certainly didn’t notice our awesome, kick ass, private mortgage industry was giving home loans to hobos until it was too late. (And if you blame the housing meltdown solely on Freddie and Fanny, you are unread and, really, very stupid).

The Reagan trickle down tax cut policy is now believed to be a sound economic policy by too many people. It is a sham, a fool’s game, a myth and extremely irresponsible. The wasteland that is California is the future of America. And yet, the idea of tax cuts being a healing elixir is believed by so many that Democrats now tout their tax cut prowess. That’s why we’re doomed. People have bought into the idea of “small government," but when asked about individual programs provided by the government, they love them. It’s a broad and stupid argument that has won and will lead to our doom. There is no one-way to do things, there are many. Once you come to believe there is only one way, like the Republican hoard, you are pretty much doomed. I find it baffling that so many hold such ignorant beliefs with such religious veracity. I look around and I just don’t know what’s happening, only that it spells ruin.

Oh, and Reagan raised taxes three times, you clown fuckers.


FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday and Friday for more from FearTheReaper


 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

6 | 7 | 8

Next

Comments
SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 27, 2009 02:13 PM

thekiller said:

Horrorflick said:
Oh, and the same people who don't think that going to war against the rich in a violent uprising is necessary at this point are either A: Just scared. (I know, violence and guns are scary things, I don't blame you.) or B: Too busy trying to be rich themselves. Shame on you, you are worse than they are. They (most of the rich) are idiots who inherited their money, they were born into it and will die with most of it. (Not if I have my way, that is.) Prosperity and success are not just necessarily capital wealth, it involves a lot of things like satisfaction, peace, happiness, being ok with the world around you and other people, etc. Bottom-liners just don't get this. If you're busy fucking people over, alienating your friends, family and whoever you can actually get to trust you for more than five minutes in order to get enough money to move into Grosse Pointe, you're missing the point entirely: You will never be rich like they are through work. None of those people have ever known what it is like to make car payments, house payments, etc. While you're busy leading up to your first heart attack, ask yourself this question: How much is enough? How much do you really fucking need to be at peace?



At least here we have a liberal who is honest about wanting to be a leech and steal from other people.. good luck with the violent uprising though!



Where does he say that? Point it out.

RandomNerd

RandomNerd

I'm lost
January 2005

FEB 27, 2009 04:03 PM

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is, sockpuppet. Horrorflick said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post. Why TheKiller didn't reply to that is beyond me, but Horrorflick did post it. That's different from "Leeching" but that isn't being a productive citizen.

Edit: I should be ashamed of myself for abetting this argument in any way, and that I'm not disturbs me greatly.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

FEB 27, 2009 04:06 PM

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is. He said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post.



Anarchists are fun to play with.

RandomNerd

RandomNerd

I'm lost
January 2005

FEB 27, 2009 04:09 PM

Coyotemike said:

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is. He said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post.



Anarchists are fun to play with.



But it's hell getting them to attend the meetings. biggrin

"Anarchy" is such a vague term. I gave up on libertarianism a while back when I realized I couldn't trust a man who wanted to live in a world where I can't call the cops....

TheFuckOffKid

TheFuckOffKid

NEWSWIRE

Australia

FEB 27, 2009 04:37 PM

RandomNerd said:

Coyotemike said:

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is. He said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post.



Anarchists are fun to play with.



But it's hell getting them to attend the meetings. biggrin

"Anarchy" is such a vague term. I gave up on libertarianism a while back when I realized I couldn't trust a man who wanted to live in a world where I can't call the cops....



Well, sometimes there's a fuzzy line, but I tend to think of political libertarianism as anarchy plus property rights.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 27, 2009 04:43 PM

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is, sockpuppet. Horrorflick said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post. Why TheKiller didn't reply to that is beyond me, but Horrorflick did post it. That's different from "Leeching" but that isn't being a productive citizen.

Edit: I should be ashamed of myself for abetting this argument in any way, and that I'm not disturbs me greatly.



Ah, no, there it isn't. Nothing about leeching. And definitely doesn't support thekiller's whining about liberals wanting to be leeches. There is a distinction between leeching and violent revolution, is there not?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 27, 2009 04:44 PM

RandomNerd said:
I gave up on libertarianism a while back when I realized I couldn't trust a man who wanted to live in a world where I can't call the cops....



Precisely.

RandomNerd

RandomNerd

I'm lost
January 2005

FEB 27, 2009 04:45 PM

TheFuckOffKid said:

RandomNerd said:

Coyotemike said:

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is. He said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post.



Anarchists are fun to play with.



But it's hell getting them to attend the meetings. biggrin

"Anarchy" is such a vague term. I gave up on libertarianism a while back when I realized I couldn't trust a man who wanted to live in a world where I can't call the cops....



Well, sometimes there's a fuzzy line, but I tend to think of political libertarianism as anarchy plus property rights.



Well, yes, I was aware of that. Minarchists feel that government has to protect against "Force and Fraud" and all that, it's just that I realized the world doesn't work that way -as a whole, people really can't handle their own affairs, and laws are necessary. Which is part of what FTR's saying in the OP, in his profanity-laden manner.

RandomNerd

RandomNerd

I'm lost
January 2005

FEB 27, 2009 04:59 PM

SockPuppet said:

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is, sockpuppet. Horrorflick said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post. Why TheKiller didn't reply to that is beyond me, but Horrorflick did post it. That's different from "Leeching" but that isn't being a productive citizen.

Edit: I should be ashamed of myself for abetting this argument in any way, and that I'm not disturbs me greatly.



Ah, no, there it isn't. Nothing about leeching. And definitely doesn't support thekiller's whining about liberals wanting to be leeches. There is a distinction between leeching and violent revolution, is there not?



Okay, first of all, I realize that first sentence was condescending- provoking you to snark back, "Ah, no, there it isn't". I apologize.

Secondly, I think violent revolution's worse than leeching.

Thirdly, I'm not on thekiller's side. He's using an association fallacy because Horrorflick said something that was uncalled for. I'm aware he's trolling.

Towelly

Towelly

Philadelphia, PA
January 2007

FEB 27, 2009 05:17 PM

RandomNerd said:
"Anarchy" is such a vague term. I gave up on libertarianism a while back when I realized I couldn't trust a man who wanted to live in a world where I can't call the cops....



It's called being poor in Vegas, but then again, most minarchists haven't really experienced that.

Actually had the 911 dispatcher say "Oh good, we don't have to send anyone out then" after a bunch of gangbangers noticed me making like I was taking pictures with my phone and ran away. While really phoning frantically for help. After said gangbangers pulled a guy out of a truck through the driver-side window and beat his head against the pavement.

Seeing things like that tends to put a damper on one's enthusiasm for, and expectation of surviving, life in the state of nature.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 28, 2009 03:35 PM

RandomNerd said:

SockPuppet said:

RandomNerd said:

Horrorflick said:
Fucking period. If the rich 1% still want to hold onto what's "theirs", that is simply not going to happen if the other 99% just up and decide to take it by force. (That is, of course, not going to be pretty, but so be it.) Let's lynch a few rich folk and see what happens!



And there it is, sockpuppet. Horrorflick said we should kill the rich and take their stuff, but in a different post. Why TheKiller didn't reply to that is beyond me, but Horrorflick did post it. That's different from "Leeching" but that isn't being a productive citizen.

Edit: I should be ashamed of myself for abetting this argument in any way, and that I'm not disturbs me greatly.



Ah, no, there it isn't. Nothing about leeching. And definitely doesn't support thekiller's whining about liberals wanting to be leeches. There is a distinction between leeching and violent revolution, is there not?



Okay, first of all, I realize that first sentence was condescending- provoking you to snark back, "Ah, no, there it isn't". I apologize.

Secondly, I think violent revolution's worse than leeching.

Thirdly, I'm not on thekiller's side. He's using an association fallacy because Horrorflick said something that was uncalled for. I'm aware he's trolling.



No worries smile

Now I'm just waiting for thekiller to try to justify his post.

PortlandMusician

PortlandMusician

Beaverton, OR
September 2008

FEB 28, 2009 10:28 PM

lawber499043 said:
ha ha, I love liberals, they are the smartest most educated people on the planet. Thank you for all you do.



I love how you had absolutely nothing of any signifigance or intelligence to offer. Thank you for all you didn't do, by sparing us your ideas.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

6 | 7 | 8

Next