• news
  • WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 18 2009 10:30 AM

Barack Obama and the Dirtiest Oil on Earth

President Obama will visit Ottawa on Thursday. On the agenda are talks regarding the tanking economy, Canada’s withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2011, energy securtiy and Alberta’s oilsands. You can bet Arctic sovereignty will receive at least passing mention, though how far either Obama or Prime Minister Harper are willing to run with it is another question. No real news, there.

State-side, Obama very recently signed off on an almost $800 billion dollar bailout package, while the Federal government here has been busy dolling out the money from our own $40 billion deficit spending spree.

Bruce Campbell, not the actor of B-movie fame but the director of Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, a left-wing think tank, recently released a report condemning the Harper government for “piggybacking” on the American stimulus package while failing to offer any genuine leadership or initiative to combat the failing economy at home. "Rather than talking about the virtues of free trade with the American president, the Conservative government should be implementing its own 'Buy Canada' policy in order to create jobs here in Canada," Campbell told the CBC.

Indeed, the NDP party was quick to champion a “buy Canadian” amendment to the federal budget, a suggestion that was dismissed with contempt by the Conservatives and, of course, not included in the final budget. Obama, for his part, told Canadians they “shouldn’t be too concerned” with Buy American provisions when he talked to CBC news on Tuesday, February 17, 2009.

In a conversation with Chris Hedges, political philosopher Sheldon S. Wolin spoke of the many troubles facing the Obama administration in the months to come:

“My greatest fear is that the Obama administration will achieve relatively little in terms of structural change …They may at best keep the system going. But there is a growing pessimism. Every day we hear how much longer the recession will continue. They are already talking about beyond next year. The economic difficulties are more profound than we had guessed and because of globalization more difficult to deal with. I wish the political establishment, the parties and leadership, would become more aware of the depths of the problem. They can’t keep throwing money at this. They have to begin structural changes that involve a very different approach from a market economy. I don’t think this will happen.”



As if the shitty economy wasn’t enough, the unraveling situation in Afghanistan refuses to go away too, and Canada is ready to get the hell out when our commitment ends in 2011. To date, over one hundred Canadian soldiers have died in Afghanistan, and with very little that any politician can show for it. For his part, Obama has angered many of those of the anti-war persuasion by committing to raise troop levels in Afghanistan by over 50% in the coming months, something that amounts to approximately 17,000 troops being sent to the area if the New York Times is to be believed.

With such doom and gloom on all major fronts, it is easy to see how Obama and Harper will be unwilling to talk in depth about the “dirty oil” problem facing North America’s energy security. It’s just too goddamn sticky.

However, the pesky issue that many would rather was swept under the carpet is being thrust into the limelight by affected Micisew Cree and Athabasca Chipewyan First Nations and the environmental group Forest Ethics, who placed a full page advertisement in USA Today urging the President to consider the implications of using “the diritiest oil on Earth.”

Alberta, for their part, denounced the whole ad as nothing but special interest groups raising disproportionately loud voices, citing their recent “20 Year Plan” for “Greening the Oilsands” as proof of their commitment to the “sustainability” of oil sands development. The 50-page document published by the provincial government, however, offers no insight into how this will be accomplished.

Like a true optimist, Obama told CBC’s The National that “technology” will solve the filthy problems created by stripping the oil out of Alberta’s bitumen deposits. The issue has long been on the people''s agenda for Obama's trip. As a president who made Change his trademark, pulling America from the teat of cheap oil has got to be among his top priorities. He is undoubtedly going to lean on Canada, in some way, to take one for the team, or so he would have Peter Mansbridge believe.

I have no illusions that the grip Canada or America has on the teat will lessen voluntary any time soon, but better we let up now and save ourselves the trauma of a violent separation later.

Speaking of violent separation, Harper has also said he would not even consider bringing up the case of Omar Khadr with the visiting president. All three opposition parties have publicly called upon the Prime Minister to appeal on behalf of Khadr, who was arrested as a minor in Afghanistan in 2002, and who has been held, since, in Guantanamo Bay. That’s shitty, hey?

So, when Obama and Harper are hanging out Thursday, enjoying Ottawa’s finest beef on the public’s tab, we can all rest assured they will be talking about “issues that matter.” Our respective media establishments have assured us that it is so, and thus we can go on with our dreary, doom filled day with no fear: America’s president and his semi-elected Canadian counterpart are on the case. Hell, Obama’s friends with Spider-Man, right? Shit, no problem! They got this shit on lock-down, right? Right?!?


Dean Jensen lives in Winnipeg, MB, where he writes for The Manitoban.


 
Comments
FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

FEB 18, 2009 11:36 AM

The whole "Buy American/Buy Canadian" controversy is seriously irking me. While I would love to see Canada stop farming out some of the manufacturing jobs that we could REALLY use here, alienating trade partners is a shitty idea. Especially if you take into consideration that we posted the first trade deficit in quite some time last month.

America isn't going to stop buying Canadian oil. They can't. Will they lean on Alberta to clean up? Sure. Are they going to simply close the tap and wait? Not a fucking chance. They need oil. They need a safe, conflict free place to get it. Iraq isn't working out. Venezuela's not much of an option. They need us as much as we need them. Probably worse. We can always start selling more to China.

And Harper is a total douchebag for refusing to even entertain the idea of repatriating Khadr. A full blown twat.

Bill_the_Cat

Bill_the_Cat

New Zealand
May 2005

FEB 18, 2009 11:45 AM

One thing that this article makes clear: I need to start paying more attention to Canadian politics again. blush
Thanks for this.

abbazappa

abbazappa

Sacramento, CA
June 2006

FEB 18, 2009 11:53 AM

Protectionism is a bad idea especially in economic downturns. It might sound good that the nation will put high tariffs so that people will buy goods made nationally but this will lead to other nations to do the same which will hurt any exports that America or Canada might be making. This kind of policy only prolongs economic downturns and hurts foreign policy negotiations with other nations.

velvet_petal

velvet_petal

I'm lost
November 2006

FEB 18, 2009 03:26 PM

FreakPirate said:
America isn't going to stop buying Canadian oil.


Not that we would necessarily want to stop, but we could greatly reduce. It is bloody expensive to pull oil from Alberta's tar sands and the quality is less than optimal. It's more a matter of economics than issues of protectionism which will decrease the world's demand for Albertan oil if the market stays as it is. It's just not economically viable, and there are greener sources, which could mean some hard times ahead for Alberta.

djensen

djensen

I'm lost
April 2006

FEB 18, 2009 08:41 PM

More of the same...

Cap & Trade

dholokov

dholokov

Toronto, ON
April 2003

FEB 19, 2009 01:42 PM

velvet_petal said:

FreakPirate said:
America isn't going to stop buying Canadian oil.


Not that we would necessarily want to stop, but we could greatly reduce. It is bloody expensive to pull oil from Alberta's tar sands and the quality is less than optimal. It's more a matter of economics than issues of protectionism which will decrease the world's demand for Albertan oil if the market stays as it is. It's just not economically viable, and there are greener sources, which could mean some hard times ahead for Alberta.



It's interesting to note that if the American stimulus bill has its desired effect, people are going to be lining up to buy tar sands oil at $125+ a barrel. If countries are too lazy to take the initiative to reduce consumption overall, then they can put credible pressure on Alberta to clean its oil, or have a roaring economy, but not both.

Sociodrunk

Sociodrunk

Canada
January 2008

MAR 04, 2009 02:22 AM

I loved how that in the National geographic issue on alberta's evil oil sands, there was an article on chinas "mystic waters".
I understand everyone wants to buy into the whole al gore religion of "evil alberta oil" crap , but may we all be told that Alberta is trying A LOT harder than say China, India, or say Ontario to clean up their messes in their own back yard. All the oilsands are concentrating on one area... so it's easy to create horrific statistics.
lets get off the whole "evil capitalist car idler" crap and privatize the CBC.

silversoul7

silversoul7

Portland, OR
January 2008

MAR 04, 2009 09:53 AM

abbazappa said:
Protectionism is a bad idea especially in economic downturns. It might sound good that the nation will put high tariffs so that people will buy goods made nationally but this will lead to other nations to do the same which will hurt any exports that America or Canada might be making. This kind of policy only prolongs economic downturns and hurts foreign policy negotiations with other nations.


Trade is generally good when capital remains relatively immobile, and this was David Ricardo's assumption when he explained comparative advantage. He didn't forsee outsourcing like we have today. So free trade is best between countries of similar developmental levels, which in the case of the US would mean Canada, Western Europe, and Japan.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

MAR 04, 2009 03:46 PM

Sociodrunk said:
I loved how that in the National geographic issue on alberta's evil oil sands, there was an article on chinas "mystic waters".
I understand everyone wants to buy into the whole al gore religion of "evil alberta oil" crap , but may we all be told that Alberta is trying A LOT harder than say China, India, or say Ontario to clean up their messes in their own back yard. All the oilsands are concentrating on one area... so it's easy to create horrific statistics.
lets get off the whole "evil capitalist car idler" crap and privatize the CBC.



Privatise the Canadian-born Chinese? What exactly are you getting at here?

dholokov

dholokov

Toronto, ON
April 2003

MAR 04, 2009 10:50 PM

Sociodrunk said:
I loved how that in the National geographic issue on alberta's evil oil sands, there was an article on chinas "mystic waters".
I understand everyone wants to buy into the whole al gore religion of "evil alberta oil" crap , but may we all be told that Alberta is trying A LOT harder than say China, India, or say Ontario to clean up their messes in their own back yard. All the oilsands are concentrating on one area... so it's easy to create horrific statistics.
lets get off the whole "evil capitalist car idler" crap and privatize the CBC.



China and India I could see, but Ontario's messes aren't nearly as bad as Alberta's to begin with. Besides, if we had tar sands for oil production, westerners couldn't keep whining about the NEP for three decades after its gone.

djensen

djensen

I'm lost
April 2006

MAR 20, 2009 06:27 AM

Tar Sands - free book!
not a bad primer for anyone who hasn't read up on Tar Sands... not terribly in depth but, again, a good primer, & Free!

Otoki

Otoki

SUICIDEGIRL

Minnesota, USA

MAR 20, 2009 10:57 AM

I see shit like this and then wonder why we aren't hearing updates about green crude

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

MAR 20, 2009 11:21 AM

Otoki said:
I see shit like this and then wonder why we aren't hearing updates about green crude



I think it's easier to convince people to touch up existing technology than to invest in newer, less proven ones. The oil sands facilities are already built, they're already running. And they aren't going to stop any time soon so the discussion needs to happen. Improvements need to be made. Yes, we need to find better sources of fuel but until that happens we need to do better with what we have.

ARRR!!!