• commentary
  • THURSDAY JANUARY 29 2009 6:00 AM

Here Come The SAGtards



It’s quite amusing to watch the Screen Actors Guild break out into a full-blown civil war, with an undemocratic coup thrown in, all while trying to negotiate a contract with a formidable enemy. When this is all wrapped up and rich actors have destroyed the ability of middle class actors to make a living in the future, a book or two should be written to illustrate how not to conduct a contract negotiation. We are witnessing an epic failure and the villains are quite obvious: Amy Brenneman, Kate Walsh, Ken Howard, Ned Vaughn, James Cromwell and Adam Arkin and their pals.

I should disclose that I am a member of SAG and make a decent wage as an actor, but I’m not one of the actors affected by this contract. I have no dog in this fight. I don’t much like acting in TV shows or movies because I don’t like homework. The amount of time wasted preparing to get a chance to get an audition to get a part is not worth it, in my opinion. I only act in commercials and am quite happy doing so. No studying, no preparation, just walk in, act like an idiot and off you go. It’s a pretty easy way to make money and I don’t have to spend a day sitting in a chair next to shocking assholes like James Spader. Seriously, he is one of the worst human beings I have ever worked with. William Shatner, on the other hand, is a peach.

If you were paying attention to the entertainment news Monday, you would have noticed SAG fired its chief negotiator. They then replaced him with a guy who is known for working with producers. You know, the other side. The enemy, as it were. His quickly released his first public comments as national executive director.

“No question about it, such a strike would be devastating, particularly on the heels of the 100 day WGA strike. People are only getting back on their feet now by paying off credit card and home equity debt they used to get through the first work stoppage. Even if some film has been stockpiled by then, SAG can basically shut down new production, which means no work for many people.”



Oh. Here’s a small bit of information. A union’s only power comes from the threat of shutting down business. Without the threat of a strike, unions don’t really have much to use during negotiations. It’s pretty much the first chapter in Union Negotiations for Retards. Actors like Kate Walsh and Amy Brenneman (who appear together in the piece of shit that is Private Practice) just took away any power SAG may have to get a decent contract. Oddly, Amy is a producer and Kate is married to a studio executive. Who would have known?

So, how did these morons come into power? Here’s where SAG becomes an amusing farce of a union. They were elected. They ran against the current SAG leadership in September and won. Fair and square, right? The democratic process, is it? Sort of. If you looked at the candidates and the winners, you’d notice one thing: Only famous people won. It had nothing to do with policies and stances, it was only about fame.

Sad and pathetic. The vast majority of actors in the union make little to no money and they voted for famous people, without considering their views. Now they are about to be destroyed by the new board, which only seems to care about the interest of rich actors. Sounds like a certain country named America over the past 28 years, doesn’t it? The little guy voting for the people who will fuck him over the most, over and over again.

Kate, Adam and Amy have a name for their group – Unite for Strength. It’s Orwellian and could have been dreamed up by the great Karl Rove. When Unite for Strength first formed, they wanted to introduce “qualified voting.” That would have eliminated actors who haven’t worked much in the past five years from voting on a contract. That’s called “Uniting,” I guess. The National SAG Board voted to send a strike authorization to members. Now, the negotiators would have a big weapon to hold over the heads of the studios.

Wait, hold on. The economy went into the shitter. Amy and Kate and their minions saw an opening. They took their fight pubic. They placed ads in papers and gave interviews, completely splitting the union (the dumbest thing you can to during a negotiation). There's this crazy saying, "United We Stand, Divided We Fall." You'd have to be a fucking idiot not to understand the "divided" part. So, the group held an unconstitutional meeting in New York, during which the president of SAG and Dave Allen, the lead negotiator, were chastised and vilified. They also sort of forgot to invite actors on the New York Board who supported Allen, like Eric Begosian. It was pretty much a Salem Witch Trial sort of affair.

Now the membership was in a tizzy. Actors creating drama, who knew that would happen? Unite for Strength demanded the National Board rescind the strike authorization vote. More meetings were held. Lots of screaming and yelling. So, Allen agreed to rescind the vote and he also said SAG should send the contract offer to the membership for a vote. That’s called a compromise. Turns out he can negotiate. Seems extremely fair, right? Nope.

Unite for Strength then held a meeting to oust Allen two weeks ago. Well, they didn't actually hold the meeting to oust Allen, they were asked point blank if that was their intention and they said "No." It was just an ordinary business meeting. But once it started, they introduced a motion to oust Allen –– that way no one could prepare a defense for him. Some SAG leadership filibustered the meeting using procedural moves. Seriously, all this shit happened DURING a contract negotiation. How do you think negotiations are going?

Finally, on Monday, the board voted to remove Allen.

The Screen Actors Guild National Board of Directors by written assent today terminated the employment of Doug Allen and appointed former Guild general counsel David White to replace him as interim national executive director. The board further appointed longtime Guild senior advisor John T. McGuire as chief negotiator.

The board also disbanded the TV/Theatrical Negotiating Committee and directed that it be replaced with a Taskforce directed to complete these negotiations on behalf of the board of directors.



Oooooo. A “task force.” Nothing instills confidence like replacing a negotiating committee with a task force. (Insert picture of studio heads laughing, drinking champagne and doing blow off hookers asses.)

A union in such a state of disarray — with the membership running a newspaper advertisement pleading with its own executive board to “lighten up,” and its own board members trying to get their chief negotiator fired because he’s “too mean,”— deserves every bad thing that happens to it. (That sound you hear in the background is Jimmy Hoffa spinning in his grave.)

It’s a shocking state of affairs. They fired a negotiator for negotiating too hard. Oh, and it cost them $500,000 to pay him out of his contract. Now, that’s quality use of membership dues.

Taking out a splashy newspaper ad that’s critical of your own leadership — an ad for all the world to see (particularly the opportunistic Alliance) — is tantamount to economic treason. Even given Hollywood’s storied reputation for bombastic egos and towering self-aggrandizement, what could have motivated someone to pull a bone-headed stunt like that



Insane narcissism.

If you’re a longshoreman, steelworker or paperworker, and you take out a newspaper ad like that, you’re likely to be picking up your teeth off the floor or finding your car on fire. In “real” unions, you do you’re bitching at the union hall, not in the media. You want to be an “independent,” fine, go it alone. But if you’re a union member, you stay united.



And that’s why SAG is a farce of a union. If this were a real union, people like Amy Brennerman and Kate Walsh would fear for their lives, as God intended. Did I mention they implemented new rules forbidding the President of SAG from speaking to the press on the union's behalf? Yeah, they president of the union cannot speak to the media. Brilliant. The elected leader of the union has been muted. I wonder if that will cause half the union to become enraged. Hey, I did mention all this is happening during a contract negotiation, right?

The worst part of this entire story is that Unite for Strength is using this contract negotiation stalemate to undermine the union in hopes of merging with AFTRA. Yes, they are making SAG less powerful to merge it with a shockingly ineffective union. It’s mind-boggling how fucking stupid these people are. AFTRA has tried to merge with SAG 17 times over the years. And 17 times, the SAG membership has said no. So, obviously the best thing to do is to use backhanded maneuvers to push a SAG-AFTRA merger. But that is the Unite for Strength endgame. Unfortunately, it’s one that will fail.

You’re going to hear a lot of crazy shit about SAG from here on out. In the end, this will be an epic fail for the Hollywood history books. This is the death of a union. Just remember the names of the people who killed it: Amy Brenneman, Kate Walsh, Ken Howard, Ned Vaughn, James Cromwell and Adam Arkin.


FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday for more from FearTheReaper and read his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 
Comments
mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

JAN 29, 2009 07:54 AM

A SAG strike would make me giddy if they got replacement, non-union actors just to fuck with the stars, especially really mediocre ones. Picture Amy Brenneman being replace on her show by some soccer mom who's greatest accomplishment is getting to play Roxie in the Buttscratch, SD production of Chicago and has the emotional range of Keanu Reeves.

I don't mean to shit on you FTR, but that would be some funny shit.

Elichrusos

Elichrusos

I'm lost
October 2007

JAN 29, 2009 09:34 AM

I first heard about this from Wil Wheaton, whose measured and restrained post on the subject is recommended reading for everyone.

Weatherpunk

Weatherpunk

Japan
June 2008

JAN 29, 2009 10:04 AM

I think if an actor is famous/rich/esteemed enough to become a producer or director at some point in their career, they should be rendered ineligible for board positions. Unions are meant to protect the little guy/gal, and there is a division between management & labor for a reason:

One directs, the other performs. Good luck SAG, you're gonna need it!

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JAN 29, 2009 10:14 AM

Elichrusos said:
I first heard about this from Wil Wheaton, whose measured and restrained post on the subject is recommended reading for everyone.



It is measured and restrained and over a month old. Things have changed for the worse. It's sort of like linking to an article about not starting the Iraq War after the Iraq War has started.

Weatherpunk said:
I think if an actor is famous/rich/esteemed enough to become a producer or director at some point in their career, they should be rendered ineligible for board positions. Unions are meant to protect the little guy/gal, and there is a division between management & labor for a reason:

One directs, the other performs. Good luck SAG, you're gonna need it!



All Hollywood unions have this problem. It is why they are very ineffective unions.

obd

obd

Venice, CA
June 2003

JAN 29, 2009 10:37 AM

FearTheReaper said:

Elichrusos said:
I first heard about this from Wil Wheaton, whose measured and restrained post on the subject is recommended reading for everyone.



It is measured and restrained and over a month old. Things have changed for the worse. It's sort of like linking to an article about not starting the Iraq War after the Iraq War has started.



The one point I took from Will's post is that in three years (once the union s have merged, or are at least negotiating together again) the actors will be able to negotiate from a better position. It seems that merger is the only way forward. I don't understand how having two separate unions with overlapping jurisdictions is good for actors.

Elichrusos

Elichrusos

I'm lost
October 2007

JAN 29, 2009 10:51 AM

FearTheReaper said:

Elichrusos said:
I first heard about this from Wil Wheaton, whose measured and restrained post on the subject is recommended reading for everyone.



It is measured and restrained and over a month old. Things have changed for the worse. It's sort of like linking to an article about not starting the Iraq War after the Iraq War has started.



Thanks for your input!

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JAN 29, 2009 11:12 AM

obd said:

The one point I took from Will's post is that in three years (once the union s have merged, or are at least negotiating together again) the actors will be able to negotiate from a better position. It seems that merger is the only way forward. I don't understand how having two separate unions with overlapping jurisdictions is good for actors.




It's pie in the sky thinking. The unions, specifically WGA and DGA and SAG and AFTRA and SAG and the DGA don't like each other. DGA undermines all the unions at every opportunity, as does AFTRA. DGA has very different objectives and needs that WGA and SAG. And SAG has even more different needs than WGA and DGA.

They will not merge and if anything, the other unions have learned to never merge with SAG. I mostly hang with writers and the prevailing attitude is thankful we avoided waiting until SAGs contract was up.

The "wait three years" thinking is what led to a horrible DVD deal that still holds today. Once this stuff is agreed to, increases will be minimal, if at all. The idea basically tosses aside all history and pretends it will be better next time. It won't. If anything it's getting harder.

This year, SAG and the WGA have basically negotiated themselves out of existence. In ten years, after we have some kind of universal healthcare and everything is viewed through the internet, SAG and the WGA will be dead - because of these contracts.

Morgan

Morgan

SUICIDEGIRL

Illinois, USA

JAN 29, 2009 11:48 AM

Elichrusos said:
I first heard about this from Wil Wheaton, whose measured and restrained post on the subject is recommended reading for everyone.



That is a brilliant post. Thank you for the link.

lil_tuffy

lil_tuffy

MODERATOR

San Francisco, CA

JAN 29, 2009 11:51 AM

I'm having a really hard time caring about this situation anymore.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

JAN 29, 2009 01:47 PM

Then this happened:



Someone please just shoot this union and put it out of its misery.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

I'm lost
August 2004

JAN 29, 2009 02:21 PM

lil_tuffy said:
I'm having a really hard time caring about this situation anymore.



i'm having a really hard time caring about humanity anymore.

Helter

Helter

Chester, PA
OLD SKOOL

JAN 29, 2009 06:26 PM

An actors strike would be *great* for those of us trying to push non-industry content development.

We mostly blew the opportunity that the WGA strike gave us, but maybe a second go-round would do the trick.