- commentary
- TUESDAY DECEMBER 23 2008 6:00 AM
Digging A Deep Warren Hole
Submitted by FearTheReaper
Edited by nicole_powers
Tags: Obama, Rick Warren, Biden, Prop 8
For those of you who havent been following, Obama chose shocking asshole and homophobe Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration. Many have explained to those who are offended that they have no right to be upset because this is a move of inclusion. They say Obama is reaching across the aisle. Its about bipartisanship. Its about him being a president to everybody. Uh, yeah. If you believe that you are one stupid motherfucker.
Obama, of course, gave his usual response. Weve really all got to work together and come to an understanding and agree to disagree. Yes. Also, bigots are fine. The one problem with Obamas comments Ñ aside from the shocking hypocrisy Ñ is that they cant stand up to one simple argument: Would he invite a racist to give the invocation? No? Why not? Theyre many racists in this country who deserve to be included in this administration. They are, after all, Americans. We really should reach out to the racists. How will we come together as a country if we dont?
But he would do no such thing, because racists are bad, while gay haters are okey-dokey. Thats the message Obama has sent with this decision. And they just wont shut the fuck up about it. Biden opened his clam hole yesterday.
Barack Obama said you've got to reach out. You've got to reach a hand of friendship across the aisle and across philosophies in this country.
Anyone think he meant homophobes? Really? Did you think he meant racists? No, of course not. Just homophones. Got it.
We can't continue to be a red and blue country. We can't be divided like we have been. And he's made good on his promise.
And he divided us further. It only serves to remind one group of people Ñ the ones who were left out of the victory on November 4th, the ones who were told they were less than by more than one state, the ones who are simmering with anger that they really dont matter, that they are not part of the equation. Obama doesnt have to reach over to that side of the aisle because hes sitting there.
And I would say to the gay and lesbian community, they have nothing to worry about. Barack Obama, every aspect of his life, every aspect of his public life, and every commitment he's made relating to equality for all people, will be things that he will stick with and that they should view this in the spirit in which he offered the opportunity to Ñ to Mr. Warren.
Lets not pretend like Barack Obama supports gay marriage. He does not. Thats why proponents of Prop 8 were able to use his words in ads supporting the ban. Many seem to think Obama is for gay marriage but cant say so because of the political climate. Bullshit. He has said he is not and that is where the truth lies.
And I get the inclusion thing. Look, Barack wants to work with all people. He wants to bring us together. Why, just take a look at these inclusive words.
Let me say at the outset that I vehemently disagree and strongly condemn the statements that have been the subject of this controversy. I categorically denounce any statement that disparages our great country or serves to divide us from our allies. I also believe that words that degrade individuals have no place in our public dialogue, whether it's on the campaign stump or in the pulpit. In sum, I reject outright the statements by Rev. Wright that are at issue.
Oops, my bad. He was talking about Reverend Wright. Sorry, I get confused when figuring out which religious guy is bad and which is good. Comparing gays to pedophiles is not using words that degrade individuals and obviously has a place in our public dialogue.
He's drawn attention as the result of some inflammatory and appalling remarks he made about our country, our politics, and my political opponents.
Obviously, he is a horrible man. Rick Warren, on the other hand, is fine. All he does is stuff like urge the assassination of foreign leaders and compare gay marriage to incest. No wait, this speech was given during the election, so it doesn't count, right? That was only for political reasons, but now he's being himself. Is that it?
Obama has picked someone George W. Bush would have picked. This is no different; this is not change in any way shape or form. There are a shitload of pastors who make respectful, civil arguments against gay marriage and abortion and a litany of other fucked up views. I disagree with them, but at least their opinions are not disgusting. Obama didnt go that way. He went with a guy who couldnt be more of a hateful fuck when it comes to gays. He picked a guy, who up until yesterday had a web page up that said gays were not welcome at his church. Thats how we disagree without being disagreeable Ñ by finding the guy who uses the most disagreeable language possible. A guy whose views are simply heinous.
But, yeah, America needs this kind of asshole to feel like he is a part of things because guys like him have been feeling so powerless for so long. Oh, woes the mega church pastor. Gay people, on the other hand, have been experiencing WAY too much inclusion and power for too long. Oh, wait; Obama let them have a marching band at the inauguration. Guys like Warren used the exact same type of language when they made arguments against interracial marriage and they didnt stop because they were included. They stopped because they were shamed, as God intended.
Obamas inclusiveness is no different than the Congressional Democrats compromises. It is never to the left, only to the right. I had a very tiny bit of hope that Obama would be a better president than Clinton, but that hope is dying as I watch his administration take shape and the choices he makes. I'm not surprised, given Obama's FISA vote, which was an ugly indicator of things to come. Clinton courted the right on matters of business and America paid the price with deregulation and cuts to social services. Now Obama looks to pick up the torch, but with one difference, hes going to court the right on social issues.
And that is where the danger lies. Because by including these bigots from the right in this government, you are leaving out a large group of people. The religious fanatics do not do inclusion. They do exclusion.
Four years ago, Rick Warren wrote an inflammatory letter about the presidential contest to thousands of evangelical pastors. This letter revealed him to be a fierce partisan, who epitomized the worst aspects of the Religious Right. He declared five issues to be "non-negotiable" and those they "are not even debatable because God's word is clear on these issues.'" These included abortion, same sex marriage, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning and euthanasia.
Obama is courting Non-negotiable Warren. There are those you work with to get things done and those you dont. These are the people you dont, unless of course, you have an entirely different agenda. Maybe you just want to stay in power, so giving in to the evangelicals makes sense. Maybe next time around Obama can have Pat Robertson give the invocation.
And make no mistake about it; this is a very important honor. This ups Warrens profile and nudges him towards becoming Americas new spiritual leader. Many have made an argument that some evangelicals do not like Warren because he invited Obama into his church. No, shit, dumbfuck. Obamas not trying to peel off the very right evangelicals, hes going for the young ones who follow Warren. And in doing so, he is tossing gay Americans off the boat. It is a shockingly divisive move.
This is another sign of the end for liberals having any sort of say in this government. This is marginalization. Its been going on for some time, especially with our current Congress, but now Democrats have an Obama to go along with their Reid and Pelosi party. The religious right took over the Republican Party and now they have their sights on the Democratic Party and Obama is going to open the door wide.
FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday for more from FearTheReaper and read his blog, Stop All Monsters.




PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 7
Comments
Subrosa
San Francisco, CA
July 2004
DEC 23, 2008 06:21 AM
OhSoOrdinary
New York, NY
July 2006
DEC 23, 2008 06:38 AM
Uncognitive
Brooklyn, NY
May 2003
DEC 23, 2008 06:44 AM
silversoul7
Portland, OR
January 2008
DEC 23, 2008 07:50 AM
RandomNerd
I'm lost
January 2005
DEC 23, 2008 08:44 AM
Subrosa
San Francisco, CA
July 2004
DEC 23, 2008 08:52 AM
Uncognitive
Brooklyn, NY
May 2003
DEC 23, 2008 09:08 AM
silversoul7
Portland, OR
January 2008
DEC 23, 2008 09:20 AM
RandomNerd
I'm lost
January 2005
DEC 23, 2008 09:29 AM
DannyDMc
Fargo, ND
July 2003
DEC 23, 2008 09:37 AM
Hussein
I'm lost
March 2004
DEC 23, 2008 09:58 AM
Horrorflick
Detroit, MI
February 2003
DEC 23, 2008 10:26 AM
Horrorflick
Detroit, MI
February 2003
DEC 23, 2008 10:28 AM
motorfirebox
Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004
DEC 23, 2008 10:48 AM
Quella
USA
July 2008
DEC 23, 2008 10:59 AM
PAGE:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
... 7