• commentary
  • THURSDAY DECEMBER 4 2008 6:00 AM

Reagan Finally Ruins America

It took a while, but Ronald Reagan finally destroyed America. The myth of Reagan, told during many a conservative circle jerk, has recently been crushed by reality. Ronald Reagan has made America less safe, less powerful and less wealthy. At this point, his great accomplishment – the collapse of the Soviet Union – looks incredibly ironic, like rain on your wedding day. Reagan’s economic policies have taken us the to brink of global unimportance. Only people with brains could have seen this coming.

The Reagan-Bush years have exalted private gain over public obligation, special interests over the common good, wealth and fame over work and family. The 1980s ushered in a Gilded Age of greed and selfishness, of irresponsibility and excess, and of neglect. – Bill Clinton 1991.



Sound familiar? That quote can now be applied to the Reagan-Bush-Bush years. The mythical Reagan recovery is about as real as a unicorn. We had a boom in the mid 80s, but the people who did well were the rich. The middle class and the poor certainly didn’t benefit. By 1990, middle class incomes were the same as 1980 and poverty had gone up. Then we were slammed by another recession. Wow, that’s some impressive shit.

American production didn’t pick up again until the mid-nineties. So, that means Reagan’s kick ass tax cuts for the rich didn’t get things rolling until 1995. Weird, huh? Of course, it all ended again brutally a few years after Bush II took over and lowered taxes of the rich again. Strange coincidence that. Bush continues Reagan’s idiotic policies of helping the rich but he added a fantastic touch: Start an expensive war with no articulated finish line. And just like Reagan, he started his presidency during a recession, which allowed him to claim his moronic economic policies worked when there was an inevitable recovery. Only, just like Reagan, production did not increase. The poor got poorer, the middle class shrunk and the rich got richer.

When Clinton came into office he raised taxes. At that time we were experiencing a terrible recession. Not one Republican Congressman or Senator voted for the tax raise. They all screamed that it would ruin the economy. How’d that work out?

The other big linchpin in the Reagan destruction of our nation is deregulation. It led to the savings and loan crisis, the Enron disaster and the current housing and credit crisis. That’s a pretty sweet record. When Reagan took office, we had a total debt of around 1 trillion dollars. Now it’s at 11 trillion.

Since the Reagan days we have been existing as a credit card economy. Now the time has come to pay the bill – and it is going to be ugly. The days of America as the global leader are over. When we nationalized large parts of our banking system, we acknowledged the American free market way of doing things was a failure. The only comparison of such a failure would be the Soviet Union. You know, the big bad country Reagan killed. He just happened to kill America, too. We’ve just been walking around with a stomach wound waiting to die.

America has spent decades lecturing other countries on finance. We are the ones who knew how to do it. The International Monetary Fund has enforced the American creed. Not doing it our way led to a decrease in aid for a few countries. We certainly gave quite a bit of shit to China, the country whose banks are not failing left and right.

Both Bush and Reagan excelled at jacking up military costs, while lowering taxes. That’s pretty much economic suicide. It’s also what doomed Britain after WWI and the Soviet Union. So, now we have to look to those countries that did not bow to American pressure to do things our way to bail us out. Now, that is ironic, like rain on your wedding day.

Regardless, we are no more. At least, not in the global sense. This is Reagan’s legacy. The policy of big spending and deregulated markets will have the end result of far less global power. Russia didn’t just happen to fight Georgia at this time. Hugo Chavez isn’t coincidentally talking endless shit about America at this exact moment. Iran isn’t bragging about 5,000 centrifuges now for the hell of it. They are all doing it because they know we are a clawless beast. We can’t afford to do what we have done in the past. Our economy can no longer support our military the way it has. It’s over.

And it’s not just military might, but the money we spread around to keep countries friendly isn’t there either. Iceland, one of the hardest hit nations of the crisis, asked for help from the U.S.. We couldn’t provide it, so they went to the next guy: Russia. Russia bailed out Iceland and now they have a new friend in the Atlantic. That same friend now dislikes America and England. That was fast.

The only way out of this recession – or depression – will be massive government spending, which means even more dependence on foreign governments. We could inflate our way out of the debt, which would lead to the dollar being dropped as the world’s reserve currency. Or the countries bailing us out will use the debt to shift the balance of power in their favor. Those are pretty much the options. That’s the Reagan legacy. Remember when he stared the evil Soviet Empire in the face, took it down and then ruined America with unsustainable economic policies? What an epic failure he was.


FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday for more from FearTheReaper and read his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
DJForce

DJForce

Summerville, SC
November 2008

DEC 17, 2008 03:08 PM

Stiles said:

silversoul7 said:

Stiles said:

Diogo said:
yeah, right: Reagan-Bush-Bush, conveniently leaving out Clinton, the neoliberal, free market democrat that most supporte IMF, World Bank and forced most under-developed countries in the world to follow those same stupid deregulatory rules.

So quit spilling this ideological bullshit and face the fact that they are all the same. Clintion is the biggest neoliberal ever.



Perhaps you'd like to support your post with some facts and hard numbers?

Just a thought.


He's actually got a point. When we talk about the deregulation that led to the current economic crisis, some of the significant deregulation happened under Clinton. Actually, one of my concerns about Obama is that he'll govern too much like Clinton and not enough like Kennedy or Roosevelt.



No, he really doesn't have a point.


they are all the same.



Is bullshit. Clinton did not start a war that has lasted

more than two years longer than US involvement in World War II. That war is costlier than any war in US history except WWII.

Clinton passed bipartisan welfare reform and the 1997 Balanced Budget Act (obviously not included by the 1996 article Motorfirebox noted - really, the last four and a half years DO matter when you criticize a Presidency).

Clinton also saw through a 1997 increase in the minimum wage, the welfare-to-work tax credit and the 1993 doubling of the earned-income tax credit for low income workers.

So no, they are not the same, not remotely.



Well, (just to increase the flaming on this thread) if Clinton had handled Al Quida and Sadam Hussein during his eight years, Bush would not have had to try and clean up the middle east.

Yeah Iraq is a mess (that's finally starting to clean up). However, what's was alternative? Leave the middle east a hotbed for Islamic Extreamism, or go WWII style total war and end up at war with the entire middle east?

DJForce

DJForce

Summerville, SC
November 2008

DEC 17, 2008 03:18 PM

Stiles said:

elmariachi said:
You said, "Ronald Reagan has made America less safe, less powerful and less wealthy." The president before Reagan was Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter lost every state to Reagan but six, including California. Not because people didn't know Reagan. During Carter's administration, the economy suffered double-digit inflation with very high interest rates. The high interest rates led to a sharp recession in the 1980s. Throughout most of Reagan's presidency unemployment dropped, GDP increased, higher wages, etc. Maybe the middle class /poor's income didnt increase since 1980, but where was it before Jimmy Carter? I'm not going to rag on Carter. He has done great things, even in his presidency of course. But economically, he was disaster.
These are facts. I like to present them and let people make a decision. Not make a decision, manipulate words, 'cherry pick' certain words and instances.



If you're going to tar Carter's performance, perhaps you could tell us what he should have done instead, policy-wise. Specifically.



Easy. Cut taxes and man up to the rest of the world. We had American Hostages in Iran for over 400 days! We should have told them deliver the hostages safely, or we'll bomb the bat snot out of you until you do (and Allah have mercy on you if they don't come home safely).

Carter actually said he didn't feel a military response to Iran was morally right? Huh? Good thing his family wasn't kidnapped. He would have felt calling the police was not "morally right". My dad was in the Navy during the carter years. He was gaurding a nuclear device one night, and was issued THREE bullets! No wonder Iran wasn't affraid of us.

Democrats, take a lesson from the greatest Democrat, Kennedy. He was strong on defense and supply side before it had a name. He cut taxes and inspired us. Was anybody inspired by Carter?

CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

DEC 17, 2008 03:31 PM

DJForce said:
Easy. Cut taxes and man up to the rest of the world. We had American Hostages in Iran for over 400 days! We should have told them deliver the hostages safely, or we'll bomb the bat snot out of you until you do (and Allah have mercy on you if they don't come home safely).



Problem with your idea . . . it wasn't the government of Iran that did the kidnapping. At the time, there really wasn't much of a government, just different groups of revolutionaries, usually with mutally exclusive goals (go read Reading Lolita in Tehran to get a better idea of what life was like over there). The Shah had been ousted, the government had no control, and the U.S. embassy was taken over by students. Who exactly would you "bomb the bat snot" out of to make sure you got the right people?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

DEC 17, 2008 03:38 PM

DJForce said:
Was anybody inspired by Carter?



Hunter S Thompson, for one.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

DEC 17, 2008 03:39 PM

Coyotemike said:

DJForce said:
Easy. Cut taxes and man up to the rest of the world. We had American Hostages in Iran for over 400 days! We should have told them deliver the hostages safely, or we'll bomb the bat snot out of you until you do (and Allah have mercy on you if they don't come home safely).



Problem with your idea . . . it wasn't the government of Iran that did the kidnapping. At the time, there really wasn't much of a government, just different groups of revolutionaries, usually with mutally exclusive goals (go read Reading Lolita in Tehran to get a better idea of what life was like over there). The Shah had been ousted, the government had no control, and the U.S. embassy was taken over by students. Who exactly would you "bomb the bat snot" out of to make sure you got the right people?



I think he would have bombed everybody. Then he'd be sure!

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

DEC 17, 2008 03:45 PM

DJForce said:
Well, (just to increase the flaming on this thread) if Clinton had handled Al Quida and Sadam Hussein during his eight years, Bush would not have had to try and clean up the middle east.



Clinton handled Iraq just fine: he kept it boxed in, and let it and Iran expend all their energy on each other.

mattacme

mattacme

Calistoga, CA
February 2006

DEC 17, 2008 05:52 PM

Finally, a piece that just says it like it is about Ronnie and his shining city on a hill. With all due respect Clinton "helped" a bit but in many ways continued the disaster. Still, Reagan was the start, and the end is anything but in sight. I wish saying "I told you so" to all of the folks I have been screaming at for the last 28 years felt better.

thekiller

thekiller

I'm lost
November 2004

DEC 19, 2008 12:49 PM

I think the only mistake Reagan made aside from having a moderate VP was his "one-time" Amnesty for illegals. It's hard to say what Obama will do since he's everything to everyone, but judging from his cabinet picks we may need to rethink stem cell research so we can clone Ronald Maximus to fight the growing Collectivism.

CoyoteMike

CoyoteMike

Iowa City, IA
May 2006

DEC 19, 2008 12:55 PM

thekiller said:
I think the only mistake Reagan made aside from having a moderate VP was his "one-time" Amnesty for illegals. It's hard to say what Obama will do since he's everything to everyone, but judging from his cabinet picks we may need to rethink stem cell research so we can clone Ronald Maximus to fight the growing Collectivism.



What else did Idiot Limbaugh tell you to think today?

Heigai

Heigai

Columbus, OH
May 2004

DEC 19, 2008 01:00 PM

thekiller said:
I think the only mistake Reagan made aside from having a moderate VP was his "one-time" Amnesty for illegals. It's hard to say what Obama will do since he's everything to everyone, but judging from his cabinet picks we may need to rethink stem cell research so we can clone Ronald Maximus to fight the growing Collectivism.



Do you have any kind of evidence to back up the assertion that Reagan's extension of amnesty was any kind of mistake?

Why do you hate the American workforce, thekiller?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next