• news
  • THURSDAY DECEMBER 4 2008 12:00 PM

It's a Leftist Takeover, Canadian Style

When Canada wants to bring down a government, we go about it a little bit differently than some other countries. When we wanted to throw off the shackles of English rule, we asked politely. The Queen was nice enough to give us the right to change our Constitution without having to go and ask the Queen again. I suspect she just wanted us to finally leave her alone.

Now, after disappointing election and a go-nowhere session of Parliament, Canada's left wing parties have finally grown some balls and decided they've had enough. They've banded together to ask the Queen's representative, the Governor General, to allow them to take over.

For those of you who don't obsessively follow Canadian politics (ie: 99% of you), here's the rundown of what has happened so far:

Canada had an election back in October. Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party formed a minority government by winning 143 of Canada's 308 seats in Parliament. Stephane Dion and the Liberal Party suffered a catastrophic drop in numbers, going from 103 seats in 2006 to 77 in 2008. Quebec's separatist Bloc Quebecois came in thrid with 49 seats and the New Democratic Party finished fourth with 37. There are also two independents in Parliament but no one really pays any attention to them. This means that the Conservatives need the support of at least one of the other parties to put through any legislation or economic matters (known as votes of confidence). If they lose the confidence of Parliament they are no longer seen as being able to lead the country. But we'll come back to that in a minute.

Last week the Conservatives presented their economic statement. They outlined the state of the Canadian economy and introduced some extremely contentious acts under the guise of saving money. They suggested suspending the right to strike for public workers, stating that a stable civil service is necessary for survival during economic hard times. They suspended pay increases for many civil servants, including members of Parliament and senators. And, in what may have been the tipping point of the statement, they proposed eliminating the public funding subsidy currently available to political parties. Parties are given $1.95 for every vote they receive in a federal election. This provides a great deal of the party funding. Moving to strike public funding overwhelmingly favours the Conservatives who draw a great deal of money from private and corporate donations. The opposition parties also strongly objected to the lack of a financial stimulus package which they feel is necessary to prop up Canada's suffering auto and forestry industries.

So the opposition stands ready to defeat the Conservative government when the statement faces a confidence vote on Monday. If the government is defeated, Prime Minister Harper will be forced to go to the Governor General to inform her that he has lost the confidence of Parliament. Normally this would trigger an election but we just finished an election and the opposition parties have cooked up something brilliant and new.

They joined together to form a proposed coalition government. The Liberals and NDP have signed an agreement that would form a new government. The Bloc, while not officially part of the new government, have agreed to support it for at least 18 months. The coalition now awaits the official word from the Governor General.

Now, to answer the question being screamed all over the internet. "IS THIS LEGAL WTF OMG!?!?! HOW CAN THEY DO THIS?!?" Easily. While it is standard procedure for the Governor General to call a new election when a government loses confidence, it is not her only option.

But the Governor General would be on very solid grounds to say, no election, let's see if we can get another government going.

It's certainly within her power and, if the prime minister asks for an election, I think the Governor General would turn him down. I think the fact that we just had an election would be sufficient to let a second person try to form a government.



She may consult with Parliament to see if there is another party who would have the confidence of Parliament. That is the solution currently being presented to her. Harper can also attempt to beat the coalition to the punch and ask the Governor General to suspend Parliament until January. The hope is to come back with a better proposal and to allow the coalition time to fall apart. The whole country now awaits the decision of Michaelle Jean who is on her way back from a tour of Europe. She is expected to meet with Harper tomorrow.

The thought of a coalition has sent waves of outrage across the country. I've personally been involved in half a dozen arguments with close friends over the issue. A handful of protesting Facebook groups have already sprung up and are seeing their memberships grow by the hour. I've even seen calls for the Western provinces (Alberta being a Conservative stronghold) to separate from Canada. The irony of calling for Western separation while railing against the separatist Bloc party is not lost on me.

No matter what happens, this has been one of the more interesting events in Canadian politics in recent years.


FreakPirate fully supports the formation of a coalition government. Unfortunately he seems to be among the minority of people who actually understand Canadian politics and has some common sense.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Comments
FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

DEC 04, 2008 12:39 PM

UPDATE

This morning, Governor General Michaelle Jean prorogued Parliament, effectively suspending any action until January 26th when Stephen Harper will have an opportunity to regain the confidence of Parliament.

mydogfarted

mydogfarted

Oakland, NJ
June 2003

DEC 04, 2008 12:54 PM

blackeyed

Not being Canadian, but living with one, I learned of this a few days ago and thought it was brilliant. Unfortunately, giving the U.S. government this ability would probably create more chaos than anything.

ericwine

ericwine

Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007

DEC 04, 2008 01:01 PM

Even though this is technically legal, I'm not sure it's such a great idea for Harper to set the predecent.

One thing I've wondered, FP: does the Bloc have any particular ideological orientation other than Quebec separatism?

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

DEC 04, 2008 01:14 PM

FreakPirate said:
When we wanted to throw off the shackles of English rule, we waited 200 years, and asked politely. The Queen was nice enough to give us the right to change our Constitution in 1982 without having to go and ask the Queen again.


Fixed.

I heard about this on the bus to Victoria (where I toured the BC capitol and learned a bit more about your wacky government). What I found most interesting is how much power the Governor General has; I was told it was mostly a ceremonial/symbolic position.

I'm looking forward to the part where you guys nominate Jar Jar Binks and start a clone war.

khoos

khoos

HOPEFUL

Ottawa, ON

DEC 04, 2008 01:17 PM

Suspending parliament = blackeyed

Sivart

Sivart

Saskatoon, SK
June 2004

DEC 04, 2008 01:18 PM

I really hope the coalition can stick together until the end of January and send Mr Harper packing.

The big irony I find is that over the course of a few short days, Harper managed to do more to unite the Left than they could on their own in the last four years. For all the Conservatives bellyaching about partisan politics, we have a centrist, a socialist, and a sepratist party all agreeing to put their differences aside and work together to keep the conservatives from destroying this country. To me that sounds like the complete opposite of partisan politics.

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

DEC 04, 2008 01:23 PM

ericwine said:
One thing I've wondered, FP: does the Bloc have any particular ideological orientation other than Quebec separatism?


Ideologically they're similar to the NDP, with progressive socialist ideals.

zoom image

They want to be a European country so bad it hurts.

FreakPirate

FreakPirate

Canada
November 2002

DEC 04, 2008 02:09 PM

ericwine said:
Even though this is technically legal, I'm not sure it's such a great idea for Harper to set the predecent.

One thing I've wondered, FP: does the Bloc have any particular ideological orientation other than Quebec separatism?



AceT already got to it but they're a fairly reasonable progressive social party. And they're far more Go Quebec! than they are separatists these days. At least that's the impression I have.

Perhaps some Quebecers could help me out there.

Salieri

Salieri

Denmark
July 2004

DEC 04, 2008 02:22 PM

FreakPirate said:

ericwine said:
Even though this is technically legal, I'm not sure it's such a great idea for Harper to set the predecent.

One thing I've wondered, FP: does the Bloc have any particular ideological orientation other than Quebec separatism?



AceT already got to it but they're a fairly reasonable progressive social party. And they're far more Go Quebec! than they are separatists these days. At least that's the impression I have.

Perhaps some Quebecers could help me out there.



I'm an Albertan currently living in Quebec ( Behind enemy lines? shocked ).

Honestly, I really find the BQ to be pretty consistent with my views (I generally vote NDP) and they, on average, have pretty great progressive ideals. Likewise, I think Gilles Duceppe is a a charismatic and intelligent leader.

They have a very big focus on family care and educational benefits benefiting the general public.

Separatism (or "sovereignty" as they call it) is definitely a back-burner issue now. The general public doesn't want another referendum, and there are far larger issues currently to deal with.

That being said, the fact that we allow a Separatist government in Federal politics still baffles me. That's a whole 'nother topic though wink

Adroitbeing

Adroitbeing

I'm lost
September 2003

DEC 04, 2008 02:47 PM

I know very little about Canadian government or structure, but this sounds even more intellectually stimulating than the US process; full of drama and midnight deals and such.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

DEC 04, 2008 02:56 PM

Adroitbeing said:
I know very little about Canadian government or structure, but this sounds even more intellectually stimulating than the US process; full of drama and midnight deals and such.



Indeed smile

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

DEC 04, 2008 03:20 PM

I think the Quebecois are perfectly happy with Canada's current official recognition of them as a nation within Canada. They know independence isn't in their best interest; they want the best of both worlds.

Salieri

Salieri

Denmark
July 2004

DEC 04, 2008 03:26 PM

AceT said:
I think the Quebecois are perfectly happy with Canada's current official recognition of them as a nation within Canada. They know independence isn't in their best interest.



Welllll,

That depends on who you speak to/where you go. Montreal, although being a huge voting population, has quite a different view on this than say, Lac St. Jean. One consists of a large variety of backgrounds and people while the other consists of...rural Francophones.

Either way, I don't think the Quebecois(e) are generally happy with Canada's anything. If Quebec is anything, it isn't content.

Edit: Your edit gets a bit closer to the truth, in my opinion.

dholokov

dholokov

Toronto, ON
April 2003

DEC 04, 2008 08:51 PM

I can't believe the governor general allowed Harper to prorogue parliament. I think it was a really bad decision.

Lemonkid

Lemonkid

Canada
May 2003

DEC 04, 2008 09:11 PM

Quebec isn't allowed to be content - it's written in the Constitution.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next