• commentary
  • TUESDAY DECEMBER 2 2008 6:00 AM

A New Terrorist Blue Print

Chalk up a big win for the terrorists. Not only did they execute a heinous plan with shocking effectiveness, but it also went on for days. Literally, for three days. And in doing so, they created a blue print for terrorists worldwide to follow in the future. They worked in pairs, they used guns and grenades and they spread out in several different locations. Sounds like the perfect plan of attack for a country like the US. And very hard to stop.

The 10 terrorists arrived in the city by water after taking over an Indian boat and killing the five sailors aboard. After landing in small rubber boats on an isolated beach, the casually dressed young men fanned out across the city. The walk took no longer than 15 minutes. They attacked 10 different locations in two hours. Most of the attacks ended quickly, but the battle at three locations went on for days, as they fought back against hundreds of Indian commandos.

They were very well trained. They knew the locations they were going to attack –– the best way to enter without being spotted, the layout of the basements and hallways and where guards would be. They also carried bags of almonds with them for nourishment.

At 9:30 p.m., the first terrorist attacked an Orthodox Chabad Lubavitch Center in a trendy neighborhood. The Jewish center was well known in the city. The terrorists would remain in the center for three days.

Just after 9:30 p.m., two terrorists attack a famous tourist hangout, Leopold Café and Bar. First they lobbed a grenade and then they opened fire. The attack lasted for about 2 minutes. At least 7 are dead and an unknown number are injured. During the chaos, people ran, so the total is not known. From there, the two terrorists jogged down the street to the Taj Mahal Hotel

They arrive at the hotel at 9:45 p.m. and open fire in the lobby. Again, people scatter, this time back into the hotel where they hide. Many would later be found and executed.

Two minutes later, two terrorists attack Mumbai’s main train station, Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus. They started by shooting into a glass-fronted restaurant and continued through the station. As they shot and threw grenades, they were very calm, even stopping for discussions about what to do next. While one would reload, the other would keep watch.

Luggage was spread everywhere. The place was full of blood. There were lots of people lying there dead.



By the time the attack at the train station was over, 53 people were killed. The terrorists escaped by stealing a truck.

At 10 p.m., two terrorists hit the Oberoi Hotel. It’s another luxury hotel popular with tourists. They, again, hit a restaurant first. After, they run into a second restaurant and shoot at the diners and waiters.

There were bodies everywhere. I felt like I was in a movie.



Then the two killers force those still alive into a stairway. They ask for identification in order to locate the Americans and Britons, who are then taken upstairs, where they will become hostages. Most people in the hotel hole up in their rooms.

Five minutes later, two terrorists attack a police station. Two bombs go off in other areas of the city, both in taxis. The terrorists then quickly move to a hospital, where they open fire. At that point, they wait behind a tree for a police vehicle to show up. As it pulls up, they shoot at the truck, killing most of the police and commandeering the truck. One of the officers killed is the Mumbai anti-terrorist chief. As the terrorists drive around the city, they laugh at the ineffectiveness of the police’s bulletproof vests and shoot out of the windows at journalists and police, until they are finally stopped.

Over the next couple of hours, police kill the three and capture one of the terrorists who had taken vehicles. But the night is filled with chaos as the police try to get an understanding of how large the attack is and where the terrorists are. The four in the hotels and the two at the Jewish Center are still holding hostages and fighting off police.

At 9 am the next day, police begin trying to take back the hotels. As they do, the terrorists begin killing hostages. They also set fires in the hotel and set off grenades. These are not your ordinary terrorists.

"It's obvious they were trained somewhere ...Not everyone can handle the AK series of weapons or throw grenades like that,"an unidentified member of India's Marine Commando unit, his face wrapped in a black mask, tells reporters after his units stormed the hotels. The attackers were "very determined and remorseless."



At 7 a.m. Friday morning, police launch an effort to take back the Jewish Center. They surround the building with sharpshooters, then land on the roof from helicopters and begin working their way down. Throughout the day, gunfire and explosions are heard. The building is finally taken back at 6 p.m. that night, after a police rocket takes out the upper floor. Nine are dead, including the Rabbi and his wife.

The operation at the Oberoi hotel is wrapping up. Hostages run from the building and are taken to hospitals. Police exit the building at 3 p.m. Friday and say the terrorists are dead. They killed 32 people. Hundreds of people were saved.

Throughout Friday night, fighting continues in the Taj Hotel. Journalists report from the street, as gunfire and explosions are heard in the hotel. The hotel catches fire again. At 8:30 a.m. the fight is over, after 60 hours of hell.

As authorities begin to look at what happened, doctors report many of the hostages were brutally tortured.

It was obvious that they were tied up and tortured before they were killed. It was so bad that I do not want to go over the details even in my head again.



Over 195 people were killed, including at least 20 police officers and more than 141 civilians –– including 22 foreigners.

A Western diplomat familiar with the investigation said officials were startled by the military precision of the attacks. At least some of the gunmen appeared to be receiving some kind of instructions from a command center where others were coordinating the overall operation, the diplomat said.



Some of the attackers are believed to have escaped. Shivraj Patil, the Indian home minister, resigns, as does India's national security adviser, MK Narayanan.

The scary thing is how simple this kind of attack is, especially if attempted in America. It would be more than easy to get the guns you would need to pull off an attack. It certainly would be easy to get into the country. This is clearly a blue print for future attacks. Bombs are more difficult to manufacture and pull off –– and once it happens it’s over. This was like a terrorist’s wet dream. It went on for days. I don’t care what city you live in, attacks in several different locations by several different men are going to cause chaos for the responders. That’s not the case with a bomb.

They trained their terrorists for urban warfare. They knew where to attack first to cause the most damage. They knew where and how the police would show up. They understood exactly where to go, both on the streets and in the buildings. They were heavily armed and brought food. They knew whom they wanted to kill and whom they didn’t. They entered large buildings full of people that would make them difficult to locate. Worst of all, it was very effective and went on for days.

From where I’m sitting, this is a very, very bad thing.

Oh, and I wonder where they learned their urban warfare tactics. Anyone know of any wars going on?


FearTheReaper is a writer, actor and stand up comedian. Check back each Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday for more from FearTheReaper and read his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 14

Next

Comments
Volkov

Volkov

San Antonio, TX
OLD SKOOL

DEC 02, 2008 07:23 AM

this kind of attack has been done before in the U.S. Happened in a little town in Colorado called Littleton. This is the same sort of attack on a larger scale and with better equipment. also, referring to the attack as incorporating "urban warfare tactics" shows your ignorance on the subject. this was a terrorist attack in a city. the high body count comes from terrorists going to high traffic areas and spraying the crowd.

there has been a fear of this kind of attack for years. Security studies include scenarios like a small unit attack on a shopping mall during busy shopping seasons, attacks on subways, office skyscrapers.

these sorts of attacks are extremely difficult to defend against because you can't have heavily armed well trained security personnel everywhere all the time.

the real fallout from this particular incident is just starting. the already strained relations between Pakistan and India are about to be stressed even more now that there are indications that the terrorists were Pakistanis.


drdetox

drdetox

Columbia, SC
May 2008

DEC 02, 2008 07:53 AM

Very scary indeed.

Best I can tell urban warfare techniques began prior to 9/11, so try to be a good winner.

ChezGeek

ChezGeek

Port Orchard, WA
January 2004

DEC 02, 2008 07:58 AM

if i didnt know better, id swear that tom clancy wrote this book a few years ago. but in all seriousness, that attack is a very serious indication of the ways that terrorists etc are advancing their tactics. makes me wonder where the next deployment is going to be...

Volkov

Volkov

San Antonio, TX
OLD SKOOL

DEC 02, 2008 08:15 AM

ChezGeek said:
if i didnt know better, id swear that tom clancy wrote this book a few years ago. but in all seriousness, that attack is a very serious indication of the ways that terrorists etc are advancing their tactics. makes me wonder where the next deployment is going to be...



actually I remember him having a book with an attack by terrorists coming across the Mexican border and driving to random shopping malls I think. I remember it was brought up in a Security Studies class I audited a long time ago.


Katieesq

Katieesq

USA
June 2008

DEC 02, 2008 09:31 AM

Where are you culling your pull quotes from, FTR?

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

DEC 02, 2008 09:39 AM

Teeth of the Tiger.

this is what is referred to as 4th/5th generation warfare. i say 4th/5th because it's unclear at this point in history whether the evolution of guerrilla tactics into open-source, high-tech, widely-dispersed kill teams represents a truly new phenomenon, or if it's just asymmetric warfare on crack.

as Volkov pointed out, it's not 'urban wafare tactics' in the traditional sense--but to be honest, the traditional sense is becoming quickly outmoded. this is the new face of urban warfare; war itself is shrinking and diversifying, heading away from the concept of huge nation-state armies pounding each other with tanks and towards the concept embraced by much of Africa: roving teams of shooters who attack not each other, but each others' social and economic centers. cities are the cardiovascular and nervous centers of the first world, and they're generally left horribly exposed to all manner of attack.

defaultx

defaultx

I'm lost
February 2006

DEC 02, 2008 09:45 AM

The odds favor a disgruntled worker or some kid jacked up on meds and grand theft auto 4 over Jihady maniacs busting a cap in you at the galleria.

How about a story about the headless mafia in Tijuana !

fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Batavia, IL
January 2005

DEC 02, 2008 09:55 AM

ChezGeek said:
if i didnt know better, id swear that tom clancy wrote this book a few years ago. but in all seriousness, that attack is a very serious indication of the ways that terrorists etc are advancing their tactics. makes me wonder where the next deployment is going to be...



I'm pretty sure every terrorist plot I've seen in the news for 15 years has been in a Tom Clancy book before. Somebody's getting the playbook from somewhere.

I'm just hoping nobody read Executive Orders. Or Rainbow Six. Those are the kinda attacks we could do without.

Well, hmm...I suppose if you consider anthrax a biological attack, I guess they DID read those books. It just didn't work so well.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

DEC 02, 2008 09:57 AM

Did you forget the chechen terrorists they have been doing this for years too. It's tragic but nothing here is new about this cept the blackberries.

School in russia held for 2 days 330 killed mostly kids.
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/11/01/1099262789727.html?from=storylhs

Russian theater crisis. more of the same.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_theater_hostage_crisis

eyelikeglasses

eyelikeglasses

Gainesville, FL
February 2008

DEC 02, 2008 10:09 AM

That's another reason why we need to keep our President-elect from taking away our 2nd Amendment rights. Good people should be allowed to keep their firearms, or bad people will be the only ones with them.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

DEC 02, 2008 10:18 AM

eyelikeglasses said:
That's another reason why we need to keep our President-elect from taking away our 2nd Amendment rights. Good people should be allowed to keep their firearms, or bad people will be the only ones with them.



But that's how he feeds! He needs peoples' 2nd Amendment right to survive!

SeanTPoindexter

SeanTPoindexter

Joplin, MO
February 2008

DEC 02, 2008 10:21 AM

eyelikeglasses said:
That's another reason why we need to keep our President-elect from taking away our 2nd Amendment rights. Good people should be allowed to keep their firearms, or bad people will be the only ones with them.



I'm a pro 2nd Amendment advocate as well, but most of the hype about Obama taking away our rights was just that: hype. No President is ever going to try to disarm America. It would be political suicide. Even if Obama was as anti-2nd Amendment as they say (and I don't think he is) he's smart enough to know he could never pull it off.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

DEC 02, 2008 10:26 AM

eyelikeglasses said:
That's another reason why we need to keep our President-elect from taking away our 2nd Amendment rights. Good people should be allowed to keep their firearms, or bad people will be the only ones with them.



With everything else going on, guns aren't on anyone's agenda right now. Nobody is trying to take guns away from citizens. The NRA is feeding bullshit and people are just eating it up.

unfiltrator

unfiltrator

San Francisco, CA
April 2004

DEC 02, 2008 11:06 AM

eyelikeglasses said:
That's another reason why we need to keep our President-elect from taking away our 2nd Amendment rights. Good people should be allowed to keep their firearms, or bad people will be the only ones with them.



Have citizen militias done anything good since the 1900's? I haven't heard any of the stories are there are some.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

DEC 02, 2008 11:16 AM

this really isn't the thread for a gun control debate.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 14

Next