• commentary
  • WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 5 2008 3:00 PM

Yes We Can…But Will We?

Yes we can…but will we? Obama challenges the cynics, but are we really wrong?

On Tuesday, Chicago's Grant Park flooded with a myriad of Obama enthusiasts to hear his acceptance speech and echo his refrain of hope and change: "Yes we can." The speech was not merely a gracious acceptance of Obama's decisive presidential win, but also a nod to the historic milestone of his successful campaign and admonishment to those who doubted American's capacity for evolution. "If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer." The crowd reveled in this joyous, momentous occasion, and blogs and newspapers alike attributed that message –– "Yes we can" –– as a sign of more change to come.

I was born about a mile from Chicago's Grant Park during a serious economic recession much like the one we are mired in today. My father, a college graduate who was unable to get a job amidst the turmoil, turned to selling drugs in the very neighborhood that Obama calls his home. My mother stayed home with me and battled severe and worsening mental illness, which even if we had possessed health insurance, would not have been covered. Despite these setbacks however, my parents both struggled to find and keep work, and with the help of Pell Grants and scholarships, I was able to go to a university of my choice in California.

President-elect Barack Obama has made progressive issues like health care and education, issues that so acutely affected my family, the cornerstone of his campaign, but at the same time he recognizes that above all pulling this country out of economic crisis will color the first years of his presidency. "There are mothers and fathers who will lie awake after their children fall asleep and wonder how they'll make the mortgage, or pay their doctor's bills, or save enough for college. There is new energy to harness and new jobs to be created; new schools to build and threats to meet and alliances to repair." His plans for economic revival through investment in clean energy and infrastructure repair are innovative and show foresight that goes far beyond his four or eight year administration.

But while Obama's policies might be the change we need, choked-up excitement at an acceptance speech or even Obama's election as a whole does not automatically foretell success for his progressive legislation. Obama told us on Tuesday to "summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves, but each other." And as onlookers teared up and waved their flags, California began tallying the votes that would decisively smash two green initiatives –– Props 7 and 10 –– and uphold a constitutional amendment that would disallow same sex marriage. Californians also said no to Prop 5, which would have expanded drug rehabilitation facilities for juvenile offenders and decrease sentences and parole for nonviolent drug offenders (like my father).

Yes on 8 activists (the proposition that bans same sex marriage) consistently used footage of San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom prophetically saying, "As goes California, so goes the nation," and the prophecy is frightening. If California, bluest of blue states, can’t pass green initiatives or drug crime reform, will Barack Obama be able to inspire a wary, financially distraught nation to invest in clean energy? Health care? Higher education? Barack Obama says, "Yes, we can," and though his election shows that Americans can vote for change, it also shows we must ask another question –– Will we?

And though I was able to go to college and start my career, my family continues to struggle. My father has changed careers twice as a result of his tech job being shipped overseas and struggles with debt accumulated from the subsequent unemployment. Will we help him? My mother, despite the fact that Congress recently passed a measure forcing insurance companies to cover mental illness the same as physical illness, will still be more likely to get the costly treatment for her liver cirrhosis than the condition that drove her to drink. Will we treat her?

I will never underestimate Barack Obama's ability to surprise us. Just a year ago he was a long shot candidate for the Democratic Party with too many factors working against him –– his blackness, his inexperience, and his so-called "liberal" agenda. Only a candidate like Obama could bring a nation together under the progressive reforms we will need to see us out of our economic, environmental, and international crises, but his ability to accomplish this affords little guarantee this will occur.

Will we?

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
phrogg

phrogg

Greenville, SC
August 2005

NOV 05, 2008 05:32 PM

n8tvegrl said:
I think it is healthy and rational to be a bit skeptical about what is to come. It sounds nice when we talk about it but what can we realistically do? To be honest, I don't expect his first term to work miracles and I'm okay with that. The fact that someone like Obama is in office just inspires confidence in my fellow Americans and gives me some hope. And hey... anything is an upgrade from W.

I'm just going to sit back, watch patiently (knowing how much there is to repair), get involved where I can, and happily pay my taxes because I want to create the best community that I can for the next generations.



And at the very least, our stock has gone up as a nation among most of our allies simply by virtue of this election. That by itself is a good beginning!

smithers_jones

smithers_jones

I'm lost
November 2003

NOV 05, 2008 05:32 PM

s5 said:


Honestly I don't think this stuff belongs at the ballot box. We need representatives who get it, who can write well-crafted policy, instead of garbage with negative consequences that voters might not fully grasp in advance.

Fortunately, the voters rejected them both.



This goes for 99.99% of all ballot initiatives. The process, which ostensibly is supposed to empower voters, does just the opposite and allows reactionary groups and big business to flood the ballot year after year with horrible laws that have to be fought and re-fought in costly campaigns. Many are defeated by a small percentage (Like Prop 8) get through.

n8tvegrl

n8tvegrl

Bend, OR
February 2004

NOV 05, 2008 05:37 PM

smithers_jones said:

s5 said:


Honestly I don't think this stuff belongs at the ballot box. We need representatives who get it, who can write well-crafted policy, instead of garbage with negative consequences that voters might not fully grasp in advance.

Fortunately, the voters rejected them both.



This goes for 99.99% of all ballot initiatives. The process, which ostensibly is supposed to empower voters, does just the opposite and allows reactionary groups and big business to flood the ballot year after year with horrible laws that have to be fought and re-fought in costly campaigns. Many are defeated by a small percentage (Like Prop 8) get through.




And let's be real... some people shouldn't be able to vote or to piss in our gene pool but our democratic ideals won't allow for such elitism. I just find it hard to believe that shit like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRqcfqiXCX0 is out there and these people are hitting the polls!

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

NOV 05, 2008 07:13 PM

We have to hold Obama to everything that he promised, and if he does not deliver, then we have to let him have it. Otherwise, we're a bunch of hypocrites.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

NOV 05, 2008 08:28 PM

The real green initiatives in California passed. Public transportation got a boost with Prop 1A and Measure R (Los Angeles County). I just hope the implementation doesn't get fucked up.

_kungfoo_

_kungfoo_

Los Angeles, CA
April 2005

NOV 05, 2008 08:32 PM

Also; FUCK YOU T. BOONE PICKENS, YOU FUCKING FUCK.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

NOV 05, 2008 08:40 PM

joker_ said:
I really enjoyed the article.
Yesterday in California did not go well. Yet as a nation a lot of progress was made.

I know that California is often considered the bluest of blue states, but having travelled to many parts of California that are definitely not blue at all; I can't say I am completely shocked that many progressive intiatives were squashed over here.

I don't feel that Gavin Newsom's statement "As goes California, so goes the nation," is accurate. The parts of California you don't hear about; Merced, Del Norte, Modoc, Inyo, Lake and others are all important when votes are being counted; but they are hardly blue or influential on a national scale.

However, when it comes to progressive ideas and business; it is difficult to argue that the nation is not influenced by the Bay area and Silicon Valley. Which voted progressively.

These developments just mean we're going to have to do a better job of teaching understanding to everyone here.





Yeah, I think the notion that we're a BLUE blue state is a bit of a misnomer. We are, after all, the state of Reagan and Schwartzenegger and Wilson and Nixon (though, by John McCain's standards, Nixon was a Trotskyite.) One of our two Democratic Senators is one of the most conservative Democrats in the chamber.

I'd say we're closer to blue states like New York and Illinois than we are to Massachusetts or Vermont.

This, of course, is totally splitting hairs. But, you know, it's fun to do so. wink

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

NOV 05, 2008 08:42 PM

As to the merits, all I can say at this time is the following: If he runs the country like he ran his campaign then I think we're going to be in good shape.

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

NOV 05, 2008 08:46 PM

Cassiel said:
We have to hold Obama to everything that he promised, and if he does not deliver, then we have to let him have it. Otherwise, we're a bunch of hypocrites.



The reality is that he will have to compromise. A President does not govern on his own. If the Congress does not agree fully, even one of the same party, there is no way that he can deliver on everything promised. We have to be practical.

Twelve

Twelve

Bay City, MI
April 2007

NOV 05, 2008 08:50 PM

Subrosa said:
Yeah, I think the notion that we're a BLUE blue state is a bit of a misnomer. We are, after all, the state of Reagan and Schwartzenegger and Wilson and Nixon (though, by John McCain's standards, Nixon was a Trotskyite.) One of our two Democratic Senators is one of the most conservative Democrats in the chamber.

I'd say we're closer to blue states like New York and Illinois than we are to Massachusetts or Vermont.

This, of course, is totally splitting hairs. But, you know, it's fun to do so. wink



It's not uncommon for blue states to elect Republican governors, but they tend to be more old school Republicans than those elected in red states.

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

NOV 05, 2008 08:52 PM

Cassiel said:
We have to hold Obama to everything that he promised, and if he does not deliver, then we have to let him have it. Otherwise, we're a bunch of hypocrites.


That's a little extreme, don't you think? How many presidents have fulfilled every single campaign promise they made?

Stiles

Stiles

Philadelphia, PA
November 2002

NOV 05, 2008 09:02 PM

Subrosa said:
(though, by John McCain's standards, Nixon was a Trotskyite.)



THANK YOU.

Christ, I'm so tired of people labeling anyone even vaguely non-right wing as being "socialist" when they are centrist by any reasonable measure.

For the last several years I have countered many right wingers claims that mainstream dem lawmakers were "the most liberal" this or that by asking them if they thought Nixon was a liberal, then pointing out that the EPA was created under Nixon and his trip to China when that was practically considered consorting with the enemy.

Nixon would be tarred and feathered by the GOP today as being a red-flag saluting Commie, if not shot on sight - notwithstanding his actual far-right for the time political leanings.

Blame Reagan for dishonestly dragging the political discourse so far to the right that ever since, solidly centrist American ideals have somehow become "far left" and "liberal" has somehow become a dirty word to many uninformed people.

It's high time we fixed that.

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

NOV 05, 2008 09:14 PM

gdarklighter said:

Cassiel said:
We have to hold Obama to everything that he promised, and if he does not deliver, then we have to let him have it. Otherwise, we're a bunch of hypocrites.


That's a little extreme, don't you think? How many presidents have fulfilled every single campaign promise they made?



Innocent_Sid said:

Cassiel said:
We have to hold Obama to everything that he promised, and if he does not deliver, then we have to let him have it. Otherwise, we're a bunch of hypocrites.



The reality is that he will have to compromise. A President does not govern on his own. If the Congress does not agree fully, even one of the same party, there is no way that he can deliver on everything promised. We have to be practical.



Well then, I'm glad to see that some aren't wrapped up in his enigma, and can see the forest for the trees, whereas most, I fell, cannot.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

NOV 05, 2008 09:40 PM

Subrosa said:
This, of course, is totally splitting hairs. But, you know, it's fun to do so.wink


It isn't possible to make the perfect Martini with Vodka. biggrin

Subrosa said:
As to the merits, all I can say at this time is the following: If he runs the country like he ran his campaign then I think we're going to be in good shape.



I agree with this statement.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

NOV 05, 2008 09:41 PM

Subrosa said:
As to the merits, all I can say at this time is the following: If he runs the country like he ran his campaign then I think we're going to be in good shape.



Yep.

And honestly, Katieesq, basing skepticism about Obama's Presidency on California's failing* on Prop 8 is really cherrypicking results to suit a cynical agenda. If your premise is one of skepticism, and you seek results to back up your premise, you'll find them. You cited the failure of 5, 7, and 10, and the passage of 8 as evidence that we're not as progressive-minded as a society as we might seem, but you overlooked a mountain of evidence to the contrary (not the least of which being that 7 and 10 were anything but overwhelmingly progressive).

First off, the overall trends:

From the NY Times (hat tip to Daily Kos):

zoom image
zoom image

This, in itself, doesn't mean we're shifting more progressive. In years past, many moderate and conservative Democrats have won their races across the country. But looking at the candidates who won and the way they ran their races says a lot. There were a whole heap of honest progressive candidates who ran as progressives and won, even in less historically progressive districts and states. In that context, the maps above speak volumes.

Beyond that, it was a shitty night for gay marriage proponents across the country, but that's not the only progressive issue on the table. Colorado rejected an anti-union referendum, South Dakota rejected a draconian abortion ban, and back in California, we rejected an anti-abortion proposition, and approved two massive public transportation proposals (prop 1A and LA's measure R) and LA also approved a low-income housing measure.

DailyKos' Orange to Blue program, focused not just on more Democrats but on better Democrats, also enjoyed a bunch of victories.

In short, there were some setbacks, to be sure, but it was an overwhelmingly successful night for Democrats in general and progressives in particular, and there are some real reasons to be optimistic about the success of progressive legislation and progressive reform in the coming years.

*Prop 8 hasn't quite won yet, with vote count not yet complete, and even if it does, it faces a serious legal challenge.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next