• commentary
  • WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 5 2008 3:00 PM

Yes We Can…But Will We?

Yes we can…but will we? Obama challenges the cynics, but are we really wrong?

On Tuesday, Chicago's Grant Park flooded with a myriad of Obama enthusiasts to hear his acceptance speech and echo his refrain of hope and change: "Yes we can." The speech was not merely a gracious acceptance of Obama's decisive presidential win, but also a nod to the historic milestone of his successful campaign and admonishment to those who doubted American's capacity for evolution. "If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer." The crowd reveled in this joyous, momentous occasion, and blogs and newspapers alike attributed that message –– "Yes we can" –– as a sign of more change to come.

I was born about a mile from Chicago's Grant Park during a serious economic recession much like the one we are mired in today. My father, a college graduate who was unable to get a job amidst the turmoil, turned to selling drugs in the very neighborhood that Obama calls his home. My mother stayed home with me and battled severe and worsening mental illness, which even if we had possessed health insurance, would not have been covered. Despite these setbacks however, my parents both struggled to find and keep work, and with the help of Pell Grants and scholarships, I was able to go to a university of my choice in California.

President-elect Barack Obama has made progressive issues like health care and education, issues that so acutely affected my family, the cornerstone of his campaign, but at the same time he recognizes that above all pulling this country out of economic crisis will color the first years of his presidency. "There are mothers and fathers who will lie awake after their children fall asleep and wonder how they'll make the mortgage, or pay their doctor's bills, or save enough for college. There is new energy to harness and new jobs to be created; new schools to build and threats to meet and alliances to repair." His plans for economic revival through investment in clean energy and infrastructure repair are innovative and show foresight that goes far beyond his four or eight year administration.

But while Obama's policies might be the change we need, choked-up excitement at an acceptance speech or even Obama's election as a whole does not automatically foretell success for his progressive legislation. Obama told us on Tuesday to "summon a new spirit of patriotism; of service and responsibility where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves, but each other." And as onlookers teared up and waved their flags, California began tallying the votes that would decisively smash two green initiatives –– Props 7 and 10 –– and uphold a constitutional amendment that would disallow same sex marriage. Californians also said no to Prop 5, which would have expanded drug rehabilitation facilities for juvenile offenders and decrease sentences and parole for nonviolent drug offenders (like my father).

Yes on 8 activists (the proposition that bans same sex marriage) consistently used footage of San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom prophetically saying, "As goes California, so goes the nation," and the prophecy is frightening. If California, bluest of blue states, can’t pass green initiatives or drug crime reform, will Barack Obama be able to inspire a wary, financially distraught nation to invest in clean energy? Health care? Higher education? Barack Obama says, "Yes, we can," and though his election shows that Americans can vote for change, it also shows we must ask another question –– Will we?

And though I was able to go to college and start my career, my family continues to struggle. My father has changed careers twice as a result of his tech job being shipped overseas and struggles with debt accumulated from the subsequent unemployment. Will we help him? My mother, despite the fact that Congress recently passed a measure forcing insurance companies to cover mental illness the same as physical illness, will still be more likely to get the costly treatment for her liver cirrhosis than the condition that drove her to drink. Will we treat her?

I will never underestimate Barack Obama's ability to surprise us. Just a year ago he was a long shot candidate for the Democratic Party with too many factors working against him –– his blackness, his inexperience, and his so-called "liberal" agenda. Only a candidate like Obama could bring a nation together under the progressive reforms we will need to see us out of our economic, environmental, and international crises, but his ability to accomplish this affords little guarantee this will occur.

Will we?

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Comments
crispy

crispy

NEWSWIRE

Philadelphia, PA

NOV 05, 2008 03:13 PM

You have nailed it on the head with this article, and echoed my own thoughts on the apparent dichotomy between the progressive showing in the Presidential election and the squashing of the progressive initiatives in California.

Tremendous work ... I can't wait to read more.

AceT

AceT

Portland, OR
April 2004

NOV 05, 2008 03:16 PM

I've been feeling the same way, but I also hope that those we did elect into office can give us the reform we need. There was a mandate during this election, but there was a mandate during the last (midterm) election as well and nothing was done.

Obama and the 111th Congress have promised a lot, and I expect those promises to be fulfilled to the best of their ability by the time the next midterms roll around. I expect most of our troops home, I expect affordable health care, I expect progressive tax reform, I expect this nation to be better off then than it is now.

The Democrats are more powerful now than they have been in several generations; this time they have no excuse.

Adroitbeing

Adroitbeing

I'm lost
September 2003

NOV 05, 2008 03:20 PM

Well done Kaiteesq.
I am hopeful that like good business executive leadership, Obama can change the conversation. From what I understand, that is what our forefathers did, what Roosevelt accomplished, what Kennedy started, what Reagan undertook, and where Clinton succeeded.

There are only a few discrete choices we need to make to right this ship. We don't have to fix everything, we simply need to get the sails filled again and narrowing the conversation to those few efforts required to do so can improve the chance for success.

So, I guess what I'm trying to say is that Obama seems, after marshaling people and money and intellect to execute the most successful campaign in history, to grasp the importance of enabling participation while still steering the discussion toward resolution and failing forward fast while managing to keep those conversations that derail the effort and focus where they belong - on the sidelines. People seem ready for someone to stand up and say - this way.

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

NOV 05, 2008 03:21 PM

AceT said:
The Democrats are more powerful now than they have been in several generations; this time they have no excuse.



Yes, yes yes yes.

Nader should have stuck with "hold his feet to the fire," but that should basically be the watch-word phrase.

I don't think Obama will need it, but I think he will need voters like me to get back to their old busybody habits of writing their Congress critters weekly. ...and annoying others with the suggestion that they should do likewise.

Sherrod Brown has needed an earful from me for a while, though. I'm still fuming over the "we'll fix it once we're in" excuse for voting the MCA in.

Twelve

Twelve

Bay City, MI
April 2007

NOV 05, 2008 03:31 PM

I don't get how anyone could vote against investment in renewable energy. That's insane.

Then again, I know people who voted against Michigan's Prop. 1 because "it will make our taxes go up." confused

We certainly can, but it won't happen via us sitting on our laurels and expecting Barack to fix everything for us.

joker_

joker_

Minneapolis, MN
October 2005

NOV 05, 2008 03:57 PM

I really enjoyed the article.
Yesterday in California did not go well. Yet as a nation a lot of progress was made.

I know that California is often considered the bluest of blue states, but having travelled to many parts of California that are definitely not blue at all; I can't say I am completely shocked that many progressive intiatives were squashed over here.

I don't feel that Gavin Newsom's statement "As goes California, so goes the nation," is accurate. The parts of California you don't hear about; Merced, Del Norte, Modoc, Inyo, Lake and others are all important when votes are being counted; but they are hardly blue or influential on a national scale.

However, when it comes to progressive ideas and business; it is difficult to argue that the nation is not influenced by the Bay area and Silicon Valley. Which voted progressively.

These developments just mean we're going to have to do a better job of teaching understanding to everyone here.



MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Portland, OR
August 2002

NOV 05, 2008 04:16 PM

We fuckin' better.

phrogg

phrogg

Greenville, SC
August 2005

NOV 05, 2008 04:30 PM

Obama has promised transparency in government, to change the way Washington operates, the end to government by special interests. During the campaign he has shown emphatically that he has the ability and charisma to inspire and engage people of all sorts and descriptions. Well, the campaign is over. We won. I couldn't agree more with your notion that the question really is: "Will we?" He has certainly shown his stuff as a candidate, and I can't but believe, given the magnitude of the problems we face and the battles that certainly lie ahead, that he will continue to call on all citizens to give their best in public service. I'm confident that his ability to inspire people will continue, and that his presidency will provide opportunities for us to serve. So the remaining question - one that nags me a little - is "will we respond to this invitation to participatory democracy"? And further "can we even remember how"?

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 05, 2008 04:42 PM

Katieesq said:
And as onlookers teared up and waved their flags, California began tallying the votes that would decisively smash two green initiatives � Props 7 and 10



7 and 10 were not green initiatives. They were greenwashing, pure and simple.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

NOV 05, 2008 04:57 PM

Yes, 7 and 10 were opposed by most environmentalists, like myself.

Bob

Bob

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 05, 2008 05:08 PM

FearTheReaper said:
Yes, 7 and 10 were opposed by most environmentalists, like myself.



Speaking as someone who works for a green company founded by one of the for-runners on the GreenBusiness movement, Joel Makower..."MOST environmentalists" would be a GROSS overstatement.

As would the phrase "greenwashing" which is environmentalist equivalent of the "liberal" or "maverick" monikers that have plagued this agenda.

For the view from the REST of the environmentalists read this:
Environmental, Cleantech Have Big Wins, Big Losses at the Polls

However, at least there is the hope that, with Federal leadership we won't need to rely on these state initiatives.

Bob

Bob

SUICIDEGIRL

California, USA

NOV 05, 2008 05:10 PM

ugh, damn double post.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

NOV 05, 2008 05:12 PM

Bob said:

FearTheReaper said:
Yes, 7 and 10 were opposed by most environmentalists, like myself.



Speaking as someone who works for a green company founded by one of the for-runners on the GreenBusiness movement, Joel Makower..."MOST environmentalists" would be a GROSS overstatement.



Okay, then the smart ones.

s5

s5

STAFF

San Francisco, CA

NOV 05, 2008 05:21 PM

The problem with 10 lies in fuzzy words like "alternative energy" and "renewables". Which in the case of 10, referred to natural gas. 10 was put on the ballot by T. Boone Pickens, who would directly stand to profit from its passage. No thanks, I don't like the idea of the ballot process being used as a wealth transfer system, handing taxpayer money from confused voters to wealthy entrepreneurs.

7 was just poorly written policy.

Honestly I don't think this stuff belongs at the ballot box. We need representatives who get it, who can write well-crafted policy, instead of garbage with negative consequences that voters might not fully grasp in advance.

Fortunately, the voters rejected them both.

n8tvegrl

n8tvegrl

Bend, OR
February 2004

NOV 05, 2008 05:27 PM

I think it is healthy and rational to be a bit skeptical about what is to come. It sounds nice when we talk about it but what can we realistically do? To be honest, I don't expect his first term to work miracles and I'm okay with that. The fact that someone like Obama is in office just inspires confidence in my fellow Americans and gives me some hope. And hey... anything is an upgrade from W.

I'm just going to sit back, watch patiently (knowing how much there is to repair), get involved where I can, and happily pay my taxes because I want to create the best community that I can for the next generations.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next