BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Jimmy Fucking Carter

TUESDAY JULY 22 2008 6:00 AM

Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By FearTheReaper.

TAGS: Gas crisis, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan

Now that we are in the middle of an energy disaster brought on by years of idiotic energy policy that were begun under the Grand Retard, Ronald Reagan, let’s take a look at what Jimmy Carter wanted to do. We didn’t do much of it, because Carter told Americans the truth and we cried like fucking babies and continued to shit our pants. If we had listened to Carter, we’d be toilet trained by now. Instead, we are living in the most horribly shit-in diapers of all time. And it’s pretty much all the fault of the right wing.

Carter delivered an energy speech on July 15, 1979. At the time, things were not looking good. The U.S. was being hit by record high energy prices, severe energy shortages, and a recession. (Sound familiar?) People were pissed at Carter, causing his approval ratings to plummet to Bush-like depths. Imagine that. A president as unpopular as Bush. So, Carter gave a speech, during which he asked the American people to adapt to the energy crisis, its limits and to change our ways.

Carter said, "Human identity is no longer defined by what one does but by what one owns." He was right, of course. But Carter didn’t have the ability to convince his fellow lawmakers to make the tough choices. He was labeled a “pessimist.” Naturally, for every pessimist, there is an optimist. In this case, it was Ronald Reagan. Reagan blew hot wind up America’s ass and we went right back to our destructive ways. Reagan was a pretty fucking stupid human being. As matter of fact, he was shockingly stupid. Had we listened to Carter and accepted a bit of personal responsibility, we might not be driving rapidly toward a cliff today.

The problems Carter identified in his speech were our dependence on oil and the connection among consumption, energy use, and environmental change. Sound familiar?

Here are some highlights from Jimmy Carter’s “Crisis of Confidence” Speech.


CARTER: Point one: I am tonight setting a clear goal for the energy policy of the United States. Beginning this moment, this nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 -- never...


And no. Not only will we, but we’ll use more and more and more. Jimmy didn’t really foresee the right wing jerk off transportation vessel called The Hummer and the murder of alternative energy.


Point two: To ensure that we meet these targets, I will use my presidential authority to set import quotas...


Good luck with that.


Point three: To give us energy security, I am asking for the most massive peacetime commitment of funds and resources in our nation's history to develop America's own alternative sources of fuel...

I will soon submit legislation to Congress calling for the creation of this nation's first solar bank, which will help us achieve the crucial goal of 20 percent of our energy coming from solar power by the year 2000.

These efforts will cost money, a lot of money, and that is why Congress must enact the windfall profits tax without delay...


Could you imagine if we had the intelligence to follow through with this? Twenty-percent solar? We’d be a tad better off. Carter was saying we needed the largest “peacetime commitment of funds” because our path would obviously lead to wars. And it has. And it will lead to more, and eventually a world war.


Point four: I'm asking Congress to mandate, to require as a matter of law, that our nation's utility companies cut their massive use of oil by 50 percent within the next decade and switch to other fuels, especially coal, our most abundant energy source...


Uh. Okay. Not so great. Coal’s a bit of a bummer. But it is preferable to being controlled by OPEC and having to take over countries like Iraq and Afghanistan in order to keep our gluttonous habits going. Carter was actually successful with this one. He reduced the percentage of oil used in our electricity production from 20% to 3%. He also expanded the Clean Air Act to combat the effects of coal power generation.


Point five: To make absolutely certain that nothing stands in the way of achieving these goals, I will urge Congress to create an energy mobilization board which, like the War Production Board in World War II, will have the responsibility and authority to cut through the red tape, the delays, and the endless roadblocks to completing key energy projects.

We will protect our environment. But when this Nation critically needs a refinery or a pipeline, we will build it.


Anyone want to guess when the last refinery was built in the U.S.? Try 32 years. That's the free market kicking ass and taking numbers. Although, South Dakota is now threatening to build one. That would be 1 in 32 years.


Point six: I'm proposing a bold conservation program to involve every state, county, and city and every average American in our energy battle. This effort will permit you to build conservation into your homes and your lives at a cost you can afford.


No fucking shit. This is the point where I want to dig up guys like Reagan, just to shit on their head. Personal fucking responsibility is the great enemy of right-wingers. Reagan killed all the tax credits that would have allowed people to "build conservation into their homes."


To further conserve energy, I'm proposing tonight an extra $10 billion over the next decade to strengthen our public transportation systems...


Whoa! Public transportation! Now close your eyes and imagine every city with a working subway system, or rail line. Mmmm. Carter. Jimmy also pushed for fuel economy standards in cars to reduce oil consumption. Republicans fought back. And they created tax rebates for giant SUVs and Hummers.


Our nation must be fair to the poorest among us, so we will increase aid to needy Americans to cope with rising energy prices. We often think of conservation only in terms of sacrifice. In fact, it is the most painless and immediate way of rebuilding our nation's strength. Every gallon of oil each one of us saves is a new form of production. It gives us more freedom, more confidence, that much more control over our own lives...


No shit. But that’s not the Republican way. The Republican way is to get more money into the pockets of oil companies. Every step outlined above takes money away from the oil boys. So, when Reagan took over, he slowly eliminated anything that would have led us away from a path of energy independence.

Instead of confronting the problem head on, Reagan chose to mock Carter. He went after the president, claiming he blamed the American people for the energy crisis – because Carter had the gall to ask Americans to sacrifice and conserve. It was, quite simply, a moron vs. a thinking man.


[President Carter] has blamed the people for inflation, OPEC, he has blamed the Federal Reserve system, he has blamed the lack of productivity of the American people, he has then accused the people of living too well and that we must share in scarcity, we must sacrifice and get used to doing with less.


I'm not so sure that it means steadily higher fuel costs, but I do believe that this nation has been portrayed for too long a time to the people as being energy-poor when it is energy-rich. . . I just happen to believe that free enterprise can do a better job of producing the things that people need than government can.


And that has been the right wing stance ever since. Conservatives have no ability to comprehend complex answers to the energy challenges we face. It’s like trying to talk to a cat about math. So, when you hear a Republican telling us how we should drill off the coast of our country, please urinate on their face. Because drilling was their answer to the crisis in the '70s and we did it. It has not helped. No one should ever listen to a Republican when it comes to energy. There is only one answer: Invest in alternative energy now.

If a right wing asshole attempts to open his pork rind hole, tell him the story of the solar panels on the White House. Jimmy Carter had them installed during his presidency. Reagan then had them torn down. He also killed off tax cuts for solar power and gutted our solar research program. How’d that work out? Oh, I can tell you. Two of the solar researchers he fired went on the win Nobel prizes – in other fields. Because he was a Class A fucking idiot.


"Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do."
- Ronald “retard” Reagan, 1981.



FearTheReaper is a writer, comic and actor. You may read more of his naughtiness on his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6

Next

stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

JUL 24, 2008 09:21 PM

Did anyone listen to NPR today? It was Fresh Air with Terry Gross, talking with Richard Holbrooke about the Bosnian Serb politician/war criminal Radivich or whatever who was just caught.

He talked about meeting him and the general Mladic in the 90's in Yugoslavia for talks. Radovich started bragging about how he was buddies with Jimmy Carter and was talking with him and how Holbrooke had to stand down because he'd bring the wrath of Carter down on his head.

Holbrooke said "there's only one president at a time, it's Clinton at the moment, and I am his agent" but it really illustrated what a presumptuous arrogant self-important fool Carter is. He thinks he is like the shadow president, the alternative president, and he has no compunctions about cozing up to Radivan, Kim Jong-il, Castro, Chavez, etc. and fronting like he is actually a representative on the USA.

Kind of reminds me of someone.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUL 24, 2008 09:38 PM

"Radivich"? what, doesn't Alaska pay you enough to afford Hooked on Phonics?

it's Radovan Karadzic, you illiterate sloth. and i hardly see how the claims of a deposed, washed-up war criminal are any real impingement on anybody's reputation.

stockula

stockula

Anchorage, AK
May 2003

JUL 24, 2008 10:09 PM

motorfirebox said:
"Radivich"? what, doesn't Alaska pay you enough to afford Hooked on Phonics?

it's Radovan Karadzic, you illiterate sloth.



Personal attacks are not allowed on CE, dude.

But it's awesome how much you care about his name being properly spelled. maybe you're in his contacts with Carter.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Pomona, CA
April 2004

JUL 24, 2008 10:21 PM

roubles said:
Criticizing Obama on one issue doesn't mean I'm not going to vote for him. George Bush wouldn't talk with Iran until recently. I will see if McCain modifies his foreign policy before making a decision on a candidate.

When did Ron Paul become "my buddy"? I haven't mentioned him any in any of my posts anywhere.

The blog I listed isn't only focused on one issue but instead on all relevant and pressing economic
issues. I disagree that protecting the US corn ethanol industry is more important than lowering prices by whatever we can with Brazil ethanol. The fact that the exact amount hasn't been quantified isn't a reason not to lift the tariffs. The US corn ethanol industry isn't "needed." I have never ued corn ethanol. How can something most don't use be needed? It isn't.



As long as you are open-minded about the impact of McCain and Obama's decisions on fuel prices, I think that we have common ground.

Sorry about the "buddy" comment; I don't thread-stalk you to see if you are pro-RP or not. Regardless, I was only semi-serious. He's just the libertarian Superman at the moment, so I had to point out his stance and I figured that I was being lighthearted enough that you wouldn't take it as an attack.

We can disagree on the issue of lower prices/corn ethanol. My stance is that the harm done to the ethanol industry outweighs the benefit of the extra fuel in the near-term. If the scale was different, it might be a different issue. The tariff doesn't only protect corn-based ethanol though. It protects cellulosic and sugar cane ethanol as well. While we might not need corn ethanol in the long run, it is our most productive ethanol source at the moment and efforts to protect it from competition also shield sugar cane and cellulosic ethanol production.

Out of curiosity, you haven't ever used corn ethanol? Perhaps it is because I live in California, but we have 10% ethanol gasoline. It's too late for me to look it up tonight, but I was under the impression that most gasoline is now around 5-10% ethanol for air quality standards. I suspect that most people do use ethanol without being aware of it. I can try finding statistics in the morning.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUL 25, 2008 12:04 AM

stockula said:

motorfirebox said:
"Radivich"? what, doesn't Alaska pay you enough to afford Hooked on Phonics?

it's Radovan Karadzic, you illiterate sloth.



Personal attacks are not allowed on CE, dude.

But it's awesome how much you care about his name being properly spelled. maybe you're in his contacts with Carter.


i'm not aware of making any personal attacks in that post. you have, through misspelling a name that any fool could google, demonstrated both illiteracy and slothfulness.

yes, i think its important to know about dangerous people. perhaps if more people shared my attitude, Karadzic would have been brought to justice years ago, rather than being allowed to pursue a life of alternative medicine for nearly a decade. but, hey--i haven't lived most of my life in ignorance. perhaps an expert such as yourself could provide some insight into the benefits of such an existence?

or would you prefer to take your toys and go home, as you usually do when faced with facts and logic?

roubles

roubles

I'm lost
June 2008

JUL 25, 2008 06:55 AM

The county I live in doesn't have 10% ethanol but some of the larger cities I have visited do and I've probably filled up there a couple of times so I stand corrected. The 10% ethanol isn't used in my area but after some research I've learned it is more widespread than I had thought.

roubles

roubles

I'm lost
June 2008

JUL 25, 2008 09:26 AM

For future reference, there is nothing "lighthearted" about casually linking someone to a vile racist like Ron Paul. Would you think it lighthearted or a joke if I linked you to David Duke?

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Pomona, CA
April 2004

JUL 25, 2008 12:04 PM

roubles said:
For future reference, there is nothing "lighthearted" about casually linking someone to a vile racist like Ron Paul. Would you think it lighthearted or a joke if I linked you to David Duke?



I did not suggest that you were racist like him. I don't think the parallel between Ron Paul and David Duke is entirely fair: if you compared me to David Duke, you would clearly be saying that I am racist (since that is the primary thing for which he is known); meanwhile, linking me to someone like Hegel (who like Paul is mostly known for non-racist stuff), for instance, would be more fair.

Also, the libertarians who do agree with Ron Paul deny that he is a racist. Had you been a fan of Ron Paul (as I mistakenly thought), then my comment wouldn't have carried an implied accusation of racism.

Regardless, I definitely did not mean to link you to his racism, just his championship of the free market. I apologize if it my comment came across as an intentional insult.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUL 25, 2008 05:18 PM

Sick said:

SockPuppet said:

Sick said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Shiny_metal_ass said:
Green crude production.
Uses algae.
Does not use farmland.
Does not use agricultural crops.
Can be refined, stored, and transported using existing facilities and infrastructure.
Produces 0 sulfur emissions.
Carbon neutral.



I like it. Algae fuel, I mean.

The website is incredibly uninformative. What is it? How do algae make fuel? How do cars run off of whatever is produced? And things like

do not result in biodiesel or ethanol
enhance, replace petroleum-based products


are just misleading. Unless these people have created some entirely new process.

But the processes I know of use algae to produce oils, and the oils are turned into biodiesel*, biogasoline, SVO, and other synthetic fuels.

End chemical makeup is the same, just the source that's different. So I guess, technically, they aren't petroleum-based, in that they weren't made from crude oil pumped from the ground. But they're still the same hydrocarbons, and they're going to produce the same greenhouse gases. That may not be an issue, but it's an something that shouldn't be glossed over.

Then again, I realize the website is a promotional thing.

*Diesel fuel made by the transesterification of vegetable oil, or algae oil in this case, rather than by refining petroleum.



IIUC, and without looking at Shiny_metal_ass's source, the algae would be photosynthetic; so their primary energy source is solar.
That should overcome the main greenhouse-gas-emission problem.

They might be nitrogen-fixing; I'd hope so. If not, nitrogenous compounds might have to be added; human urine would probably work OK.



Quite right about the greenhouse gas emission problem. Any carbon dioxide produced through the combustion of the fuel would be reused by more algae to produce more fuel. Thus it being carbon-neutral.

Which is why it may not be an issue.

However, it's still not something that should be glossed over; the "information" on the website could possibly be construed as meaning no greenhouse gases are produced at all, which isn't true. It may be of concern if greenhouse gas emissions are a local health topic, for example.



I'm not disagreeing.

roubles

roubles

I'm lost
June 2008

JUL 25, 2008 05:30 PM

RedBstrd said:

roubles said:
For future reference, there is nothing "lighthearted" about casually linking someone to a vile racist like Ron Paul. Would you think it lighthearted or a joke if I linked you to David Duke?



I did not suggest that you were racist like him. I don't think the parallel between Ron Paul and David Duke is entirely fair: if you compared me to David Duke, you would clearly be saying that I am racist (since that is the primary thing for which he is known); meanwhile, linking me to someone like Hegel (who like Paul is mostly known for non-racist stuff), for instance, would be more fair.

Also, the libertarians who do agree with Ron Paul deny that he is a racist. Had you been a fan of Ron Paul (as I mistakenly thought), then my comment wouldn't have carried an implied accusation of racism.

Regardless, I definitely did not mean to link you to his racism, just his championship of the free market. I apologize if it my comment came across as an intentional insult.



Sorry for overreacting. For some reason I assume the worst. I will work on not doing that. I hadn't followed Ron Paul's campaign much. I read some of those newsletters for the first time today and I don't know how libertarians could say he's not a racist.

Sick

Sick

Minneapolis, MN
June 2003

JUL 25, 2008 05:36 PM

SockPuppet said:

Sick said:

SockPuppet said:

Sick said:

SPOILERS! (Click to view)

Shiny_metal_ass said:
Green crude production.
Uses algae.
Does not use farmland.
Does not use agricultural crops.
Can be refined, stored, and transported using existing facilities and infrastructure.
Produces 0 sulfur emissions.
Carbon neutral.



I like it. Algae fuel, I mean.

The website is incredibly uninformative. What is it? How do algae make fuel? How do cars run off of whatever is produced? And things like

do not result in biodiesel or ethanol
enhance, replace petroleum-based products


are just misleading. Unless these people have created some entirely new process.

But the processes I know of use algae to produce oils, and the oils are turned into biodiesel*, biogasoline, SVO, and other synthetic fuels.

End chemical makeup is the same, just the source that's different. So I guess, technically, they aren't petroleum-based, in that they weren't made from crude oil pumped from the ground. But they're still the same hydrocarbons, and they're going to produce the same greenhouse gases. That may not be an issue, but it's an something that shouldn't be glossed over.

Then again, I realize the website is a promotional thing.

*Diesel fuel made by the transesterification of vegetable oil, or algae oil in this case, rather than by refining petroleum.



IIUC, and without looking at Shiny_metal_ass's source, the algae would be photosynthetic; so their primary energy source is solar.
That should overcome the main greenhouse-gas-emission problem.

They might be nitrogen-fixing; I'd hope so. If not, nitrogenous compounds might have to be added; human urine would probably work OK.



Quite right about the greenhouse gas emission problem. Any carbon dioxide produced through the combustion of the fuel would be reused by more algae to produce more fuel. Thus it being carbon-neutral.

Which is why it may not be an issue.

However, it's still not something that should be glossed over; the "information" on the website could possibly be construed as meaning no greenhouse gases are produced at all, which isn't true. It may be of concern if greenhouse gas emissions are a local health topic, for example.



I'm not disagreeing.



I know. I was just clarifying my position. smile

realistic67

realistic67

Vancouver, BC
August 2005

JUL 27, 2008 04:13 AM

Wow... I'm amazed....

Just north of you.... outside of America... People in Canada for the most part felt that American's on the whole treated Jimmy Carter to a really raw deal throughout his presidency. Blaming him personally for things really outside of his control. The Energy crisis, the late 1970's recession ( brought on after America left Vietnam ) and Iran. That guy was really, doing his job as president. Trying to tell you the hard facts as what the world was going to be like. Especially if you just continued to consume and destroy. And fuel the military industrial machine past the point of sanity. Did you listen???

No you booted him out the door as soon as you could. But, not before you mocked him.

( I work with alot of really great American's - The artsy ones who tour shows up here ) So I had faith. I knew one day that you'd all, one by one. Start to wake up from your ongoing nightmare of a nation that the republicans have dealt back to you in return thease last 30 years. While they've sold their souls to business lobby groups. lined their pockets with international company stocks, and pork barrel deals laid inside stupid bills..

It's nice to see that your realising for the most part. That you were all quite foolish and nieve for listening to the republican diatribe of : " It's not your fault, it's that evil government 's fault.....Or....Those guys!!!! Over There.!!!! who aren't Americans!!!! - let's get rid of them.!!! - P.S. While we spend all your money on doing that, but refuse to raise taxes... please look the other way at some pop culture, and continue to buy shit "

It's sad that's it's taken this long. And it almost feels like it's too late to save you as a superpower. but it's nice to see the signs, out on the internet, of the pendulum swinging back towards some balance.

And poor Jimmy? What's he been up to?

( While everyone commenting here has decided to use this comment section as a Bio fuel debate. Or trying too score points for or against Obama )

Building homes for the homeless across the world and even now in your own poor states and counties, wrecked by Hurricanes and Tornados. All, while trying to use his past influence as your past president, to continue working for world Peace.

You all owe him an apology. And a friendly chat over coffee, at least.

r00kers

r00kers

Nederland, CO
February 2003

JUL 27, 2008 04:08 PM

He is now fighting an idiot damn project in Northern Georgia that he once helped squash as governor.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 5 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 5 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 5 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 6 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 21 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Joy Division's Peter Hook
SuicideGirls Interview: Debbie Harry
SuicideGirls Interview: Stan Lee