BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Jimmy Fucking Carter

TUESDAY JULY 22 2008 6:00 AM

Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By FearTheReaper.

TAGS: Gas crisis, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan

Now that we are in the middle of an energy disaster brought on by years of idiotic energy policy that were begun under the Grand Retard, Ronald Reagan, let’s take a look at what Jimmy Carter wanted to do. We didn’t do much of it, because Carter told Americans the truth and we cried like fucking babies and continued to shit our pants. If we had listened to Carter, we’d be toilet trained by now. Instead, we are living in the most horribly shit-in diapers of all time. And it’s pretty much all the fault of the right wing.

Carter delivered an energy speech on July 15, 1979. At the time, things were not looking good. The U.S. was being hit by record high energy prices, severe energy shortages, and a recession. (Sound familiar?) People were pissed at Carter, causing his approval ratings to plummet to Bush-like depths. Imagine that. A president as unpopular as Bush. So, Carter gave a speech, during which he asked the American people to adapt to the energy crisis, its limits and to change our ways.

Carter said, "Human identity is no longer defined by what one does but by what one owns." He was right, of course. But Carter didn’t have the ability to convince his fellow lawmakers to make the tough choices. He was labeled a “pessimist.” Naturally, for every pessimist, there is an optimist. In this case, it was Ronald Reagan. Reagan blew hot wind up America’s ass and we went right back to our destructive ways. Reagan was a pretty fucking stupid human being. As matter of fact, he was shockingly stupid. Had we listened to Carter and accepted a bit of personal responsibility, we might not be driving rapidly toward a cliff today.

The problems Carter identified in his speech were our dependence on oil and the connection among consumption, energy use, and environmental change. Sound familiar?

Here are some highlights from Jimmy Carter’s “Crisis of Confidence” Speech.


CARTER: Point one: I am tonight setting a clear goal for the energy policy of the United States. Beginning this moment, this nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 -- never...


And no. Not only will we, but we’ll use more and more and more. Jimmy didn’t really foresee the right wing jerk off transportation vessel called The Hummer and the murder of alternative energy.


Point two: To ensure that we meet these targets, I will use my presidential authority to set import quotas...


Good luck with that.


Point three: To give us energy security, I am asking for the most massive peacetime commitment of funds and resources in our nation's history to develop America's own alternative sources of fuel...

I will soon submit legislation to Congress calling for the creation of this nation's first solar bank, which will help us achieve the crucial goal of 20 percent of our energy coming from solar power by the year 2000.

These efforts will cost money, a lot of money, and that is why Congress must enact the windfall profits tax without delay...


Could you imagine if we had the intelligence to follow through with this? Twenty-percent solar? We’d be a tad better off. Carter was saying we needed the largest “peacetime commitment of funds” because our path would obviously lead to wars. And it has. And it will lead to more, and eventually a world war.


Point four: I'm asking Congress to mandate, to require as a matter of law, that our nation's utility companies cut their massive use of oil by 50 percent within the next decade and switch to other fuels, especially coal, our most abundant energy source...


Uh. Okay. Not so great. Coal’s a bit of a bummer. But it is preferable to being controlled by OPEC and having to take over countries like Iraq and Afghanistan in order to keep our gluttonous habits going. Carter was actually successful with this one. He reduced the percentage of oil used in our electricity production from 20% to 3%. He also expanded the Clean Air Act to combat the effects of coal power generation.


Point five: To make absolutely certain that nothing stands in the way of achieving these goals, I will urge Congress to create an energy mobilization board which, like the War Production Board in World War II, will have the responsibility and authority to cut through the red tape, the delays, and the endless roadblocks to completing key energy projects.

We will protect our environment. But when this Nation critically needs a refinery or a pipeline, we will build it.


Anyone want to guess when the last refinery was built in the U.S.? Try 32 years. That's the free market kicking ass and taking numbers. Although, South Dakota is now threatening to build one. That would be 1 in 32 years.


Point six: I'm proposing a bold conservation program to involve every state, county, and city and every average American in our energy battle. This effort will permit you to build conservation into your homes and your lives at a cost you can afford.


No fucking shit. This is the point where I want to dig up guys like Reagan, just to shit on their head. Personal fucking responsibility is the great enemy of right-wingers. Reagan killed all the tax credits that would have allowed people to "build conservation into their homes."


To further conserve energy, I'm proposing tonight an extra $10 billion over the next decade to strengthen our public transportation systems...


Whoa! Public transportation! Now close your eyes and imagine every city with a working subway system, or rail line. Mmmm. Carter. Jimmy also pushed for fuel economy standards in cars to reduce oil consumption. Republicans fought back. And they created tax rebates for giant SUVs and Hummers.


Our nation must be fair to the poorest among us, so we will increase aid to needy Americans to cope with rising energy prices. We often think of conservation only in terms of sacrifice. In fact, it is the most painless and immediate way of rebuilding our nation's strength. Every gallon of oil each one of us saves is a new form of production. It gives us more freedom, more confidence, that much more control over our own lives...


No shit. But that’s not the Republican way. The Republican way is to get more money into the pockets of oil companies. Every step outlined above takes money away from the oil boys. So, when Reagan took over, he slowly eliminated anything that would have led us away from a path of energy independence.

Instead of confronting the problem head on, Reagan chose to mock Carter. He went after the president, claiming he blamed the American people for the energy crisis – because Carter had the gall to ask Americans to sacrifice and conserve. It was, quite simply, a moron vs. a thinking man.


[President Carter] has blamed the people for inflation, OPEC, he has blamed the Federal Reserve system, he has blamed the lack of productivity of the American people, he has then accused the people of living too well and that we must share in scarcity, we must sacrifice and get used to doing with less.


I'm not so sure that it means steadily higher fuel costs, but I do believe that this nation has been portrayed for too long a time to the people as being energy-poor when it is energy-rich. . . I just happen to believe that free enterprise can do a better job of producing the things that people need than government can.


And that has been the right wing stance ever since. Conservatives have no ability to comprehend complex answers to the energy challenges we face. It’s like trying to talk to a cat about math. So, when you hear a Republican telling us how we should drill off the coast of our country, please urinate on their face. Because drilling was their answer to the crisis in the '70s and we did it. It has not helped. No one should ever listen to a Republican when it comes to energy. There is only one answer: Invest in alternative energy now.

If a right wing asshole attempts to open his pork rind hole, tell him the story of the solar panels on the White House. Jimmy Carter had them installed during his presidency. Reagan then had them torn down. He also killed off tax cuts for solar power and gutted our solar research program. How’d that work out? Oh, I can tell you. Two of the solar researchers he fired went on the win Nobel prizes – in other fields. Because he was a Class A fucking idiot.


"Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do."
- Ronald “retard” Reagan, 1981.



FearTheReaper is a writer, comic and actor. You may read more of his naughtiness on his blog, Stop All Monsters.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Holden_Caulfield

Holden_Caulfield

Ann Arbor, MI
April 2004

JUL 22, 2008 11:42 AM

It's like trying to talk to a cat about math.


This cat knows math! wink



Great post, BTW. smile

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

JUL 22, 2008 12:03 PM

abbazappa [posted some stupid video]


I don't think Glenn Beck understands the meaning of the word "promises." A lot of those things were politicians actually telling the truth. "It's going to get worse." "Nothing's going to be done and we're going to get stuck with it."

Some of the clips in there have little to do with oil prices at all, like Clinton and Gore talking about the need to develop alternative energy infrastructure for electricity. A recent NY Times story points out irrefutable facts about our oil consumption:

Nearly 70 percent of the 21 million barrels of oil the United States consumes every day goes for transportation, with the bulk of that burned by individual drivers, according to the National Commission on Energy Policy, a bipartisan research group that advises Congress.

[...]

Home to only 4 percent of the world's population, the nation slurps up about a quarter of the planet's oil %u2014 and Americans' daily use is nearly twice the combined consumption of the Chinese and Indians, according to an annual energy survey published by BP, the British oil giant.


And who's responsible for our continued thirst for more and more oil?

Before that point, the country reaped the benefits of the first fuel-economy standards, passed in 1975, known as corporate average fuel economy, or CAFE. Between 1974 and 1989, the efficiency of a typical car sold in the United States almost doubled, to 27.5 miles per gallon from 13.8.

LARGELY as a result, oil consumption in 1990 totaled 16.9 million barrels per day, basically on a par with the 17 million barrels per day consumed in 1980, even as the economy grew substantially. Oil prices were in the middle of a long downward slide that would take them from well above $30 a barrel in 1980 to a low of just under $10 in late 1998 and early 1999, interrupted only by brief spike in 1990 after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.

In 1990, Richard H. Bryan, a Nevada Democrat, teamed up in the Senate with Slade Gorton, Republican of Washington, and proposed lifting fuel standards again over the next decade, with a goal of 40 m.p.g. for cars. Amid furious opposition from Detroit, liberal Democrats from automaking states, like Carl Levin of Michigan, joined conservative Republicans like Jesse Helms of North Carolina to block new CAFE standards. "It was one of the most frustrating issues in my Senate career," says Mr. Gorton, who left the Senate in 2001.



Forward-thinking Democrats and Republicans were stymied, by a bipartisan coalition of Senators who were in the pocket of the oil and auto industries, in efforts to increase fuel standards. For the entire tenure of Republican Congressional majority, from 1995 to 2006, Republicans managed to make the problem even worse.

Congressional Republicans made matters worse in 1995, when they attached a rider to a huge appropriations bill forbidding the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration from spending any money to raise fuel standards. That law, in effect until 2001, made any change in CAFE standards impossible, says Representative Edward J. Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat who has pushed for better fuel efficiency.

Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.

Glenn Beck is a blathering idiot.


It's worth noting that transportation is such a huge part of our oil consumption because Carter was successful in reducing our use of oil for electricity, as FTR pointed out.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

JUL 22, 2008 12:19 PM

a one-line indication of agreement could sum up my reaction to most of the article. except for one line:

FearTheReaper said:
Personal fucking responsibility is the great enemy of right-wingers.


that there might be the funniest thing i've read all day.

ericwine

ericwine

Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007

JUL 22, 2008 12:35 PM

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.

Adroitbeing

Adroitbeing

I'm lost
September 2003

JUL 22, 2008 12:46 PM

coyotemike said:

jessferfun said:
the list of ignorant money-motivated escapades that dickface reagan is responsible for is very very long. a list, whose length is only rivaled now by little beady-eyed W's list.



Might be fun, and depressing, to look at how many things that are fucked up today can be laid at Reagan's feet. Just off the top of my head . . .

Iran (Gave them weapons, a la Ollie North)
Afganistan (Trained and armed the people who became Al Qaeda)
Oil (personally greased us all up for Opec anal rapage)
Dubya (Gave his dad a high political office, which helped W. get enough votes to cheat his way into office)

Anyone care to add to the list?



Reagan fell for the Soviet bluff suggesting Russia would increase the defense budget by 45%. He responded by increasing the US military budget from 3.9% of GDP to 6.3% of GDP. We all later learned that Russia was completely incapable of approaching the feigned levels.

OhSoOrdinary

OhSoOrdinary

New York, NY
July 2006

JUL 22, 2008 12:51 PM

wildswan said:
zoom image

Always ahead of the curve. Always thinking of others.



How do you do it? How?

BTW, did anyone see that Congressional Hearing about the White House cover up of the EPA's finding that greenhouse gases were a danger to the public and needed to be regulated? That I wish I could quote.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

JUL 22, 2008 01:25 PM

ericwine said:

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.


35 mpg by 2020 is a joke. By 2012, no car company will be able to sell a car or light truck getting under 35 mpg anyhow. These are standards that should have been active years ago.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Pomona, CA
April 2004

JUL 22, 2008 01:28 PM

Adroitbeing said:

coyotemike said:

jessferfun said:
the list of ignorant money-motivated escapades that dickface reagan is responsible for is very very long. a list, whose length is only rivaled now by little beady-eyed W's list.



Might be fun, and depressing, to look at how many things that are fucked up today can be laid at Reagan's feet. Just off the top of my head . . .

Iran (Gave them weapons, a la Ollie North)
Afganistan (Trained and armed the people who became Al Qaeda)
Oil (personally greased us all up for Opec anal rapage)
Dubya (Gave his dad a high political office, which helped W. get enough votes to cheat his way into office)

Anyone care to add to the list?



Reagan fell for the Soviet bluff suggesting Russia would increase the defense budget by 45%. He responded by increasing the US military budget from 3.9% of GDP to 6.3% of GDP. We all later learned that Russia was completely incapable of approaching the feigned levels.



More importantly, the USSR was unwilling to increase their military spending (as percentage of GDP) even to levels that they could have reached. I just want to underline as much as possible the fact that Reagan did not "bankrupt" the Soviet Union. He couldn't even get them to spend more money on defense than they were already spending under Brezhnev. Any money he spent to intimidate/compete with the Soviet Union was wasted money that could have gone towards goals that actually helped America (such as investing towards energy independence and alternate energy sources).

As Frances FitzGerald explains:


As CIA analysts discovered in 1983, Soviet military spending had leveled off in 1975 to a growth rate of 1.3 percent, with spending for weapons procurements virtually flat. It remained that way for a decade. According to later CIA estimates, Soviet military spending rose in 1985 as a result of decisions taken earlier, and grew at a rate of 4.3 percent per year through 1987. Spending for procurements of offensive strategic weapons, however, increased by only 1.4 percent a year in that period. In 1988 Gorbachev began a round of budget cuts, bringing the defense budget back down to its 1980 level. In other words, while the U.S. military budget was growing at an average of 8 percent per year, the Soviets did not attempt to keep up, and their military spending did not rise even as might have been expected given the war they were fighting in Afghanistan.



Way Out There In the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War

You can use the Search function and enter "474" to access pages 474-475.

alaric

alaric

I'm lost
June 2005

JUL 22, 2008 02:29 PM

You need look no further than the US DoD (AKA: department of corporate and imperial maintenance) to see the lost opportunities.

Imagine if we had spend just one year of iraq or one year of reagan's defense budget on alt energy?

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

JUL 22, 2008 02:36 PM

bean said:

ericwine said:

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.


35 mpg by 2020 is a joke. By 2012, no car company will be able to sell a car or light truck getting under 35 mpg anyhow. These are standards that should have been active years ago.



We've been polishing a turd called the combustion engine for years. They keep enhancing said turd with higher horsepower, dual overhead cams, and many other options just to make the turd shinier and prettier so the consumer wants it.

We are in a day and age in which we can get a Cadillac with air conditioned seats, an in dash 40 gig hard drive with a computer that will respond to voice commands, back-up cameras, finger coded ignition switches and all these other technically advanced options, yet it still has that turd of a combustion engine in it.

We should be well past mileage requirements and into requirements for where we can legally plug in our electric cars. I dream of the day when my truck is looked at as an antique because of it's power source and people will pay big bucks to have "such an old technology like that".

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

Knoxville, TN
OLD SKOOL

JUL 22, 2008 02:44 PM

bean said:

ericwine said:

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.


35 mpg by 2020 is a joke. By 2012, no car company will be able to sell a car or light truck getting under 35 mpg anyhow. These are standards that should have been active years ago.



I'd love to make a bet with you on that one, but making money off the stupidity of the human race* is what got us into this mess in the first place.

I mean, look at how things are today. Some people out there are still driving two Hummers or something. How painfully, cripplingly idiotic do you have to be to do that in this day and age?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
* Not yours personally, of course. I'm talking about the segment of the consumer population which keeps the novelty singing wall-mounted fish people in business.

Skeletone

Skeletone

Lowell, MA
May 2008

JUL 22, 2008 04:52 PM

RizzoFord
too bad John Hinckley didn't have a better shot....



WTF?

Hate Reagan all ya want, but that's just wrong.



bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

JUL 22, 2008 05:18 PM

BlastProcessing said:

bean said:

ericwine said:

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.


35 mpg by 2020 is a joke. By 2012, no car company will be able to sell a car or light truck getting under 35 mpg anyhow. These are standards that should have been active years ago.



I'd love to make a bet with you on that one, but making money off the stupidity of the human race* is what got us into this mess in the first place.

I mean, look at how things are today. Some people out there are still driving two Hummers or something. How painfully, cripplingly idiotic do you have to be to do that in this day and age?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
* Not yours personally, of course. I'm talking about the segment of the consumer population which keeps the novelty singing wall-mounted fish people in business.



I said car companies won't be able to sell them. As in "new." I said nothing of people driving around heaping piles of shit that get crap mileage. Those are irrelevant anyhow since CAFE standards don't cover them. Time will take care of most old cars all by itself, and the rest don't matter that much in terms of consumption.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

JUL 22, 2008 05:20 PM

DevilsReject said:

bean said:

ericwine said:

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.


35 mpg by 2020 is a joke. By 2012, no car company will be able to sell a car or light truck getting under 35 mpg anyhow. These are standards that should have been active years ago.



We've been polishing a turd called the combustion engine for years. They keep enhancing said turd with higher horsepower, dual overhead cams, and many other options just to make the turd shinier and prettier so the consumer wants it.

We are in a day and age in which we can get a Cadillac with air conditioned seats, an in dash 40 gig hard drive with a computer that will respond to voice commands, back-up cameras, finger coded ignition switches and all these other technically advanced options, yet it still has that turd of a combustion engine in it.

We should be well past mileage requirements and into requirements for where we can legally plug in our electric cars. I dream of the day when my truck is looked at as an antique because of it's power source and people will pay big bucks to have "such an old technology like that".



I agree. All I'm saying is that low-mileage gas-fueled cars will not be a product that can be sold for a profit, as the extinction of the Hummer foreshadows.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

Knoxville, TN
OLD SKOOL

JUL 22, 2008 05:30 PM

bean said:

BlastProcessing said:

bean said:

ericwine said:

bean said:Bush's CAFE standard plan is to gradually increase mileage to a pathetic 28 mpg. He proposed that in 2005, well after oil and gas prices had started to skyrocket.



The Energy Independence and Security Act raises it to 35 mpg by 2020 - in response to Bush's call to reduce gasoline consumption by 20% by 2017.


35 mpg by 2020 is a joke. By 2012, no car company will be able to sell a car or light truck getting under 35 mpg anyhow. These are standards that should have been active years ago.



I'd love to make a bet with you on that one, but making money off the stupidity of the human race* is what got us into this mess in the first place.

I mean, look at how things are today. Some people out there are still driving two Hummers or something. How painfully, cripplingly idiotic do you have to be to do that in this day and age?

SPOILERS! (Click to view)
* Not yours personally, of course. I'm talking about the segment of the consumer population which keeps the novelty singing wall-mounted fish people in business.



I said car companies won't be able to sell them. As in "new." I said nothing of people driving around heaping piles of shit that get crap mileage. Those are irrelevant anyhow since CAFE standards don't cover them. Time will take care of most old cars all by itself, and the rest don't matter that much in terms of consumption.



Don't get me wrong - I want to see that happen. I just don't see America divesting itself of enough self-righteous mouth-breathers with disposable incomes and a complete lack of forward thinking practices to completely tank the market for SUVs with the acreage and efficiency of, say, the entire state of Texas.

Also, one of the biggest obstacles between us and creating and maintaining a true economically and ecologically sound energy policy is getting vehicles which meet or exceed the strictest regulations in the hands of people who can in this day and age only afford those heaping piles shit with crap mileage. That's another thread, though.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 5 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 5 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 5 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 6 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 21 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: David Carradine
SuicideGirls Interview: Dita Von Teese author of The Art of the Teese
SuicideGirls Interview: Frank Black