BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

China's New Olympic Rules

FRIDAY JUNE 6 2008 9:00 PM

Submitted by Coyotemike. Edited By FearTheReaper.

TAGS: China, Olympics, human rights

Ahh, the Olympics: the traditions; the majesty; the competitive spirit; the graceful athleticism and the...the political restrictions?

That's right. China, not satisfied with infringing on their own citizens' rights to protest against the government, or cracking down on claims of independence of different areas, now they have released a list of rules for foreign visitors coming for the Games. These include:


  • No printed material that is critical of China

  • No rallies or demonstrations

  • Olympic Tickets do not necessarily mean an entry visa will be issued

  • No smuggling in Opium
  • (since there's no history of opium in China)

  • Do not insult the Chinese flag or other national Chinese symbols

  • No religious or political banners


Some of these make sense, like the rules of what to do if you get food poisoning, and I'm sure that plenty of host countries have refused entry visas to some people who had Olympic tickets. But some of these count as suppression of what are considered basic human rights.


“A person’s ability to express his or her opinion is a basic human right and as such does not need to have a specific clause in the Olympic Charter because its place is implicit,” said Jacques Rogge, the president of the International Olympic Committee, at a meeting in Beijing in April.



It should be noted that Olympic rules have, for over 50 years, included a ban on political, religious, and racial propaganda on Olympic sites, but that is more about suspending political differences and descriminations than China's version:

The advisory issued by the Beijing Organizing Committee includes a ban on bringing into China “anything detrimental to China’s politics, economy, culture or moral standards, including printed material, film negatives, photos, records, movies, tape recordings, videotapes, optical discs and other items.”



China was supposed to, as part of their winning bid in 2001, improve their human rights records.

We're still waiting.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Weatherpunk

Weatherpunk

Japan
June 2008

JUN 07, 2008 12:59 PM

dholokov said:

Weatherpunk said:
Does the IOC care so much about simply HAVING a Summer Games that they wouldn't pull China's hosting rights and maybe just co-ordinate to have a pre-existing site used as an auxiliary location? I'm sure most countries wouldn't balk at the sudden upswing in tourism if they already had infrastructure in place.

.



On behalf of the city that placed second, the time for that idea has long passed.

(And not to make it all about my city, but every time Toronto places second for an olympic bid, the winner is pretty suspect. ((Atlanta for the bribery, Beijing for being Beijing)).



While I have naught but goodwill towards Toronto (Being half-Canadian by blood) I was referring to cities that had ALREADY hosted an event in the past, and thus might still have some of the support structure in place. I realize that obviously within a 12-18 month window of the games beginning, it's point-of-no-return for moving the competition, but the IOC must have seen China dragging its feet for YEARS even after winning the bid.

True, other countries/cities that had bid & lost might feel some disappointment at having China pulled and the games return to an already-chosen location, but given the shortened timeline & circumstances, I think any rancor would quickly pass in the spirit of the actual purpose of the games: Goodwill.

I agree with Olympic principles that the games should be exempt from political exploitation, but the very nature of the whole set-up is meant to express & inspire the best in humanity. We've fallen short on both sides, in my opinion, this summer. frown

dholokov

dholokov

Toronto, ON
April 2003

JUN 07, 2008 02:30 PM

Weatherpunk said:

dholokov said:

Weatherpunk said:
Does the IOC care so much about simply HAVING a Summer Games that they wouldn't pull China's hosting rights and maybe just co-ordinate to have a pre-existing site used as an auxiliary location? I'm sure most countries wouldn't balk at the sudden upswing in tourism if they already had infrastructure in place.

.



On behalf of the city that placed second, the time for that idea has long passed.

(And not to make it all about my city, but every time Toronto places second for an olympic bid, the winner is pretty suspect. ((Atlanta for the bribery, Beijing for being Beijing)).



While I have naught but goodwill towards Toronto (Being half-Canadian by blood) I was referring to cities that had ALREADY hosted an event in the past, and thus might still have some of the support structure in place. I realize that obviously within a 12-18 month window of the games beginning, it's point-of-no-return for moving the competition, but the IOC must have seen China dragging its feet for YEARS even after winning the bid.

True, other countries/cities that had bid & lost might feel some disappointment at having China pulled and the games return to an already-chosen location, but given the shortened timeline & circumstances, I think any rancor would quickly pass in the spirit of the actual purpose of the games: Goodwill.

I agree with Olympic principles that the games should be exempt from political exploitation, but the very nature of the whole set-up is meant to express & inspire the best in humanity. We've fallen short on both sides, in my opinion, this summer. frown




Maybe six months ago that could have been an idea - and that's a big maybe. With almost two months to the day until it starts, it's too late under any circumstances to move the games, unless you are going to cancel them and hold them later.

As an aside, it's incredibly unlikely that the committee had any serious intention of holding China to any kind of human rights or open-ness standards. At the time, I don't recall any benchmarks that China would have to meet or contingency plans if they didn't. I do recall people thinking that having journalists in the country for the games would shed light on their actions and maybe create international pressure. And in that regard I think we've seriously underestimated the Chinese government.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Pomona, CA
April 2004

JUN 07, 2008 03:48 PM

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Pomona, CA
April 2004

JUN 07, 2008 03:51 PM

abbazappa said:
Yay, isn't Communism grand love



Clearly that's the correct reading of events. As China has been restructuring their economy to be a beacon of capitalism, we are seeing a great flowering of democracy, huh?

mojomofo

mojomofo

Australia
February 2008

JUN 07, 2008 04:08 PM

zoom image

zoom image

zoom image

zoom image

zoom image

I'm just absolutely disgusted that China has been awarded the Olympics, the supposed symbol of freedom and world peace in sports.

How their record of atrocities against the Tibetan people and indeed their own population can be overlooked by the powers at be is beyond me.

I've got a feeling that there's going to be some serious uprising in Beijing whilst the Olympics are on.

The world cannot stand silent and allow China's disgraceful record of human rights abuse to continue.

dholokov

dholokov

Toronto, ON
April 2003

JUN 07, 2008 04:21 PM

mojomofo said:


The world cannot stand silent and allow China's disgraceful record of human rights abuse to continue.



Wanna bet?

Ascanius

Ascanius

South Royalton, VT
October 2006

JUN 07, 2008 04:42 PM



Thanks for mentioning that. I was about to point out that finding fault in the Chinese government for cracking down on opium smuggling because China has a history of opium use is the historical equivalent of finding fault in Sierra Leone for cracking down on human trafficking because they have a history of slavery. WTF?

Ascanius

Ascanius

South Royalton, VT
October 2006

JUN 07, 2008 04:44 PM

mojomofo said:
I've got a feeling that there's going to be some serious uprising in Beijing whilst the Olympics are on.



I've got a feeling you've never been to Beijing.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Pomona, CA
April 2004

JUN 07, 2008 04:46 PM

Ascanius said:



Thanks for mentioning that. I was about to point out that finding fault in the Chinese government for cracking down on opium smuggling because China has a history of opium use is the historical equivalent of finding fault in Sierra Leone for cracking down on human trafficking because they have a history of slavery. WTF?



You're welcome. I should be clear, though, that I think we have plenty of legitimate grounds for criticizing the current Chinese government. I just don't think that their opposition to opium is one of these legitimate criticisms.

Ascanius

Ascanius

South Royalton, VT
October 2006

JUN 07, 2008 04:48 PM

RedBstrd said:
You're welcome. I should be clear, though, that I think we have plenty of legitimate grounds for criticizing the current Chinese government. I just don't think that their opposition to opium is one of these legitimate criticisms.



Of course.

mojomofo

mojomofo

Australia
February 2008

JUN 07, 2008 04:52 PM

Ascanius said:

mojomofo said:
I've got a feeling that there's going to be some serious uprising in Beijing whilst the Olympics are on.



I've got a feeling you've never been to Beijing.



Well no i haven't been to Beijing. I imagine the police presence will be massively overwhelming during the olympics.

mojomofo

mojomofo

Australia
February 2008

JUN 07, 2008 04:52 PM

dholokov said:

mojomofo said:


The world cannot stand silent and allow China's disgraceful record of human rights abuse to continue.



Wanna bet?



Yep, its a disgrace.

Ascanius

Ascanius

South Royalton, VT
October 2006

JUN 07, 2008 04:59 PM

mojomofo said:

Ascanius said:

mojomofo said:
I've got a feeling that there's going to be some serious uprising in Beijing whilst the Olympics are on.



I've got a feeling you've never been to Beijing.



Well no i haven't been to Beijing. I imagine the police presence will be massively overwhelming during the olympics.



Also, Beijing is doing pretty well in a lot of ways these days. If there's going to be some 'serious uprising', I think it'll happen out in the country where people are seriously fucked.

mojomofo

mojomofo

Australia
February 2008

JUN 07, 2008 05:08 PM

Yep thats a good point.

I just have had a feeling all along that these olympics will not go smoothly at all. With all of the protests surrounding the torch relay, i dont think that that's the last we've seen of the protest actions.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

JUN 08, 2008 04:12 PM

Ascanius said:



Thanks for mentioning that. I was about to point out that finding fault in the Chinese government for cracking down on opium smuggling because China has a history of opium use is the historical equivalent of finding fault in Sierra Leone for cracking down on human trafficking because they have a history of slavery. WTF?


+1

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 5 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 6 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 21 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Queens of the Stone Age: An Interview With Troy Van Leeuwen
SuicideGirls Interview: Aesop Rock
SuicideGirls Interview: Laura Dern