BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

GOP Prepares For Anal Rape

THURSDAY MAY 15 2008 12:00 PM

Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By erin_broadley.

TAGS: Republicans, Election 08

The big news during this primary season is not Barack Obama, but the shit kicking Republicans have taken in three Congressional districts. Illinois, Louisiana and Mississippi have given the GOP a glimpse of the future – and it is one ugly sight for the right wing. In each of these states, a Republican stronghold district was holding a special election because the GOP incumbent retired. And in each district, the Republicans lost to a Democrat. Losing in these areas would be like a Democrat losing in San Francisco. Expect a brutal bloodbath in November.

It’s the perfect storm. Republicans are stuck with the most unpopular president of all time, an unpopular war, a horrible economy and a fired up Democratic base. Many GOP lawmakers are retiring because their orgy days in Congress are over. So far, 30 Republicans lawmakers have retired or won’t seek re-election, compared to only 7 Democrats. Turns out the GOP suddenly found themselves unpopular with lobbyists and voters, alike.

Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert announced his retirement last year and his seat was up for grabs during the March 5th Illinois primary. Republicans spent a massive $1.2 million on a seat that they held for two decades. That amounted to 20% of the Republican Congressional Committee’s total cash on hand – and they were spending it in a district that hadn’t been competitive for decades. In 2004, Bush won the district 55%-44%. This is deep in Republican land.

Yet, local businessman and Democrat Bill Foster won the seat easily, with 53% of the vote. Not a good sign for John McCain, who campaigned and raised money for the Republican loser. And not a good sign for the GOP “Iraq is going super” mantra. Foster is strongly opposed to the war, while the Republican loser kept saying the surge was working. Not so much.

Next up on the Republican shame train was May 5th in Louisiana. Republican Richard Baker retired from Congress after 11 terms. The district he represented had been in GOP control for 33 years and, like Hastert’s seat, was largely a conservative and rural district. Serious Republican country – or it was, anyway.

Republicans also spent heavily in this Louisiana special election, dropping $1 million on radio and TV ads trying to link Democratic candidate Don Cazayoux to Barack Obama (black guy) and Nancy Pelosi (lady). FAIL. Cazayoux squeaked by with a 49% to 46% victory. That is an incredibly pathetic number for a Republican candidate in a conservative district, one that was actually redrawn in 2000 to make it even “more reliably Republican.” Richard Baker had won the previous 2 races with 72% and 83% and in 2004, Bush won with 59% of all votes. Now Republicans aren’t even hitting that all-important 50% number. Welcome to the world of grim.

Finally, on Tuesday night, Democrat Travis Childers easily beat his Republican opponent in a conservative Mississippi district. By “easily,” I mean 54% - 46%. That’s a fucking ridiculous number for a Democrat in a Republican stronghold and means a serious anal rape for the GOP come November.

This was as safe a seat as Republicans have. In 2004, the district voted for Bush by a margin of 62% to 37%. The GOP had a decent candidate named Greg Davis, who didn’t bring any baggage. Trent Lott, Mike Huckabee, Dick Cheney and Haley Barbour all showed up and campaigned with Davis. The Republican Congressional Committee spent $1.3 million, Davis spent over a million and Freedom Watch spent $500,000. And they went as pathetic as possible with their ads.



Black guy, black guy, lady! Oh, my God!

And yet, it resulted in a spectacular Republican FAIL. It is inconceivable that Republicans lost this seat and a harbinger of doom. The GOP can do nothing to stop the brutal devastation heading their way. Well, that’s not true, they can lube up and relax their sphincters. EVERY Republican seat is now officially in play. You will see them attack each other and even their God, George Bush. It only took 8 hours for a Republican House member to take a shot at El Presidente.


Rep. Tom Davis stomped on the concrete floor of the Capitol basement when asked by reporters about Republican fortunes at the moment.

"This is the floor," he said, by way of explanation. "We're below the floor."

Inside the meeting, Davis had just presented his colleagues with what he said was a 20-page memo outlining his prescription for a way out of this mess. He did not offer details to the press, yet did not spare the party and the president scathing criticism in his public comments.

"The president swallows the microphone every time he opens his mouth," Davis said.


Tommy is the representative for the city of Babytown. Here’s a tip, Tommy: For the past eight years, when Bush was putting forth the most retarded policies of all time, you probably shouldn’t have been tickling his balls and taking his load into your mouth. When Americans turned against the war, you probably shouldn’t have done everything in your power to keep it going. When Bush put forth his insane tax cuts during a time of war, you probably shouldn’t have acted like they were the second coming of Jesus. You are spineless, deluded cunts and the suffering coming your way is of your own making.

And just in case you don't get it, here’s where you stand, you ignorant shit beast.

The public believes Democrats are better than Republicans on most important issues by massive margins.


    On the economy, Democrats now have a 14-point advantage over the Republicans.

    On Government Ethics and Corruption - 45% now trust Democrats, while just 26% prefer the GOP.

    On National Security and the War on Terror, 49% of voters now trust the Democrats more, while 42% trust the Republicans more.

    On Iraq, Democrats hold an 11-point lead over the Republicans.


Congressional Republicans can blame Bush all they want, but they are at fault spending the past eight years acting like NAMBLA on a boy fuck-trip to Bangkok. Without a care in the world, they plundered our country and indulged in the most selfish and unethical acts democratically elected officials could. They aren’t even a party anymore. The GOP is a just a brothel, created to service corporate cocks in their angry, wet holes. Let the suffering begin.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

MAY 17, 2008 12:52 AM

malkav11 said:

gdarklighter said:

seme said:
Not only are the Democrats NOT reaching out to independents and moderate Republicans, they're making such a show about tearing each other apart they're risking losing a chunk of their own party's vote.


Are you always this wrong? Obama's been grabbing independent votes like crazy and he's running an honest-to-god 50 states strategy, and it's one that the DCCC has been emulating.

Also, only trolls use the (exceptionally loaded) phrase "pro-war on terror". Democrats aren't against the war on terror. They're against a war on terror headed by an incompetent administration.



I am against the "war on terror". It's a ridiculous notion, pandering to people scared of their own shadows and being used to curtail rights and freedoms. Little to none of which is making us any safer.


See above, re: incompetent administration. The terminology is certainly ridiculous, and the implementation has been inept, but I refuse to believe that we can't take steps to mitigate terrorism without sacrificing our civil liberties. It's a false dichotomy perpetrated by an administration that has never really been concerned about serving the people.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 17, 2008 02:18 AM

seme said:
Nice to see the ridiculous rhetoric is still a viable substitution for actual intelligent discourse when it comes to politics.

Before you cream yourself in glee you might actually want to spend a minute actually reading Don Cazayoux's political platform. He's FAR from a candidate lefties should be patting themselves on the back as a great upset. He's pro-life, against gun control, pro-war on terror (and from the phrase 'bring our troops home with honor' I suspect pro-Iraq), seemingly pro-Patriot Act and against amnesty for illegal immigrants. All of this would have taken you three minutes to find out ... but no it's way easier just to read "Democrat" and assume this is a massive victory.

What's most distressing is how many Democrats have their heads up their asses. You can't assume that negative views on Iraq will equal a win, if that were true Kerry would have taken the Presidency four years ago when the war was at its most violent and most unpopular. But he didn't, probably for the same reason the Democrats are likely to lose this time too: he assumed he had it locked up and forgot to actually run for President. Not only are the Democrats NOT reaching out to independents and moderate Republicans, they're making such a show about tearing each other apart they're risking losing a chunk of their own party's vote. The dirtiness between Obama and Clinton is making the Dems look ridiculous and turning swing voters off while McCain is smelling like a rose.



Anyway, dipshit, I'm not a Democrat. I'm an independent who is able to have the simple understanding that Democrats with a veto less majority is a good thing. I think if your head wasn't crammed up your ass, you'd realize Cazayoux's win was symbolic of something else.

Syntropia

Syntropia

Oakland, CA
February 2004

MAY 17, 2008 03:41 AM

bean said:

Narghile said:

Stiles said:
One other thing, to everyone who is looking down their nose at West Virginians:

Most of these people have been in grinding poverty for a long time, and are fearful of change because change has not brought them much good so far. A lot of them have worked very hard at pretty brutal jobs (like coal mining) to get what little they may have.

Derision and stereotypes aren't going to help them, but better education and jobs will. Let's try not to reinforce their stereotypes of us, please.



But does that really excuse them from educating themselves at a local library or making a simple Google search to discover the difference between Saddam Hussein and Barack Hussein Obama?


If you don't have any access to the internet, or you're reading at a 5th grade level when you graduate from high school (and that's the average, not the bottom of the class, nevermind the ones who dropped out), there's not a very good chance you're going to be able to do either of those things for yourself.

So, yeah, it does.

It should be noted that West Virginia isn't the lowest performing state on most education measures, and that the above examples don't represent the statewide averages, but rather the reality of life in the areas where the type of ignorance we're talking about is prevalent.



Just because ignorance is prevalent, doesn't mean that the proletariat is stupid... just sayin!
wink

Syntropia

Syntropia

Oakland, CA
February 2004

MAY 17, 2008 03:43 AM

Benzino said:
The less Republicans in office. the better.



Nevahh...

Syntropia

Syntropia

Oakland, CA
February 2004

MAY 17, 2008 03:50 AM

DevilsReject said:

Mr_Matt_ said:
Hopefully, the younger generation, with it's (improved) access to the information age, will be able to break out of this rut.



I really don't want to stereotype the state, so i am speaking from personal experience.

I spent some time there with a girlfriend that had family down there, we went to a Family Reunion right around the summer of 2003. We drove into a town that was basically carved into the side of a mountain.

I felt stupid because when i got there, her family still used an outhouse and the water running into the house was from a well. It reeked of sulfur and wasn't always clear. They had one phone between the three houses that were within a mile of one another and one television from about 1974, that got about 4 channels, not clear either. I was naive enough to believe that in the 2000's that this didn't exist anymore.

The whole time i was down there i was kind of in culture shock. I have four desktop computers and a laptop, cable connections, air cards, cell phones and PDA's are a part of my everyday life, i am a tech geek. I was frowned upon because of my tattoos, asked if i was gay several times and it was just assumed that i worshiped Satan. I mentioned "Bluetooth" and was looked at like i was insane.

They don't worry about college in this little town. They don't worry about anymore education than the "damned Yankee government" requires. I can't tell you the number of times that her grandmother said "I only got a sixth grade education, and i am fine!".

I am pretty sure her grandfather hated me, not for anymore reason than i was from a "big city". The feeling was just about mutual because the word "nigger" poured from his lips ignorantly in just about every sentence he used. They don't do white collar work. They're basically blue collar to the bone and have no desire to change that.

While i am sure things in the bigger cities of West Virginia are different. There are plentiful amounts of people living in the hollers and the hills that are perfectly happy with how they are living life. They're basically cut-off from society and don't care and really have no desire to change. They're family roots run deep, and they stay very close together in their beliefs and keep the family extremely close.

About two weeks after we got back from the Family re-union the girl who grew up there and i was dating, broke up with me because "Her grandparents didn't like me", even though she lives roughly 6 hours away from them, she still held onto the fact that she needed to impress her family with who she was dating. So even though she didn't live there anymore, her ideals still centered around keeping the family happy.

It's a different world in some places, and i am sure that is true in more places than just West Virginia. Change comes very, very slow to places like that.





Just because ignorance is stupid? Or delusion is the apathy of involvemennt?

Syntropia

Syntropia

Oakland, CA
February 2004

MAY 17, 2008 04:01 AM

robot Yargit robot Yargit robot

Mr_Matt_

Mr_Matt_

Hollywood, FL
July 2005

MAY 17, 2008 07:24 AM

Syntropia said:
robot Yargit robot Yargit robot



Excellent. Thank you for your participation.

seme

seme

Czech Republic
July 2005

MAY 17, 2008 01:19 PM



Anyway, dipshit, I'm not a Democrat. I'm an independent who is able to have the simple understanding that Democrats with a veto less majority is a good thing. I think if your head wasn't crammed up your ass, you'd realize Cazayoux's win was symbolic of something else.

Symbolism? Give me a break. Symbolism is the argument that people use in these kinds of debates when what they want to believe isn't meeting reality.

Frankly, independent or not, I've read several of your political news items and you always seem much more interested in calling people shit heads than you are at saying anything remotely intelligent. Now, before you get ahead of yourself, I think objectivity is overrated people SHOULD express their opinions for what they are, and certainly many people here do enjoy and respond to what you have to say. But that being said, in the quest to get out of this lesser of two evils corrupt partisan system people like you are part of the problem.

You want to know why some people still support Bush after everything that's happened? It's because people don't like being called names and treated like crap. So people like you, rather than provoking thought and dialogue that might actually change some minds, just make everyone more fanatical and push this country further into a system where the moderate and independent voices are lost. YOUR ACTIONS speak louder than what's written on your voter registration card.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 17, 2008 01:37 PM

seme said:
[
You want to know why some people still support Bush after everything that's happened? It's because people don't like being called names and treated like crap. So people like you, rather than provoking thought and dialogue that might actually change some minds, just make everyone more fanatical and push this country further into a system where the moderate and independent voices are lost. YOUR ACTIONS speak louder than what's written on your voter registration card.



Oh. Your post was a total dialogue opener, for sure. It was very much a "hello, let's talk about some stuff."

Reasonable discourse:

seme said:
Before you cream yourself in glee



Opening wonderful dialogue:

seme said:
Nice to see the ridiculous rhetoric



Gentlemanly discussions:

seme said:
...how many Democrats have their heads up their asses..



See, I attack people when they act like cunts. You asked for an attack and you got one. You're opening post was troll like and I was tired and responded in kind.

But, by all means, consider yourself Gandhi.
.

Bill_the_Satan

Bill_the_Satan

West Vancouver, BC
May 2005

MAY 17, 2008 02:04 PM

FearTheReaper said:

seme said:
[
You want to know why some people still support Bush after everything that's happened? It's because people don't like being called names and treated like crap. So people like you, rather than provoking thought and dialogue that might actually change some minds, just make everyone more fanatical and push this country further into a system where the moderate and independent voices are lost. YOUR ACTIONS speak louder than what's written on your voter registration card.



Oh. Your post was a total dialogue opener, for sure. It was very much a "hello, let's talk about some stuff."

Reasonable discourse:

seme said:
Before you cream yourself in glee



Opening wonderful dialogue:

seme said:
Nice to see the ridiculous rhetoric



Gentlemanly discussions:

seme said:
...how many Democrats have their heads up their asses..



See, I attack people when they act like cunts. You asked for an attack and you got one. You're opening post was troll like and I was tired and responded in kind.

But, by all means, consider yourself Gandhi.
.





I'm Mohandas Ghandi, and I approve this message.

MisterSatan

MisterSatan

Vancouver, WA
August 2002

MAY 17, 2008 02:13 PM

The Republican Party is getting no more than exactly what they deserve.

Well, that's not entirely true, but I don't see anyone setting up nationwide "Hot Pokerings" for the GOP anytime soon. Still, this is encouraging news. Now let's just hope the Democrats can take the ball and run with it a little.

ckdexterhaven

ckdexterhaven

Redding, CA
December 2005

MAY 17, 2008 02:17 PM

FearTheReaper said:
See, I attack people when they act like cunts. You asked for an attack and you got one. You're opening post was troll like and I was tired and responded in kind.


Are we really at the point where if someone disagrees with the "popular" opinion on here, they're considered a troll? Her retort was no more troll-like than any of your articles. That must mean that... nah, couldn't be.

seme

seme

Czech Republic
July 2005

MAY 17, 2008 02:25 PM

RudieCantFail said:
As a Louisiana voter that identifies himself proudly as liberal, I can tell you that while Don Cazayoux may not be my ideal representative, he's as good as I can realistically hope for. It will take 100 years before the kind of candidate I consider to be ideal will ever have a shot in Louisiana. The fact that Don Cazayoux won as a Democrat down here is stupendous in and of itself. At the very least, a representative who is registered with the Democractic party, will be far more likely to represent my views than any of his Republican counterparts.



Well certainly it suggests that people are willing to look beyond the label under the candidate's name and make decisions based on policies they agree with and who might be better suited for the job. And that, I agree, can ONLY be seen as a good thing.


Citation needed. In 2004, the war was only a year old, and though Bush's support was waning, it was no where near the abysmal levels it is at now.



I lose points here I guess smile I looked but wasn't able to find numbers on this ... but I feel (and this is totally unscientific so take it as you will) that in 2004 the war in Iraq was surrounded by a lot of media coverage that would make negative feelings more politically potent. Things like Michael Moore's movie, Abu Ghraib, and what seemed like horrific acts of violence committed everyday against the Iraqi people and our troops. So while I'll certainly concede that some polls may put the American public's support for Iraq lower than 2004, for me it's a matter of how easy/difficult it is to convert those feelings to votes one way or the other. FeartheReaper is acting like this is no contest and I don't believe it is.

The problem with 2004 is that Bush's plan and Kerry's plan for leaving Iraq were essentially the same thing. A few semantic differences here and there, but essentially they both wanted to "leave Iraq ... eventually." McCain and Obama are further apart in this regard, but do people disapprove of Iraq enough now to make those differences a deciding factor?


But he didn't, probably for the same reason the Democrats are likely to lose this time too: he assumed he had it locked up and forgot to actually run for President.



False. Kerry was a wooden and unpersonable candidate, just like Gore. Kerry and Gore also fell into the trap of fighting the non-issue battles that the Republicans choose. Obama has shown every indication so far, in his campaign against Hillary of not stooping to her ridiculous shots unless absolutely necessary. He doesn't allow his opponents to choose the battles.



While I agree that Kerry's personality was also a factor, I disagree with you here. Kerry made his entire campaign theme "I am not George Bush" which was fine for the people who really hated George Bush. But those people were going to vote for Kerry anyway, the rest of us wanted actual policy. You're right Kerry did get pulled into non-issue battles, but the blame for that did not lie so much with Republicans as with his own campaign and its utter lack of a specific plan. At the very last minute he came out with this healthcare scheme that he touted as "self-funding" ... but this concept itself was built on the supremely stupid assumption that a bill might go all the way through both houses of Congress without being modified in the slightest.

True, Obama doesn't have this problem, but that doesn't mean his campaign is any better. People are cynical: they've heard the "I'm going to change this town!" speech many times before and of course every politician at the beginning of their career in Washington plays the same card. This is where Obama's "experience" becomes an issue for his campaign: will people believe that Obama's speeches are naivete talking or will they take them seriously? If his campaign focuses on plans, specific reforms, etc then I believe he has a good chance. If "change" becomes political slang for "not Republican" then he will lose.

From the looks of his website he looks prepared to run a good campaign, and I like the reforms he's proposed. But he will have to answer critics who will say that he's better equipped to make such reforms as a Senator. The Constitution is set up in a way that makes reforms very difficult to initiate from the Executive Branch. I'd say he has better odds with a lot of the stuff he's put together as a charismatic Senator then as a controversial President. So this concerns me.

Sorry, that was a much longer response than I thought. I got a little too into it biggrin

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 17, 2008 02:26 PM

ckdexterhaven said:

FearTheReaper said:
See, I attack people when they act like cunts. You asked for an attack and you got one. You're opening post was troll like and I was tired and responded in kind.


Are we really at the point where if someone disagrees with the "popular" opinion on here, they're considered a troll? His retort was no more troll-like than any of your articles. That must mean that... nah, couldn't be.



I guess the difference being I was not talking shit about the people on the site, but he was. My point was, which you missed, you can't act like a cunt, then get upset when someone calls you a cunt. He claims I am an example of the "problem," while doing the exact same thing. End of story.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 17, 2008 02:29 PM

seme said:
I lose points here I guess smile I looked but wasn't able to find numbers on this ... but I feel (and this is totally unscientific so take it as you will) that in 2004 the war in Iraq was surrounded by a lot of media coverage that would make negative feelings more politically potent. Things like Michael Moore's movie, Abu Ghraib, and what seemed like horrific acts of violence committed everyday against the Iraqi people and our troops. So while I'll certainly concede that some polls may put the American public's support for Iraq lower than 2004, for me it's a matter of how easy/difficult it is to convert those feelings to votes one way or the other. FeartheReaper is acting like this is no contest and I don't believe it is.



Right, me and every political pundit in America. Oh, and Republicans as well. Might want to read up a bit.

The media coverage of the war was far from bad in 2004. It wasn't until 2005 that the news out of Iraq turned for the worse. You're simply wrong.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

Food Coma: What The Fuck Is Ethnic Food?

Last Comment 43 MIN

That is what I was thinking. We are the hodgepodge bastard children of the world. More ...

The Frankenliberal

Last Comment 1 HR by bean

The Frankenliberal

Last Comment 1 HR

Look, I don't care who you support, if you're going to make generalized claims like that and expect to... More ...

Human Gaffe Machine

Last Comment 2 HR by hk85

Human Gaffe Machine

Last Comment 2 HR

Imagine that, a human being making a mistake, accepting responsibility, and apologizing. What an ass. More ...

Vampires: State of the Genre Report

Last Comment 6 HR

Well, not really unique (hasn't anything and everthing been done before?). I remember the idea of vampires... More ...

The King Orders You To Vote!

Last Comment 13 HR

As the King wills, so the world bends! Thine bidding shall be fulfilled! More ...

Palin: A Perfect Train Wreck

Last Comment 10/6/08 by Ferretbite

Palin: A Perfect Train Wreck

Last Comment 10/6/08

This really didn't fit anwhere else... (video) More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Al Jourgensen of Ministry
SuicideGirls Interview: Tura Satana
SuicideGirls Interview: Debbie Harry