BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Meet The Gastards

TUESDAY MAY 6 2008 6:00 AM

Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By erin_broadley.

TAGS: McCain, Clinton, Obama, Gas Tax Holiday

Last week, John McCain proposed an idea so incredibly stupid that Hillary Clinton decided to jump on board the next day. McCain and Clinton want to have a “gas tax holiday," which is a retarded way of saying they want to suspend the 18.4-cent-per-gallon federal gas tax and the 24.4-cent diesel tax between Memorial Day and Labor Day.

They say it would save Americans 10 billion dollars! Wow! That’s awesome. Until you use your brain, do a little math and realize $10 billion divided by America equals around 30 bucks each. Thirty bucks is now also known as a half a tank of gas. But then you lose that 30 bucks in damage done to your car by under funded roads.

Barack Obama is opposed to the gastard holiday – mostly because he’s not a pandering moron. That means Hillary gets to call him an elitist and say he’s out of touch with the average American. Just so we understand this situation, a lady who is worth $134 million dollars is saying that a guy worth $4 million is out of touch because he doesn’t want to give people $30 for an entire summer.



Yummy, yummy rich people. What a tool she is. Never mind that she was against a gas tax holiday in 2000.


And one of my fundamental disagreements during this campaign with my opponent was when he called for the repeal of the gas tax. Now, the gas tax is one of those few taxes that New York actually gets more money from Washington than we send. And we are totally reliant on it to do things like finishing I-86 in the Southern Tier, or the fast- ferry harbor works up in Rochester, as well as the work we need to do here in the city.


And that guy named Bill Clinton used to be against this idea.


But the problem I have with it, apart from what it might do to the Highway Trust Fund and the spending obligations that have already been incurred by the acts of Congress, the budgets, is that I’m not sure that the savings would be passed along to the consumers in addition to that. So I think there are a lot of questions about it.


Why didn’t Bill think the savings would be passed on to customers? Two reasons: First, gas companies are evil and they will just up the prices. Second, when you eliminate the gas tax, demand goes up, and then the price will go back up to what it was before the tax. It’s called economics. But, Hillary doesn’t want economics to get in the way.


We have to get out of the mindset where somehow elite opinion is always on the side of doing things that really disadvantage the vast majority of Americans. I’m not going to put my lot in with economists because I know if we did it right ... we would design it in such a way that it would be implemented effectively.


Oh, Christ, someone shoot me in the face. Please fucking kill me. I can’t take how stupid these people are.

Hillary is, of course, attempting to use it as a wedge issue in ads.



You go girl! Best way to win the Democratic nomination is to become a Republican!

The McCaintards are also taking swipes at Obama for wanting an economically sound policy.


“It’s clear Barack Obama’s not strong enough to provide immediate relief at the pump, and it shows he doesn’t understand our economy or have the ability to deliver for hard-working Americans,” said Tucker Bounds, a McCain aide. “Senator Obama’s arguments against John McCain’s gas tax holiday are complete fiction, and the reality is that he used to support a gas tax holiday before he was running for president.”


Right. Obama did support a gas tax holiday. That’s why he’s against it now, you fucking dipshit. God, why can’t I shit in the mouths of guys like this? Just once, I want to crouch over one of these guy’s faces and crap in their dumb hole. Amen.

Back in 2000, when prices were going apeshit and hitting $2 a gallon, Illinois politicians decided to give people a break. Obama and other lawmakers voted for a six-month holiday from the state’s 5-cent gas tax. The state lost $175 million in revenue, while the actual savings was only 3 cents per gallon because oil companies just upped prices.


"It turned out to have a pretty small effect," said Joseph Doyle, an assistant economics professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Consumers were slightly better off, but the benefits were spread very thinly, and the government was a lot worse off."


So, the McCain campaign is calling Obama a flip-flopper because he had the audacity to make a mistake and LEARN from it. Good stuff. McCain and Clinton are the worst kind of politicians in this instance. They are panderers attempting to take advantage of Americans who are having a hard time. They are playing to the emotions and vulnerabilities of people who are having major economic difficulties – which makes McCain and Clinton scum.

Nearly every economist agrees that the gas tax holiday would be a total disaster. Gas prices would simply adjust back up to where they were before the tax break. And it would have a profound negative effect on our roads and highways.


"This proposal would have devastating impacts upon the federal-aid highway and transit programs, sharply reducing funding available to states and jeopardizing hundreds of thousands of jobs nationwide. Such a move would be short-sighted and damaging to our nation's economy, while providing little relief to America's drivers."


Oh, hey, people work on roads and highways? You mean that $10 billion in tax revenue that goes to improve roads leads to jobs? Holy shit! Who would have thunk?

But I'm coming from a different place. I believe gas should be expensive. I think Detroit needs to build some decent cars that get over 5 miles per gallon. Right now American car makers are living in a fantasy land, a world that ceased to exist years ago. I think we need to drive less and think of alternative ways to get around. We need to invest in the energy-efficient and climate-friendly transportation alternatives. We are addicted to artificially cheap fuel and the best solution is to change how we operate.

A true leader would stand up and say, “America, you need to only drive out of necessity for one week. Those that can take the bus or a train, will. Those who can work from home, will. Those who can ride a bike, will. Those who can walk, will walk. Let's take a holiday from gas. Only by cutting our consumption will we lower prices.”

But that would take a leader, not a pandering fuck monkey.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

alaric

alaric

I'm lost
June 2005

MAY 06, 2008 06:12 AM

Some facts are missing here.

Clinton has said that the gas tax will be paid for by taxing the obscene profits of oil companies. Its an important fact. I have no problem with this. Though she should tax the traders (wall st.) who account for a heavy chunk (as much as 50% by some sources) of the price of oil as well.

Also important. A lot of businesses rely on the summer season for a good portion of their revenues. These businesses will be hurt by high gas prices and a small reduction in gas could create revenues or limit contraction for these businesses.

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

MAY 06, 2008 06:35 AM

People keep talking about the obscene profits of oil companies, but not of the obscene amount of money taken by government in taxes (a large chunk of which is given away as pork).

If McCain was a real conservative. he'd know this. He'd also know that increasing supply will eventually bring down prices and he'd propose allow drilling in ANWAR & the Gulf.

Reducing spending and increasing supply are the long term answers...but i guess they lack "cheap gimmick" appeal.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

MAY 06, 2008 07:07 AM

UpTight said:
People keep talking about the obscene profits of oil companies, but not of the obscene amount of money taken by government in taxes (a large chunk of which is given away as pork).



Any taxes they pay in (which is less than the amount paid by non-oil companies) is easily made back by government subsidies.

Source

669jones

669jones

Chicago, IL
June 2004

MAY 06, 2008 07:20 AM

The cost of gasoline will spike due to the increased demand that summer brings. So economics kicks in. Also, the oil companies have admitted that they don't release nearly as much product as they produce(reduced supply + increased demand = high ass prices). Duh, if they put out their entire production, that would deflate prices severely. We can't have that! The boys on Lasalle street in Chicago and their counterparts on Wall street have a lot to do with the extra 70 dollars per barrel cost on oil these days. Oil should be around 60 bucks a barrel, last I heard. But that's another issue entirely.

If Clinton wants to say...abolish the gas tax and stick the tax back to the oil companies for every gallon of gas they put out and also on every gallon that is produced, then so be. But hold on, then the oil companies would then increase the prices by double the imposed tax amounts for just shits and giggles. So they would just shove the nozzle right back up the government's and consumer's ass again.

Anyway that gas tax holiday is dumb. It works for most dumb assess because they can't get past the idea of saving 18 cent, which they would not save anyway due to increased demand and withheld supply. Get it?!

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 06, 2008 07:31 AM

alaric said:

Clinton has said that the gas tax will be paid for by taxing the obscene profits of oil companies. Its an important fact. I have no problem with this. Though she should tax the traders (wall st.) who account for a heavy chunk (as much as 50% by some sources) of the price of oil as well.



Right. Not mentioned. Because oil companies would pass it on to consumers immediately.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

MAY 06, 2008 07:53 AM

Wonder how much of that $134 million Clinton estate is invested in oil?

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAY 06, 2008 08:01 AM

FAIL

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

MAY 06, 2008 08:03 AM

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

MAY 06, 2008 08:15 AM

FearTheReaper said:
FAIL


I hope somebody hits that guy in the head with a basic economics textbook.

commonman

commonman

Baltimore, MD
August 2003

MAY 06, 2008 08:17 AM

FTR's question: "God, why can't I shit in the mouths of guys like this?"

Answer: Because you would just be giving them even more shit to spray out all over the rest of us.

I agree with Obama. No gas tax holiday. In fact, a gas tax increase would be better for the economy.

alaric

alaric

I'm lost
June 2005

MAY 06, 2008 08:56 AM

FearTheReaper said:

alaric said:

Clinton has said that the gas tax will be paid for by taxing the obscene profits of oil companies. Its an important fact. I have no problem with this. Though she should tax the traders (wall st.) who account for a heavy chunk (as much as 50% by some sources) of the price of oil as well.



Right. Not mentioned. Because oil companies would pass it on to consumers immediately.



Not mentioned because its a very tilted pro obama article. Good to have all the facts before making a conclusion.

I should point out that both obama and clinton want to tax oil companies record profits. So if obama fans are worried about oil companies passing it on to consumers they should be outraged by his tax plan as well.

The solution here is a harsh one. New tech (electrics cards, wind mills, solar, etc), less consumption (goodbye SUV and V6/V8s), better urban planning (so long suburb/exburb), more public transportation, more walking, more bicycles.

Another important part of the problem (and congress looked into it) is the role of market speculators traders. They are a big part of the oil pricing problem.

Hunkpapa

Hunkpapa

United Kingdom
June 2004

MAY 06, 2008 09:00 AM

coyotemike said:

UpTight said:
People keep talking about the obscene profits of oil companies, but not of the obscene amount of money taken by government in taxes (a large chunk of which is given away as pork).



Any taxes they pay in (which is less than the amount paid by non-oil companies) is easily made back by government subsidies.

Source



Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought UpTight was referring to the tax paid by the consumer when they buy the petrol, rather than any corporation or business tax paid by the oil companies. Over here, about 60% of the price of petrol at the pump is fuel tax and VAT.

This whole tax holiday idea does seem ridiculous and desperate.

commonman

commonman

Baltimore, MD
August 2003

MAY 06, 2008 09:15 AM

Another important point: The majority of gas taxes go directly into the Highway Trust Fund, which is projected to run a deficit deficit for the first time in 2009, while a small amount is also dedicated to mass transit programs. Taxes on oil company profits, however, just go directly to the government's general fund and can be used for anything, which means that they will be used for anything other than road construction and repair.

So, if we want more of this . . .



. . . we should decrease gas taxes. However, if you want to know that driving over a highway bridge is not akin to playing a game of russian roulette, reducing gas tax revenues is not a good idea.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

MAY 06, 2008 09:18 AM

Hunkpapa said:

coyotemike said:

UpTight said:
People keep talking about the obscene profits of oil companies, but not of the obscene amount of money taken by government in taxes (a large chunk of which is given away as pork).



Any taxes they pay in (which is less than the amount paid by non-oil companies) is easily made back by government subsidies.

Source



Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought UpTight was referring to the tax paid by the consumer when they buy the petrol, rather than any corporation or business tax paid by the oil companies. Over here, about 60% of the price of petrol at the pump is fuel tax and VAT.

This whole tax holiday idea does seem ridiculous and desperate.



Could be. I thought he was making an excuse for high gas prices.

Toku666

Toku666

Columbus, OH
May 2004

MAY 06, 2008 09:28 AM

I think he just wanted to say something really quickly without specifically referring to any particular tax breakdown.

That way he can make half-ass argumentation that he was right all along no matter how somebody decides to disagree with his clear assertion.

Regardless of how you feel about Clinton, McCain, or Obama, if you can't come up with at least one good reason why this is total bullshit (helpful note: both FTR and UpTight feel this is bad policy, remember) then you aren't thinking very hard.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 7

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 5 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 6 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 21 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Tura Satana
SuicideGirls Interview: On the Vineyard with Maynard James Keenan
SuicideGirls Interview: Slash and Marc Canter on Reckless Road: Guns N' Roses