BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Being Straight Just Isn't Enough Anymore

SATURDAY APRIL 26 2008 1:30 PM

Submitted by JekyllAndHyde. Edited By crispy.

TAGS: Iraq, atheism, discrimination, US Army

If God said, "Thou shalt not kill," how can belief in God be a prerequisite for military service?

With the shitstorm in Iraq resulting in (among other things) personnel deficiencies in the United States military, one would think the Army would be attempting to keep the soldiers they already have. However, a soldier who enlisted to serve his country and fight terrorism is claiming he has suffered discrimination; not because he is gay, but because he is an atheist.

Like hundreds of young men joining the Army in recent years, Jeremy Hall professes a desire to serve his country while it fights terrorism.

But the short and soft-spoken specialist is at the center of a legal controversy. He has filed a lawsuit alleging he's been harassed and his constitutional rights have been violated because he doesn't believe in God. The suit names Defense Secretary Robert Gates.


While this is not official military policy, it seems to me that anyone who is actually ready and willing to go over to Iraq should be welcome to do so, regardless of their beliefs or sexual orientation. Then again, I'm naïve enough to still attempt to apply logic to anything involving this war.

Known as "the atheist guy," Hall has been called immoral, a devil worshipper and -- just as severe to some soldiers -- gay, none of which, he says, is true. Hall even drove fellow soldiers to church in Iraq and paused while they prayed before meals.

"I see a name and rank and United States flag on their shoulder. That's what I believe everyone else should see," he said.

Hall, 23, was raised in a Protestant family in North Carolina and dropped out of school. It wasn't until he joined the Army that he began questioning religion, eventually deciding he couldn't follow any faith.

But he feared how that would look to other soldiers.

"I was ashamed to say that I was an atheist," Hall said.

It eventually came out in Iraq in 2007, when he was in a firefight. Hall was a gunner on a Humvee, which took several bullets in its protective shield. Afterward, his commander asked whether he believed in God, Hall said.

"I said, 'No, but I believe in Plexiglas,"' Hall said. "I've never believed I was going to a happy place. You get one life. When I die, I'm worm food."


Great, let's take one more step toward making this a religious crusade. Should we just go ahead and make it a requirement for military service that you fuck the other gender, and view your enemies as enemies of the one true Lord who hates fags and abortionists and liberals?

Hall said he had had enough but feared he wouldn't get support from Welborn's superiors. He turned to Mikey Weinstein and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.

Weinstein is the foundation's president and a U.S. Air Force Academy graduate. He had previously sued the Air Force for acts he said illegally imposed Christianity on students at the academy, though that case was dismissed. He calls Hall a hero.

"The average American doesn't have enough intestinal fortitude to tell someone to shut up if they are talking in a movie theater," Weinstein said. "You know how hard it is to take on your chain of command? This isn't the shift manager at KFC."

Hall was in Qatar when the lawsuit was filed on September 18 in federal court in Kansas City, Kansas. Other soldiers learned of it and he feared for his own safety. Once, Hall said, a group of soldiers followed him, harassing him, but no one did anything to make it stop.

The Army told him it couldn't protect him and sent him back to Fort Riley. He resumed duties with a military police battalion. He believes his promotion to sergeant has been blocked because of his lawsuit, but he is a team leader responsible for two junior enlisted soldiers.


I'll say right now that I usually don't have the balls to tell someone to shut up in a theater either, much less sign up for military service. On one hand, if a guy's in Iraq, having to endure harrassment from other soldiers seems like it wouldn't be that big of a concern next to worrying about IEDs. On the other hand, the Army's comment about not being able to "protect him" should make anyone nervous. If a soldier can't trust his compatriots in a war zone, there's a problem.

Lt. Col. David Shurtleff, a Fort Riley chaplain, declined to discuss Hall's case but said chaplains accommodate all faiths as best they can. In most cases, religious issues can be worked out without jeopardizing military operations.

"When you're in Afghanistan and an IED blows up a Humvee, they aren't asking about a wounded soldier's faith," Shurtleff said.


And yet

Hall said he enjoys being a team leader but has been told that having faith would make him a better leader.

"I will take care of my soldiers. Nowhere does it say I have to pray with my soldiers, but I do have to make sure my soldiers' religious needs are met," he said.

"Religion brings comfort to a lot of people," he said. "Personally, I don't want it or need it. But I'm not going to get down on anybody else for it."


Seeing as how I'm safely tucked at home in Texas and not patrolling the streets of Iraq, it's not really my place to criticize the military, but, my aforementioned naïveté demands me to question how they could possibly see driving even more qualified soldiers away as a positive thing. Especially when the doors are opening wider to allow more convicted felons to enlist.

Personally, I do believe in God, but it's idiocy like this that has made me hesitant to say that out loud.

This is the Army now: you can be be a rapist and it's fine as long as you raped the other gender; you can be a religious extremist but not an atheist.

And we wonder why enrollments are down and we're losing the war....

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

 ... 15

Next

ItsSoDamnHot

ItsSoDamnHot

I'm lost
April 2008

APR 28, 2008 03:34 PM

TO THE HELP DESK A WHILE AGO:
QUESTION - WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
I am the problem. Can you eliminate MY ability to post on the boards (I'm guessing you can). I've already cancelled my account but it's still paid through the end of July. Love the site but I've got work to do, need sleep, wife & kids to be with, etc. I lack the discipline to stay off of the boards for hours at a time. Last couple of days proved that.

The girls are gorgeous and an FTR article (BLACK MEN ARE SCARY) was so good, it prompted me to join. However, I was up until nearly 3 last night accomplishing nothing. I believe it is in my best interest to hit the EJECT button. So ZAP me off the boards if you would, I'd appreciate it!

ANYTIME PLEASE! ......PLEASE?

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

APR 28, 2008 03:35 PM

ItsSoDamnHot said:
TO THE HELP DESK A WHILE AGO:
QUESTION - WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
I am the problem. Can you eliminate MY ability to post on the boards (I'm guessing you can). I've already cancelled my account but it's still paid through the end of July. Love the site but I've got work to do, need sleep, wife & kids to be with, etc. I lack the discipline to stay off of the boards for hours at a time. Last couple of days proved that.

The girls are gorgeous and an FTR article (BLACK MEN ARE SCARY) was so good, it prompted me to join. However, I was up until nearly 3 last night accomplishing nothing. I believe it is in my best interest to hit the EJECT button. So ZAP me off the boards if you would, I'd appreciate it!

ANYTIME PLEASE! ......PLEASE?



Thank you for sharing . . . because when people stop showing up, we all get really worried.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

APR 28, 2008 03:49 PM

coyotemike said:

ItsSoDamnHot said:
TO THE HELP DESK A WHILE AGO:
QUESTION - WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
I am the problem. Can you eliminate MY ability to post on the boards (I'm guessing you can). I've already cancelled my account but it's still paid through the end of July. Love the site but I've got work to do, need sleep, wife & kids to be with, etc. I lack the discipline to stay off of the boards for hours at a time. Last couple of days proved that.

The girls are gorgeous and an FTR article (BLACK MEN ARE SCARY) was so good, it prompted me to join. However, I was up until nearly 3 last night accomplishing nothing. I believe it is in my best interest to hit the EJECT button. So ZAP me off the boards if you would, I'd appreciate it!

ANYTIME PLEASE! ......PLEASE?



Thank you for sharing . . . because when people stop showing up, we all get really worried.



God I cried that one time and you won't fucking ever shut up about it.....

ItsSoDamnHot

ItsSoDamnHot

I'm lost
April 2008

APR 28, 2008 03:57 PM

coyotemike said:

ItsSoDamnHot said:
TO THE HELP DESK A WHILE AGO:
QUESTION - WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
I am the problem. Can you eliminate MY ability to post on the boards (I'm guessing you can). I've already cancelled my account but it's still paid through the end of July. Love the site but I've got work to do, need sleep, wife & kids to be with, etc. I lack the discipline to stay off of the boards for hours at a time. Last couple of days proved that.

The girls are gorgeous and an FTR article (BLACK MEN ARE SCARY) was so good, it prompted me to join. However, I was up until nearly 3 last night accomplishing nothing. I believe it is in my best interest to hit the EJECT button. So ZAP me off the boards if you would, I'd appreciate it!

ANYTIME PLEASE! ......PLEASE?



Thank you for sharing . . . because when people stop showing up, we all get really worried.



Yeah, Mike, thank you so much for the concern I appreciate it. I know it's heartfelt. Actually, I'm just hoping I can get zotted w/out having to drop a bunch of f-bombs and insults, etc. I cannot stop checking this infernal thread every ten minutes or so, and if not stopped, I'll probably keep replying.

bald_eagle

bald_eagle

Indianapolis, IN
November 2006

APR 28, 2008 04:29 PM

ItsSoDamnHot said:
Actually, I'm just hoping I can get zotted w/out having to drop a bunch of f-bombs and insults, etc. I cannot stop checking this infernal thread every ten minutes or so, and if not stopped, I'll probably keep replying.



Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

APR 28, 2008 04:32 PM

bald_eagle said:

ItsSoDamnHot said:
Actually, I'm just hoping I can get zotted w/out having to drop a bunch of f-bombs and insults, etc. I cannot stop checking this infernal thread every ten minutes or so, and if not stopped, I'll probably keep replying.





Would have been funnier if you had posted that from work tongue

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

APR 28, 2008 04:35 PM

so... is anyone going to show the self-control necessary to quit slapfighting each other and get back to the topic? because it's a pretty interesting topic.

ItsSoDamnHot

ItsSoDamnHot

I'm lost
April 2008

APR 28, 2008 04:52 PM

"Without it, even the simplest goal can seem like the impossible dream."

I know, man. I'm crushed. All I've ever wanted my whole entire lif... for the last 3 days was to be the greatest board-posting guy in SG board-posting-guy history. Damn, another dream dashed up against the rocks!! mad

gdarklighter

gdarklighter

San Diego, CA
August 2005

APR 28, 2008 06:01 PM

motorfirebox said:
so... is anyone going to show the self-control necessary to quit slapfighting each other and get back to the topic? because it's a pretty interesting topic.


I don't actually think it is, no matter how you look at it. From my perspective, it looks like Hall has his own testimony and at least one witness to back it up, while Major Fucktard has nobody backing his story up (does he even have a coherent story?).

If you're referring to the topic of the larger causes behind anti-atheist sentiment in the military, that seems pretty open-and-shut to me, too.

motorfirebox

motorfirebox

Pittsburgh, PA
March 2004

APR 28, 2008 08:35 PM

gdarklighter said:
I don't actually think it is, no matter how you look at it. From my perspective, it looks like Hall has his own testimony and at least one witness to back it up, while Major Fucktard has nobody backing his story up (does he even have a coherent story?).


even if the major in question did do what Hall says he did--and i'm honestly not questioning that he did; majors have more opportunities to step on their dicks than any other rank in the military--that hardly constitutes any sort of military-wide anti-atheist discrimination. Hall did not make any attempt, as far as i can tell from what's been presented, to resolve the discrimination issue using the mechanisms which the military has in place to prevent and resolve the types of behavior that Hall is complaining about.

Hall's argument, of course, would be that anti-atheist discrimination is so deeply ingrained into the military that he had no hope of getting any resolution there. why, then, have none of the self-described atheist military and former military posters here at SG stepped forward to say "you know what, i got treated the same way"? some of them have mentioned some level of discrimination, but by and large most of us have no idea what the fuck Hall is going on about. have we all been brainwashed? are we secret Zionist conspirators helping to hide the truth? what's the deal?

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

APR 28, 2008 09:24 PM

emotedcreations said:

malkav11 said:
I don't think there are more than a tiny handful of atheists by that (EmotedCreations') definition. But I don't think it's fair to say that 99.99% certainty (which is more or less where I stand) is functionally uncertain. It's as close to certainty as makes no difference, and as certain as I am comfortable being about anything, because I don't believe it's physically possible for any human being to know anything with absolute certainty...at least, not based on evidence, logic, or other rational processes.

I guess the "I admit to the potential of a divine being" made me think you were a little more than 0.10% uncertain. And I'd agree that functionally 99.9% certainly falls into the category of atheism, however, theoretically, as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't*.

Again, let me be clear, belief is a tricky business and it's not for me to tell you whether or not you're atheist. That's for you to define (I consider myself a Buddhist, however, there ares some Buddhists who'd argue that I'm not since I've yet to take my refuge vows.) But that's how I personally divide belief of God into categories.

*Because again, theoretically you'd have to be 100% certain in the absence of God, otherwise, I'd consider you agnostic.



Well, you know, I admit to the possibility that: a) there is an invisible pink unicorn curled up on my shoulders right now, b) Nobunaga Oda assassinated JFK, c) we are all intelligent geckos. That doesn't mean I think any of those things are true.

And I think your categories eliminate the possibility of informed atheism, which I disagree with.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 28, 2008 09:45 PM

malkav11 said:
...informed atheism...

?

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:50 PM

Atheism based on rational inquiry, etc, rather than simply being the opposite of religion. I suppose that not everyone will agree with me as to the ultimate limits on the scope of human knowledge, but I think it's fairly obvious that whether or not we can ultimately know everything, we don't have the tools or knowhow for it at the moment. Which means that God (or pink unicorns, or whatever) could theoretically be hiding somewhere past those limits. Hence why I don't feel comfortable postulating 100% certainty. Of anything.

Syntropia

Syntropia

Oakland, CA
February 2004

APR 29, 2008 05:25 AM

malkav11 said:
Atheism based on rational inquiry, etc, rather than simply being the opposite of religion. I suppose that not everyone will agree with me as to the ultimate limits on the scope of human knowledge, but I think it's fairly obvious that whether or not we can ultimately know everything, we don't have the tools or knowhow for it at the moment. Which means that God (or pink unicorns, or whatever) could theoretically be hiding somewhere past those limits. Hence why I don't feel comfortable postulating 100% certainty. Of anything.



Perhaps, then, there is the correlation between Atheism and Theism... both necessitate a certainty of belief aka. faith?

FellOnEarth

FellOnEarth

Temecula, CA
April 2006

APR 29, 2008 07:47 AM

I think it essentially boils down to "show me" vs. "believe me", and there you have it... Unless of course you're a Nihilist, in which case you could completely care less about either and you're response would just be "blow me".

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

 ... 15

Next

PreviousNext

Enjoying Your Gas Rape?

Comments 275 Comments - Last Comment 4 days ago

McCain: Unstable Lunatic

Comments 253 Comments - Last Comment 1 day ago

Palin: A Perfect Train Wreck

Comments 197 Comments - Last Comment 1 hour ago

McCain: Confused Old Man

Comments 99 Comments - Last Comment 6 days ago

Republican Scumbaggery

Comments 74 Comments - Last Comment 4 days ago

Palin: A Perfect Train Wreck

Last Comment 1 HR

Ha ha ha ! That was fun. More ...

Paulson: Total Fuck Up

Last Comment 2 HR by jessferfun

Paulson: Total Fuck Up

Last Comment 2 HR

if you are a bush appointee, you are pretty much a complete fucking loser. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #67

Last Comment 11 HR

Sweet Odin, let somebody sane win in Nov. I don't care who. Just. Not. McCain. If it must be the man with... More ...

Another Palin Enters The Presidential Race

Last Comment 23 HR

(video) Monty Python's John Cleese says Michael's not the funniest Palin anymore. More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Al Jourgensen of Ministry
SuicideGirls Interview: Frank Black
SuicideGirls Interview: Queens of the Stone Age: An Interview With Troy Van Leeuwen