BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Welcome. Are you prepared to read about this week’s worst human beings on the face of the Earth? Some people can’t handle it. Last week was a prime example. So, if you can’t – back your shit up now. Over the hundreds of years my people have been doing the Asshole Fuckface Roundup, many weak people have come to understand it is too intense for their baby pants. After the first Asshole Fuckface of all time, Jan Pieterszoon Coen, was revealed, many people cried like children.

In 1621, Jan Pieterszoon Coen was the newly appointed Dutch governor-general of The Banda Islands. Coen forced the leading citizens, called the orang kava, to sign a treaty at gunpoint. The treaty was structured so that the orang kava could not hold up their end. Once a couple of violations were noted, Coen massacred the Bandanese as punishment. He hired Japanese mercenaries, who cut off the heads of forty orang kava and displayed their heads on spears. Then they went about massacring the locals.

When Coen began the massacre, there were around 13,000 people living on Banda. By the time the massacre was finished, only 1,000 Bandanese were left. They all became slaves. Turns out the Dutch needed a few Bandanese as laborers because of their expertise in nutmeg cultivation. Ever since The Banda Massacre, my people have been pointing out Asshole Fuckfaces, so you can know whom to hate. It’s not pretty, so put on your rubber raincoat and prepare yourself for the worst of the worst.

My first Asshole Fuckface is a "performance artist." Normally I detest the use of quotes to undermine someone's trade, but in this case it is very appropriate.

Meet Jonathan Yegge. He’s a 24-year-old student at the San Francisco Art Institute, who apparently confuses art with being a complete moron. Last week, one of his professors, Tony Labat, asked Yegge to enlighten his fellow performance art students with a piece. Yegge hatched a brilliant idea.

First he asked for a volunteer from the class. Then he had the poor bastard sign a “contract” saying he agreed to participate in a performance piece that would include sexual and violent acts. Now, obviously the volunteer is a fucking moron. But that does not excuse what happened next.


Yegge led the volunteer out into a campus public area, in front of Labat's class and anyone else who happened by…

"He was tied up. He had a blindfold and a gag, but he could see and talk through it. He had freedom of movement of his pelvis," Yegge says, by way of defending his piece. "I engaged in oral sex with him and he engaged in oral sex with me. I had given him an enema, and I had taken a shit and stuffed it in his ass. That goes on, he shits all over me, I shit in him. There was a security guard present. There was an instructor from the school present. It was videoed, and the piece was over."


First of all, I didn’t even know you could take a shit and shove it in someone else’s ass. Congrats on breaking new ground, so to speak. You really took shit to a new level. Fantastic. You know who would have loved this? Michelangelo. He always wanted to blow a dude, give him an enema and then cram his shit into the dude’s anus – while in The Sistine Chapel.

Apparently the volunteer is a little bummed.


"He was pissed off, as he should be," says Ryan Castaneda, a friend of the volunteer. "He felt he was being violated. He just didn't think this was cool."


Uh, saying this was not cool is the understatement of the year. The volunteer complained to school officials – because another student shoved shit into his asshole. Man, I miss college!

Yegge is now on academic probation and is no longer allowed to have public sex on campus.


"If I have to not have sex on campus anymore, they'd better put that in the student handbook, and then we can decide whether that's an appropriate rule or not," says Yegge. "I mean, I'm on probation, and I can't have sex on campus, and anyone else can."


Way to get the point. You’re more of an Asshole Fuckface than I thought. Also, you’re not very good at sex.

Professor Labat was not impressed with the art.


"It was plain bad art," says Labat. "This was irresponsible in any context. It made me wonder why anyone would want to do a story about it. Why would anyone be interested in anything as basic as that? Nobody should be interested in that."


Really? You don’t know why anyone would want to do a story on public blow job/enema/shit fest? Have you ever met another human being?

Labat also neglected to mention that Yegge explaining the piece to him before it was performed. Oh, and he sat and watched it being performed. I’m going to take a wild guess and say that blowing a dude, giving him an enema, then shoving you shit into his ass takes a little while. Probably long enough to stop it.

The school is now, obviously, concerned about a lawsuit. Oh, and the volunteer’s mom is a judge.

Next up, Israeli Asshole Fuckfacery.

Jimmy Carter announced last week that he was going to meet with Hamas in an attempt to gauge “the group's willingness to accept Arab peace overtures.” It’s the kind of thing one might do if they want peace. You actually don’t get peace by never talking to your enemy. Crazy, huh?

Shin Bet is the Israeli security force that helps to protect visiting dignitaries. But they decided to take a pass on protecting Carter.


Israel's secret service declined to assist U.S. agents guarding former U.S. President Jimmy Carter during a visit in which Israeli leaders shunned him over his plans to meet Hamas, U.S. sources said on Monday.

"They're not getting support from local security," one of the sources said, on condition of anonymity.


Bold move. Really taking a stance there. Should work out great for you if Carter gets killed.

Carter pissed off Israelis when he described Israel’s policy in the occupied territories as "a system of apartheid" in a book two years ago. And then he says he wants to meet with Hamas. So, obviously he should die.

Sadly for Israel, Carter survived the meeting yesterday.

Maybe next time, huh?

Next up, Australia reveals past Asshole Fuckfacery.

This week we learned that that the Australian government performed some heinous acts on aboriginal children during the '20s and '30s. Australia is holding a Senate inquiry this week to determine how to compensate the “stolen generation” of aboriginal kids who were taken from their families and placed with whites. Now we find out they also used the kids as guinea pigs and injected them with leprosy serums. That’s some "Class A" Asshole Fuckfacery.


Ms. Mills said children held at a compound in Darwin were injected with serums designed to be used in the treatment of leprosy – a practice which seriously damaged their health. Her uncle, who worked there as a medical orderly, had told her about the sinister goings-on.

"He said it made our people very, very ill. The treatment almost killed them," she told reporters outside the hearing. "It was a common experience and a common practice."


Come on, how else were they supposed to find a cure for white people?

Many in Australia don’t believe the accusation and records to support the claim may be difficult to obtain – mostly because they contain information about using aboriginals as human guinea pigs. Who’s going to leave that lying around or dig it up?

Australia’s health minister has ordered an investigation into the claim. Good luck with that.

My final Asshole Fuckface has the worst alibi of all time.

Things have not been going well for the Republican commissioner of Cumberland County in Pennsylvania lately. Late last month, Bruce Barclay was accused of rape – by another man. That isn’t the kind of thing that the religious right expects.

Bruce was forced to retire and was fighting to keep his ass out of prison. Thankfully, he had made tapes of himself fucking tons and tons of dudes. All with hidden cameras. Yay!


On March 31st, police, investigating the allegation of rape by the 20-year-old Marshall McCurdy, obtained a warrant to search Barclay's home. They didn't find evidence of rape. But they did find videotapes of hundreds of sexual encounters with men that Barclay had filmed on high-tech surveillance cameras.


Turns out Bruce was hiring prostitutes from Harrisburgfratboys.com and then banging them on camera without their knowledge. I like to call that “Thursday night,” myself.


The cameras were hidden inside AM/FM radios, motion detectors and intercom speaker systems, among other places.


Thankfully, one of the illegal tapes showed the rape accuser engaging is consensual sex. Take that?


On April 10th, the rape charges were dropped. One of the videos found during the search showed Barclay and McCurdy engaging in apparently consensual sex.


No rape charges! Ha! But now Bruce may be facing privacy violations and promoting prostitution charges. And the rape accuser is looking at three years in jail for making false reports to police.

So, it’s a happy ending for everyone.

Congrats to all of this week's Asshole Fuckfaces! You each win a FearTheReaper cape!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7

Next

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 09:54 AM

Uncognitive said:

Wrong.

So very, very wrong.

UN Resolution 181 divided post-1920 British Palestine into "independent Arab and Jewish States". It didn't "become Israel", it became Israel and Palestine.



Nuh??!!!!

Presumably you misheard a conversation about the 1947 Partition plan. This proposed to divide the remaining bit of British Mandate Palestine. They'd already given most of it to the Arabs (which became Jordan) and they proposed a Jewish State and yet another Arab state on the bit that remained.

The Jews voted to accept the UN's offer of a state.

The Arabs REFUSED their new state because they didn't want the Jews to get anything.

The ensuing war saw Israel's establishment. It also saw Egypt annexing Gaza and Jordan annexing the West Bank.

The Palestinians did not want those lands either - they just wanted the Jewish bits. They changed their minds when Israel won back the West Bank & Gaza in 1967.

Then - and only then - did the world start making a fuss about giving the West Bank and Gaza to the Palestinians for a new state.

Why?

Why those bits?

There's plenty of other parts of British Mandate Palestine to build another Arab state and call it Palestine,.

Why INSIST on building a Palestine sandwich in the tiny land held by Israel?

They should build it in Jordan. This was the largest part of British Mandate Palestine to be allocated. It was given to a Saudi tribe. It has a majority Palestinian population. It will be a consolidated homeland - not split into two separate chunks.

zoom image

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:02 AM

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:

Wrong.

So very, very wrong.

UN Resolution 181 divided post-1920 British Palestine into "independent Arab and Jewish States". It didn't "become Israel", it became Israel and Palestine.



Nuh??!!!!

Presumably you misheard a conversation about the 1947 Partition plan. This proposed to divide the remaining bit of British Mandate Palestine. They'd already given most of it to the Arabs (which became Jordan) and they proposed a Jewish State and yet another Arab state on the bit that remained.

The Jews voted to accept the UN's offer of a state.

The Arabs REFUSED their new state because they didn't want the Jews to get anything.

The ensuing war saw Israel's establishment. It also saw Egypt annexing Gaza and Jordan annexing the West Bank.

The Palestinians did not want those lands either - they just wanted the Jewish bits. They changed their minds when Israel won back the West Bank & Gaza in 1967.

Then - and only then - did the world start making a fuss about giving the West Bank and Gaza to the Palestinians for a new state.

Why?

Why those bits?

There's plenty of other parts of British Mandate Palestine to build another Arab state and call it Palestine,.

Why INSIST on building a Palestine sandwich in the tiny land held by Israel?

They should build it in Jordan. This was the largest part of British Mandate Palestine to be allocated. It was given to a Saudi tribe. It has a majority Palestinian population. It will be a consolidated homeland - not split into two separate chunks.

zoom image



Wow, you really do live in a magical alternate reality where Israel's borders shrank between 1948 and 1967, and where Arab Palestinians only wanted land because they hated those gosh-darned Jews.

I'm sure some publisher would love to pick up your alternate history novel once you're finished writing it.

But as a bonus question: Can UN resolutions be selectively agreed to and enforced, or ignored, depending on the benefits they provide?

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:08 AM

Uncognitive said:
Since you completely ignored my point, I'll rephrase it for you to ignore again:In your fantasy plan what happens to the current population of Gaza and the West Bank when Israel annexes that land?



If the Palestinians are "refugees", then they can "return" to Palestine (once it's been built on the East Bank).

If any of the current residents of Gaza & the West Bank had homes there before Jordan & Egypt annexed the lands, then they aren't really refugees and should be given the option to stay and gain Israeli citizenship.

If any of the residents were original residents of what became Israel, then they should have the right of return and Israeli citizenship. They'll probably be in their 70's or 80's by now, so what the hell. This is of course contingent on Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Morocco etc. etc. offering compensation to the Jews they kicked out.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:20 AM

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:
Since you completely ignored my point, I'll rephrase it for you to ignore again:In your fantasy plan what happens to the current population of Gaza and the West Bank when Israel annexes that land?



If the Palestinians are "refugees", then they can "return" to Palestine (once it's been built on the East Bank).

If any of the current residents of Gaza & the West Bank had homes there before Jordan & Egypt annexed the lands, then they aren't really refugees and should be given the option to stay and gain Israeli citizenship.

If any of the residents were original residents of what became Israel, then they should have the right of return and Israeli citizenship. They'll probably be in their 70's or 80's by now, so what the hell. This is of course contingent on Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Morocco etc. etc. offering compensation to the Jews they kicked out.



So the "right of return" only applies to the first generation of refugees? Hmmm.

Last time I checked, previous peace talks between Israel and Palestine broke down right about the time they got to the "right of return" for Palestinians, but you actually think that not only would the Israeli government suddenly agree to this, but would also agree to the idea of granting Israeli citizenship to all of the Palestinians currently living in Gaza and the West Bank? How many seats should Hamas get in the Knesset, anyway?

Might as well simplify your plan to "C'mon people now, smile on your brother, everybody get together and try and love one another right now".

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:25 AM

Uncognitive said:
Explain to me how, exactly, Jordan is going to simply give up a huge chunk of land that it's ruled since the 1920's without any compensation, in order to both expand the borders of Israel and create a homeland for the Palestinians? And how you can completely ignore Black September in favor of two quotes as some magical assurance that unlike previously in their history, Jordan and Palestine will get along all peachy keen?



No borders are being expanded. The West bank is part of Israel. I mean - the world saw it as part of Jordan when they annexed it in 1947. So what's the difference?

Even the Jordyptyrians denied any claim to the West bank....right up until 1967, when they suddenly dropped the "we don't give a flying fuck about the West bank" clause from the charter.

As for Black September - that was the PLO attempting to overthrow an alien monarchy who ruled over the Palestinians in land that used to be part of British Mandate Palestine.

The establishment of the Palestinian State on the East bank will sort that out.

If the Hashemites don't like it, they can console themselves that they still have the majority of British Palestine. (albeit the rocky shithole bit)

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:31 AM

UpTight said:
No borders are being expanded. The West bank is part of Israel. I mean - the world saw it as part of Jordan when they annexed it in 1947. So what's the difference?



If the West Bank and Gaza are part of Israel, then why aren't the Palestinians there Israeli citizens? Why aren't they governed by the Israeli government?

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:31 AM

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:
Since you completely ignored my point, I'll rephrase it for you to ignore again:In your fantasy plan what happens to the current population of Gaza and the West Bank when Israel annexes that land?



If the Palestinians are "refugees", then they can "return" to Palestine (once it's been built on the East Bank).

If any of the current residents of Gaza & the West Bank had homes there before Jordan & Egypt annexed the lands, then they aren't really refugees and should be given the option to stay and gain Israeli citizenship.

If any of the residents were original residents of what became Israel, then they should have the right of return and Israeli citizenship. They'll probably be in their 70's or 80's by now, so what the hell. This is of course contingent on Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, Morocco etc. etc. offering compensation to the Jews they kicked out.



So the "right of return" only applies to the first generation of refugees?



Yes - just the people who lived in part of British Mandate Palestine that eventually became Israel.

Not their descendents, descendent's descendents or their descendent's dogs, cats and goldfish's descendents.

I don't see why or how people who didn't live somewhere can "return" there.

I remind you that a) many of the Arabs fled on the orders of the Arab military during the war b) a similar number of Jews were kicked out of neighbouring Arab lands during times of peace.

You don't see the descendents of Jews moaning about the right to return to their Granny's old apartment in Damascus. I don't see why Israel should be mugged by hoards of opportunistic relatives of former British Mandaters.



UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:33 AM

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:
No borders are being expanded. The West bank is part of Israel. I mean - the world saw it as part of Jordan when they annexed it in 1947. So what's the difference?



If the West Bank and Gaza are part of Israel, then why aren't the Palestinians there Israeli citizens?



cos they're "refugees", dummy

the Jordanians & Egyptians should have given them citizenship iwhen they annexed Gaza & the West bank. They didn't. They kept them in refugee camps until the Jews could be driven into the sea.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:36 AM

UpTight said:
Yes - just the people who lived in part of British Mandate Palestine that eventually became Israel.

Not their descendents, descendent's descendents or their descendent's dogs, cats and goldfish's descendents.

I don't see why or how people who didn't live somewhere can "return" there.

I remind you that a) many of the Arabs fled on the orders of the Arab military during the war b) a similar number of Jews were kicked out of neighbouring Arab lands during times of peace.

You don't see the descendents of Jews moaning about the right to return to their Granny's old apartment in Damascus. I don't see why Israel should be mugged by hoards of opportunistic relatives of former British Mandaters.



Ah, so applying the existing Israeli "right of return" law to Palestinian Arabs would entail a "mugging" of Israel by "hordes" of Arab opportunists.

Fascinating.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:40 AM

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:
No borders are being expanded. The West bank is part of Israel. I mean - the world saw it as part of Jordan when they annexed it in 1947. So what's the difference?



If the West Bank and Gaza are part of Israel, then why aren't the Palestinians there Israeli citizens?



cos they're "refugees", dummy

the Jordanians & Egyptians should have given them citizenship iwhen they annexed Gaza & the West bank. They didn't. They kept them in refugee camps until the Jews could be driven into the sea.



Ah, so why again hasn't Israel given them citizenship?

I mean, according to your Real Plan Of Genius, Israel's government wouldn't have the slightest problem granting full citizenship to them, so why haven't they done so already?

I mean, there's a pesky UN Resolution or two standing in the way, but hey, since apparently the 1948 Resolution can be ret-conned into actually giving Israel all of post-1920 Palestine, why let that bother anyone?

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:53 AM

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:
No borders are being expanded. The West bank is part of Israel. I mean - the world saw it as part of Jordan when they annexed it in 1947. So what's the difference?



If the West Bank and Gaza are part of Israel, then why aren't the Palestinians there Israeli citizens?



cos they're "refugees", dummy

the Jordanians & Egyptians should have given them citizenship iwhen they annexed Gaza & the West bank. They didn't. They kept them in refugee camps until the Jews could be driven into the sea.



Ah, so why again hasn't Israel given them citizenship?



why the hell should Israel give them citizenship?

They are Palestinians. If Palestine is created on the East Bank, they'll stop being refugees and can become citizens of Palestine.

Until then, they are what the Arabs made them : refugees

In fact, why the hell would they want citizenship of Israel (unless they are gay or feminists).

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 10:56 AM

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:
Yes - just the people who lived in part of British Mandate Palestine that eventually became Israel.

Not their descendents, descendent's descendents or their descendent's dogs, cats and goldfish's descendents.

I don't see why or how people who didn't live somewhere can "return" there.

I remind you that a) many of the Arabs fled on the orders of the Arab military during the war b) a similar number of Jews were kicked out of neighbouring Arab lands during times of peace.

You don't see the descendents of Jews moaning about the right to return to their Granny's old apartment in Damascus. I don't see why Israel should be mugged by hoards of opportunistic relatives of former British Mandaters.



Ah, so applying the existing Israeli "right of return" law to Palestinian Arabs would entail a "mugging" of Israel by "hordes" of Arab opportunists.

Fascinating.



Israel isn't stupid.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 28, 2008 11:02 AM

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:

Uncognitive said:

UpTight said:
No borders are being expanded. The West bank is part of Israel. I mean - the world saw it as part of Jordan when they annexed it in 1947. So what's the difference?



If the West Bank and Gaza are part of Israel, then why aren't the Palestinians there Israeli citizens?



cos they're "refugees", dummy

the Jordanians & Egyptians should have given them citizenship iwhen they annexed Gaza & the West bank. They didn't. They kept them in refugee camps until the Jews could be driven into the sea.



Ah, so why again hasn't Israel given them citizenship?



why the hell should Israel give them citizenship?

They are Palestinians. If Palestine is created on the East Bank, they'll stop being refugees and can become citizens of Palestine.

In fact, why the hell would they want citizenship of Israel (unless they are gay or feminists).



So wait, if Palestinians claim that being Palestinian gives them the right to a Palestinian state that's part of the post-1920 British Mandate Palestine, then "Palestine" doesn't exist and "Palestinians" are a legal fiction invented by scary Islamists to sucker liberals.

But hey, if you think that the West Bank and Gaza actually belong to Israel, suddenly being "Palestinian" takes on just enough of a solid legal meaning to deny the Arab folks living there claims to Israeli citizenship.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 28, 2008 01:11 PM

UpTight said:

Israel isn't stupid.



No. Just bloodthirsty.

UpTight

UpTight

I'm lost
December 2003

APR 28, 2008 07:53 PM

FearTheReaper said:

UpTight said:

Israel isn't stupid.



No. Just bloodthirsty.



No - just defending itself from genocidal, barbarian maniac culties.

(and bloated, failed cabaret artistes...seemingly)

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

4 | 5 | 6 | 7

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 5 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 6 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 21 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: David Carradine
SuicideGirls Interview: Bootsy Collins
SuicideGirls Interview: CSI Franchise creator: Anthony E. Zuiker