• commentary
  • TUESDAY APRIL 8 2008 6:00 AM

Bumblin’ Grandpa Old

The time has come to fear a McCain presidency. Hillary Clinton is doing everything she can to make Barack Obama unelectable, clearing the way for the time worn Senator from Arizona to march into the White House. But over the past few weeks McCain has shown himself to be either a confused old man or a lying sack of shit. Either way, it’s bad news.

Some of the old man’s mistakes have been harmless. For instance, a couple of weeks ago in Israel, he made this blunder while touring the city of Sderot with Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barack.


McCain was discussing the numerous rock attacks on the city. "Nine hundred rocket attacks in less than three months, an average of one every one to two hours. Obviously this puts an enormous and hard to understand strain on the people here, especially the children. As they celebrate their version of Halloween here, they are somewhere close to a 15-second warning, which is the amount of time they have from the time the rocket is launched to get to safety. That's not a way for people to live obviously."


Uh. Purim commemorates a time when the Jewish people living in Persia were saved from execution. So, not at all close. Thank God there was a Jewish guy there to save McCain’s babbling ass.


"I had a brief exchange with one of the mothers whose children was in there in a costume for Purim," Lieberman, who is Jewish and celebrates the holiday, said. "And it's my fault that I said to Senator McCain that this is the Israeli version of Halloween. It is in the sense because the kids dress up and it's a very happy holiday and actually it is in the sense that the sweets are very important of both holidays."


And fail. Joe wants us to believe that he lied to McCain about the holiday. Bullshit. McCain is a crazy old fuck who blurts shit out. This Purim mistake would be no big deal if it weren’t a pattern of an old man fucking up, over and over and over. His best old man or blatant liar moments had to do with Iran and al Qaeda on a recent Middle East trip.

First, in February, he burted out this gem.


And my friends, if we left, they (al-Qaeda) wouldn't be establishing a base. They'd be taking a country, and I'm not going to allow that to happen, my friends. I will not surrender. I will not surrender to al-Qaeda.


Right. Hey, really old man who wants to be president, Iraq is the birthplace of the Shiite religion. Shiites make up the majority of people in Iraq. Shiites and Sunnis hate each other. Al Qaeda are Sunnis. See how your idiotic statement doesn’t work?

But gramps wasn’t done there. A few days later, he blurted out this lie or old man brain misstatement.


Today in Iraq, America and our allies stand on the precipice of winning a major victory against radical Islamic extremism. The security gains over the past year have been dramatic and undeniable. Al Qaeda and Shiite extremists -- with support from external powers such as Iran -- are on the run but not defeated.


Well, not so much. Actually, not at all. See, Iran is controlled by a Shiite government. The Shiites would not fund a Sunni group, like al Qaeda. They are actually enemies. Sorry. You’re either losing your mind or a dirty fucking liar.

Oh, and the “undeniable security gains” turned into a big pile of steaming shit last week. Now, totally deniable security gains.

But John Boy wasn’t done being old or lying just yet. A week later...


It was, he said, "common knowledge and has been reported in the media that al-Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran, that's well known. And it's unfortunate."

He said several times that Iran, a predominately Shiite country, was supplying the mostly Sunni militant group, al-Qaeda.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, who was accompanying McCain on the trip, was forced to lean over and whisper in McCain's ear that it was Shiite extremists, not Sunni al-Qaeda, that was going to predominantly Shiite Iran.


Now this moment makes me think gramps wasn’t lying. If it was a lie, Lieberman would have let it go. He didn’t. Gramps doesn’t know who is who, because he is old and losing his mind.


“We're succeeding. I don't care what anybody says. I've seen the facts on the ground," the Arizona senator insisted a day after a roadside bomb in Baghdad killed four U.S. soldiers and rockets pounded the U.S.-protected Green Zone there, and a wave of attacks left at least 61 Iraqis dead nationwide.


Really, gramps? Did you take a drive to the Syrian border and stop in Mosul for lunch? Then turn around and head on down to Sunni Ramadi? Maybe take sunset stroll through the city and talk to the peeps? After that, did you grab a Vespa and putter on down to Najaf to see the Shiites? They love us there! But, you know that because you were “on the ground.” I’m sure you then took a nice drive down to Basra to see the oil rich countryside, right? And then, I assume, you hopped on a boat and enjoyed a nice ride up the Tigris to Baghdad? And then your threw on your old fighter plane jacket and strolled the streets of Sadr City, meeting and shaking hands with the good folks? No? Oh, then you don’t know shit. You were a well-protected, isolated asshole who saw what they wanted you to see. That’s why one week after your “we’re succeeding” declaration everything went to shit.

His clueless bullshit has continued and continued. After the recent flare up in Iraq, that left the government of Maliki greatly weakened, McCain continued to spew nonsense.



What a stupid old man. The history of cease-fires is meaningless because we know the truth of this specific instance. Sadr was clearly the victor. The Maliki government went crawling on its knees to Iran, begging them to get Sadr to stop.


The backdrop to Sadr's dramatic statement was a secret trip Friday by Iraqi lawmakers to Qom, Iran's holy city and headquarters for the Iranian clergy who run the country.

There the Iraqi lawmakers held talks with Brig. Gen. Qassem Suleimani, commander of the Qods (Jerusalem) brigades of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps and signed an agreement with Sadr, which formed the basis of his statement Sunday, members of parliament said.

"We asked Iranian officials to help us persuade him that we were not cracking down on the Sadr group," said an Iraqi official, who asked for anonymity due to the sensitivity of the subject.


McCain is a fool. He has a profound lack of understanding of the region and its people. His multiple claims over a period of a month that Iran is training al Qaeda is disturbing. It’s like claiming that Republicans are funding and training Democratic candidates. It’s moronic. And this wasn’t a momentary slip, like his campaign would have us believe. He said it over and over and over. Five years into this disaster of a war and McCain doesn’t know the simplest – and most important facts.

This video from yesterday sums it up.



Oops.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next

Comments
GS2099

GS2099

Fayetteville, AR
September 2005

APR 10, 2008 10:10 AM

Chainlink said:


Other than serving as a big patriotic gold feather in his cap I don't find his military experience relative at all to being President.


His experience allows him to understand the true nature of war in a way no American president has understood it since WWII.

War is a form of conflict resolution in which the participants KILL EVERYONE who disagrees with them until there's no one left. It isn't and activity for nice, moral people... and if you aren't willing to pursue victory ruthlessly, it's not a game you should play.

If McCain had won in 2000, we wouldn't be in Iraq right now. He didn't and that's too bad.

Unfortunately, the other thing his experience does is make him over sensitive to military failure. He's blind to the fact that as bad as losing is, at this point any victory would be so costly it would taste like ashes with dog shit sprinkles on top.

McCain is the best candidate the GOP could field. The old bastard's just 8 years too late.




smithers_jones

smithers_jones

I'm lost
November 2003

APR 10, 2008 10:40 AM

GS2099 said:

Chainlink said:


Other than serving as a big patriotic gold feather in his cap I don't find his military experience relative at all to being President.


His experience allows him to understand the true nature of war in a way no American president has understood it since WWII.

War is a form of conflict resolution in which the participants KILL EVERYONE who disagrees with them until there's no one left. It isn't and activity for nice, moral people... and if you aren't willing to pursue victory ruthlessly, it's not a game you should play.


So I presume you voted for Kerry in 2004?

GS2099 said:
If McCain had won in 2000, we wouldn't be in Iraq right now. He didn't and that's too bad.

Unfortunately, the other thing his experience does is make him over sensitive to military failure. He's blind to the fact that as bad as losing is, at this point any victory would be so costly it would taste like ashes with dog shit sprinkles on top.

McCain is the best candidate the GOP could field. The old bastard's just 8 years too late.


McCain was proponent of the invasion. He said at the time it was going to be easy:


"But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily."



He also believes things are going great currently. He had this to say this week:


"We're no longer staring into the abyss of defeat and we can now look ahead to the genuine prospect of success,"



McCain didn't have a clue about Iraq before the invasion; he doesn't have a clue about the current situation.

GS2099

GS2099

Fayetteville, AR
September 2005

APR 10, 2008 02:01 PM

smithers_jones
So I presume you voted for Kerry in 2004?


Reluctantly, yes I did.


McCain was proponent of the invasion. He said at the time it was going to be easy:


"But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily."


The Senate voted 77/23 to use force in Iraq. That McCain supported his president on a popular (at the time) resolution just shows he has no more integrity than the average politician... It certainly doesn't prove he would have ordered the invasion as president. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have had neocon fuckwits like Wolfowitz, Cheney and Rumsfeld in his administration telling him what a good idea it would be.


He also believes things are going great currently. He had this to say this week:


"We're no longer staring into the abyss of defeat and we can now look ahead to the genuine prospect of success,"



And I agree; he's wrong.

I'm not a McCain fan. My only point was that I think it would be a very good idea to have more candidates with military experience who might know something about the actual nature of war. It's not a goddamn video game. If it's not worth firebombing Dresden or nuking Hiroshima over, DON'T FUCKING GO TO WAR.
If we had more politicians who could grasp that concept, we'd have far fewer wars but they'd all be successful.

Uncognitive

Uncognitive

Brooklyn, NY
May 2003

APR 10, 2008 02:15 PM

GS2099 said:
I'm not a McCain fan. My only point was that I think it would be a very good idea to have more candidates with military experience who might know something about the actual nature of war. It's not a goddamn video game. If it's not worth firebombing Dresden or nuking Hiroshima over, DON'T FUCKING GO TO WAR.
If we had more politicians who could grasp that concept, we'd have far few wars but they'd all be successful.



FDR never served in the military. Richard Nixon, as well as every President who oversaw U.S. involvement in Vietnam, did.

Military service doesn't equate to sound Presidential judgment as far as how and when war is to be waged.

GS2099

GS2099

Fayetteville, AR
September 2005

APR 10, 2008 02:54 PM

Uncognitive said:

FDR never served in the military. Richard Nixon, as well as every President who oversaw U.S. involvement in Vietnam, did.

Military service doesn't equate to sound Presidential judgment as far as how and when war is to be waged.


FDR didn't serve because he was a gimp.

But I'll give you another, Truman (who did serve) was ruthless enough to nuke Japan twice, but he still fucked around in Korea… bitch-ass punk was scared of the Russians.

Okay, forget military service. We need more presidents with polio.




Fuckin' bastards with your facts and your logic…

mad

otaku

otaku

USA
January 2004

APR 14, 2008 10:10 PM

Chainlink said "While I personally wouldn't find that record anything to toot about, his sacrifice for his country is nothing short of heroic. I certainly wouldn't suggest making a swift-boatish campaign tactic out of it.
But really, propping him up at some kind of military genius has got to be a losing battle too.
Other than serving as a big patriotic gold feather in his cap I don't find his military experience relative at all to being President. "

For anyone considering that military genius = good president, it's worth noting that Grant may have been kick-ass as a military leader, but he was somewhat less so (to put it mildly) as a president.

hk85

hk85

Guerneville, CA
October 2007

MAY 07, 2008 01:17 PM

zoom image


With McCain likely to face Obama in the general election, it appears his staff has realized they have an uphill marketing battle ahead of them. Obama has some of the best marketing money can buy. He has a brilliant logo, multiple slogans, a pretty face, and he's even laid claim to the words "change" and "hope." The following memo by a high level McCain staffer was accidentally leaked to the press. It shows the McCain campaign's struggle to find the perfect slogan.



Link

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Next