• commentary
  • TUESDAY APRIL 1 2008 6:00 AM

A Steaming Pile Of Sadr

George Bush is such a colossal fuck up it is astounding. Every choice the administration makes in Iraq turns out to be the wrong choice. Their latest blunder is backing the wrong Shiite in Iraq. Today, after a couple of days of violence in Iraq, a new strongman has risen and his name is Muqtada al-Sadr. Our guy is the other guy -- the weak one.

Al-Sadr played Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki like a couple of children. Seven months ago, al-Sadr agreed to a cease-fire in Iraq – which has led many right wing morons to believe the surge has been a success. They are, of course, fucking idiots desperate to prove that their imbecilic support of the invasion was the right call. Deaths have dropped in Iraq because al-Sadr has not been killing people and we have been paying Sunni insurgents not to kill people. Last week, the cease-fire with al-Sadr took a break – just long enough to show who is the big boy in Iraq. And his name ain’t Maliki.

We’re supposed to believe that Al-Sadr is the bad guy and Maliki is the good guy. The truth is they both are nasty motherfuckers. Both sides are guilty of sectarian cleansing. Both have strong connections to Iran. Maliki has been using the US military and the Iraqi Army to arrest and kill members of al-Sadr’s militia, The Mahdi Army. But this week, al-Sadr fought back, which is exactly what Maliki was hoping for. Maliki expected the US to fight this battle for him. His master plan was to get our guys to wipe out al-Sadr, leaving him as the last Shiite standing.

The fighting first started in Basra. Maliki claimed he was cracking down on “criminals,” but it was obviously a massive power grab. And a pretty pathetic one, at that. First rule of power grab: Make sure you aren’t a retard. Maliki clearly didn’t realize his pals the Iranians and his other pals, the Americans, don’t want a civil war between Iraqi Shiites. So, Maliki and the Islamic Supreme Council started the fighting in Basra and al-Sadr pushed back – and he pushed back hard.

The fighting moved to Baghdad, where US forces were also involved. There Maliki learned the second lesson of power grab: Make sure all the guys on your side are actually on your side. Many members of the Iraqi Army walked away from checkpoints, because they support al-Sadr. Members of the Army were actually walking into al-Sadr’s offices and giving up their weapons.


One apparent offering took place in al-Sadr City and was witnessed by several dozen people, including Iraqi journalists. A Times employee saw about 40 police officers walk through al-Sadr City's dusty streets and lay their automatic weapons at the feet of Salman Furaiji, director of the al-Sadr office there.


Meanwhile, Iran wanted the fighting to end because Iran supports both Maliki and al-Sadr and would rather they don’t kill each other. They want the Shiites to save it up to attack the Sunnis when the US pulls out. Bush certainly does not want Iraq to fall further into chaos at this point, because it would devastate McCain’s chances in November and screw up his plan to leave a land mine for the incoming Democratic president. At the same time, the Kurds refused to get involved in Maliki’s moronic fight.


The other major component of the Iraqi Army, recruits from the Kurdish militias in northern Iraq, "would not go down to the south to fight this kind of fight."


Hello, blunder, my name is Maliki. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister was demanding the Mahdi Army disarm. He actually set a three-day deadline for the al-Sadr kids to turn in their weapons. There was some chuckling, a few shrugs and then the three days passed with no one turning in their guns. Day four: Maliki actually extended the deadline – and offered cash for weapons. Third rule of power grab: Don’t look like a massive pussy.

The US provided air support for Maliki’s weak ass forces and al-Sadr held strong. Turns out it is very hard to dislodge highly motivated indigenous fighters who know every nook and cranny in the area. Who knew? I mean, besides everybody. Rule number four of power grab: Read at least one book on the history of urban warfare.

After a couple days and a few hundred dead guys, Iran said enough is enough. Officials in Maliki’s own government told him to stop his little war and went to Iran for help.


Iraqi lawmakers traveled to the Iranian holy city of Qom over the weekend to win the support of the commander of Iran's Qods brigades in persuading Shiite cleric Muqtada al al-Sadr to order his followers to stop military operations, members of the Iraqi parliament said.


Iran then brokered a peace deal. Maliki actually went to Iran to meet with al-Sadr – which brings up the fifth rule of power grab: Don’t beg your opponent to stop.

Bestest of allest, al-Sadr had a list of demands for Maliki before he would agree to an end to hostilities. The fucking rebel set the rule to end the conflict that the government started! Holy shit! Maliki is a plane crashing into a train wreck, falling on top of a car crash, hitting a boat. What an epic disaster. Rule number six of power grab: Don’t let your enemy kick your balls in.

Here is what Maliki agreed to:


    1. Ending armed manifestations in Basra governorate and all the other governates.
    2. Ending of attacks and illegal arbitrary detentions.
    3. Demand that the government apply the law on general amnesty, and release all prisoners who have not had charges confirmed against them, in particular prisoners belonging to the Al-Sadrist current.
    4. We announce that we will repudiate those who carry weapons and target the government and service agencies and institutions, or the offices of political parties.
    5. Cooperation with government agencies to bring about security and to charge criminals, according to due process of law.
    6. We reassert that the Al-Sadrist movement does not possess heavy weapons.
    7. Efforts [meaningful efforts are to be made] for the return to their residential areas of those who were forced out as a result of security incidents.
    8. We demand respect for human rights by the government in all of its security activities.
    9. Working [meaningful efforts are to be made] towards the realization of development and service projects in all governates.


Oh, and here’s a napkin to wipe yourself off the floor with. My favorite number in that list is 7. She’s a beaut. Maliki is demanding that Sunnis and Shiites be placed back in their homes, from which they were removed by sectarian cleansing. You now, the sectarian cleansing that the Mahdi army was responsible for – but so were the militias working under Maliki. Al-Sadr is trying to make the case that other Shiites were responsible for the cleansing, just as he has been trying to claim Maliki has been killing Sunnis and blaming the Mahdi army. Now he’s demanding those people be put back in their houses. It’s called politics and this was a master move. Rule number seven of power grab: Don’t take on a guy who is a million times smarter than you.


Many Iraqi politicians say that Mr. Maliki’s political capital has been severely depleted by the campaign and that he is now in the curious position of having to turn to Mr. al-Sadr, a longtime rival and now his opponent in battle, for a solution to the crisis.

“With this statement, Sayyed Moktada al-Sadr proved that he is a good politician, working for the sake of Iraq,” said Mahmoud al-Mashadani, the speaker of the Iraqi Parliament and a senior Sunni politician.


To top it all off, al-Sadr has now completely positioned himself as the only powerful man in Iraq who is against the US occupation. Maliki is Bush’s boy, and called in the US military to fight against his fellow Iraqis. The Sunnis have been collaborating with and accepting money from the US for over a year. The vast majority of Iraqis want the US to leave. Now they have a strong man who loudly opposes the occupation and has shown he will not back down. And guess what is coming later this year? An election.

The October provincial elections are one of the main reasons Maliki went after al-Sadr now. He’s been attempting to displace al-Sadr supporters, while inserting members of his own Dawa Party and the Islamic Supreme Council, in areas of Basra that al-Sadr controls. Maliki completely failed. He has all but assured a massive victory for al-Sadr this October.

The other big loser in the mess is the US. What a massive fuck up. We just injected ourselves into an inter-Shiite conflict and chose the wrong side. Going after assorted rogue groups in the Mahdi Army is one thing, but going after the entire al-Sadr organization on behalf of Maliki was moronic. Did I mention the vast majority of voting Iraqis want the US out of the country?

Any gains the US made with al-Sadr and his followers are gone.


The U.S. military now risks forfeiting gains with the al-Sadrists, arguably the most popular Shiite political movement across Iraq. Already, U.S. officers have reported a rise in attacks against them in Baghdad, where soldiers had benefited from the Mahdi Army's tacit cooperation.


The end result of this mess is that al-Sadr is far stronger and Maliki much weaker. The Iraqi Army appears considerably weaker, which isn’t a great sign for the future. Iran also is strengthened because they brokered the peace deal. The US is, once again, the clumsy fool.


Overnight al-Mahdi Army has melted back into the population in Baghdad and Basra after its leader, the anti-American cleric Moqtada al-al-Sadr, ordered it to stop fighting government forces.


The Mahdi Army went back into the shadows, waiting for the day when the US pulls out and they take over the country – if they are not just voted in this October.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 12

Next

Comments
FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 01, 2008 11:52 AM

MrMat said:

Phantom_medic said:
Like it or not, the US troops really are having a positive impact in many areas. We are not just blundering idiots. That would be our politicians jobs.



I think everyone here agrees with you on this.



Also a complete load of horseshit. Nobody said the soldiers were blundering idiots.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 01, 2008 12:36 PM

1) Maliki was compromised from the start. The only reason he was able to become the PM is because both sides (Sunni and Shia) knew he wouldn't do shit. Their inability to reach meaningful compromise has been a huge issue since the beginning of the new Iraqi government. Hell, a lot of major governmental positions have yet to be filled because of this. Things won't get better till this changes. Unfortunately, that may never be possible to changes way (WAY) beyond our control take place.

2) I liked your article FTR, but and maybe it's just me, you seemed to suggest that al Sadr just popped up 8 months ago. The US government has known about him and his potential to control large portions of the Iraqi population since the beginning of the invasion. There was actually talk of neutralizing him, although it was eventually decided against.

DevilsReject

DevilsReject

Cleveland, OH
February 2007

APR 01, 2008 12:47 PM

Okay quick question.

If the majority of Iraqi citizens want an immediate withdrawal of U.S. Troops, the majority of U.S. citizens want an immediate withdrawal of U.S. Troops from Iraq, why are we still in Iraq?

And no offense, to judge how well a war is doing by comparing the number of deaths of soldiers, is a miserable way to do it. Mostly because tactics of war have changed, removing soldiers from the front lines, some of the more dangerous jobs are done by non-human entities. Comparing Iraq to anything WWI or pre-WWII, they were totally different eras, and totally different wars.

WWII and prior had a lot of ongoing Naval battles, back when the world was competing to build the biggest and the baddest battleship. Now battleships don't even exist, and there hasn't been a noteworthy Naval battle in decades.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 01, 2008 01:20 PM

emotedcreations said:
2) I liked your article FTR, but and maybe it's just me, you seemed to suggest that al Sadr just popped up 8 months ago. The US government has known about him and his potential to control large portions of the Iraqi population since the beginning of the invasion. There was actually talk of neutralizing him, although it was eventually decided against.



Didn't mean to imply that - just that he agreed to a cease fire 8 months ago.

His father was a Shiite leader who was killed for speaking out against Hussein. He is like a Shiite Kennedy.

Oh, and ooops:


The Iranian general who helped broker an end to nearly a week of fighting between Iraqi government forces and Shiite Muslim militiamen in southern Iraq is an unlikely peacemaker.

Brig. Gen. Qassem Suleimani, who helped U.S.-backed Iraqi leaders negotiate a deal with radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al Sadr to stop the fighting in Iraq's largely Shiite south, is named on U.S. Treasury Department and U.N. Security Council watch lists for alleged involvement in terrorism and the proliferation of nuclear and missile technology

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 01, 2008 01:20 PM

DevilsReject said:

And no offense, to judge how well a war is doing by comparing the number of deaths of soldiers, is a miserable way to do it. Mostly because tactics of war have changed, removing soldiers from the front lines, some of the more dangerous jobs are done by non-human entities. Comparing Iraq to anything WWI or pre-WWII, they were totally different eras, and totally different wars.



Not to mention the advances in body armor.

Phantom_medic

Phantom_medic

Des Moines, IA
October 2007

APR 01, 2008 02:09 PM

I will concede i was wrong on the issue of Iraqi people wanting us out. I take no offense to being told im wrong. As long as its in a civil manner. I was also wrong in the way i made my comparison of conflicts.The only slightly pertinent conflict in style of warfare is Vietnam and even then it was a different kind of war. I apologize for my inaccuracy.

SergeantPsycho

SergeantPsycho

USA
January 2007

APR 01, 2008 02:45 PM

FearTheReaper said:
new strongman has risen and his name is Muqtada al-Sadr.



FearTheReaper said:
Iran then brokered a peace deal. Maliki actually went to Iran to meet with al-Sadr - which brings up the fifth rule of power grab: Don't beg your opponent to stop.



If Sadr is Iraq's new Awesome McBadAss, what's he doing hanging out in Iran?

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 01, 2008 03:05 PM

SergeantPsycho said:

FearTheReaper said:
new strongman has risen and his name is Muqtada al-Sadr.



FearTheReaper said:
Iran then brokered a peace deal. Maliki actually went to Iran to meet with al-Sadr - which brings up the fifth rule of power grab: Don't beg your opponent to stop.



If Sadr is Iraq's new Awesome McBadAss, what's he doing hanging out in Iran?



Uh, because Iran is running the show...

Turns out badass doesn't mean retarded. Or maybe you think your boy George Bush is hanging out in an office in Baghdad? Not so much. Turns out Sadr knows he is more important dead than alive.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

APR 01, 2008 03:07 PM

FearTheReaper said:

His father was a Shiite leader who was killed for speaking out against Hussein. He is like a Shiite Kennedy.



Kinda makes me wonder what woud have happened if the U.S. had financed him against Hussein, after getting promises not to let it turn into a Shiite/Sunni civil war.

SergeantPsycho

SergeantPsycho

USA
January 2007

APR 01, 2008 03:10 PM

FearTheReaper said:

SergeantPsycho said:

FearTheReaper said:
new strongman has risen and his name is Muqtada al-Sadr.



FearTheReaper said:
Iran then brokered a peace deal. Maliki actually went to Iran to meet with al-Sadr - which brings up the fifth rule of power grab: Don't beg your opponent to stop.



If Sadr is Iraq's new Awesome McBadAss, what's he doing hanging out in Iran?



Uh, because Iran is running the show...

Turns out badass doesn't mean retarded. Or maybe you think your boy George Bush is hanging out in an office in Baghdad? Not so much. Turns out Sadr knows he is more important dead than alive.



If Iran is running the show, then Sadr is just a puppet and he's not Testicle McGiganticton, now is he?

Chainlink

Chainlink

Key West, FL
August 2005

APR 01, 2008 03:24 PM

SergeantPsycho said:

FearTheReaper said:

SergeantPsycho said:

FearTheReaper said:
new strongman has risen and his name is Muqtada al-Sadr.



FearTheReaper said:
Iran then brokered a peace deal. Maliki actually went to Iran to meet with al-Sadr - which brings up the fifth rule of power grab: Don't beg your opponent to stop.



If Sadr is Iraq's new Awesome McBadAss, what's he doing hanging out in Iran?



Uh, because Iran is running the show...

Turns out badass doesn't mean retarded. Or maybe you think your boy George Bush is hanging out in an office in Baghdad? Not so much. Turns out Sadr knows he is more important dead than alive.



If Iran is running the show, then Sadr is just a puppet and he's not Testicle McGiganticton, now is he?



Did you miss the part where the United States was supposed to be running the show ?
Oddly, our puppets don't seem to be doing so good.

Testicle McGiganticon, indeed.

Tiger_Fodder

Tiger_Fodder

Braintree, MA
June 2007

APR 01, 2008 03:36 PM

Excellent article, but you seem to be surprised by Bush's attitude. Would you expect anything else?

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

APR 01, 2008 03:43 PM

SergeantPsycho said:

If Iran is running the show, then Sadr is just a puppet and he's not Testicle McGiganticton, now is he?



Let me know when your brain starts functioning.

emotedcreations

emotedcreations

Germany
July 2006

APR 01, 2008 03:55 PM

SergeantPsycho said:
If Iran is running the show, then Sadr is just a puppet and he's not Testicle McGiganticton, now is he?

Do you have a point to make? Your comments don't make any sense. If you're trying to say that al-Sadr isn't a powerful man in Iraq, then you've lost your mind.

smithers_jones

smithers_jones

I'm lost
November 2003

APR 01, 2008 04:16 PM

SergeantPsycho said:

FearTheReaper said:

SergeantPsycho said:

FearTheReaper said:
new strongman has risen and his name is Muqtada al-Sadr.



FearTheReaper said:
Iran then brokered a peace deal. Maliki actually went to Iran to meet with al-Sadr - which brings up the fifth rule of power grab: Don't beg your opponent to stop.



If Sadr is Iraq's new Awesome McBadAss, what's he doing hanging out in Iran?



Uh, because Iran is running the show...

Turns out badass doesn't mean retarded. Or maybe you think your boy George Bush is hanging out in an office in Baghdad? Not so much. Turns out Sadr knows he is more important dead than alive.



If Iran is running the show, then Sadr is just a puppet and he's not Testicle McGiganticton, now is he?


How would you characterize someone who has his own non-state militia and who has a major military and political confrontation with state forces that are backed by the political and military might of the world's biggest superpower and wins?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 12

Next