• commentary
  • TUESDAY MARCH 11 2008 6:00 AM

Feel The Pride, America!

The treatment of Omar Khadr is an example of the monsters we have become in our “War on Terror.” Born in 1988 in Toronto, Khadr was raised by two, insane Muslim parents. They spent every moment preparing him for Jihad, telling him suicide bombers were the bestest of the best.


Omar's father always said he did not want to die in bed. He wanted to be killed. When his children were very young, he told them, "If you love me, pray that I will get martyred." Three times he asked Omar's older brother Abdurahman to become a suicide bomber. It would bring honor to the family, he said. Abdurahman declined. Later, when Ahmed sensed that Abdurahman's faith was weakening, he told him, "If you ever betray Islam, I will be the one to kill you."


Sounds like my old man -- except he made me play baseball.

When Omar was two, the family moved to Pakistan. In 1992, the family moved back to Canada for three years because Dad stepped on a land mine and needed to recover. Shit happens during a Jihad, yo. Omar's father raised money for Al Qaeda and sent Khadr to get formal military training before he was 12. He spent most of his formative years in Al Qaeda camps and even spent time with Osama bin Laden in Jalalabad.

When the US attacked Afghanistan, Omar was fighting with the Taliban. Well, sort of fighting. At 14, his job was to wash clothes and cook for the actual fighters. On July 27, 2002, Khadr was sent to the village of Ab Khail to translate for Taliban fighters at a gathering. American forces arrived and a firefight broke out.

Khadr was captured and charged with throwing a grenade that killed Sgt. Christopher Speer. The Pentagon said that Khadr was the only one who could have killed Speer, because he was the only person alive at that point. Of course, the Pentagon was lying.


However, a classified document, inadvertently released to reporters at the military prison by a Pentagon official Monday, provides a different eyewitness account of the events.

A U.S. soldier at the battle said in sworn testimony that two al-Qaeda fighters were alive after the fatal grenade attack.

The unidentified soldier says he killed the first al-Qaeda fighter before spotting Khadr, whom he said was wounded, on his knees and facing away from him. For reasons he does not go into, he says he shot him in the back twice.


Khadr was 15 on that day. Check him out in all his glory.



The shooting left him blind in one eye. And Khadr’s fucked up life was only about to become a lot worse. Raised by animals, who filled his mind with poison and attempted to turn him into a killing machine, Khadr saw one way out.


"Kill me," he murmured, in fluent English. "Please, just kill me."


No can do. We have to torture you and make you go crazy. Khadr was patched up and sent to Guantanamo for some civilized American treatment.


In February, his U.S. lawyer told reporters the teenager had been used as a human mop to clean urine on the floor and had been beaten, threatened with rape and tied up for hours in painful positions at Guantanamo Bay.


How about a little more detail?


Many hours had passed since Omar had been taken from his cell. He urinated on himself and on the floor. The MPs returned, mocked him for a while and then poured pine-oil solvent all over his body. Without altering his chains, they began dragging him by his feet through the mixture of urine and pine oil. Because his body had been so tightened, the new motion racked it. The MPs swung him around and around, the piss and solvent washing up into his face. The idea was to use him as a human mop. When the MPs felt they'd successfully pretended to soak up the liquid with his body, they uncuffed him and carried him back to his cell. He was not allowed a change of clothes for two days.


In 2004, the U.S. called him an “enemy combatant” in a Summary of Evidence memo that was prepared for his Combatant Status Review Tribunal. A judge tossed the case out last year.


A judge at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, ruled June 4 that Omar Khadr's case could not go forward because a military tribunal had merely determined he was an "enemy combatant" and because the judge believed he could not make such a determination of "unlawful" status.


No problemo.


The new Court of Military Commission Review has ordered a military judge to reopen the terrorism case against a 20-year-old Canadian accused of killing a U.S. serviceman in Afghanistan, ruling that the judge's decision earlier this year to dismiss the case was in error.

In a 25-page opinion issued last night, a three-member panel of the court decided that judges in military commissions can determine whether terror suspects are "unlawful enemy combatants" and are therefore subject to trial


But just to make sure there are no further problems, Khadr is now an "unprivileged belligerent." “Unprivileged belligerents” apparently don't have the right to wage war.

I am constantly amazed at our retardation and incredible lack of humanity. I am, however, no longer amazed by our constant defying of our own laws and treaties.


In December 2002, the United States ratified a treaty that establishes 18 as the minimum age for any compulsory recruitment or participation in armed conflict. This treaty "the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Children" obliges governments to assist in the demobilization and rehabilitation of former child soldiers, with a particular responsibility to rehabilitate child soldiers within its jurisdiction.


But he’s 20 now, so I wouldn’t expect any sympathy from anyone. He’s a product of child abuse, raised by an insane family that tried to turn him into a suicide bomber. He is the reason many countries came together to create child soldier laws. But rather than being civilized, we have gone the other way. We have justified every lie Omar’s parents ever told him. We have erased any doubt he may have had that America must be destroyed. And we have given up any right to condemn another country when they torture our soldiers during war. We are no different than the supposed enemy we fight.

Omar Khadr will have another hearing next week. Maybe we should ask him if he wants to continue to live like a rat, or if he would rather die. But, then, that would show a glimmer of humanity.

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

16 | 17 | 18

Next

Comments
scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

MAR 13, 2008 11:48 PM

goodpoltergeist said:

mingol said:

elslowhand said:
Perhaps we should send members of Al Qaeda to Disneyland, or Six Flags, or something. Perhaps a parade in their honor on Main Street, USA. They should be rewarded for wanting to kill as many white devils as they can. There are far too many of us around anyway.

The current administration is full of assholes, and the President may well be the Antichrist, but Al Qaeda is the enemy. If you met Omar Khadr and apologized for the way he's been treated, he would much rather kill you than thank you.

Don't doubt that for a second.

He's been taught to hate and kill American's since birth. He was bred for murder. This is not a philosophy to respect, it is to be feared. These are the bad guys, we are not.


I was wondering how long it would take for one of these posts to show up.

With regards to this...

These are the bad guys, we are not.


... the treatment described in the article more or less proves you wrong, in case you hadn't noticed.



because sending the severed fingers of captive civilians, American and otherwise, to U.S. officials is so much better.



just because the morals and social mores of those we find ourselves in conflict with are antiquated and brutal in comparison to the majority of the major powers in the world, thereby opening themselves up to being labeled "bad guys," does not make us, by default, the "good guys." i think torturing people kinda precludes our ability to be "the good guys." would G.I. Joe torture members of COBRA they captured? i think not.

we might be able to get away with naming ourselves the "slightly better than those we're at conflict with, chiefly when it comes to social reforms for our citizens, but out government agencies can be real fucking assholes on par with our opponents if you give us a chance, or when no one's looking" guys.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAR 13, 2008 11:56 PM

1983boy said:
Maybe it is just me, but the real sadness behind this story is the language in which the original article is written in. Both the tone and the topic of the story is reminicint of Vietnam and Post-Vietnam Era hate propaganda. This type of trash journalism is the kind that had America spitting on a generation of its warriors as they returned home. puke puke puke



I wuv you.

RedBstrd

RedBstrd

Riverside, CA
April 2004

MAR 14, 2008 12:11 AM

1983boy said:
Maybe it is just me, but the real sadness behind this story is the language in which the original article is written in. Both the tone and the topic of the story is reminicint of Vietnam and Post-Vietnam Era hate propaganda. This type of trash journalism is the kind that had America spitting on a generation of its warriors as they returned home. puke puke puke



Events such as the My Lai Massacre were what shifted public opinion so strongly against the Vietnam War.

scylis

scylis

USA
November 2004

MAR 14, 2008 12:14 AM

RedBstrd said:

1983boy said:
Maybe it is just me, but the real sadness behind this story is the language in which the original article is written in. Both the tone and the topic of the story is reminicint of Vietnam and Post-Vietnam Era hate propaganda. This type of trash journalism is the kind that had America spitting on a generation of its warriors as they returned home. puke puke puke



Events such as the My Lai Massacre were what shifted public opinion so strongly against the Vietnam War.



and God damn the press for talking about it!

smithers_jones

smithers_jones

I'm lost
November 2003

MAR 14, 2008 12:22 AM

1983boy said:
Maybe it is just me, but the real sadness behind this story is the language in which the original article is written in. Both the tone and the topic of the story is reminicint of Vietnam and Post-Vietnam Era hate propaganda. This type of trash journalism is the kind that had America spitting on a generation of its warriors as they returned home. puke puke puke



You are totally right about that Reaper guy, but the idea of Vets being spat on turns out to be more myth than reality.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

MAR 14, 2008 12:54 AM

smithers_jones said:

1983boy said:
Maybe it is just me, but the real sadness behind this story is the language in which the original article is written in. Both the tone and the topic of the story is reminicint of Vietnam and Post-Vietnam Era hate propaganda. This type of trash journalism is the kind that had America spitting on a generation of its warriors as they returned home. puke puke puke



You are totally right about that Reaper guy, but the idea of Vets being spat on turns out to be more myth than reality.



Fuck you, fascist.

mingol

mingol

Singapore
July 2005

MAR 14, 2008 04:19 AM

goodpoltergeist said:

mingol said:
With regards to this...

elslowhand said:
These are the bad guys, we are not.


... the treatment described in the article more or less proves you wrong, in case you hadn't noticed.


because sending the severed fingers of captive civilians, American and otherwise, to U.S. officials is so much better.


And that of course makes it perfectly morally acceptable for the U.S. to torture prisoners, just so long as they don't stoop so low as to mail anyone severed fingers. Yes?

Um, no. Sorry.

BlastProcessing

BlastProcessing

USA
OLD SKOOL

MAR 14, 2008 08:54 AM

goodpoltergeist said:

because sending the severed fingers of captive civilians, American and otherwise, to U.S. officials is so much better.



Could you go ahead and explain to us soldier-spitting Commie pinko bastard peaceniks exactly how being "the good guys" somehow translates into being "the guys who take it almost as far as the bad guys, but not quite"?

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

USA
May 2006

MAR 14, 2008 09:05 AM

BlastProcessing said:

goodpoltergeist said:

because sending the severed fingers of captive civilians, American and otherwise, to U.S. officials is so much better.



Could you go ahead and explain to us soldier-spitting Commie pinko bastard peaceniks exactly how being "the good guys" somehow translates into being "the guys who take it almost as far as the bad guys, but not quite"?



Cuz Bush said it was ok, and he talks to God . . . obviously.

puke

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

MAR 14, 2008 06:03 PM

scylis said:
just because the morals and social mores of those we find ourselves in conflict with are antiquated and brutal in comparison to the majority of the major powers in the world, thereby opening themselves up to being labeled "bad guys," does not make us, by default, the "good guys."




I applaud. Loudly, and with feeling.

willam9

willam9

Philadelphia, PA
January 2008

MAR 17, 2008 12:58 AM

UpTight said:
Wanna piss and moan about the occasional, probably unavoidable shortcomings of America? Fine - but don't be angry if people question your loyalties and values.



jesus christ, i am such an idiot. here i was thinking thomas jefferson had envisioned a system of government that could be freely critisized by its people without fear of persecution. my god, that might lead to a situation where the shortcomings of that government would have to be addressed...

attn_ho

attn_ho

Brooklyn, NY
February 2004

MAR 17, 2008 04:50 AM

willam9 said:

UpTight said:
Wanna piss and moan about the occasional, probably unavoidable shortcomings of America? Fine - but don't be angry if people question your loyalties and values.



jesus christ, i am such an idiot. here i was thinking thomas jefferson had envisioned a system of government that could be freely critisized by its people without fear of persecution. my god, that might lead to a situation where the shortcomings of that government would have to be addressed...



thats pre 9/11 thinking. sorry, were fighting the worst most dangerous enemy ever now.

willam9

willam9

Philadelphia, PA
January 2008

MAR 17, 2008 09:44 AM

attn_ho said:

willam9 said:

UpTight said:
Wanna piss and moan about the occasional, probably unavoidable shortcomings of America? Fine - but don't be angry if people question your loyalties and values.



jesus christ, i am such an idiot. here i was thinking thomas jefferson had envisioned a system of government that could be freely critisized by its people without fear of persecution. my god, that might lead to a situation where the shortcomings of that government would have to be addressed...



thats pre 9/11 thinking. sorry, were fighting the worst most dangerous enemy ever now.



good point, i better hurry up and get with us before i end up against us.

boardbrad

boardbrad

Lakewood, WA
March 2008

MAR 24, 2008 04:41 AM

willam9 said:

SnowgodCCR said:
In times of war, isn't it understood that people die? Since when do we prosecute individual soldiers for killing other soldiers? Even if the kid DID throw the grenade, isn't that kinda what you do during a war? And it's not like they're waging a war on us behind our backs...I think that if we declare war on terrorism, then we should kinda acknowledge the rules of war. But then we would be the good guys, and other people might stop hating us so much. Can't have that.




we don't prosecute soldiers for killing soldiers. however, i believe the geneva convention defines a soldier as a combatant who wears a uniform fighting for an organized military structure as a part of a recognized government. al- qaeda and the taleban don't fall into these catgories, aren't recognized by any international treaty as made up of legitimate soldiers and are thus categorized as unlawful enemy combatants (not to endorse a bastardized bushism). they, therefore aren't protected under the "rules of war," formally or otherwise, and are subject to prosecution under many international laws.
that being said, i still think we need to take a hard look at what defines our humanity and us as a nation. mistreatment of a child who was indoctrinated into a terrorist organization is still mistreatment of a child and this will help to negatively color the world's view of modern america. thus, i don't think we need to "recognize the rules of war" since the organizations we are engaging don't do such; however, i think we need to recognize that the treatment of this child in guantanamo presents a real risk of pushing us one step closer to becoming the 'enemy' we are supposed to be fighting.



I couldn't agree more. very eloquently put. however... l think we should stop focusing on the "child" aspect, and more on the treatment of simply another human being. Also, and this is just my opinon, in groups like al-qaeda, i doesn't matter if your the kid doing laundry or the 22yr old with the AK-47, or the 80yr old funding the whole operation, the enemy is the enemy. Sorry but thats just the way it is, no amount of philosophizing or dreamey Utopian thoght will change that. would we make that distction if it were a soldier, and i mean of an actual country, who's job it was to do laundry? would "they" make that distiction for us? I'm not supposing that i know the answer to these or any other questions. sometimes you just can't be quite..... and whats a troll?

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

16 | 17 | 18

Next