BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

On Sunday night, "60 minutes" broadcast a report that could have easily come straight out of Pakistan, instead of the great state of Alabama. The frightening aspect of this story is not that it occurred, but that it was done so brazenly. It is, quite simply, fascism, right here in the good old US of A. The story goes back years, but the most frightening part of the tale occurred on Sunday night, when the program was supposed to air on "60 Minutes". Many in Alabama never saw it because big brother shut it down.

Alabama is obviously a very Republican state. Nearly every big politician is a Republican, except for one very popular Democrat named Don Siegelman. Don used to be governor, but then Republicans targeted him for destruction. Now he sits in prison. Karl Rove started the ball rolling in 2001, when he made a request to Republican lawyer and activist Jill Simpson.


"Karl Rove asked you to take pictures of Siegelman?" reporter Scott Pelley asks.

"Yes," Simpson replies.

"In a compromising sexual position with one of his aides," Pelley says.

"Yes, if I could," she responds.


Well, it worked on Clinton and the Republicans were never punished, so why would they stop? Simpson could not produce the photos because Siegelman wasn’t fucking his aides. So, the Republicans switched to the courts to take down Siegelman and they succeeded. This is why the Attorney General scandal is so important. The Bush Administration has turned the independent branch of government responsible for justice into a Republican weapon. We no longer live in a country where laws apply equally to everyone.

Siegelman was investigated for bribery during his re-election campaign in 2002. Local prosecutors charged Siegelman and the case went to trial. The trial lasted an hour or so, before the judge tossed it out because there was absolutely no evidence. But the damage was done to Siegelman and he lost the election.

Siegelman decided to run for governor again in 2004 and the Republican machine went back to work. This time the Department of Justice decided to get their hands dirty, or as Karl Rove said to Jill Simpson:


My girls will take care of him.


On of the “girls” Karl spoke of was US Attorney Leura Canary, who just happened to be married to William Canary, a Republican campaign consultant. They built a case out of nothing. First they flipped a “witness.” The guy was a Republican named Nick Bailey, who just happened to have committed a few crimes and was looking at a long time in jail. The Republicans offered him a lot less time in jail and in return, all he had to do was lie in court.

Bailey worked for Siegelman, but the governor was not involved in his crimes and had no knowledge of them. Bailey told US Attorneys what they wanted to hear, or they told him what he would say: That he had seen Siegelman take a check in return for an appointed position on the state hospital oversight board. The Department of Justice claimed this was a crime. It is not. If it were, Karl Rove and George Bush would be in prison for their “Pioneers” and “Rangers” fundraising operation. People who donated $100,000 or more to the Bush campaign received one of those awesome titles and many were appointed to government offices, like an ambassadorship. 146 Bush donors were appointed to government offices after making large donations. There were zero prosecutions in those “cases.”

Okay, so ignore that it was a not even a crime. And ignore the fact that Siegelman didn’t even receive the check because it was made out to the Alabama Education Foundation, a vehicle the governor created to run a campaign for a state education lottery. Ignore that stuff and focus on this: The Republicans actually manufactured the not illegal evidence against Siegelman. They couldn't even decently frame the guy, and yet it worked. Bailey story was that he witnessed the check being handed to Siegelman. Total bullshit. It was actually pathetically false.


JONES: They got a copy of the check. And the check was cut days after that meeting. There was no– there was no way possible for Siegelman to have walked out of that meeting with a check in his hand.

PELLEY: So, Siegelman could not have had that check–

JONES: No.

PELLEY: –in his hand that Bailey–

JONES: It was–

PELLEY: –testified to seeing?

JONES: Absolutely impossible and they knew that, absolutely impossible.

PELLEY: That would seem like a problem with the prosecution’s case…

JONES: It was a huge problem especially when you’ve got a guy whose credibility was going to be the linchpin of that case. It was a huge problem.


The check was cut days after the meeting and prosecutors knew it. Maybe that’s why they had to train their witness. According to Bailey, he was getting the story so mixed up during preparation they made him write it down over and over and over, until he got it right. That’s usually how the truth works; you have to get it right using a rudimentary memorization technique. Prosecutors then illegally withheld Bailey’s writings from the defense, because his false testimony it would have been devastated under cross-examination.

The Rove machines also attempted to force another Republican to testify in the case, but he refused. Jefferson County Republican Commissioner Gary White was pressured to back up Bailey’s claim. He refused to do so because,


My testimony would be false.


Wow, a guy going to jail wouldn't back up their bullshit story.

Coincidentally, the federal judge overseeing the case was appointed by a fella named George W. Bush. Judge Mark Fuller was also a former member of the Alabama GOP’s Executive Committee and once claimed that Siegelman had a grudge against him. For some reason he refused to recuse himself from the case. Go figure.

Siegelman was convicted and sentenced to seven years in jail. Usually, when a person is convicted of a crime such as bribery, he is allowed 48 hours to get his affairs in order. Not Siegelman. He had his hands and feet shackled, and was immediately taken to prison. Republican prosecutor Grant Woods said he had never in his career seen someone other than a violent criminal treated in this way.

Woods is co-chair of the McCain for President leadership committee and a former Arizona Attorney General. Dude is a hard core Republican and this is what he had to say about Siegelman’s prosecution:


I personally believe that what happened here is that they targeted Don Siegelman because they could not beat him fair and square. This was a Republican state and he was the one Democrat they could never get rid of.


It’s a big deal when a Republican heavy hitter comes out to attack his own party’s actions. Besides Woods, 52 former attorneys general have called Congress to investigate the case. The Department of Justice, of course, refused to speak to 60 Minutes and refused to allow Bailey to be interviewed on camera. That’s a sign that the government has done something on the up and up. Oh, but it’s worse than that. The Justice Department would only issue a “no comment” to CBS in response to the accusation of false evidence. It was also recently revealed that two career prosecutors refused to move forward with the Siegelman case due to a lack of evidence. Both of their careers stalled.

I feel like this is a good time to remind you that the White House and Karl Rove deleted over 10 million emails. How about that? I'm sure they are all the simple, "What's doing Karl?", "Nothing, LOL!" type of emails. No way are there emails about the Siegelman case. That's why they were deleted.

Now, this is where this story gets really creepy. This entire scandal was detailed Sunday night on "60 Minutes". Most of the nation watched, except in Northern Alabama – where the screen suddenly went black. Residents of Huntsville and Mobile did not see the broadcast.


Just before the segment was to start, people in the northern part of the state who were tuned in to WHNT-TV, Channel 19 in Huntsville, found this on their screen instead:

We apologize that you missed the first segment of 60 Minutes tonight featuring ‘The Prosecution of Don Siegelman.’ It was a technical problem with CBS out of New York.


Because bloggers are not retarded, one called CBS in New York to find the source of the problem that was blocking transmission in Alabama. Turns out nothing, according to CBS in New York.


There is no delicate way to put this: the WHNT claim is not true. There were no transmission difficulties. The problems were peculiar to Channel 19, which had the signal and had functioning transmitters.” I was told that the decision to blacken screens across Northern Alabama “could only have been an editorial call.


Nice. Siegelman is a political prisoner. When evidence of his illegal prosecution was presented to the people of his state, it was blacked out. Feel free to explain to me how that is not a fascist maneuver.

The New York Times points out the similarities to a certain Asian country.


After two broadcasters who had been banned by the Pakistani government appeared on the Aaj TV channel there on Friday night, the channel’s programming was suddenly cut off, and replaced with a message, according to CNN:

Dear Users, Please note Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) temporarily suspended transmission of independent news TV channels till further instructions.


Luckily, during the original broadcast they had the problem worked out in time for the "60 Minutes" segment following the Siegelman story. And the station made good by airing the story at 10 p.m. -- right in the middle of The Oscars, one of the most watched TV programs of the year.

The station that blocked the transmission, WHNT, is owned by Oak Hill Partners, which is owned by the Bass Family. The Bass Family are big, big contributors to the Republican Party and a man named George W. Bush. They are long time friends and the Bass family has bailed out George on more than one occasion.


Back in the 1980s, George W. Bush was put on the board of directors at Harken Oil. In 1988, an oil venture to Bahrain was proposed. With Bush Sr. president at the time, the virtually unknown Texas company had beat out huge oil conglomerate Amoco for exclusive rights to exploration, development, transportation, etc. Even though Harken had no international experience and little capital for such a huge venture, Bahraini oil was theirs for the taking. Many thought that Harken was moribund, and without this contract they more than likely would have sunk. Harken got its big contract but couldn't finance it. The Basses then stepped into the picture by volunteering $25 million.


Now they Bass family is shutting down public airwaves, so the people of Alabama won’t hear the truth. And the action just happens to protect Karl Rove.

Time to be afraid. Not because to the act itself, but the brazenness of the undertaking. They know, as do many of us, that they will not be punished. This lack of justice will lead to a heightening of their shamelessness and an increase in their risk taking. The only question is, “When is it too late?”

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

FEB 26, 2008 01:12 PM

PointBlank said:

elysianfielder said:

"I think a lot of people are missing the point here. Yes, the Siegelman attack is reprehensible, but it's the (literal) media blackout that is the truly shocking, fascistic move here."

You think Bush's good ole boy crony pulling the plug on a local station is a bigger issue (and a stronger indication of creeping fascism) than Karl Rove turning the entire Department of Justice into a political hit squad?



No, but it's a different issue when (ostensibly) the people who are supposed to be able to independently criticize/investigate the government are literally silenced like this. Again, as has been pointed out: Rove and Bush have been using the DOJ in this manner for quite a while.

Not worse, just different. I'm not trying to argue with anyone, I'm just pointing out that there is a big part of this article that people seem to be ignoring.



I think the jailing (for years) of one's political opponents on trumped-up charges and the forced blackout of the media are each key instruments of fascist states. Neither is anything to be taken lightly.

drrn

drrn

Fairfax, VA
December 2007

FEB 26, 2008 01:13 PM

PointBlank said:

dronehymns said:
Dishonest, frightening? Yes.
Fascist? No.



How so? How is the literal blackout of media not fascist?



The blackout would have been total, not just regional. There also wouldn't have been a trial (no matter how rigged this one was). He would disappear without any fanfare and we'd never hear from him again.

Another very important reason is that these actions benefit only a few individuals within the Republican Party and are not meant to benefit the State as a whole. If anything, these actions are much closer to Stalin era Russia than any fascist state.

bean

bean

STAFF

Los Angeles, CA

FEB 26, 2008 01:20 PM

dronehymns said:

PointBlank said:

dronehymns said:
Dishonest, frightening? Yes.
Fascist? No.



How so? How is the literal blackout of media not fascist?



The blackout would have been total, not just regional. There also wouldn't have been a trial (no matter how rigged this one was). He would disappear without any fanfare and we'd never hear from him again.

Another very important reason is that these actions benefit only a few individuals within the Republican Party and are not meant to benefit the State as a whole. If anything, these actions are much closer to Stalin era Russia than any fascist state.


We've been saying "this is a slippery slope" and "this road leads to fascism" for years. I'm becoming convinced that people would still be saying it's not actually fascism if Bush united the branches of government under his control and refused to pack his bags this winter.

elysianfielder

elysianfielder

Los Angeles, CA
March 2003

FEB 26, 2008 01:20 PM

I think the good news here is that this TV station blackout is so sensational, and so blatant, that it may serve as the Watergate-like "minor burglary" that exposes the larger and more disturbing web of crimes it's trying to silence. I have to admit I'm surprised that Bush's old Harkin pal (whether prompted by the White House or not) would do something so insanely stupid-- with today's technology, this type of shit can be easily traced.

Of course the bad news is, this will fade away into oblivion in a week like all the other outrages that have occurred.

FearTheReaper

FearTheReaper

NEWSWIRE

I'm lost

FEB 26, 2008 01:22 PM

Right, because fascism happens all at once. There is not a chipping away process. It's all or nothing.

elysianfielder

elysianfielder

Los Angeles, CA
March 2003

FEB 26, 2008 01:37 PM

FearTheReaper said:
Right, because fascism happens all at once. There is not a chipping away process. It's all or nothing.



I'm talking about the media's interest in this story fading into oblivion in a week. Not the effects of this and the countless other incremental steps toward fascism.

drrn

drrn

Fairfax, VA
December 2007

FEB 26, 2008 01:47 PM

I think you're all misunderstanding me. This is certainly a step towards America as a totalitarian state, but this is not fascism. There's a difference.

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

FEB 26, 2008 01:52 PM

bean said:



I don't know, for some reason, this just seems exponentially more blatant. I think because the person they railroaded in that case was just a tool used to discredit an opponent, whereas this time they actually went after their opponent.



Well, I dunno if it's more or less blatant, but they both seem equally troubling to me. I only pointed it out to evidence the pattern. These people are criminals and liars and they're running our Justice Department.

scylis

scylis

Seattle, WA
November 2004

FEB 26, 2008 02:02 PM

fas·cism (f%u0101sh'%u012Dz'%u0259m) n.

1. often Fascism
1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.


to·tal·i·tar·i·an (t%u014D-t%u0101l'%u012D-târ'%u0113-%u0259n) adj.
Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed: "A totalitarian regime crushes all autonomous institutions in its drive to seize the human soul" (Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.)

this from the American Heritage Dictionary.

doesn't sound mutually exclusive to me. in fact, sounds like one can gleefully go hand in hand with one another. however, the direct censorship of political advocates is one of the main tenets of fascism, and the provided definition shows this. so it is an act fascism, and hints at a totalitarian goal. furthermore, the Republicans in close association to Rove and the administration consistently "wave the flag" to stir up nationalistic pride, but only when connected with them; Democrats are labeled (or have been attempted to be labeled, more precisely) as anti-American, merely because they're not Republicans and (at least in theory) are opposed to Republican tactics.

that's fascism.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

FEB 26, 2008 02:12 PM

^^^ No fair knowin stuff

Subrosa

Subrosa

San Francisco, CA
July 2004

FEB 26, 2008 03:11 PM

scylis said:
fas·cism (f%u0101sh'%u012Dz'%u0259m) n.

1. often Fascism
1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
2. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.


to·tal·i·tar·i·an (t%u014D-t%u0101l'%u012D-târ'%u0113-%u0259n) adj.
Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed: "A totalitarian regime crushes all autonomous institutions in its drive to seize the human soul" (Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.)

this from the American Heritage Dictionary.

doesn't sound mutually exclusive to me. in fact, sounds like one can gleefully go hand in hand with one another. however, the direct censorship of political advocates is one of the main tenets of fascism, and the provided definition shows this. so it is an act fascism, and hints at a totalitarian goal. furthermore, the Republicans in close association to Rove and the administration consistently "wave the flag" to stir up nationalistic pride, but only when connected with them; Democrats are labeled (or have been attempted to be labeled, more precisely) as anti-American, merely because they're not Republicans and (at least in theory) are opposed to Republican tactics.

that's fascism.



It seems to me that dronehymns is not arguing that fascism and totalitarianism are mutually exclusive, but rather that there is a distinction between them. He's right on that account, for the record. One can have a totalitarian monarchy or oligarchy or whatnot.

Personally, I don't really care to quibble over classifying things as fascist or totalitarian or any variation of those ideas. In the long run what we call this is unimportant. These types of actions are profoundly un-democratic, un-republican and un-American. That's all that should matter.

joker_

joker_

Windsor, CA
October 2005

FEB 26, 2008 03:13 PM

Subrosa said:
Personally, I don't really care to quibble over classifying things as fascist or totalitarian or any variation of those ideas. In the long run what we call this is unimportant. These types of actions are profoundly un-democratic, un-republican and un-American. That's all that should matter.



Well said.

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 26, 2008 03:18 PM

Subrosa said:
Personally, I don't really care to quibble over classifying things as fascist or totalitarian or any variation of those ideas. In the long run what we call this is unimportant. These types of actions are profoundly un-democratic, un-republican and un-American. That's all that should matter.



Beg to differ. What you call it is important. That's what the right have got away with before; "oh he's a leftist so he must be undemocratic".

Personally I would go with "totalitarian".

PS: kudos to joker.

naveed

naveed

Calgary, AB
January 2005

FEB 26, 2008 03:23 PM

i figured out way back in grade 12 social studies class 6 years ago that the American government was going to turn fascist if it already wasn't. hordes of people have agreed with me, why does it take so long for those who live in the country to see these things?

SockPuppet

SockPuppet

I'm lost
July 2006

FEB 26, 2008 03:35 PM

Um. It seems to me that this is a problem whenever corporations are national, and politics are local (=state-wide, in this case). Is that right?

If so, doesn't globalisation mean that nations are handing over power to corporations?

Just asking.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

 ... 9

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 4 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: David Lynch
SuicideGirls Interview: Tura Satana
SuicideGirls Interview: Kinky Friedman