BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #31

SATURDAY FEBRUARY 2 2008 6:00 AM

Submitted by FearTheReaper. Edited By FearTheReaper.

TAGS: Ohio, Vehicular homicide, Iraq, Suicide Bombers

In Turkey, Saturday is actually known as Asshole Fuckface day, because Turkey was the home of the Ottoman Empire and home to the very first Asshole Fuckface. It’s true. Sultan Abdul Hamid the second was the first. In the West, he was known as The Red Sultan, or The Great Assassin, because of the thousands of Armenians who died during his rule. He really kicked off the Armenian genocide.

When Hamid came to power in 1894, things were not going to well for the Ottoman Empire. Hamid needed a scapegoat, so he falsely charged the Christian Armenians with rebelling against his authority. He encouraged local Muslims to attack the Armenian people. And when Muslim refuges poured in from Europe, he told them to take Armenian land. Over a two-year period, 200,000 Armenians were massacred or died of starvation. A couple of years after his rule, the actual genocide kicked off. 1.5 million Armenians were killed between 1914-1918. Ever since those days, my people have carried the burden of picking the Asshole Fuckfaces out for the common man to see. Today, I will shine a bright light on the vermin of our world. So, put on a plastic burka, because this is going to be nasty.

Ohio never lets me down when I need a quality Asshole Fuckface.

Judge Mary Wiseman, of Montgomery County, is facing a challenge for her position on the bench from Judge James D. Piergies in the upcoming Democratic primary. The campaign is apparently getting quite heated, and by heated, I actually mean retarded. Turns out Wiseman is gay and Piergies is an Asshole Fuckface.

Piergies has claimed that Wiseman should excuse herself from cases involving the state ban on gay marriage and Dayton’s law banning discrimination against gays. Which makes sense, because her lust for other women’s bodies completely overwhelms her trained and educated mind.


"If that were the rule, then Thurgood Marshall would never have presided over a civil rights case," Wiseman said.

Piergies said the situation was different for former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Marshall, who more than a decade prior to being named to the court, argued the civil rights case Brown v. Board of Education. But after acknowledging Marshall's support of civil rights prior to joining the court, Piergies then said perhaps Marshall should have recused himself from such cases.


How’s that giant can of asshole you just opened working out? Let’s just make sure we have this right. Black people should not be able to rule on civil rights, that should be up to white people. And gay people should not be able to rule on gay rights, that should be left up to white people. Sorry, straight, white people. Don’t get me started on the Asians!

Later, Piergies tried to back away from his Asshole Fuckface comments.


"It's the fact that she has an opinion on the issue that she's expressed and that she's well known," Piergies said. "What I'm saying is if you have a specific issue that violates the canon of ethics, then you should step aside."


What if your issue is that you are an Asshole Fuckface? How will you ever be able to honestly oversee cases of other Asshole Fuckfaces?

Next, up, it’s a vehicular Asshole Fuckface bonanza!

My fellow Los Angeleno, Carlos Gutierrez, went out drinking with his uncle and girlfriend, and then decided to take a nice drive home. At some point during the sloshy ride, Carlos became pissed at his lady and his uncle and forced them to get out of the car. Then Carlos threatened to run them over. Then he actually went ahead and ran them over. Then he must have felt bad, because he put them back in the car.


According to police, Gutierrez piled his mortally wounded girlfriend, Yolanda Martinez, 37, into the vehicle's back seat and propped up his uncle in the passenger seat. Then he drove to a gas station.

The pit stop proved to be the alleged killer's undoing. As Gutierrez reportedly struggled to operate a gas pump in Pacific Palisades, his uncle -- whose leg was shattered -- dragged himself out of the car and began screaming for help, authorities say. That's when people started calling 911.


Oops. His lady was dead when police arrived and his uncle had a compound leg fracture. Maybe they should have learned how to party.


Neither Gutierrez nor the uncle -- whom police have not identified -- seem to be able to remember where the crime occurred.


Nice going, drunky. But, hey, at least he hasn’t filed a lawsuit against his uncle. That is what our next vehicular Asshole Fuckface did.


A Spanish businessman withdrew a controversial lawsuit Wednesday against the family of a teenage boy he struck and killed while driving a luxury car.

Tomas Delgado had filed a suit asking the dead boy's parents to pay him $29,400 on the grounds that the collision that killed their teenage son also damaged his Audi A-8.


I hope he also added in the cost of washing that kid’s blood and hair off his hood, not to mention his teeth in the grill. Unlike America, where we have no sense of community, the Spanish town actually showed concern.


Hundreds of people descended on a courthouse in northern Spain in a show of support for the boy's parents Wednesday. They broke into applause when word came that Delgado had dropped the suit.


Hey! What a great guy! He had a change of heart and realized he was wrong!


The businessman had insisted in a recent television interview that he was a victim, too. He was not present for a court hearing Wednesday. His lawyer told the court that Delgado felt that the extensive publicity amounted to a public lynching.


Oh. Hey, Asshole Fuckface, why so Asshole Fuckfacish? Delgado was originally cleared of any criminal wrongdoing, but his actions have caused the local prosecutor to take another look at the case.


A local prosecutor told reporters that he would take a second look at the case to see whether authorities can file fresh charges against Delgado.


Please. Make him suffer.

Next up, is there anything more Asshole Fuckfacish than strapping a bomb to a mentally retarded lady, sending her into a market and blowing her up with a bunch of other people? Turns out there is: Sending two mentally retarded ladies into markets and blowing them up with a bunch of other people.

Ah, Iraq. Some serious Asshole Fuckfacery going on in that nightmare of a country. But we seem to have hit a new low. On Friday 65 people were killed and 250 were wounded when two “suicide bombers” blew themselves up in crowded pet markets.


One Iraqi official who speaks for Qassim al Moussani , the head of the Baghdad security plan, said the women might have been mentally retarded and forced to wear suicide vests that were detonated remotely.


What a great moment that must have been for these masterminds. Convincing a couple of mentally retarded woman to wear the heavy vest, strapping it on them and sending them into the market. The feeling of righteousness must have been overwhelming for those heroes. They are truly a bright light in this dark mass called humanity. Hopefully in the future, they can strap a bomb to a toddler, or a puppy.


Witnesses said the bombers were women who'd slipped into the markets without being searched, as Iraqi security forces include few women and men aren't allowed to search women. Iraqi police are trying to recruit more female members.


Oh, get with the fucking 21st century, you stupid fucks. Asshole Fuckfaces abound in Iraq. Good luck making your country secure with your archaic, religious rules.

Finally, an Asshole Fuckface cop who doesn’t seem to understand his job.

On January 10th, a 13-year-old girl ran away from her Brooklyn home. Naturally, she met someone who said they could get her a job “dancing at parties.” Typical entry-level job. That person then introduced her to a great lady name Zelike Brown. Zelike told the runaway she had bought her for $500 and she was going to have to work off the debt. Pretty much how we all got started in the workforce.

Then Zelike brought her home to meet her husband, Wayne Taylor, who was a New York cop. Taylor, using his academy training, decided to turn the girl out.


Taylor and Brown took the girl to parties throughout the city where she was told to have sex with about 20 men in exchange for money given to the pair.

Taylor instructed the girl to tell people that she was 19 years old and that she charged $40 to $80 for sexual acts, prosecutors said.


This is why Jesus invented the scrotal punch.

The two Asshole Fuckfaces used a house alarm to keep the girl hostage and told her if she tried to escape they would make her work on the streets. Taylor also made fun of her for not making enough money and once slammed her head into the floor.

Yesterday, the girl escaped and made her way home. Her family took her to the police and Taylor and Brown were arrested for kidnapping, promoting prostitution, assault and endangering the welfare of a child. Way to go, New York's finest! Hopefully, these Asshole Fuckfaces spend a few years in prison.

Congrats to this weeks Asshole Fuckface winners! You each get a FearTheReaper spelunkin' kit!

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Mankarlen

Mankarlen

Columbia City, OR
June 2006

FEB 02, 2008 06:24 AM

Ah screw the court system, just lench the assholes in New York

PsylentNemo

PsylentNemo

Honolulu, HI
November 2007

FEB 02, 2008 07:02 AM

Not to detract from your article, but the insurgencies in Iraq have been known to use kids and animals. I can remember one particular case in which the insurgents convinced all the children to crowd around the high-backs, and then one would pull the pin and shout "Allah Akbari" as a kind of sue word for them to scatter. The target was then left confused with a grenade either in the back of the truck, or beneath it. Just FYI.

And by the by, do you have ANY idea how expensive it is to remove kids teeth from an Audi? It has to be professionally done, or it voids the warranty. That's why I stick to the bus. If someone get's hit, the city foots the bill.

xfinitex

xfinitex

East Lansing, MI
August 2005

FEB 02, 2008 08:40 AM

Ugh. Once more humanity fails to surprise me.

arawngwydion

arawngwydion

Jackson, MO
April 2007

FEB 02, 2008 09:22 AM

I believe that the point is the lack of humanity these days

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

FEB 02, 2008 09:37 AM

weird. i work with a guitierrez from LA. i wonder if they're related.

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

FEB 02, 2008 10:31 AM

The businessman had insisted in a recent television interview that he was a victim, too.


Everyone's a fucking victim these days. Run over a kid? You're a victim. Get fat? You're a victim of McDonalds. Get lung cancer? You're a victim of cigarettes (only applicable to smokers). Slip on the ice? You're a victim of whoever owns the property.

I don't know about anybody else, but I was raised to take responsibility for my own dumb-ass mistakes. I get so fucking sick and tired of hearing people who think they're entitled to something. I will agree that if some terrible wrong happens to someone, they should get some sort of recovery. I have an aunt in the hospital who landed in the ICU because her doctor accidentally cut a hole in her esophagus. I think she deserves some sort of substantial monetary award. But to have the gall to sue because the kid you ran over left a dent in your car . . .

MarcMerm

MarcMerm

West Hempstead, NY
April 2007

FEB 02, 2008 10:58 AM

It's not the first time they've used the mentally handicapped. A few years ago they took a retarded boy and did the same thing with him except he was inept enough to not make it to the target, fortunately. But I do think they qualify as Asshole Fuckfaces.

As for the judge, in many cases a judge has to recuse themselves. All the times where a family member is involved or something they have deep emotional ties to, they have to recuse themselves. According to your argument the presiding judge shouldn't have to remove themselves if for instance the case involved a child of theirs or a parent and as a matter of law they were sentenced to 15 years in jail because every judge would send the relative to jail rather than figure out a way to get them off the hook. And certainly gay rights or civil rights are not emotionally charged issues that ever sway a person away from strict logic. Oh no, never.

MarcMerm

MarcMerm

West Hempstead, NY
April 2007

FEB 02, 2008 11:00 AM

bald_eagle said:
Yeah, I heard about those women.

My first thought was, "What the hell are they going to do with 70 virgins?"



I tried looking for it on YouTube but people who post there are themelves AFFs. Family Guy had a scene about a suicide bomber going to heaven to find his 70 virgins all ready for a Star Trek or Dungeons and Dragons conventions. Instead here's something close:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joylAVP6v5M

MarcMerm

MarcMerm

West Hempstead, NY
April 2007

FEB 02, 2008 11:04 AM

coyotemike said:

The businessman had insisted in a recent television interview that he was a victim, too.


Everyone's a fucking victim these days. Run over a kid? You're a victim. Get fat? You're a victim of McDonalds. Get lung cancer? You're a victim of cigarettes (only applicable to smokers). Slip on the ice? You're a victim of whoever owns the property.

I don't know about anybody else, but I was raised to take responsibility for my own dumb-ass mistakes. I get so fucking sick and tired of hearing people who think they're entitled to something. I will agree that if some terrible wrong happens to someone, they should get some sort of recovery. I have an aunt in the hospital who landed in the ICU because her doctor accidentally cut a hole in her esophagus. I think she deserves some sort of substantial monetary award. But to have the gall to sue because the kid you ran over left a dent in your car . . .



I presume this case is where the driver was at fault. But presuming the kid was at fault (create your own scenario), how would it be any different than I hit you because you run a red light, neither of us are injured, and I sue you (or your insurance) for the damage to my car? Why should this driver suffer a loss (just because it's a "luxury" car?) if the kid was at fault just because the kid is a person and not a machine.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Christmas Island
August 2005

FEB 02, 2008 11:33 AM

MarcMerm said:

coyotemike said:

The businessman had insisted in a recent television interview that he was a victim, too.


Everyone's a fucking victim these days. Run over a kid? You're a victim. Get fat? You're a victim of McDonalds. Get lung cancer? You're a victim of cigarettes (only applicable to smokers). Slip on the ice? You're a victim of whoever owns the property.

I don't know about anybody else, but I was raised to take responsibility for my own dumb-ass mistakes. I get so fucking sick and tired of hearing people who think they're entitled to something. I will agree that if some terrible wrong happens to someone, they should get some sort of recovery. I have an aunt in the hospital who landed in the ICU because her doctor accidentally cut a hole in her esophagus. I think she deserves some sort of substantial monetary award. But to have the gall to sue because the kid you ran over left a dent in your car . . .



I presume this case is where the driver was at fault. But presuming the kid was at fault (create your own scenario), how would it be any different than I hit you because you run a red light, neither of us are injured, and I sue you (or your insurance) for the damage to my car? Why should this driver suffer a loss (just because it's a "luxury" car?) if the kid was at fault just because the kid is a person and not a machine.



Iriondo Trinidad's father told CNN he heard the screeching of the car from the campgrounds. The teen was struck from behind and dragged 106 meters (347 feet) along the rural highway, the father said.

A traffic report said Delgado was traveling 113 km per hour (70 mph) in an area where the speed limit is 90 km (55 mph). An independent expert hired by Trinidad's family said Delgado was going 173 km per hour (107 mph).



But . . .

Shortly after the collision, a judge dismissed criminal charges against Delgado after concluding that he had committed no criminal infraction, the Spanish newspaper El Pais reported



. . . even though he hit a kid bicycling down the road from behind and was going by some estimates almost twice the posted speed limit.
Here in the United States twice the speed limit is considered Driving to Endanger in most places and can be a felony in and of itself.

I think it's fairly safe to say he's a pretty big AFF.

LostLucy

LostLucy

USA
December 2006

FEB 02, 2008 11:39 AM

Oh fuck. The domestic and child abuse this week is particularly gut wrenching. blackeyed

Here is some gender and even statisically based logic back at Judge Asshole Fuckface Piergies of OHIO:

Shouldn't male judges be excused from presiding over any case concerning rape since about half of men asked say they would force a woman to have sex against her will if they could get away with it.

Furthermore, no men should sit on a jury for a rape trial, you know...


...based on the same logic.

Just an anaolgy...

MarcMerm

MarcMerm

West Hempstead, NY
April 2007

FEB 02, 2008 11:50 AM

Chainlink said:

MarcMerm said:

coyotemike said:

The businessman had insisted in a recent television interview that he was a victim, too.


Everyone's a fucking victim these days. Run over a kid? You're a victim. Get fat? You're a victim of McDonalds. Get lung cancer? You're a victim of cigarettes (only applicable to smokers). Slip on the ice? You're a victim of whoever owns the property.

I don't know about anybody else, but I was raised to take responsibility for my own dumb-ass mistakes. I get so fucking sick and tired of hearing people who think they're entitled to something. I will agree that if some terrible wrong happens to someone, they should get some sort of recovery. I have an aunt in the hospital who landed in the ICU because her doctor accidentally cut a hole in her esophagus. I think she deserves some sort of substantial monetary award. But to have the gall to sue because the kid you ran over left a dent in your car . . .



I presume this case is where the driver was at fault. But presuming the kid was at fault (create your own scenario), how would it be any different than I hit you because you run a red light, neither of us are injured, and I sue you (or your insurance) for the damage to my car? Why should this driver suffer a loss (just because it's a "luxury" car?) if the kid was at fault just because the kid is a person and not a machine.



Iriondo Trinidad's father told CNN he heard the screeching of the car from the campgrounds. The teen was struck from behind and dragged 106 meters (347 feet) along the rural highway, the father said.

A traffic report said Delgado was traveling 113 km per hour (70 mph) in an area where the speed limit is 90 km (55 mph). An independent expert hired by Trinidad's family said Delgado was going 173 km per hour (107 mph).



But . . .

Shortly after the collision, a judge dismissed criminal charges against Delgado after concluding that he had committed no criminal infraction, the Spanish newspaper El Pais reported



. . . even though he hit a kid bicycling down the road from behind and was going by some estimates almost twice the posted speed limit.
Here in the United States twice the speed limit is considered Driving to Endanger in most places and can be a felony in and of itself.

I think it's fairly safe to say he's a pretty big AFF.



Yes he is. I prefaced my statement by saying I presume the driver was at fault. And now that you have provided the details that were left out, I no longer need to presume. Thanks.

MarcMerm

MarcMerm

West Hempstead, NY
April 2007

FEB 02, 2008 12:15 PM

LostLucy said:
Oh fuck. The domestic and child abuse this week is particularly gut wrenching. blackeyed

Here is some gender and even statisically based logic back at Judge Asshole Fuckface Piergies of OHIO:

Shouldn't male judges be excused from presiding over any case concerning rape since about half of men asked say they would force a woman to have sex against her will if they could get away with it.

Furthermore, no men should sit on a jury for a rape trial, you know...


...based on the same logic.

Just an anaolgy...




Thanks for the interesting reading. It's amazing to think that an agressive bunch like frat guys, football players, and basketball players would commit acts of violence against women. hmmm

I've fallen victim, sort of, to the double standard they mention. I passed on sex with an ex girlfriend because she said no when she was merely offering token resistance. I just can't understand why people have to be coy and dance around things they want. If you want sex, say it. If you don't, say no. Or maybe I was brought up to respect women and to listen to what people say and believe them? Nah, that can't be it.

ericwine

ericwine

Charlotte Hall, MD
January 2007

FEB 02, 2008 12:37 PM

That FTR spelunking kit will lead them straight down to hell, where they belong, right?

Coyotemike

Coyotemike

Kearney, NE
May 2006

FEB 02, 2008 12:57 PM

MarcMerm said:

coyotemike said:

The businessman had insisted in a recent television interview that he was a victim, too.


Everyone's a fucking victim these days. Run over a kid? You're a victim. Get fat? You're a victim of McDonalds. Get lung cancer? You're a victim of cigarettes (only applicable to smokers). Slip on the ice? You're a victim of whoever owns the property.

I don't know about anybody else, but I was raised to take responsibility for my own dumb-ass mistakes. I get so fucking sick and tired of hearing people who think they're entitled to something. I will agree that if some terrible wrong happens to someone, they should get some sort of recovery. I have an aunt in the hospital who landed in the ICU because her doctor accidentally cut a hole in her esophagus. I think she deserves some sort of substantial monetary award. But to have the gall to sue because the kid you ran over left a dent in your car . . .



I presume this case is where the driver was at fault. But presuming the kid was at fault (create your own scenario), how would it be any different than I hit you because you run a red light, neither of us are injured, and I sue you (or your insurance) for the damage to my car? Why should this driver suffer a loss (just because it's a "luxury" car?) if the kid was at fault just because the kid is a person and not a machine.



I've been trying to think of a pedestrian/car accident that could be ruled as the pedestrian's fault, but I can't think of one. Isn't the general rule "Pedestrians always have the right of way"? If it was a 2 car accident, then yes it could be either party's fault, both parties, and yes then whoever is not at fault should be paid, regardless of who has the better car. But that is an entirely different creature than a car vs person or car vs bike situation.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 5 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Portishead
SuicideGirls Interview: Mike Patton: A Perfect Place
SuicideGirls Interview: Al Franken