BLOG VIEW  |  HEADLINE VIEW
SUBMIT NEWS  |  RSS FEED  |  SEARCH

Uncool Blackwater Gases U.S. Soldiers

THURSDAY JANUARY 10 2008 9:30 AM

Submitted by Zarth. Edited By Uncognitive.

TAGS: blackwater, iraq, political scandals

The incident in question occurred nearly a year-and-a-half ago, but is just now coming to light.

The helicopter was hovering over a Baghdad checkpoint into the Green Zone, one typically crowded with cars, Iraqi civilians and United States military personnel.

Suddenly, on that May day in 2005, the copter dropped CS gas, a riot-control substance the American military in Iraq can use only under the strictest conditions and with the approval of top military commanders. An armored vehicle on the ground also released the gas, temporarily blinding drivers, passers-by and at least 10 American soldiers operating the checkpoint.

“This was decidedly uncool and very, very dangerous,” Capt. Kincy Clark of the Army, the senior officer at the scene, wrote later that day. “It’s not a good thing to cause soldiers who are standing guard against car bombs, snipers and suicide bombers to cover their faces, choke, cough and otherwise degrade our awareness.”


The vehicles were part of a Blackwater convoy that apparently felt that riot gas was an appropriate way to deal with a traffic jam.

Officers and noncommissioned officers from the Third Infantry Division who were involved in the episode said there were no signs of violence at the checkpoint. Instead, they said, the Blackwater convoy appeared to be stuck in traffic and may have been trying to use the riot-control agent as a way to clear a path.


While a Blackwater spokesperson has characterized the release of the riot gas as a mere gaffe, in which CS gas canisters were mistaken for smoke canisters (which, admittedly, Blackwater uses routinely to clear traffic - a policy the US military frowns upon), it is not clear how such "mistake" might have been coordinated between both the helicopter and the armored car.

Blackwater also claims that the incident was reported to US Embassy in Baghdad, which conducted a "full investigation."

The troops exposed to the gas also said they reported it to their superiors. But military officials in Washington and Baghdad said they could not confirm that an investigation had been conducted. Officials at the State Department, which contracted with Blackwater to provide diplomatic security, also could not confirm that an investigation had taken place.


No American soldiers were hospitalized as a result of the incident, but its impact on civilians that day is unknown. CS gas is nonlethal, but neither is it particularly healthy. Moreover,

The military . . . tightly controls use of riot control agents in war zones. They are banned by an international convention on chemical weapons endorsed by the United States, although a 1975 presidential order allows their use by the United States military in war zones under limited defensive circumstances and only with the approval of the president or a senior officer designated by the president.
. . .
In 2003, President Bush approved the use of riot control agents by the military in Iraq under the 1975 order, but only for such purposes as controlling rioting prisoners.
. . .
A United States military spokesman in Baghdad refused to describe the current rules of engagement governing the use of riot control agents, but former Army lawyers say their use requires the approval of the military’s most senior commanders.

(Emphasis added)

The State Department's contract with Blackwater did not specifically mention riot gas at the time of incident, an omission which Blackwater evidently took as an "authorization" to deploy the gas at will.

The company initially got a contract to provide security for American officials in Iraq with the Coalition Provisional Authority, an agreement which did not address the use of CS gas. After the authority went out of business, the State Department extended the contract for another year until rebidding it. Blackwater and two other companies — DynCorp and Triple Canopy — that now provide security are not permitted to use CS gas under their current contracts, the State Department said.

The State Department said that its lawyers did not believe the Blackwater incident violated any treaty agreements.


But Michael Schmitt, a professor of international law at the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, disagrees.

“I have never seen anything that would make it permissible to use tear gas to get traffic out of the way,” Mr. Schmitt said. “In my view, it’s an improper use of a riot control agent.”

 

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Jackie_Treehorn

Jackie_Treehorn

Seattle, WA
June 2004

JAN 10, 2008 09:36 AM

Fuck Blackwater to fucking hell.

And fuck everyone who continues to LET THEM WORK in Iraq. Or ever did.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

JAN 10, 2008 09:54 AM

oh blackwater, you lovable goof.

fountainofdreams

fountainofdreams

Mokena, IL
January 2005

JAN 10, 2008 10:08 AM

MrCrisp said:
oh blackwater, you lovable goof.



It's just like one of those summertime college student movies, and Blackwater is the lovable college dropout who gets into all sorts of zany adventures.

Zarth

Zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:10 AM

How is this news?

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:11 AM

Zarth said:
How is this news?



i know, right? we always knew blackwater was a bunch of dicks. this is kind of like beating said dicks into the ground.


good article, though, as always wink

Zarth

Zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:16 AM

MrCrisp said:

Zarth said:
How is this news?


i know, right? we always knew blackwater was a bunch of dicks. this is kind of like beating said dicks into the ground.


good article, though wink


Researching this, I ran into so much more bullshit than I could possibly include, like the lawsuit alleging steroid use and the fact the State Department's own inspector-general (already under investigation for the rotten embassy contracts) was compelled to recuse himself after it came to light that his own brother was a Blackwater advisor - and that he (the inspector-general) has lied about it at first. Not to mention various other, more well-known incidents. It's almost too much.

But yeah, there's no real controversy here. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on SG willing to defend these venal, macho pricks. I just figured I'd try to inform.

Chainlink

Chainlink

Christmas Island
August 2005

JAN 10, 2008 11:20 AM

Nice article.
Whats been happening between our government and contractors, particularly Blackwater has a frighteningly ominous air.

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:21 AM

Zarth said:

But yeah, there's no real controversy here. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on SG willing to defend these venal, macho pricks. I just figured I'd try to inform.



and thank you for that. i'd love to see more articles focusing on blackwater controversy. i mean, that shit is just crazy and fun, albeit ultimately distressing.

Zarth

Zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:32 AM

Chainlink said:
Nice article.
Whats been happening between our government and contractors, particularly Blackwater has a frighteningly ominous air.


Thanks.

Fortunately, we're not at a point of no return. There's no compelling reason (beyond the chummy funnelling of taxpayer largesse into the pockets of the president's golfing buddies) for the world's premier military power to be employing mercenary companies instead of regular troops. The standard objection, that we can't retain good soldiers because they can make more money in the private sector, is simply made ludicrous by the obvious fact it's still ultimately the U.S. government that's actually paying them.

It'd be different if they had somehow become indispensable to the conduct of postindustrial warfare. That'd be bad. Like, imminent Fall of the Republic bad.

malkav11

malkav11

Saint Paul, MN
July 2003

JAN 10, 2008 11:33 AM

Zarth said:
But yeah, there's no real controversy here. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on SG willing to defend these venal, macho pricks. I just figured I'd try to inform.



I could swear some came out of the woodwork last time a Blackwater article came up. But then, that was a while ago and most of those guys probably caught the zot by now.

Zarth

Zarth

Seattle, WA
December 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:38 AM

malkav11 said:

Zarth said:
But yeah, there's no real controversy here. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on SG willing to defend these venal, macho pricks. I just figured I'd try to inform.


I could swear some came out of the woodwork last time a Blackwater article came up. But then, that was a while ago and most of those guys probably caught the zot by now.


Or went gray, yeah.

The closest to an intelligent defense of private security contracting I've seen was that of freshprnceblair, but if memory serves me correctly, even that was pretty half-assed and ultimately ineffective.

Colinism

Colinism

Atlanta, GA
July 2005

JAN 10, 2008 11:48 AM

The truth of the matter is that if all you unpatriotic liberal assholes would just accept that islamofacists want us dead and that they are subhuman and want to kill us, then quit whining that our government is taking away our "Rights" and just join the fucking army and do something useful for a change we would not have to rely on Blackwater so much to do the things that the US army can't because it "morally wrong". I mean what good are rights when your dead due to terrorism?

MrCrisp

MrCrisp

Charleston, SC
August 2004

JAN 10, 2008 11:49 AM

Zarth said:

malkav11 said:

Zarth said:
But yeah, there's no real controversy here. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone on SG willing to defend these venal, macho pricks. I just figured I'd try to inform.


I could swear some came out of the woodwork last time a Blackwater article came up. But then, that was a while ago and most of those guys probably caught the zot by now.


Or went gray, yeah.

The closest to an intelligent defense of private security contracting I've seen was that of freshprnceblair, but if memory serves me correctly, even that was pretty half-assed and ultimately ineffective.



what? the private security firms or freshprnceblair's argument?

Colinism said:
The truth of the matter is that if all you unpatriotic liberal assholes would just accept that islamofacists want us dead and that they are subhuman and want to kill us, then quit whining that our government is taking away our "Rights" and just join the fucking army and do something useful for a change we would not have to rely on Blackwater so much to do the things that the US army can't because it "morally wrong". I mean what good are rights when your dead due to terrorism?



welcome back!

smithers_jones

smithers_jones

Los Angeles, CA
November 2003

JAN 10, 2008 11:55 AM

Blackwater can go fuck themselves. One of the legacies of the Iraq war will be the institutionalizing of privatizing and outsourcing of war fighting and reconstruction to asshole mercs like Blackwater on such a massive scale.

Ironically, the free market (and by free market I mean private companies sucking off the massive tit of government handouts) has created a mirror image of the jihadist. Armies of international soldiers not affiliated with or loyal to any nation state waging wars throughout the globe. If the Bush administration's made-up terms of "unlawful combatants" and "enemy combatants" have any meaning (which they probably don't) they certainly should include mercs like Blackwater as well as Al-Queda.

Tony_T

Tony_T

San Diego, CA
August 2005

JAN 10, 2008 11:58 AM

They are trying to open a training facility near the border near Potrero, CA. Thankfully they have recalled several of the local planning group. I was at the SDSU/BYU football game last month, and they were trying to gain some publicity by having a skydive team land on the field prior to the game. The came in with the Blackwater flags flying behind them. The whole crowd went apeshit, cheering for them. I was booing, and did I ever get the evil eye from some in the crowd. No one wanted to hear my exlanation. I don't think most people would differentiate the Blackwater jerks from our military. That is a big problem.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Next

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR by orbro

Now Hear This

Last Comment 4 HR

There's like a half-hour of video here. You should do a vlog. More ...

Asshole Fuckface Roundup #74

Last Comment 4 HR

Parents who are accustomed to carrying guns around may not think anything of going into child-related... More ...

An Encounter With Jonathan Shaw's Narcisa

Last Comment 5 HR

thanx gurlz... u rrrrrule!! xx jonathan shaw and narcisa More ...

SuicideGirl: Bob

Bob

Terrible Woman's MySpace Alias Leads to Teen's Suicide.

Last Comment 20 HR

But, it's delivered poorly...really poorly. Unless, it's not a joke, in which case, it's a good place... More ...

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08 by Shalome

Bail The Shit Out Of Detroit

Last Comment 11/30/08

Oh my fucking god. More ...

Filtering the Truth: Religion - Friend or Foe?

Last Comment 11/30/08

I'm just going to skip over the mass orgy that's going on and say my piece: I don't think religion is... More ...

SuicideGirls Interview: Portishead
SuicideGirls Interview: Travis Barker
SuicideGirls Interview: Aesop Rock